ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN
ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN
ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
12 REP12/CAC<br />
Pesticide Residues (CCPR)<br />
Draft and proposed draft maximum residue limits for pesticides in food and feed 15<br />
50. The Delegation of the European Union expressed its reservation on a number of MRLs proposed for<br />
the following pesticide / commodity combinations: tebuconazole (lettuce, head); acephate / methamidophos<br />
(rice); hexythiazox (hops, dry and tea, green, black (black, fermented and dried)); tebuconazole (table grapes,<br />
dried grapes, peaches (includes nectarines at EU level), apples, pears, peppers, cherries and apricots);<br />
pyraclostrobin (papaya, citrus, oilseeds (except peanuts)); spirotetramat (edible offal (mammalian));<br />
acetamiprid (spring onions and plums) and isopyrazam. The rationale for the reservations is explained in<br />
CX/CAC 12/35/4. The Delegation of Norway also expressed its reservation in this regard.<br />
51. The Delegation of Egypt expressed its reservation on the following pesticide / commodity<br />
combinations: methamidophos in rice, husked and rice straw and fodder, dry; profenofos in peppers chilli<br />
and peppers chilli, dried and tebuconazole in wheat and wheat straw and fodder, dry as the MRLs proposed<br />
would adversely affect consumers’ health due to high national consumption patterns for these products.<br />
52. The Delegation of Colombia noted that the MRLs proposed for acephate and methamidophos in rice,<br />
husked should be adopted at Step 5 only and be further considered by the Committee on Pesticide Residues<br />
as the national consumption data for this product exceeded the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) established by<br />
the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting on Residues of Pesticides (JMPR) therefore the MRLs proposed would<br />
not protect consumers’ health.<br />
53. The Representative of WHO clarified that, when estimating exposure from long term consumption, the<br />
consumption figure was based on the figure for cluster K in which Colombia was represented. This figure<br />
was an average for countries within the cluster so values for individual countries could be above or below.<br />
Since the total exposure for long term consumption was below 10% of the ADI, even higher consumption of<br />
rice should not present a health concern.<br />
54. The Commission adopted all the draft and proposed draft MRLs for the various pesticide / commodity<br />
combinations as proposed by the CCPR while noting the reservations of the European Union, Norway, Egypt<br />
on a number of MRLs as indicated above and the reservation of Colombia on acephate and methamidophos<br />
in rice, husked.<br />
Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods (CCRVDF)<br />
Draft MRLs for Narasin (cattle tissues) 16<br />
55. The Commission adopted the draft MRLs for narasin in cattle tissues, as proposed by the CCRVDF.<br />
56. The Commission noted the reservation of the Delegations of the European Union, Norway and<br />
Switzerland because narasin in cattle is used for growth promotion.<br />
Proposed draft MRLs for Amoxicillin (cattle, sheep and pig tissue and cattle and sheep milk) and<br />
Monensin (cattle liver) 17<br />
57. The Commission adopted the proposed draft MRLs for amoxicillin and monensin, as proposed by the<br />
CCRVDF, and noted that the proposed draft MRL for monensin in cattle liver, would replace the MRLs<br />
adopted at its 32 nd Session.<br />
58. The Commission noted the reservation of Egypt to the adoption of the proposed draft MRL for<br />
monensin, as they suggested retaining the previous one.<br />
Food Labelling (CCFL)<br />
Draft Revision of the Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling (CAC/GL 2-1985) concerning a new definition<br />
of “nutrient reference values” 18<br />
59. The Delegation of Malaysia, while not opposing the adoption of the new definition on “nutrient<br />
reference values”, entered a reservation on the inclusion of the sentence “or with the reduction in the risk of<br />
diet-related non-communicable diseases”.<br />
15 REP12/PR paras 28-85, Appendix II and Appendix III<br />
16 REP12/RVDF para. 65, Appendix III.<br />
17 REP12/RVDF para. 65, Appendix IV.<br />
18 REP12/FL, para. 46, Appendix IV .