15.05.2013 Views

ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN

ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN

ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 REP12/CAC<br />

Pesticide Residues (CCPR)<br />

Draft and proposed draft maximum residue limits for pesticides in food and feed 15<br />

50. The Delegation of the European Union expressed its reservation on a number of MRLs proposed for<br />

the following pesticide / commodity combinations: tebuconazole (lettuce, head); acephate / methamidophos<br />

(rice); hexythiazox (hops, dry and tea, green, black (black, fermented and dried)); tebuconazole (table grapes,<br />

dried grapes, peaches (includes nectarines at EU level), apples, pears, peppers, cherries and apricots);<br />

pyraclostrobin (papaya, citrus, oilseeds (except peanuts)); spirotetramat (edible offal (mammalian));<br />

acetamiprid (spring onions and plums) and isopyrazam. The rationale for the reservations is explained in<br />

CX/CAC 12/35/4. The Delegation of Norway also expressed its reservation in this regard.<br />

51. The Delegation of Egypt expressed its reservation on the following pesticide / commodity<br />

combinations: methamidophos in rice, husked and rice straw and fodder, dry; profenofos in peppers chilli<br />

and peppers chilli, dried and tebuconazole in wheat and wheat straw and fodder, dry as the MRLs proposed<br />

would adversely affect consumers’ health due to high national consumption patterns for these products.<br />

52. The Delegation of Colombia noted that the MRLs proposed for acephate and methamidophos in rice,<br />

husked should be adopted at Step 5 only and be further considered by the Committee on Pesticide Residues<br />

as the national consumption data for this product exceeded the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) established by<br />

the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting on Residues of Pesticides (JMPR) therefore the MRLs proposed would<br />

not protect consumers’ health.<br />

53. The Representative of WHO clarified that, when estimating exposure from long term consumption, the<br />

consumption figure was based on the figure for cluster K in which Colombia was represented. This figure<br />

was an average for countries within the cluster so values for individual countries could be above or below.<br />

Since the total exposure for long term consumption was below 10% of the ADI, even higher consumption of<br />

rice should not present a health concern.<br />

54. The Commission adopted all the draft and proposed draft MRLs for the various pesticide / commodity<br />

combinations as proposed by the CCPR while noting the reservations of the European Union, Norway, Egypt<br />

on a number of MRLs as indicated above and the reservation of Colombia on acephate and methamidophos<br />

in rice, husked.<br />

Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods (CCRVDF)<br />

Draft MRLs for Narasin (cattle tissues) 16<br />

55. The Commission adopted the draft MRLs for narasin in cattle tissues, as proposed by the CCRVDF.<br />

56. The Commission noted the reservation of the Delegations of the European Union, Norway and<br />

Switzerland because narasin in cattle is used for growth promotion.<br />

Proposed draft MRLs for Amoxicillin (cattle, sheep and pig tissue and cattle and sheep milk) and<br />

Monensin (cattle liver) 17<br />

57. The Commission adopted the proposed draft MRLs for amoxicillin and monensin, as proposed by the<br />

CCRVDF, and noted that the proposed draft MRL for monensin in cattle liver, would replace the MRLs<br />

adopted at its 32 nd Session.<br />

58. The Commission noted the reservation of Egypt to the adoption of the proposed draft MRL for<br />

monensin, as they suggested retaining the previous one.<br />

Food Labelling (CCFL)<br />

Draft Revision of the Guidelines on Nutrition Labelling (CAC/GL 2-1985) concerning a new definition<br />

of “nutrient reference values” 18<br />

59. The Delegation of Malaysia, while not opposing the adoption of the new definition on “nutrient<br />

reference values”, entered a reservation on the inclusion of the sentence “or with the reduction in the risk of<br />

diet-related non-communicable diseases”.<br />

15 REP12/PR paras 28-85, Appendix II and Appendix III<br />

16 REP12/RVDF para. 65, Appendix III.<br />

17 REP12/RVDF para. 65, Appendix IV.<br />

18 REP12/FL, para. 46, Appendix IV .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!