ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN
ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN
ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
REP12/CAC 11<br />
42. The Commission noted the reservations of the European Union, supported by Croatia, Egypt and<br />
Norway, for the provisions for:<br />
- Caramel III (INS 150c) and caramel IV (INS 150d), due to safety concerns.<br />
- The use of colours in food categories related to cocoa-based confectionary products; namely, the<br />
provisions for carotenes-beta, vegetable (INS 160a(ii)) and grape skin extracts (INS 163(ii)) in food<br />
categories 05.1.3 “Cocoa-based spreads, including filling” and 05.1.4 “Cocoa and chocolate products”,<br />
as this use could mislead consumers.<br />
- Para-hydroxybenzoates (INS 214; 218) and sorbates (INS 200-2<strong>03</strong>) in food category 04.1.2.5 “Jams,<br />
jellies and marmelades”, which were not technologically justified other than in low sugar versions of<br />
this food category.<br />
43. The Commission further noted the reservations of Chile for the provision for erythrosine (INS 127) in<br />
food category 08.3 “Processed comminuted meat, poultry and game products”, which could mask poor<br />
hygienic practice, and of the United States of America for the provisions for carotenoids (INS 160a(i),<br />
160a(iii), 160e, 160f) and erythrosine (INS 127).<br />
Draft Revision of the Standard for Food Grade Salt (CODEX STAN 150-1985) 11<br />
44. Some delegations made comments on sections, namely Section 3 Essential Composition and Quality<br />
Factors” and Section 8 “Packaging, Transportation and Storage”, which were outside of the scope of the<br />
CCFA revision. The Commission noted that delegations could present proposals for new work on the<br />
revision of these sections to the CCFA.<br />
45. The Commission adopted the revision of the Standard, as proposed by the CCFA, and noted the<br />
reservation of Colombia.<br />
Proposed draft Amendments to the International Numbering System (INS) for Food Additives 12<br />
46. The Commission recalled that the 67 th CCEXEC had noted that the INS number for sodium potassium<br />
hexametaphosphate should be corrected to read 452(vi) and had recommended not to adopt the new INS 561,<br />
erroneously associated with potassium aluminium silicate 13 .<br />
47. The Commission adopted the proposed draft amendments to the INS as proposed by the CCEXEC and<br />
recommended to the CCFA to reconsider a new INS number for “potassium aluminium silicate, based<br />
pearlescent pigments” on the basis of the description of the specifications monograph prepared by the 74 th<br />
JECFA.<br />
Contaminants in Foods (CCCF)<br />
Revision of the Code of Practice for Source Directed Measures to Reduce Contamination of Food with<br />
Chemicals 14<br />
48. The Commission agreed to include a footnote to the term “feed” in paragraph 4 of the Code to make it<br />
clear that the ALARA Principle (“as low as reasonably achievable”) applied to maximum levels of<br />
contaminants from feed as carry-over into food of animal origin which were relevant to public health in<br />
accordance with the use of this Principle in the General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and<br />
Feed. It was noted that the addition of this note was for clarification purposes and did not change the content<br />
of the provisions in the Code.<br />
49. The note would read as follows: The General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed<br />
(CODEX STAN 193-1995) limits application of the ‘as low as reasonably achievable’ concept to feed to<br />
those contaminants than can be transferred from feed to food of animal origin and thereby can be relevant for<br />
public health.<br />
11 REP12/FA para.141, Appendix XI.<br />
12 REP12/FA para.152, Appendix XII.<br />
13 REP 12/EXEC 2, paras 9-12.<br />
14 REP12/CF para. 38, Appendix III.