15.05.2013 Views

ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN

ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN

ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 REP12/CAC<br />

34. The Delegation of the United States, speaking as Chair of the CCFH, pointed out that while there was<br />

a need for increased communication between Codex Committees, texts developed by general subject<br />

committees are used very broadly and should be easily accessible to all and it might not be convenient for<br />

users to search through various specific texts for general guidance.<br />

35. Noting the above, the Committee adopted the proposed Draft Guidelines with some editorial<br />

amendments as proposed in CX/CAC 12/35/4. The Commission further agreed to forward the Guidelines to<br />

the Committee on Fish and Fishery Products (CCFFP) for their information and/or comment.<br />

Proposed Amendment to the Principles and Guidelines for the Conduct of Microbiological Risk<br />

Assessment 7<br />

36. The Committee adopted the proposed Amendment with an amendment to better indicate the<br />

conditional applicability of the risk assessment principles to feed and feed ingredients as follows: “These<br />

principles for risk assessment also apply to feed and feed ingredients for food-producing animals in cases<br />

where it could impact food safety.”<br />

Methods of Analysis and Sampling (CCMAS) 8<br />

Methods of Analysis in Codex Standards at different steps, including methods of analysis for food grade salt<br />

37. The Commission adopted the methods of analysis as proposed with the amendments proposed by<br />

Argentina 9 .<br />

38. With regard to the method of analysis for total nitrogen in fish sauce, the Committee agreed with the<br />

method proposed by CCMAS because another proposed method, AOAC 981.10, is not applicable to the<br />

commodity.<br />

Food Additives (CCFA)<br />

Draft and Proposed Draft Food Additive Provisions of the General Standard for Food Additives (GSFA) 10<br />

39. A number of delegations proposed to discontinue the provisions for phosphates associated with the<br />

four food categories related to vegetable juices and nectars and their concentrates. These delegations noted<br />

that these provisions were associated with Note 40 “INS 451i (pentasodium triphosphate) only, to enhance<br />

the effectiveness of benzoates and sorbates” and that there were no provisions for benzoates and sorbates in<br />

the four food categories (the 44 th CCFA had decided to discontinue work on the provisions of sorbates in<br />

these food categories). One Observer recalled that at the 40th CCFA they had proposed to associate to the<br />

provisions for phosphates Note 40 and Note 122 “Subject to national legislation of the importing country”<br />

for consistency with the provisions for the four food categories for fruit juices and nectars and their<br />

concentrates (i.e. 14.1.2.1, 14.1.2.3, 14.1.3.1 and 14.1.3.3) and that the use of preservatives in these food<br />

categories was essential to take account of the extreme temperatures in certain countries. It was also noted<br />

that the GSFA included a provision for benzoates in food category 14.1.3.4 “Concentrates for vegetable<br />

nectar”.<br />

40. A number of delegations did not support the adoption of the proposed maximum level of 200 mg/kg<br />

for sorbates in food category 08.4 “Edible casings (e.g. sausage casings)” as the level was not sufficient to<br />

achieve its technological function in collagen casing. It was also noted that this problem could be indicative<br />

of a broader problem related to the use of food additives in edible casing and that it would be appropriate for<br />

the CCFA to review all provisions for food category 08.4 to avoid any inconsistencies.<br />

41. The Commission adopted the draft and proposed draft food additive provisions as proposed by the<br />

CCFA, with the exception of: (i) the provisions for phosphates in food categories 14.1.2.2 “Vegetable juice”;<br />

14.2.2.4 “Concentrates for vegetable juices”; 14.1.3.2 “Vegetable nectars” and 14.1.3.4 “Concentrates for<br />

vegetable nectar” that were returned to the CCFA for a review of the use of phosphates, benzoates and<br />

sorbates for the purpose of ensuring consistency; and (ii) the provisions for sorbates in food category 08.4<br />

“Edible casings (e.g. sausage casings)” for further consideration.<br />

7 REP12/FH, para.118 and Appendix IV.<br />

8 REP 12/MAS, paras 23 - 60, Appendix III).<br />

9 CX/CAC 12/35/4.<br />

10 REP12/FA para.131, Appendix VI.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!