View/Open - UZSpace Home
View/Open - UZSpace Home
View/Open - UZSpace Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3. Introduction<br />
CHAPTER THREE<br />
AN EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT LOGOTHERAPEUTIC TESTS<br />
Different tests have originated elapso tempore when logotherapeunc influences have<br />
startingto spread. However, the three most widelyused tests are the so-calledPIL<br />
test (the Purpose in Life test), the SONG-test (the Seekingofnoetic goalstest), and<br />
the LOGO-test. A brief discussion and evaluation ofthese three major logotherapeu<br />
tic tests will assist us in better assessing the therapeutic value ofthis type ofinterven<br />
tion. Otherlogotherapeutic tests will also get brief attention.<br />
Franklwas normally eagerto showthat logotherapy has more than just li-theoretical<br />
philosophical basis, namely, that its major tenets about a will-to-meaning, the moti<br />
vationto find meaning-in-life, and existential-vacuum can be measured and validated<br />
through research, even with the most sophisticated researchmethods and statistical<br />
procedures (Guttmann 1996:174). The three different mentioned tests are widely<br />
used todayby logotherapists,<br />
Very oftenthese tests are normally administered before therapy starts in order to eva<br />
luate the "state ofmind"ofthe client/patient. Then, in the lightofthe test results a<br />
specific logotherapeutic techniqueis implemented to start with the "healingpro<br />
cess." Thismeans that the tests and the consequenttechniques very often cannot be<br />
separatedbecause the tests assist in the therapeutical process, or even determine the<br />
methodor aid that is goingto be used. Therefore,the interrelationship between tests<br />
and techniques cannot be overlooked and ignored.<br />
85