View/Open - UZSpace Home
View/Open - UZSpace Home
View/Open - UZSpace Home
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
that logotherapeutic techniquewhich will enable the patient/clientto achieve this at<br />
tention-shift (Guttmann 1996:90).<br />
Lukas (1980) points out that in logotherapyone must offer a part ofoneself in order<br />
to awaken a part ofthe patient/clientto a life ofmeaning. To gain from dereflection<br />
one must be ready to sacrifice. Itrequires an immenseeffort and folerance offrustra<br />
tion by the therapist. However, before applyingthis technique, one must make sure<br />
that there is no physiological cause present, and that it rather safely can be assumed<br />
that the roots lie elsewhere, most likelyin the client's/patient's exaggerated self-ob<br />
servationor hyper-intention.<br />
How does dereflection work practically? The logotherapistwill first reduce the pa<br />
tient's/client's hyper-reflection on bimselflherself, an "alternative list" will'then be<br />
drawn np and lastly one of these alternativeswill be selected. The "doing" ofthe<br />
"choice' will assist and help the client/patientto be more goal-directedand to over<br />
come the negative symptom/problem/feeling (Guttmann 1996:101-106).<br />
This techniqueis based on the human capacity to rise above limitingand constricting<br />
circumstances and situations and to take a stand toward them. Rising above and be<br />
yond conditions that imprisonthe human spirit and cause undue suffering opens new<br />
doors before the eyes ofthe sufferer. In short this means that the essence ofdereflec<br />
tion is to counteract the negativeforces and to turn them into human achievements.<br />
The technique itselfserves as a vehiclefor directingthe individual toward higher and<br />
more positive goals in life. Because people, from a religiousperspective, have been<br />
placed into this world to contnbute to its improvement, anythingthatprevents this<br />
must be regarded as problematic. Guttmann (1996:106) correctly said that when so-<br />
41