View/Open - UZSpace Home
View/Open - UZSpace Home View/Open - UZSpace Home
2. Introduction CHAPTER TWO THE DIFFERENT LOGOTHERAPEUTIC lECHNIQUES . Thischapterfocuses on the different logotherapeutic techniques in logothempy. In orderto evaluate these methods it is first necessaryto say what these methods are and how they are used in the therapeutic setting. 2.1 The different logothempeutic techniques The main techniques oflogotherapy in the 1960swere paradoxicalintentionand de- 'reflection (Frankl 1970:143; 1971:99 & GuttmaTlTlI996:72). The othertechniques that developed later were modification ofattitudes, the logo-anchor technique, the appealing technique, the Socraticdialogue, the symbolic growthexperience and 10 gothempeutic dream analysisfJnterpretation. A proper understanding ofthese diffe rent methods is essential in order to evaluateit in a more objectiveway. 2.U Paradoxical intention AlreadybeforeWorld War II Franklpublished case histories in whichhe used this particulartherapeutic method. He said thathehad used this methodalready since 1929but did not publishit scientifically until 1939. This methodhadbeen used with especially good results in the treatment ofphobic and compulsive patients, in cases of severe obsessive-compulsive neurosis and for many other problemsthat cause much anguish and pain wherethefreedom andenjoyment oflife were limited for the sufferers (Guttmann 1996:72). 26
- Page 1 and 2: AN EVALUATION OF THE LOGOTHERAPEUTI
- Page 3 and 4: SUMMARY This study is an evaluation
- Page 5: TABLEOF CONTENTS CHAPTERONE METIIOD
- Page 10 and 11: 2. The problem and reason for this
- Page 13: A meaningful evaluation of the diff
- Page 17 and 18: (Frankl 1970:103). The generaluse o
- Page 20 and 21: Mental health is based on a certain
- Page 22 and 23: 6.11 Collective neurosis ForFmnkl t
- Page 24: 6.17 The tragic triad Thisis a term
- Page 30 and 31: a fear offlying, a fear ofheights,
- Page 32 and 33: patient to change hisIher attitude(
- Page 36 and 37: environmental influences. Although
- Page 39 and 40: aimed at the releasing and freeingo
- Page 41 and 42: that logotherapeutic techniquewhich
- Page 43 and 44: ing and a self-centered path, to a
- Page 45 and 46: tised as a logotherapeutic aid The
- Page 47: Emotional reeducation is probablyth
- Page 50 and 51: Logotherapy aims at restoring healt
- Page 52 and 53: emaining energyon goals and meaning
- Page 54 and 55: 2.1.3.2 Modification ofunhealthy at
- Page 56 and 57: Egopsychologists likeErik Erikson(1
- Page 58 and 59: 1980:366-374). Logotherapists, on t
- Page 60 and 61: instances ofthe past for use in the
- Page 62 and 63: ied", or "only until Christmas." Th
- Page 64 and 65: to tum formerly negative attitudes
- Page 66: According to Guttmann it is only wh
- Page 70 and 71: A prerequisite in the Socratic dial
- Page 73 and 74: therapist whobasicallyjustreward, t
2. Introduction<br />
CHAPTER TWO<br />
THE DIFFERENT LOGOTHERAPEUTIC lECHNIQUES<br />
.<br />
Thischapterfocuses on the different logotherapeutic techniques in logothempy. In<br />
orderto evaluate these methods it is first necessaryto say what these methods are and<br />
how they are used in the therapeutic setting.<br />
2.1 The different logothempeutic techniques<br />
The main techniques oflogotherapy in the 1960swere paradoxicalintentionand de-<br />
'reflection<br />
(Frankl 1970:143; 1971:99 & GuttmaTlTlI996:72). The othertechniques<br />
that developed later were modification ofattitudes, the logo-anchor technique, the<br />
appealing technique, the Socraticdialogue, the symbolic growthexperience and 10<br />
gothempeutic dream analysisfJnterpretation. A proper understanding ofthese diffe<br />
rent methods is essential in order to evaluateit in a more objectiveway.<br />
2.U Paradoxical intention<br />
AlreadybeforeWorld War II Franklpublished case histories in whichhe used this<br />
particulartherapeutic method. He said thathehad used this methodalready since<br />
1929but did not publishit scientifically until 1939. This methodhadbeen used with<br />
especially good results in the treatment ofphobic and compulsive patients, in cases of<br />
severe obsessive-compulsive neurosis and for many other problemsthat cause much<br />
anguish and pain wherethefreedom andenjoyment oflife were limited for the<br />
sufferers (Guttmann 1996:72).<br />
26