- Page 1: Import Risk Analysis: Wollemia nobi
- Page 5 and 6: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following peop
- Page 7 and 8: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Synopsis T
- Page 9 and 10: 1.4 Recommended Measures Based on t
- Page 11 and 12: 1.4.2 Plant Inspection Requirements
- Page 13 and 14: Plant Management Requirements • T
- Page 15 and 16: 1.4.6 Expected Performance of Measu
- Page 17 and 18: Figure 2.1: A summary of the Biosec
- Page 19 and 20: determine the level of likely risk.
- Page 21 and 22: 2.2.3.4 Risk Estimations The aim of
- Page 23 and 24: 2.2.5 Assessment of Residual Risk R
- Page 25 and 26: Photo of Wollemia nobilis foliage i
- Page 27 and 28: There are about 20 species in the g
- Page 29 and 30: visual inspection. Any of the requi
- Page 31 and 32: to group allocations are provided i
- Page 33 and 34: o As a group, endophytic or saproph
- Page 35 and 36: 3.5.2 Assessment of Risk of Exposur
- Page 37 and 38: Figure 3.4: Overview of the potenti
- Page 39 and 40: 3.7 References Bullock, S; Summerel
- Page 41 and 42: citrus planting material and fruit
- Page 43 and 44: clumps over the face of the fruit.
- Page 45 and 46: Potential for spread Surface feedin
- Page 47 and 48: c) Treating all imported Wollemia n
- Page 49 and 50: While this methyl bromide treatment
- Page 51 and 52: sufficient protection from surface
- Page 53 and 54:
The objective for the pesticide tre
- Page 55 and 56:
Coptotermes: Termite Coptotermes ar
- Page 57 and 58:
found in plant material from small
- Page 59 and 60:
New Zealand economy will only becom
- Page 61 and 62:
o transmitted to a host plant in th
- Page 63 and 64:
Additional measures Inspections sho
- Page 65 and 66:
considered adequate to ensure air-b
- Page 67 and 68:
6. FOLIAGE DISEASES 6.1 Hazard Iden
- Page 69 and 70:
turn yellowish brown or grey at the
- Page 71 and 72:
the New Zealand economy will only b
- Page 73 and 74:
6.3 Risk Management 6.3.1 Risk Eval
- Page 75 and 76:
• To reduce the likelihood of exp
- Page 77 and 78:
ack under quarantine conditions (fo
- Page 79 and 80:
Ji SQ, Fan BH, 1988. A study of cot
- Page 81 and 82:
Life cycle The main inoculum source
- Page 83 and 84:
7.2 Risk Assessment 7.2.1 Entry Ass
- Page 85 and 86:
The likelihood that a root disease-
- Page 87 and 88:
management practices provided in 3.
- Page 89 and 90:
To manage the potential risks assoc
- Page 91 and 92:
8. WOOD DECAY FUNGI 8.1 Hazard Iden
- Page 93 and 94:
Epidemiology P. noxius attacks a wi
- Page 95 and 96:
8.3.2 Option Evaluation 8.3.2.1 Ris
- Page 97 and 98:
Storozhenko VG, 2003. Rot incidence
- Page 99 and 100:
10. MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI 10.1 Hazard I
- Page 101 and 102:
diversity of Glomalean fungi occurs
- Page 103 and 104:
o Acting as a parasite (pathogen) o
- Page 105 and 106:
still infected with the fungus, and
- Page 107 and 108:
through excessive handling of root
- Page 109 and 110:
Cowan, P E (1989) A vesicular-arbus
- Page 111 and 112:
or fruits. The majority of the asco
- Page 113 and 114:
It is possible that a serious infec
- Page 115 and 116:
plants and rootless cuttings import
- Page 117 and 118:
Pre-export Requirements The princip
- Page 119 and 120:
11.4 Assessment of Residual Risk 11
- Page 121 and 122:
12. PHYTOPHTHORA CINNAMOMI 12.1 Haz
- Page 123 and 124:
overseas showed modest variation, s
- Page 125 and 126:
content were considered important f
- Page 127 and 128:
12.3.2 Option Evaluation 12.3.2.1 R
- Page 129 and 130:
apparent on infected plants that ar
- Page 131 and 132:
Zentmyer, G A (1983) The world of P
- Page 133 and 134:
HEPA filter A ‘high-efficiency pa
- Page 135 and 136:
Unwanted organism (Biosecurity Act
- Page 137 and 138:
Scientific name Common name Hazard
- Page 139 and 140:
Ridley, G S; Bain, J; Bulman L S; D
- Page 141 and 142:
a) Access Access to propagation and
- Page 143 and 144:
3.6.1.4 DISEASE, PEST AND WEED CONT
- Page 145 and 146:
APPENDIX 3: ANALYSIS OF CLEARANCE R
- Page 147 and 148:
ate of Caenorhabditis elegans from
- Page 149 and 150:
eadily removed, may result in reshi
- Page 151 and 152:
App 3.2.3 Recommendations for measu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reference Treatment Schedules and C
- Page 155 and 156:
Table App 3.3: A selection of USDA
- Page 157 and 158:
Active ingredient Chemical group Di
- Page 159 and 160:
(Yue et al. 2003). All exposed stag
- Page 161 and 162:
First and 2 nd instars of the preda
- Page 163 and 164:
Table App 3.5: Derived efficacies f
- Page 165 and 166:
• the lack of efficacy data under
- Page 167 and 168:
App 3.3.11 Analysis of measure effi
- Page 169 and 170:
o Nursery stock should be treated a
- Page 171 and 172:
Active ingredient (Chemical Group)
- Page 173 and 174:
Matheron et al. (2000) assessed in
- Page 175 and 176:
App 3.4.2.6 Pencycuron Pencycuron i
- Page 177 and 178:
Active ingredient (Chemical Group)
- Page 179 and 180:
Active ingredient (Chemical Group)
- Page 181 and 182:
Herron, G; Jiang, L; Spooner Hart,
- Page 183 and 184:
littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
- Page 185 and 186:
APPENDIX 4: ANALYSIS OF PEQ REQUIRE
- Page 187 and 188:
App 4.2.1.3 Treatments applied to p
- Page 189 and 190:
App 4.2.6 Recommendations for measu
- Page 191 and 192:
o as standard requirements for all
- Page 193 and 194:
The limitations of the specificatio
- Page 195 and 196:
NPPRL to test for the presence of f
- Page 197 and 198:
o the minimum quarantine period be
- Page 199:
App 4.3.9 Recommendations for measu