The Numismatic Chronicle 171 Offprint - Royal Numismatic Society
The Numismatic Chronicle 171 Offprint - Royal Numismatic Society
The Numismatic Chronicle 171 Offprint - Royal Numismatic Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
108<br />
RICHARD SCHAEFER and ANDREW McCABE<br />
RRC 113: New Classifi cation: star above prow on as and semis, before on lower<br />
fractions<br />
Characteristics as described in Sections 2 and 4 above:<br />
Star-above as, RRC 113/2. Figs 1, 5<br />
Star-above semis, RRC 113/3. Fig. 2<br />
Star-before triens, R.RRC 113/4 – new classifi cation, formerly RRC 196/3.<br />
Fig. 7<br />
Star-before quadrans, R.RRC 113/5 – new classifi cation, formerly RRC 196/4.<br />
Fig. 8<br />
Star-before sextans, R.RRC 113/6 – new classifi cation, formerly RRC 196/5 9 .<br />
RRC 196: New Classifi cation: Star always above prow<br />
Characteristics as described in Sections 3 and 5 above:<br />
Star-above as, RRC 196 /1. Figs 3, 6<br />
Star-above semis, RRC 196/2. Fig. 4<br />
Star-above triens, R.RRC 196/3 – new classifi cation, formerly RRC 113/4.<br />
Fig. 9<br />
Star-above quadrans, R.RRC 196/4 – new classifi cation, formerly RRC 113/5.<br />
Fig. 10<br />
Star-above sextans, R.RRC 196/5 – new classifi cation, formerly RRC 113/6.<br />
Fig. 11<br />
Unoffi cial Small Change Star Quadrantes Issue<br />
Without any link to a series headed by an as and semis, the small change star<br />
quadrantes need to be classifi ed separately. <strong>The</strong>y are clearly much later than the<br />
well-made RRC 113 series, given their light weight and erratic reverse styles, and<br />
are also different in style from the regular RRC 196/4 quadrans, as well as having the<br />
star before rather than above the prow.<br />
Characteristics as described in Section 6 above:<br />
Star-before quadrans, later small change issue – new classifi cation, formerly<br />
RRC 196/4. See other small change unoffi cial issues discussed in Crawford<br />
1982 (n. 6 above). Figs 12, 13.<br />
9 This classifi cation is theoretical since, to our knowledge, no example exists – see note 5 above.