12.05.2013 Views

The Numismatic Chronicle 171 Offprint - Royal Numismatic Society

The Numismatic Chronicle 171 Offprint - Royal Numismatic Society

The Numismatic Chronicle 171 Offprint - Royal Numismatic Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ROMAN REPUBLICAN STAR BRONZES, RRC 113 AND 196 107<br />

Since the 90% confi dence ranges of RRC 113 and RRC 196 asses do not overlap,<br />

they were probably struck to a different standard. In Fig. 18 below, the histogram<br />

illustrates the two standards. <strong>The</strong> RRC 113 as average (31-36g) clearly exceeds the<br />

uncial standard of 27g and the offi cial standard is probably higher than the average<br />

weight. <strong>The</strong> RRC 113 semis (average as weight 28-32g) also suggests a standard<br />

heavier than uncial. <strong>The</strong> RRC 196 asses, which average 21-23g, a bit less than uncial,<br />

were probably offi cially on an uncial standard. Coins over 30g are probably RRC<br />

113, and those under 20g are probably RRC 196. Coins between 20 and 30g need to<br />

be assessed by style.<br />

Fig. 18<br />

<strong>The</strong> RRC 196 as is relatively light as compared with its fractions; the latter are<br />

however consistent with an uncial standard as the confi dence ranges for the RRC 196<br />

semis, star-above triens and quadrans all indicate an as weight in the 24-29g range.<br />

<strong>The</strong> small change quadrantes indicate an as weight average of 16-18g. Not only<br />

is this half of RRC 113 but is also much below the RRC 196 as, RRC 196 semis, and<br />

other fractions. <strong>The</strong>refore we conclude that they form a lighter and probably later<br />

issue.<br />

Since the weight standards of the offi cial star-before and star-above triens and<br />

quadrans overlap considerably, we cannot determine by weight alone if they follow<br />

different weight standards, nor whether the star-above precedes or follows the starbefore<br />

coins. But the stylistic analysis in Sections 2-5 shows that the fractions hew<br />

closely to the as styles, so they may be assigned to the as they resemble. Space<br />

precludes further analysis, but further confi rmation can be found in the style and<br />

weight of other contemporary Period 1 and Period 2 bronze issues.<br />

9. A New Classifi cation of Star Bronzes<br />

We have made the case above for a new classifi cation of Star bronzes. It only remains<br />

to tabulate the new classifi cation in its proper sequence. Where rearrangement is<br />

necessary, coins moved are assigned a number with prefi x R (Revised) so as to leave<br />

Crawford’s existing references intact.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!