12.05.2013 Views

The Numismatic Chronicle 171 Offprint - Royal Numismatic Society

The Numismatic Chronicle 171 Offprint - Royal Numismatic Society

The Numismatic Chronicle 171 Offprint - Royal Numismatic Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106<br />

8. Weights<br />

RICHARD SCHAEFER and ANDREW McCABE<br />

Analysis of the star coin weights raises complex problems. We have surveyed coins<br />

from published and internet auctions over the last decade as well as from major<br />

public collections. 7<br />

Although there are suffi cient weight data on the easily distinguished RRC 113/2<br />

and RRC 196/1 as, and the RRC 113/3 and RRC 196/2 semis, the data available for<br />

other fractions is very limited. For example Michael Crawford’s archived papers<br />

in the British Museum indicate that he considered two star-above trientes in Paris,<br />

weighing 10.70 and 10.41g, and eight star-before trientes in Paris and Hannover<br />

weighing an average 6.93g. 8 Weights for quadrantes cannot be accepted sight-unseen,<br />

given the variable design features. Sextantes are so rare as to defy weight analysis.<br />

At fi rst glance the limited trientes data seem to support the existing classifi cation.<br />

However many of the Paris coins are very worn, and thus best not included in the data.<br />

A wider survey of well-preserved pieces which we have viewed in person or from<br />

photographs shows that the offi cial smaller fractions, as opposed to the unoffi cial<br />

quadrantes, cannot be distinguished by weight between Period 1 and Period 2, nor<br />

by diameter.<br />

For each type we give the sample size and the average weight (mean). As sample<br />

sizes are small, we have calculated a ‘90% confi dence range’ for the mean – within<br />

which the mean of a theoretically large sample should (with 90% confi dence) fall. If<br />

the ‘90% confi dence range’ of two issues do not overlap, the issues were probably<br />

made to different weight standards. If the ‘90% confi dence range’ of two issues<br />

overlap, it is our view that the two issues cannot be distinguished by weight alone.<br />

Weights are rounded to the nearest half gram: it is not statistically meaningful to be<br />

more precise.<br />

RRC 113/2 as: 14 coins averaging 33½ g (90% confi dence range is 31 to 36g)<br />

RRC 196/1 as: 39 coins averaging 22½ g (90% confi dence range is 21½ to<br />

23½ g)<br />

RRC 113/3 semis: 3 coins averaging 15g (90% confi dence range is 14 to 16 g)<br />

RRC 196/2 semis: 20 coins averaging 13½ g (90% confi dence range is 13 to<br />

14½ g)<br />

Star-before triens: 6 coins averaging 7½ g (90% confi dence range is 6 to 9 g)<br />

Star-above triens: 9 coins averaging 9 g (90% confi dence range is 8 to 9½ g)<br />

Star-before quadrans offi cial issue: 4 coins averaging 7g (90% confi dence range<br />

is 6 to 8g)<br />

Star-above quadrans: 6 coins averaging 6½ g (90% confi dence range is 6 to 7g)<br />

Star-before quadrans, later small change: 37 coins averaging 4½ g (90%<br />

confi dence range is 4 to 4½g)<br />

Insuffi cient sextantes were available to include in the data.<br />

7 Public collections: ANS, Bibliothèque Nationale (Paris), Kestner Museum (Hannover), and Museo<br />

Civico (Milan). Private collections: Russo, Witschonke, Goodman, McCabe, Blume-Poulton and<br />

others.<br />

8 Michael Crawford, archive of notes compiled in the preparation of Roman Republican Coinage,<br />

British Museum.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!