11.05.2013 Views

Nearby Supernova Factory: Étalonnage des données de SNIFS et ...

Nearby Supernova Factory: Étalonnage des données de SNIFS et ...

Nearby Supernova Factory: Étalonnage des données de SNIFS et ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00372504, version 1 - 1 Apr 2009<br />

CHAPTER 1. BIG BANG COSMOLOGY<br />

1.3.5 Cosmological observables<br />

All the introduced cosmological param<strong>et</strong>ers <strong>de</strong>pend on a certain number of observables, of<br />

which we already introduced the redshift. We will now introduce another one: distances.<br />

Proper distance<br />

In the comoving frame at which we are at the origin, the distance from us to an object is not<br />

an observable. That’s because a distant object can only be observed by the light it emitted at<br />

an earlier time, where the universe had a different scale factor, none of which observable either.<br />

We need then to <strong>de</strong>fine a relationship b<strong>et</strong>ween the physical distance and the redshift, as a<br />

function of the dynamics and the contents of the universe.<br />

The proper distance dP is <strong>de</strong>fined so that 4πd2 P is the area of the sphere over which light from<br />

a far emitting source spreads in the time it travels to us. It can be <strong>de</strong>rived using the m<strong>et</strong>ric for<br />

a null geo<strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>ic<br />

dP<br />

0<br />

dr<br />

√<br />

1 − kr2 =<br />

t0 dt<br />

0<br />

′<br />

a =<br />

z<br />

0<br />

dz ′<br />

H(z ′ ) =<br />

1<br />

a<br />

Evaluating the left hand si<strong>de</strong> integral and using (1.37) we g<strong>et</strong><br />

dP =<br />

with Ωk = Ω0 − 1 (see footnote 7),<br />

and<br />

Z(z ′ ) =<br />

H0<br />

1<br />

<br />

|Ωk| X<br />

<br />

|Ωk|<br />

z<br />

Z(z<br />

0<br />

′ )dz ′<br />

<br />

⎧<br />

⎨ sin x if k > 0<br />

X [x] = x<br />

⎩<br />

sinh x<br />

if k = 0<br />

if k < 0<br />

da ′<br />

a ′2 H(a ′ )<br />

. (1.39)<br />

, (1.40)<br />

, (1.41)<br />

<br />

Ωr(1 + z ′ ) 4 + Ωm(1 + z ′ ) 3 + Ωx(1 + z ′ ) 3(1+wx) + Ωk(1 + z ′ ) 2 − 1<br />

2<br />

If we now have k ∼ 0, (1.40) reduces to (cf. Fig. 1.4)<br />

dP = 1<br />

Luminosity distance<br />

H0<br />

z<br />

0<br />

. (1.42)<br />

dz ′<br />

<br />

Ωr(1 + z ′ ) 4 + Ωm(1 + z ′ ) 3 + Ωx(1 + z ′ . (1.43)<br />

) 3(1+wx)<br />

The main m<strong>et</strong>hod to calculate distances to any stellar objects is to estimate its true luminosity<br />

and compare that to the observed flux (inversely proportional to the square distance).<br />

The measured flux f is connected to the intrinsic luminosity L by<br />

f = L<br />

4πd 2 L<br />

, (1.44)<br />

where dL is the luminosity distance. In an expanding universe, this relation does not hold: the<br />

observed flux is reduced by (1+z) 2 due to the cosmological redshift. From (1.13) we see that one<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!