09.05.2013 Views

On the Derived Length of Lie Solvable Group Algebras

On the Derived Length of Lie Solvable Group Algebras

On the Derived Length of Lie Solvable Group Algebras

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 CHAPTER 1<br />

1.2.2 <strong>Lie</strong> derived lengths <strong>of</strong> group algebras<br />

M. Sahai [24] proved <strong>the</strong> relation<br />

(1.1) I(G ′ ) 2n −1 ⊆ δ (n) (F G) ⊆ I(G ′ ) 2 n−1<br />

for all n > 0,<br />

from which it follows that a group algebra F G is strongly <strong>Lie</strong> solvable<br />

if and only if ei<strong>the</strong>r G is abelian or <strong>the</strong> ideal I(G ′ ) is nilpotent, that<br />

is G ′ is a finite p-group and char(F ) = p. The description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Lie</strong><br />

solvable group algebras is due to I.B.S. Passi, D.S. Passman and S.K.<br />

Sehgal [22]: a group algebra F G is <strong>Lie</strong> solvable if and only if one <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> following conditions holds: (i) G is abelian; (ii) G ′ is a finite pgroup<br />

and char(F ) = p; (iii) G has a subgroup <strong>of</strong> index two whose<br />

commutator subgroup is a finite 2-group and char(F ) = 2.<br />

Clearly, dlL(F G) and dl L (F G) are equal to one if and only if G is<br />

an abelian group. The group algebras <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lie</strong> derived length (strong <strong>Lie</strong><br />

derived length) two, that is <strong>the</strong> so-called <strong>Lie</strong> metabelian (strongly <strong>Lie</strong><br />

metabelian) group algebras were described by F. Levin and G. Rosenberger<br />

[19]. For odd characteristic <strong>the</strong> complete list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strongly<br />

<strong>Lie</strong> solvable group algebras <strong>of</strong> strong <strong>Lie</strong> derived length three can be<br />

found in M. Sahai’s paper [24]. Moreover, he also showed that <strong>the</strong><br />

statements δ [3] (F G) = 0 and δ (3) (F G) = 0 are equivalent, provided<br />

that char(F ) ≥ 7. All <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r cases <strong>the</strong> question is still open.<br />

In general, we have very little information about <strong>the</strong> <strong>Lie</strong> derived<br />

length <strong>of</strong> group algebras. The first and, at <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> more<br />

significant results on this topic can be found in papers [27] and [29] <strong>of</strong><br />

A. Shalev.<br />

Throughout this part by F G we always mean a strongly <strong>Lie</strong> solvable<br />

group algebra.<br />

From (1.1) it follows immediately that<br />

(1.2) ⌈log 2(tN(G ′ ) + 1)⌉ ≤ dl L (F G) ≤ ⌈log 2(2tN(G ′ ))⌉<br />

and so<br />

dlL(F G) ≤ ⌈log 2(2tN(G ′ ))⌉.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong>re is no similarly valuable lower bound on dlL(F G), <strong>the</strong> computation<br />

<strong>of</strong> its value is more difficult than <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> dl L (F G).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!