sl-2012-5

УГОЛОВНОЕ СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВО
2. Zelenetsky V.S. Functional structure of public
prosecutory activity. Kharkov, 1978. P. 20.
3. See, for example: Elkind P.S. The purposes
and means of their achievement in the Soviet
criminal procedural law. L., 1976. P. 27 and further;
Mikhaylovsky I.B. Purpose, functions and
principles of the Russian criminal legal proceedings
(a criminal and procedural form). M., 2003. P.
27 and further.
4. See, for example: Shpilev V.N. Contents and
form of criminal legal proceedings. Minsk, 1973.
P. 126; Soloviev A.B. Approach's to principles of
criminal legal proceedings in the Criminal Procedure
Code of the Russian Federation demands
specification. Col. «Conceptual bases of reform of
criminal legal proceedings in Russia». M., 2002.
P. 87.
5. See, for example: Mikhaylovskya I.B. Unitary
work. P. 31 and further. The author formulates an
overall objective of criminal legal proceedings as a
resolution of conflict between the personality and
the government (in the same place, p. 36).
6. See: for example: Ishchenko E.P. The existing
Criminal Procedure Code and problems of
criminal legal proceedings. Works of the Kuban
state agrarian university. Series: Right, 2008. No 2
(3). P. 41-48; Orlov Yu.K. Problem's of the theory
of proofs in criminal trial. M., 2009. P. 11-12.
7. Orlov Yu.K. Principle's of competitiveness in
criminal trial: value and action limits / Russian
justice. 2004. No 2. P. 52.
8. See: Antonov I.A. Moral and legal beginnings
of criminal and procedural activity (theoretical
ideas and law-enforcement practice). Dis. … doc.
law scien. SPb., 2005. P. 92.
9. Antonov I.A. Decree. work. P. 99-100.
10. Such definition, with insignificant textual distinctions
is given practically by all authors considering
this question (see, for example: Dobrovolskya
T.N. Principle of the Soviet criminal trial.
M., 1972. P. 16; Tyrichev I.V. Principles of the
ОБЩЕСТВО И ПРАВО ● 2012 ● № 5 (42)
158
Soviet criminal trial. Manual. M., 1983. P. 4; Criminal
procedural law of the Russian Federation.
Textbook. / Under the editorship of P.A. Lupinskaya.
M., 2010. P. 234).
11. Tyrichev I.V. In the same place. P. 6.
12. In more detail about it see Mikhaylovsky
I.B..Unitary work. P. 110 and further.
13. Reznik G.M. Internal belief at an assessment
of proofs. M., 1977. P. 54.
14. In more detail about it see Mikhaylovsky
I.B.Unitary work. P. 113-114.
15. Orlov Yu.K. Unitary article. P. 52.
16. Tomin V.T. Criminal trial. Actual problems of
the theory and practice. M., 2009. P. 121.
17. Grinenko A.V. Principles of criminal legal
proceedings // Criminal trial: textbook for higher
education institutions / Otv. A.V. Grinenko's edition.
M., 2004. P. 30.
18. Bezrukov S.I., Bezrukov S.S. Principles of
criminal legal proceedings: concept, system and
general characteristic. Omsk, 2005. P. 22.
19. Elkind P.S. The purposes and means of
their achievement in the Soviet criminal procedural
law. L., 1976. P. 51.
20. See: Zinatullin Z.Z., Zinatullin T.Z. Criminal
and procedural functions: Studies. grant. Izhevsk,
2002. P. 9-10.
21. See: Mikhaylovsky I.B. Purpose, functions
and principles of the Russian criminal legal proceedings
(a criminal and procedural form). M.,
2003. P. 67.
22. Bulletin Supreme Vessels Russian Federation,
2009. No 12. P. 21-22.
23. As it was shown above, this term is applied
in the general theory of the right (see, for example:
Zhimirov V. N. Legal functionalism (the teoretiko-methodological
analysis). Doc. dis. SPb.,
2005. P. 81).
24. See, for example: Belkin A.R. Proven theory.
M., 1999; Hmyrov A.A. Orlov theory: general
part. Krasnodar, 2006.