25.05.2012 Views

harris corporation

harris corporation

harris corporation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Key Indicators<br />

We believe our value drivers, when implemented, will improve our key indicators of value, such as: income<br />

from continuing operations and income from continuing operations per diluted common share; revenue; income<br />

from continuing operations as a percentage of revenue; net cash provided by operating activities; return on average<br />

assets; and return on average equity. The measure of our success is reflected in our results of operations and<br />

liquidity and capital resources key indicators as discussed below:<br />

Fiscal 2011 Results of Operations Key Indicators: Income from continuing operations, income from<br />

continuing operations per diluted common share, revenue, and income from continuing operations as a percentage of<br />

revenue represent key measurements of our value drivers:<br />

• Income from continuing operations increased 4.7 percent to $588.0 million in fiscal 2011 from<br />

$561.6 million in fiscal 2010;<br />

• Income from continuing operations per diluted common share increased 7.5 percent to $4.60 in fiscal 2011<br />

from $4.28 in fiscal 2010;<br />

• Revenue increased 13.8 percent to $5.9 billion in fiscal 2011 from $5.2 billion in fiscal 2010; and<br />

• Income from continuing operations as a percentage of revenue decreased to 9.9 percent in fiscal 2011 from<br />

10.8 percent in fiscal 2010.<br />

Refer to MD&A heading “Operations Review” below in this Report for more information.<br />

Liquidity and Capital Resources Key Indicators: Net cash provided by operating activities, return on average<br />

assets and return on average equity also represent key measurements of our value drivers:<br />

• Net cash provided by operating activities increased to $833.1 million in fiscal 2011 from $802.7 million in<br />

fiscal 2010;<br />

• Return on average assets (defined as income from continuing operations divided by the two-point average of<br />

total assets at the beginning and ending of the fiscal year) decreased to 10.8 percent in fiscal 2011 from<br />

12.2 percent in fiscal 2010; and<br />

• Return on average equity (defined as income from continuing operations divided by the two-point average of<br />

equity at the beginning and ending of the fiscal year) decreased to 25.0 percent in fiscal 2011 from<br />

27.7 percent in fiscal 2010.<br />

Refer to MD&A heading “Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Strategies” below in this Report for more<br />

information.<br />

Industry-Wide Opportunities, Challenges and Risks<br />

Department of Defense: The DoD’s U.S. Government Fiscal Year (“GFY”) 2012 budget proposal reflects<br />

continued investment in national security priorities (including cyber security) and continues efforts to rebalance<br />

military forces to focus on both today’s wars as well as potential future conflicts. Building on efforts begun in GFY<br />

2010, the DoD will continue to implement its acquisition reforms and modernize key weapons systems to provide<br />

service members with the best technology to meet battlefield needs. We expect the U.S. Government to remain<br />

committed to funding intelligence, information superiority, special operations, warfighter support and cyber security,<br />

although there can be no assurance it will do so.<br />

The DoD’s $671 billion GFY 2012 budget request is approximately 3.1% less than GFY 2010 enacted levels of<br />

$692 billion and approximately 5.3% less than the $708 billion GFY 2011 budget request. The GFY 2012 budget<br />

request includes $553 billion for base defense programs compared with $549 billion for base defense programs in<br />

the GFY 2011 budget request, and includes $118 billion for overseas contingency operations (“OCO”) compared<br />

with $159 billion for OCO in the GFY 2011 budget request, reflecting the winding down of military operations in<br />

Iraq and Afghanistan. Of the $118 billion GFY 2012 budget request for OCO, $107 billion is to support activities in<br />

Afghanistan and $11 billion is to support activities in Iraq.<br />

The level of budget amounts allocated to DoD procurement accounts (“Procurement”), along with research,<br />

development, test and evaluation (“RDT&E”) components of the DoD budget, also are an important indicator of<br />

spending. The GFY 2012 budget requests for Procurement and RDT&E of $113 billion and $75 billion, respectively,<br />

are comparable to the GFY 2011 budget requests of $113 billion and $76 billion, respectively. Additionally, the<br />

DoD Operations and Maintenance account (“O&M”), which contains the bulk of funding for training, logistics,<br />

services and other logistical support, is an account of major importance. The DoD O&M budget request for GFY<br />

2012 is $204 billion compared with the GFY 2011 budget request of $200 billion.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!