07.05.2013 Views

Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case

Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case

Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

All assets acquired by the concubine or the spouse under the separation <strong>of</strong> assets<br />

regime in the two years prior to the beginning <strong>of</strong> the retroactive period are rebuttably<br />

presumed to belong to the debtor and, therefore, are included in the estate [LCM 187].<br />

l. Separation<br />

Any legitimate title-holder (not necessarily an owner) may separate individually identified<br />

assets in the debtor’s possession, provided such assets were not transferred to the<br />

debtor pursuant to a final and irrevocable legal title [LCM 70]. To be separated, an asset<br />

must: (1) be in the debtor’s possession; (2) be individually identified; and (3) may not<br />

have been transferred pursuant to a final and irrevocable legal title.<br />

i. In Debtor’s Possession<br />

An asset not in the debtor’s possession shall not be separated. Possession is a<br />

technical term that implies a de facto power over a certain asset and includes not only<br />

assets over which the debtor has physical possession, but also assets over which the<br />

debtor has primary possession (e.g., the debtor shall be deemed to be in possession<br />

<strong>of</strong> an asset even if the debtor has leased it out to a third person).<br />

ii. Individually Identified<br />

The identity <strong>of</strong> the asset is a necessary requisite for separation. Therefore, a fungible<br />

asset (e.g., money) cannot be separated unless it can be individually identified.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> accession (i.e., the case where one asset is naturally or artificially<br />

incorporated into another asset), the rules for identifying assets become casuistic<br />

and generally rely on who acquires title <strong>of</strong> the resulting asset. The determination <strong>of</strong><br />

who acquires title requires applying rules governing the question on which is the<br />

principal asset and which is the accessory asset. If, pursuant to these rules, the<br />

debtor becomes the owner <strong>of</strong> the resulting asset, the debtor may have to indemnify<br />

the owner <strong>of</strong> the incorporated asset (which claim would have to be subject to the<br />

insolvency proceedings), but if a third person becomes the owner <strong>of</strong> the resulting<br />

asset, then such third person may separate it, indemnifying the debtor. The level <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>White</strong> & <strong>Case</strong><br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!