Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case

Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case

whitecase.com
from whitecase.com More from this publisher
07.05.2013 Views

PART IV Administrative Resolution of Banks 70 As a result of the 2008 – 2010 worldwide financial crisis, the issues surrounding bank insolvency have taken on new speed. The situation is fluid and the legal framework can change at any moment. For example, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision recently published many of the “Basel III” rules for the new global capital and liquidity standards for banks, the United States recently passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Mexico is discussing a new bill of law to regulate the insolvency of banks and other financial system firms. 21. Introduction Bank insolvency merits a specifically devoted portion of this book due to the complexity of its regulation. There is ample discussion on the importance of banks having a special insolvency treatment. One of the exponents, Hüpkes (2003), devotes a whole paper to the subject and sets forth the following reasons why banks should have a special insolvency treatment: 71 Why should banks be accorded special treatment in insolvency? The common answer is that banks play a special role in a country’s economy in that, collectively, their functions are so important as to constitute a sort of public service. In order to justify this special attention, reference is commonly made to three characteristic functions of banks: ■■ 100 First, banks typically hold highly liquid liabilities in the form of deposits that are repayable at par on demand. On the asset side, they generally hold long-term loans that may be difficult to sell or borrow against on short notice. Under normal circumstances, this mismatch of maturity does not pose a major problem: Whereas withdrawals are subject to the law of large numbers, loans will be held until maturity and repaid at face value. A bank’s required capitalization covers the risk of loan loss, and a cushion of liquid assets ensures its ability to cover withdrawals in normal times. 70 Mexican banks are either (1) commercial banks or (2) state-owned national development institutions [LIC 2]. Unless the context requires otherwise, reference herein to “banks” shall be deemed to be made to commercial banks only. State-owned national development institutions are governed by the Banking Law and their respective organic laws [LIC 30], and the resolution regime applicable thereunder could defer from the one applicable under the Banking Law. 71 Hüpkes (2003), pp. 2-3 (footnotes omitted).

■■ ■■ If, however, something happens to disturb confidence in the bank’s ability to meet its payment obligations, massive withdrawals of deposits risk causing liquidity problems and may threaten the bank’s solvency. Second, banks perform financial services that are fundamental to the functioning of an economy, such as the extension of credit, the taking of deposits and the processing of payments. Despite the complementary role of capital markets in the credit intermediation process and their capacity to mobilize capital, banks remain the primary source of liquidity for most financial and non-financial institutions. They provide direct and standby sources of credit and liquidity to the economy of a country, either by supplying money in the form of loans or by providing guarantees in the form of loan commitments. Third, banks constitute the transmission belt for monetary policy, that is, the linkage between the monetary policy process and the economy. 22. Three Pillars There are three pillars in a bank insolvency: (1) protection of interests of depositors; (2) soundness of the payment system; and (3) prevention of systemic risk. Oftentimes these three pillars are in conflict with each other and require compromises from lawmakers and regulators. The legal framework for bank insolvency goes beyond the rules of administrative resolution and includes preventive and remedial tools. Preventive tools are directed to prevent a bank from insolvency and include capitalization requirements (cfr. 24), asset allocation and risk management rules, deposit insurance and payment systems rules (cfr. 15.p). It is beyond the scope of this book to address these measures. Remedial tools are those directed to resolving the case of a bank that encounters insolvency, and these are addressed in this part of the book. White & Case 101

■■<br />

■■<br />

If, however, something happens to disturb confidence in the bank’s ability to meet its payment<br />

obligations, massive withdrawals <strong>of</strong> deposits risk causing liquidity problems and may threaten the<br />

bank’s solvency.<br />

Second, banks perform financial services that are fundamental to the functioning <strong>of</strong> an economy,<br />

such as the extension <strong>of</strong> credit, the taking <strong>of</strong> deposits and the processing <strong>of</strong> payments. Despite<br />

the complementary role <strong>of</strong> capital markets in the credit intermediation process and their capacity<br />

to mobilize capital, banks remain the primary source <strong>of</strong> liquidity for most financial and non-financial<br />

institutions. They provide direct and standby sources <strong>of</strong> credit and liquidity to the economy <strong>of</strong> a<br />

country, either by supplying money in the form <strong>of</strong> loans or by providing guarantees in the form <strong>of</strong><br />

loan commitments.<br />

Third, banks constitute the transmission belt for monetary policy, that is, the linkage between the<br />

monetary policy process and the economy.<br />

22. Three Pillars<br />

There are three pillars in a bank insolvency: (1) protection <strong>of</strong> interests <strong>of</strong> depositors;<br />

(2) soundness <strong>of</strong> the payment system; and (3) prevention <strong>of</strong> systemic risk. Oftentimes<br />

these three pillars are in conflict with each other and require compromises from lawmakers<br />

and regulators.<br />

The legal framework for bank insolvency goes beyond the rules <strong>of</strong> administrative resolution<br />

and includes preventive and remedial tools. Preventive tools are directed to prevent a bank<br />

from insolvency and include capitalization requirements (cfr. 24), asset allocation and risk<br />

management rules, deposit insurance and payment systems rules (cfr. 15.p). It is beyond<br />

the scope <strong>of</strong> this book to address these measures. Remedial tools are those directed to<br />

resolving the case <strong>of</strong> a bank that encounters insolvency, and these are addressed in this part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the book.<br />

<strong>White</strong> & <strong>Case</strong><br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!