07.05.2013 Views

Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case

Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case

Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART IV<br />

Administrative Resolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> Banks 70<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> the 2008 – 2010 worldwide financial crisis, the issues surrounding bank<br />

insolvency have taken on new speed. The situation is fluid and the legal framework can<br />

change at any moment. For example, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision recently<br />

published many <strong>of</strong> the “Basel III” rules for the new global capital and liquidity standards for<br />

banks, the United States recently passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer<br />

Protection Act and Mexico is discussing a new bill <strong>of</strong> law to regulate the insolvency <strong>of</strong> banks<br />

and other financial system firms.<br />

21. Introduction<br />

Bank insolvency merits a specifically devoted portion <strong>of</strong> this book due to the complexity<br />

<strong>of</strong> its regulation. There is ample discussion on the importance <strong>of</strong> banks having a special<br />

insolvency treatment. One <strong>of</strong> the exponents, Hüpkes (2003), devotes a whole paper to<br />

the subject and sets forth the following reasons why banks should have a special<br />

insolvency treatment: 71<br />

Why should banks be accorded special treatment in insolvency? The common answer is<br />

that banks play a special role in a country’s economy in that, collectively, their functions<br />

are so important as to constitute a sort <strong>of</strong> public service. In order to justify this special<br />

attention, reference is commonly made to three characteristic functions <strong>of</strong> banks:<br />

■■<br />

100<br />

First, banks typically hold highly liquid liabilities in the form <strong>of</strong> deposits that are repayable at par<br />

on demand. On the asset side, they generally hold long-term loans that may be difficult to sell or<br />

borrow against on short notice. Under normal circumstances, this mismatch <strong>of</strong> maturity does not<br />

pose a major problem: Whereas withdrawals are subject to the law <strong>of</strong> large numbers, loans will<br />

be held until maturity and repaid at face value. A bank’s required capitalization covers the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

loan loss, and a cushion <strong>of</strong> liquid assets ensures its ability to cover withdrawals in normal times.<br />

70 <strong>Mexican</strong> banks are either (1) commercial banks or (2) state-owned national development institutions [LIC 2].<br />

Unless the context requires otherwise, reference herein to “banks” shall be deemed to be made to commercial<br />

banks only. State-owned national development institutions are governed by the Banking Law and their respective<br />

organic laws [LIC 30], and the resolution regime applicable thereunder could defer from the one applicable under<br />

the Banking Law.<br />

71<br />

Hüpkes (2003), pp. 2-3 (footnotes omitted).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!