Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case
Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case
Mexican Legal Framework of Business Insolvency - White & Case
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PART IV<br />
Administrative Resolution<br />
<strong>of</strong> Banks 70<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> the 2008 – 2010 worldwide financial crisis, the issues surrounding bank<br />
insolvency have taken on new speed. The situation is fluid and the legal framework can<br />
change at any moment. For example, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision recently<br />
published many <strong>of</strong> the “Basel III” rules for the new global capital and liquidity standards for<br />
banks, the United States recently passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer<br />
Protection Act and Mexico is discussing a new bill <strong>of</strong> law to regulate the insolvency <strong>of</strong> banks<br />
and other financial system firms.<br />
21. Introduction<br />
Bank insolvency merits a specifically devoted portion <strong>of</strong> this book due to the complexity<br />
<strong>of</strong> its regulation. There is ample discussion on the importance <strong>of</strong> banks having a special<br />
insolvency treatment. One <strong>of</strong> the exponents, Hüpkes (2003), devotes a whole paper to<br />
the subject and sets forth the following reasons why banks should have a special<br />
insolvency treatment: 71<br />
Why should banks be accorded special treatment in insolvency? The common answer is<br />
that banks play a special role in a country’s economy in that, collectively, their functions<br />
are so important as to constitute a sort <strong>of</strong> public service. In order to justify this special<br />
attention, reference is commonly made to three characteristic functions <strong>of</strong> banks:<br />
■■<br />
100<br />
First, banks typically hold highly liquid liabilities in the form <strong>of</strong> deposits that are repayable at par<br />
on demand. On the asset side, they generally hold long-term loans that may be difficult to sell or<br />
borrow against on short notice. Under normal circumstances, this mismatch <strong>of</strong> maturity does not<br />
pose a major problem: Whereas withdrawals are subject to the law <strong>of</strong> large numbers, loans will<br />
be held until maturity and repaid at face value. A bank’s required capitalization covers the risk <strong>of</strong><br />
loan loss, and a cushion <strong>of</strong> liquid assets ensures its ability to cover withdrawals in normal times.<br />
70 <strong>Mexican</strong> banks are either (1) commercial banks or (2) state-owned national development institutions [LIC 2].<br />
Unless the context requires otherwise, reference herein to “banks” shall be deemed to be made to commercial<br />
banks only. State-owned national development institutions are governed by the Banking Law and their respective<br />
organic laws [LIC 30], and the resolution regime applicable thereunder could defer from the one applicable under<br />
the Banking Law.<br />
71<br />
Hüpkes (2003), pp. 2-3 (footnotes omitted).