07.05.2013 Views

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2009 VOSS AND JANSA: DIDELPHID MARSUPIALS 49<br />

Fig. 19. Lateral views <strong>of</strong> left C1–P3 in Hyladelphys<br />

kalinowskii (A, AMNH 267338), Gracilinanus<br />

agilis (B, AMNH 134005), <strong>and</strong> Thylamys<br />

pusillus (C, AMNH 275445) illustrating taxonomic<br />

differences in the relative heights <strong>of</strong> P2 <strong>and</strong> P3<br />

(toothrows are not drawn to the same scale).<br />

both sexes <strong>of</strong> Lestoros, whereas male Caenolestes<br />

<strong>and</strong> Rhyncholestes have single-rooted<br />

unicuspid teeth (Osgood, 1924; Bublitz,<br />

1987). The position <strong>of</strong> C1 with respect to<br />

the maxillary-premaxillary suture has not<br />

been widely surveyed in Marsupialia, but<br />

the upper canine alveolus is entirely contained<br />

by the maxilla in Dromiciops, some<br />

peramelemorphians (e.g., Echymipera, Perameles),<br />

<strong>and</strong> some dasyuromorphians (Murexia,<br />

Sminthopsis). In several diprotodontian<br />

clades, C1 is absent.<br />

UPPER PREMOLARS: The <strong>didelphid</strong> first<br />

upper premolar (P1) is usually in contact<br />

with or very close to C1, but a diastema is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten present between P1 <strong>and</strong> P2. The gap<br />

between P1 <strong>and</strong> P2 tends to be individually<br />

<strong>and</strong> ontogenetically variable, however, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

continuous range <strong>of</strong> intermediates exist<br />

between taxa in which it is usually absent<br />

(e.g., Lestodelphys; fig. 51) <strong>and</strong> those in<br />

which it is normally present (e.g., Phil<strong>and</strong>er;<br />

fig. 48). By contrast, no diastema is ever<br />

present between P2 <strong>and</strong> P3, the crowns <strong>of</strong><br />

which are in contact or closely approximated<br />

in all examined opossum dentitions.<br />

Although consistently smaller than the<br />

posterior premolars, P1 in most <strong>didelphid</strong>s<br />

is at least half the height or width <strong>of</strong> P2,<br />

which it essentially resembles in having a<br />

large, laterally compressed, more or less<br />

triangular central cusp that is usually flanked<br />

by smaller anterior <strong>and</strong> posterior accessory<br />

cusps. By contrast, P1 is a much smaller<br />

(apparently vestigial) tooth that lacks distinct<br />

occlusal features in Caluromys (fig. 38) <strong>and</strong><br />

Caluromysiops (fig. 39). In a few specimens<br />

<strong>of</strong> the latter genus (e.g., AMNH 244364), P1<br />

is missing.<br />

The second <strong>and</strong> third upper premolars are<br />

always large <strong>and</strong> well-developed teeth. Each<br />

is surrounded by a broad basal cingulum in<br />

Caluromys <strong>and</strong> Caluromysiops, but the basal<br />

cingulum <strong>of</strong> P2 <strong>and</strong>/or P3 is <strong>of</strong>ten incomplete<br />

or indistinct in other <strong>didelphid</strong>s. The second<br />

upper premolar is distinctly taller than P3 in<br />

Caluromys, Caluromysiops, <strong>and</strong>Hyladelphys<br />

(fig. 19A), but P3 is distinctly taller than P2<br />

in Chironectes, Cryptonanus, Didelphis, Lestodelphys,<br />

Lutreolina, Monodelphis, Phil<strong>and</strong>er,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Thylamys (fig. 19C). By contrast, P2<br />

<strong>and</strong> P3 are about the same height in<br />

Chacodelphys, 14 Glironia, Gracilinanus (fig.<br />

19B), Marmosa, Marmosops,<strong>and</strong>Metachirus.<br />

When unworn, P3 is provided with sharp<br />

anterior <strong>and</strong> posterior cutting edges—each <strong>of</strong><br />

which extends from the cingulum to the apex<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tooth—in Caluromys, Caluromysiops,<br />

Glironia, <strong>and</strong> Hyladelphys. In all other<br />

<strong>didelphid</strong>s, however, the anterior margin <strong>of</strong><br />

14 Although we (Voss et al., 2004a) previously reported that<br />

P2 is taller than P3 in Chacodelphys based on our examination <strong>of</strong><br />

the holotype <strong>of</strong> C. formosa (USNM 236330), subsequently<br />

collected material (Teta et al., 2006) includes five individuals in<br />

which P2 <strong>and</strong> P3 are subequal in height. We reexamined<br />

USNM 236330 <strong>and</strong> concluded that, although the crown <strong>of</strong> P3<br />

was completely exposed above the alveolus, it had not yet<br />

attained its definitive adult position in the toothrow <strong>of</strong> this<br />

young adult specimen.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!