07.05.2013 Views

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 322<br />

Fig. 12. Lateral view <strong>of</strong> posterior braincase in Marmosa murina (A, AMNH 272816) <strong>and</strong> Marmosops<br />

impavidus (B, AMNH 272709), illustrating the presence <strong>of</strong> a fenestra (fen) that exposes the petrosal (pet)<br />

between the parietal (par) <strong>and</strong> squamosal (sq) inMarmosops. The petrosal is not laterally exposed by a<br />

fenestra in the parietal-squamosal suture <strong>of</strong> Marmosa. Other abbreviations: fc, fenestra cochleae; ssf,<br />

subsquamosal foramen.<br />

parietal suture—occur as balanced polymorphisms<br />

(neither state clearly predominating)<br />

in Lestodelphys, Marmosops incanus, <strong>and</strong> M.<br />

noctivagus. No non<strong>didelphid</strong> marsupial that<br />

we examined has a fenestrated squamosalparietal<br />

suture.<br />

INTERPARIETAL: Although some authors<br />

(e.g., Novacek, 1993) have stated that <strong>marsupials</strong><br />

lack an interparietal bone, a large<br />

interparietal is unequivocally present in<br />

Dromiciops (see Giannini et al., 2004: fig.<br />

3), many diprotodontians (e.g., Tarsipes;<br />

Parker, 1890: fig. 2), <strong>and</strong> some dasyuromorphians<br />

(e.g., Myrmecobius). In these taxa, the<br />

sutures that separate the interparietal from<br />

adjacent bones (supraoccipital <strong>and</strong> parietals)<br />

are clearly visible <strong>and</strong> ontogenetically persistent.<br />

In all <strong>of</strong> the taxa we examined with such<br />

distinctly sutured interparietals, the interparietal-supraoccipital<br />

boundary coincides<br />

closely with the transverse (lambdoid) crest<br />

that marks the dorsalmost insertion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

neck extensor musculature.<br />

An interparietal is also unambiguously<br />

present in <strong>didelphid</strong>s, all <strong>of</strong> which exhibit a<br />

large, unpaired, wedge-shaped or oblong<br />

element between the left <strong>and</strong> right parietals<br />

in the same position (anterior to the lamb-<br />

doid crest) as the sutured interparietals <strong>of</strong><br />

other <strong>marsupials</strong>. The <strong>didelphid</strong> interparietal,<br />

however, is fused with the supraoccipital in<br />

all <strong>of</strong> the skulls we examined (including<br />

postweaning juveniles assignable to Gardner’s<br />

[1973] age class 1), few <strong>of</strong> which show<br />

any trace <strong>of</strong> a suture. 9 Fortunately, developmental<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>didelphid</strong> pouch young are<br />

available to prove the existence <strong>of</strong> a distinct<br />

interparietal center <strong>of</strong> ossification. In Didelphis<br />

the interparietal first appears around day<br />

8 postpartum (p) <strong>and</strong> fuses with the supraorbital<br />

by day 28p (Nesslinger, 1956), whereas<br />

in Monodelphis these events occur on days<br />

3p <strong>and</strong> 8p, respectively (Clark <strong>and</strong> Smith,<br />

1993). By contrast, the <strong>didelphid</strong> interparietal<br />

never appears to fuse with the parietals, the<br />

sutures between them persisting even in the<br />

largest adult specimens we examined.<br />

9 Vestiges <strong>of</strong> the interparietal-supraoccipital suture in juvenile<br />

specimens <strong>of</strong> Monodelphis brevicaudata were described by Wible<br />

(2003). What appears to be a well-defined suture between the<br />

interparietal <strong>and</strong> supraoccipital <strong>of</strong> Didelphis albiventris in an<br />

illustration published by Abdala et al. (2001: fig. 3) was<br />

intended to represent the hypothetical boundary between bones<br />

that were indistinguishably fused in all <strong>of</strong> the specimens<br />

examined by the authors <strong>of</strong> that report (D.A. Flores, personal<br />

commun.).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!