07.05.2013 Views

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2009 VOSS AND JANSA: DIDELPHID MARSUPIALS 19<br />

Fig. 3. Dorsal views <strong>of</strong> right forefeet <strong>of</strong> Monodelphis brevicaudata (A, AMNH 140466), Marmosops<br />

incanus (B, MVZ 197629), Marmosa robinsoni (C, AMNH 259983), <strong>and</strong> Caluromys phil<strong>and</strong>er (D, AMNH<br />

7433) illustrating generic differences in claw size <strong>and</strong> digital proportions. Monodelphis <strong>and</strong> Marmosops<br />

both have mesaxonic forefeet in which the third digit (dIII) is longest, whereas Marmosa has a paraxonic<br />

forefoot in which dIII <strong>and</strong> dIV are subequal. In Caluromys, dIV is the longest manual digit.<br />

the plantar pads is sharply differentiated from<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the surrounding plantar surface because<br />

it is provided with dermatoglyphs (friction or<br />

papillary ridges; Hamrick, 2001) resembling<br />

those on human fingertips. Plantar pads tend<br />

to be larger <strong>and</strong> to have more pronounced<br />

dermatoglyphs in arboreal opossums (e.g.,<br />

Caluromys) than in terrestrial forms (e.g.,<br />

Monodelphis), but a few <strong>didelphid</strong>s exhibit<br />

qualitatively different morphologies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!