phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ... phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

digitallibrary.amnh.org
from digitallibrary.amnh.org More from this publisher
07.05.2013 Views

128 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 322 ular nerve (secondary foramen ovale absent), and not contacting rostral tympanic process of petrosal. Anterior limb of ectotympanic directly suspended from basicranium. Stapes triangular, perforated by large obturator foramen. Fenestra cochleae exposed, not concealed by rostral and caudal tympanic processes of petrosal. Paroccipital process small, adnate to petrosal. Dorsal margin of foramen magnum formed by supraoccipital and exoccipitals, incisura occipitalis present. Two mental foramina present on lateral surface of each hemimandible; angular process acute and strongly inflected. Unworn crowns of I2–I5 symmetrically rhomboidal (‘‘premolariform’’), with subequal anterior and posterior cutting edges, slightly increasing in length (mesiodistal dimension) from I2 to I5. Upper canine (C1) alveolus in premaxillary-maxillary suture; C1 usually with one or two small accessory cusps (the posterior accessory cusp is more consistently distinct than the anterior cusp). First upper premolar (P1) smaller than posterior premolars but well formed and not vestigial; third upper premolar (P3) taller than P2; P3 with posterior cutting edge only; upper milk premolar (dP3) large and molariform. Upper molars strongly carnassialized (postmetacristae conspicuously longer than postprotocristae); relative widths M1 , M2 , M3 . M4 or M1 , M2 , M3 , M4; centrocrista strongly inflected labially on M1–M3; ectoflexus shallow or absent on M1, deeper on M2, and consistently deep on M3; anterolabial cingulum continuous with preprotocrista (complete anterior cingulum present) on M3 in some species (e.g., C. unduaviensis) but anterolabial cingulum and preprotocrista discontinuous (anterior cingulum incomplete) on M3 in others (e.g., C. chacoensis); postprotocrista without carnassial notch. Last upper tooth to erupt is P3. Lower incisors (i1–i4) with distinct lingual cusps. Lower canine (c1) procumbent, with flattened bladelike apex, usually with small posterior accessory cusp (but often absent on even moderately worn teeth). Second lower premolar (p2) taller than p3; lower milk premolar (dp3) with complete trigonid (tricuspid in in C. chacoensis) or with incomplete trigonid (bicuspid in C. unduaviensis). Hypoconid labially salient (level with labial apex of protoconid) on m3; hypoconulid twinned with entoconid on m1–m3; entoconid much taller than hypoconulid on m1–m3. DISTRIBUTION: Cryptonanus is known from mostly unforested tropical and subtropical biomes south of the Amazon River and east of the Andes, including the Caatinga, Cerrado, Chaco, and northern Pampas; collection localities mapped by Voss et al. (2005) and D’Elía and Martínez (2006) are from Paraguay, Uruguay, eastern Bolivia, northern Argentina, and eastern Brazil. REMARKS: Our species-level taxonomy of Cryptonanus follows Voss et al. (2005) who, however, cautioned that this arrangement is provisional and unsupported by rigorous tests of species limits. In particular, the genetic distinctness of C. agricolai, C. chacoensis, C. ignitus, and C. unduaviensis is not overwhelmingly indicated by available morphological data and merits careful evaluation. Molecular sequence comparisons would be an especially welcome supplement to the scant phenotypic evidence at hand. Gracilinanus Gardner and Creighton, 1989 Figure 50 CONTENTS: aceramarcae Tate, 1931; agilis Burmeister, 1854 (including beatrix Thomas, 1910; buenavistae Tate, 1931; and peruana Tate, 1931); dryas Thomas, 1898; emiliae Thomas, 1909 (including longicaudus Hershkovitz, 1992); marica Thomas, 1898 (including perijae Hershkovitz, 1992); and microtarsus Wagner (1842). MORPHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION: Combined length of adult head and body ca. 75– 130 mm; adult weight ca. 10–50 g. Rhinarium with two ventrolateral grooves on each side of median sulcus; dark circumocular mask present; pale supraocular spot absent; dark midrostral stripe absent; throat gland present in adult males. Dorsal pelage unpatterned reddish or grayish brown with dark-gray hair bases; dorsal guard hairs short and inconspicuous; ventral fur mostly gray-based buff or orange (e.g., in G. microtarsus), but self-white in some species (e.g., G. emiliae). Manus paraxonic (dIII 5 dIV); manual claws small, not extending beyond fleshy apical pads of digits; dermatoglyph-bearing manual plantar pads

2009 VOSS AND JANSA: DIDELPHID MARSUPIALS 129 Fig. 50. Gracilinanus agilis (based on MVZ 197437, an adult male from Mato do Vasco, Minas Gerais, Brazil).

128 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 322<br />

ular nerve (secondary foramen ovale absent),<br />

<strong>and</strong> not contacting rostral tympanic process<br />

<strong>of</strong> petrosal. Anterior limb <strong>of</strong> ectotympanic<br />

directly suspended from basicranium. Stapes<br />

triangular, perforated by large obturator<br />

foramen. Fenestra cochleae exposed, not<br />

concealed by rostral <strong>and</strong> caudal tympanic<br />

processes <strong>of</strong> petrosal. Paroccipital process<br />

small, adnate to petrosal. Dorsal margin <strong>of</strong><br />

foramen magnum formed by supraoccipital<br />

<strong>and</strong> exoccipitals, incisura occipitalis present.<br />

Two mental foramina present on lateral<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> each hemim<strong>and</strong>ible; angular process<br />

acute <strong>and</strong> strongly inflected.<br />

Unworn crowns <strong>of</strong> I2–I5 symmetrically<br />

rhomboidal (‘‘premolariform’’), with subequal<br />

anterior <strong>and</strong> posterior cutting edges,<br />

slightly increasing in length (mesiodistal<br />

dimension) from I2 to I5. Upper canine<br />

(C1) alveolus in premaxillary-maxillary suture;<br />

C1 usually with one or two small<br />

accessory cusps (the posterior accessory cusp<br />

is more consistently distinct than the anterior<br />

cusp). First upper premolar (P1) smaller than<br />

posterior premolars but well formed <strong>and</strong> not<br />

vestigial; third upper premolar (P3) taller<br />

than P2; P3 with posterior cutting edge only;<br />

upper milk premolar (dP3) large <strong>and</strong> molariform.<br />

Upper molars strongly carnassialized<br />

(postmetacristae conspicuously longer than<br />

postprotocristae); relative widths M1 , M2<br />

, M3 . M4 or M1 , M2 , M3 , M4;<br />

centrocrista strongly inflected labially on<br />

M1–M3; ect<strong>of</strong>lexus shallow or absent on<br />

M1, deeper on M2, <strong>and</strong> consistently deep on<br />

M3; anterolabial cingulum continuous with<br />

preprotocrista (complete anterior cingulum<br />

present) on M3 in some species (e.g., C.<br />

unduaviensis) but anterolabial cingulum <strong>and</strong><br />

preprotocrista discontinuous (anterior cingulum<br />

incomplete) on M3 in others (e.g., C.<br />

chacoensis); postprotocrista without carnassial<br />

notch. Last upper tooth to erupt is P3.<br />

Lower incisors (i1–i4) with distinct lingual<br />

cusps. Lower canine (c1) procumbent, with<br />

flattened bladelike apex, usually with small<br />

posterior accessory cusp (but <strong>of</strong>ten absent on<br />

even moderately worn teeth). Second lower<br />

premolar (p2) taller than p3; lower milk<br />

premolar (dp3) with complete trigonid (tricuspid<br />

in in C. chacoensis) or with incomplete<br />

trigonid (bicuspid in C. unduaviensis). Hypoconid<br />

labially salient (level with labial apex <strong>of</strong><br />

protoconid) on m3; hypoconulid twinned<br />

with entoconid on m1–m3; entoconid much<br />

taller than hypoconulid on m1–m3.<br />

DISTRIBUTION: Cryptonanus is known from<br />

mostly unforested tropical <strong>and</strong> subtropical<br />

biomes south <strong>of</strong> the Amazon River <strong>and</strong> east<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Andes, including the Caatinga, Cerrado,<br />

Chaco, <strong>and</strong> northern Pampas; collection<br />

localities mapped by Voss et al. (2005)<br />

<strong>and</strong> D’Elía <strong>and</strong> Martínez (2006) are from<br />

Paraguay, Uruguay, eastern Bolivia, northern<br />

Argentina, <strong>and</strong> eastern Brazil.<br />

REMARKS: Our species-level taxonomy <strong>of</strong><br />

Cryptonanus follows Voss et al. (2005) who,<br />

however, cautioned that this arrangement is<br />

provisional <strong>and</strong> unsupported by rigorous<br />

tests <strong>of</strong> species limits. In particular, the<br />

genetic distinctness <strong>of</strong> C. agricolai, C. chacoensis,<br />

C. ignitus, <strong>and</strong> C. unduaviensis is not<br />

overwhelmingly indicated by available morphological<br />

data <strong>and</strong> merits careful evaluation.<br />

Molecular sequence comparisons would<br />

be an especially welcome supplement to the<br />

scant phenotypic evidence at h<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Gracilinanus Gardner <strong>and</strong> Creighton, 1989<br />

Figure 50<br />

CONTENTS: aceramarcae Tate, 1931; agilis<br />

Burmeister, 1854 (including beatrix Thomas,<br />

1910; buenavistae Tate, 1931; <strong>and</strong> peruana<br />

Tate, 1931); dryas Thomas, 1898; emiliae<br />

Thomas, 1909 (including longicaudus Hershkovitz,<br />

1992); marica Thomas, 1898 (including<br />

perijae Hershkovitz, 1992); <strong>and</strong> microtarsus<br />

Wagner (1842).<br />

MORPHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION: Combined<br />

length <strong>of</strong> adult head <strong>and</strong> body ca. 75–<br />

130 mm; adult weight ca. 10–50 g. Rhinarium<br />

with two ventrolateral grooves on each<br />

side <strong>of</strong> median sulcus; dark circumocular<br />

mask present; pale supraocular spot absent;<br />

dark midrostral stripe absent; throat gl<strong>and</strong><br />

present in adult males. Dorsal pelage unpatterned<br />

reddish or grayish brown with<br />

dark-gray hair bases; dorsal guard hairs<br />

short <strong>and</strong> inconspicuous; ventral fur mostly<br />

gray-based buff or orange (e.g., in G.<br />

microtarsus), but self-white in some species<br />

(e.g., G. emiliae). Manus paraxonic (dIII 5<br />

dIV); manual claws small, not extending<br />

beyond fleshy apical pads <strong>of</strong> digits; dermatoglyph-bearing<br />

manual plantar pads

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!