07.05.2013 Views

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 BULLETIN AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY NO. 322<br />

mation. 1 In effect, such information comes<br />

from commonly available materials that can<br />

be examined without dissection or other<br />

special preparations. Therefore, microscopic<br />

features (e.g., those <strong>of</strong> the spermatozoa;<br />

Temple-Smith, 1987) <strong>and</strong> visceral characters<br />

(e.g., <strong>of</strong> the digestive tract; Santori et al.,<br />

2004) are not reviewed below, nor are<br />

osteological traits that require X-ray computed<br />

tomography, serial sectioning, or<br />

destructive methods for their study.<br />

Size <strong>and</strong> External Features<br />

Most opossums are externally unremarkable<br />

mammals with pointed muzzles, large<br />

rhinaria, well-developed vibrissae, prominent<br />

eyes, membranous ears, nonspinous pelage,<br />

subequal limbs, pentadactyl feet, <strong>and</strong> naked<br />

tails. In many <strong>of</strong> these respects they resemble<br />

other plesiomorphic <strong>marsupials</strong> (e.g., Dromiciops<br />

<strong>and</strong> dasyurids) as well as certain<br />

unspecialized placentals (e.g., solenodontids,<br />

rice tenrecs, gymnures, <strong>and</strong> tree shrews).<br />

Closer inspection, however, reveals numerous<br />

distinctive <strong>and</strong> <strong>phylogenetic</strong>ally informative<br />

details <strong>of</strong> <strong>didelphid</strong> external morphology.<br />

SIZE: Didelphids are small to mediumsized<br />

mammals. The smallest Recent species<br />

is probably Chacodelphys formosa, the young<br />

adult holotype <strong>of</strong> which had a head-<strong>and</strong>body<br />

length <strong>of</strong> 68 mm <strong>and</strong> probably weighed<br />

about 10 g (Voss et al., 2004a). By contrast,<br />

the largest living opossum, Didelphis virginiana,<br />

can measure almost 500 mm in head<strong>and</strong>-body<br />

length <strong>and</strong> weigh more than 3000 g<br />

(Hamilton, 1958). Most <strong>didelphid</strong>s, however,<br />

range in head-<strong>and</strong>-body length from about<br />

100 to 300 mm <strong>and</strong> weigh between about 20<br />

<strong>and</strong> 500 g (table 4). Although some authors<br />

have recognized ‘‘large’’, ‘‘medium’’, <strong>and</strong><br />

‘‘small’’ opossums, taxonomic assignments<br />

to discrete size categories are <strong>of</strong>ten arbitrary<br />

<strong>and</strong> sometimes misleading. For example,<br />

Reig et al. (1987: character 25) scored<br />

Metachirus as ‘‘large’’ <strong>and</strong> Caluromys as<br />

‘‘medium’’ in their <strong>phylogenetic</strong> analysis,<br />

but linear measurements <strong>and</strong> weights that<br />

we compiled suggest that these taxa are<br />

indistinguishable in size. More taxonomically<br />

1 An important exception is postcranial skeletal morphology,<br />

the topic <strong>of</strong> an independent study (Flores, 2009).<br />

comprehensive compilations <strong>of</strong> morphometric<br />

data will probably document a continuum<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>didelphid</strong> size distributions.<br />

By comparison, Old World <strong>marsupials</strong><br />

include some species that are smaller <strong>and</strong><br />

others that are much larger than any<br />

<strong>didelphid</strong>. The smallest living Australian<br />

species, for example, is said to be Planigale<br />

ingrami, with an adult weight <strong>of</strong> only about<br />

4 g, <strong>and</strong> the largest is Macropus rufus, males<br />

<strong>of</strong> which are said to weigh as much as 85 kg<br />

(Dawson et al., 1989). The extinct Pleistocene<br />

species Diprotodon optatum, however, may<br />

have weighed almost 2800 kg (Wroe et al.,<br />

2004).<br />

RHINARIUM AND MOUTH: The rhinarium,<br />

a prominent pad <strong>of</strong> naked gl<strong>and</strong>ular skin<br />

surrounding the nostrils, is divided by a<br />

median crease or sulcus (sulcus medianus;<br />

Ade, 1999) that extends from between the<br />

nares to the upper lip in all examined<br />

<strong>didelphid</strong>s. The part <strong>of</strong> the rhinarium that<br />

borders the upper lip (pars supralabialis) is<br />

broad, <strong>and</strong> its ventral margin is notched by<br />

one or two distinct grooves on each side <strong>of</strong><br />

the median sulcus (fig. 1). Two ventrolateral<br />

grooves are present on each side in most<br />

examined taxa, but only a single groove is<br />

present in Chironectes, Didelphis, Lestodelphys,<br />

Lutreolina, Metachirus, Monodelphis,<br />

Phil<strong>and</strong>er, <strong>and</strong> Thylamys pallidior. Dasyurids<br />

<strong>and</strong> Dromiciops have rhinaria that are<br />

essentially similar in gross morphology to<br />

those <strong>of</strong> <strong>didelphid</strong>s, with a pars supralabialis<br />

that makes broad contact with the upper lip;<br />

however, only a single ventrolateral groove is<br />

present in these taxa (Pocock, 1926: figs. 26–<br />

28). By contrast, the supralabial part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rhinarium is reduced to a narrow philtrum in<br />

caenolestids <strong>and</strong> peramelids, such that the<br />

groove-bearing ventral rhinarial margin <strong>of</strong><br />

other <strong>marsupials</strong> is effectively absent.<br />

The mouth is large in all <strong>didelphid</strong>s, with a<br />

posterior angle (angulis oris; Brown, 1971)<br />

that extends posteriorly to a point below the<br />

eye; the upper <strong>and</strong> lower oral margins are<br />

smooth or irregularly wrinkled <strong>and</strong> anatomically<br />

featureless. Most other <strong>marsupials</strong> have<br />

anatomically featureless oral margins like<br />

those <strong>of</strong> <strong>didelphid</strong>s, but caenolestids are<br />

uniquely provided with reciprocating fleshy<br />

lappets <strong>of</strong> unknown function on the upper<br />

<strong>and</strong> lower lips (Osgood, 1921: pl. 2; Bublitz,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!