06.05.2013 Views

Final Interventions Report - DWA Home Page

Final Interventions Report - DWA Home Page

Final Interventions Report - DWA Home Page

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Water Reconciliation Strategy Study for the Large Bulk Water Supply Systems: Greater Bloemfontein Area 24<br />

Those operations which appeared to be obvious non-starters were flagged. Comment was also made as to<br />

the extent of available information and whether the technology had been successfully utilised previously or<br />

elsewhere in the country or internationally.<br />

7.5.2 Costing<br />

Where possible, capital costs were based on costs available from previous studies. These costs were<br />

then escalated based on Contract Price Adjustment (CPA) indices to be representative of the base year<br />

costs (June 2009).<br />

An evaluation period of 50 years was selected for all water augmentation schemes, for determination of<br />

URVs. Discount rates of 6%, 8%, and 10% were used in URV calculations, to cater for funding by both<br />

MLM and the <strong>DWA</strong>. Multiplication factors were applied to allow for additional costs as follows:<br />

Preliminary and General costs of 20% were first added to the capital costs;<br />

A 10% Contingency sum was then added to the previous sub-total;<br />

A 15% Professional fees/site supervision sum was further added to the previous sub-total, to get the<br />

total construction cost estimate;<br />

The total construction cost estimate was spread over the first two financial years in the URV<br />

calculation; and<br />

VAT is excluded in URV calculations<br />

Equipment replacement periods for pumps (mechanical and electrical), pipelines, etc and desalination<br />

membranes were not considered.<br />

Capital costing and determination of URVs was undertaken at a conceptual level. Potential future electricity<br />

increases were not allowed for in URV calculations. Demand profile was assumed to be constant. Cost of<br />

electricity was assumed to be 35c/kWh for Eskom and 58c/kWh for Centlec (the local distributer). The<br />

Centlec supply was assumed for the water re-use options.<br />

7.5.3 Outcomes of Preliminary Screening Workshop<br />

The proceedings of the Preliminary Screening Workshop are bound into this document as Appendix 1. The<br />

comments and recommendations made at the workshop were taken into account when refining proposed<br />

interventions and developing reconciliation scenarios during the remainder of the study.<br />

7.5.4 Refinement of Selected Potential <strong>Interventions</strong><br />

After the Preliminary Screening Workshop, selected interventions were refined by improving cost estimates<br />

and carrying out more detailed determinations of the effects that the interventions would have on the yield<br />

of the water resources system if implemented. The refined interventions, as used for the final scenarios, are<br />

described in the remainder of this document. Details of estimates of capital and operating and maintenance<br />

costs for the interventions are contained in Appendix 2 and the calculation of unit reference values is shown<br />

in Appendix 3.<br />

<strong>Interventions</strong> <strong>Report</strong> June 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!