Board Agenda - 12-11-1985.pdf - College of the Desert
Board Agenda - 12-11-1985.pdf - College of the Desert Board Agenda - 12-11-1985.pdf - College of the Desert
CALL TO ORDER SALUTE TO THE FLAG 1. Present: COACHELLA VALLEY COhlMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES AGENDA - ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING DECEMBER 11, 1985 - 9:00 A.M. BOARD ROOM - ADMINISTRATION'BUILDING John Anderholt, Charles Hayden, Ray House, Virnita McDonald, Jackie Suitt, Eric Meeks, Student Trustee. Absent: Also Present: F. D. Stout, J. 8. Iantorno, C. A. Patterson, J. T. Pulliam, T. W. Spears 2. Organization for 1986: ELECTION OF OFFICERS REQUIRED AT ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING, A. Election of PER EDUCATION CODE. Officers: Chairman: Action: Election of Board Chairman: Moved Seconded Yes- No -- Vice-chairman: Action: Election of Board Vice-chairman: Clerk: Moved Seconded Yes- No Action: Election of Board Clerk: Moved Seconded Yes Continued.. . . . . .
- Page 2 and 3: 2. Organization for 1986: A. Electi
- Page 4 and 5: 6. Certificated Personnel: A. Job D
- Page 6 and 7: Page 6 Board Agenda December 11, 19
- Page 8 and 9: CALL TO ORDER SALUTE TO THE FLAG 1.
- Page 10 and 11: 14. Approval of Grant Application/
- Page 12 and 13: SUBJECT : CURRICULAR DEPARTMENT CHA
- Page 14 and 15: A[ ,CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL PLACEMENT
- Page 16 and 17: PERSONAL NECESSITY LEAVE (Administr
- Page 18 and 19: Personal Necessity -- Flow Chart
- Page 20 and 21: May 6, 1985 Paae 3.i ~< " Board Min
- Page 22 and 23: 11. Consults, advises and assists i
- Page 24 and 25: I RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT O
- Page 26 and 27: COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE j D I S TR I CT
- Page 29 and 30: - I - ) COUNTY 33 RlVERSlDE D 1 S T
- Page 31 and 32: COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE D l STR l CT 01
- Page 33 and 34: COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE D I ST R I C T
- Page 35 and 36: COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE D l S T R 1 CT
- Page 37 and 38: COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE D 1 S TR I CT 0
- Page 39 and 40: REF VENDOR NO. DATE w, VENDOR NAME
- Page 41 and 42: PANTRY CHEF INSTITUTE OF CULINARY A
- Page 43 and 44: C. Assists students to evaluate the
- Page 45 and 46: MEMORANDUM TO : \ i Dr. F. D. Stout
- Page 47 and 48: DATE : December 4, 1985 TO : Dr. St
- Page 49 and 50: 8 MARIA RIIOTNSKV pr ten! 01 Ihr an
- Page 51 and 52: FALL 1987 August 17 September 7 Nov
CALL TO ORDER<br />
SALUTE TO THE FLAG<br />
1. Present:<br />
COACHELLA VALLEY COhlMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT<br />
BOARD OF TRUSTEES<br />
AGENDA - ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING<br />
DECEMBER <strong>11</strong>, 1985 - 9:00 A.M.<br />
BOARD ROOM - ADMINISTRATION'BUILDING<br />
John Anderholt, Charles Hayden, Ray House, Virnita McDonald,<br />
Jackie Suitt, Eric Meeks, Student Trustee.<br />
Absent:<br />
Also Present: F. D. Stout, J. 8. Iantorno, C. A. Patterson,<br />
J. T. Pulliam, T. W. Spears<br />
2. Organization for 1986: ELECTION OF OFFICERS REQUIRED AT ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING,<br />
A. Election <strong>of</strong> PER EDUCATION CODE.<br />
Officers:<br />
Chairman: Action: Election <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Chairman:<br />
Moved Seconded Yes- No --<br />
Vice-chairman: Action: Election <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Vice-chairman:<br />
Clerk:<br />
Moved Seconded Yes- No<br />
Action: Election <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Clerk:<br />
Moved Seconded Yes<br />
Continued.. . . . . .
2. Organization for 1986:<br />
A. Election <strong>of</strong> Officers:<br />
(Cont .)<br />
Secretary: Action: Election <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Secretary:<br />
Moved - Seconded YesNo-<br />
Representative/ Action: Election <strong>of</strong> Representative/County Committee:<br />
County Committee :<br />
1-loved Seconded YesNo-<br />
Representative/ Action: Election <strong>of</strong> Representative/California<br />
CACC : Association <strong>of</strong> Community <strong>College</strong>s:<br />
Moved Seconded Yes No<br />
B. Determination <strong>of</strong> Action: Determination <strong>of</strong> Meeting Dates, Times,<br />
Meeting Dates, and Locations, 1986:<br />
iimes ,-and Locations,<br />
1986:<br />
REQUIRED BY EDUCATION CODE.<br />
C. Naming <strong>of</strong><br />
Authorized<br />
Agents:<br />
Page 2<br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> ,<br />
December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />
Moved Seconded Yes- No -<br />
Action: Naming <strong>of</strong> Authorized Agents:<br />
OFFICERS MUST BE NAMED BY BOARD - PER EDUCATION CODE.<br />
Moved Seconded YesNo-<br />
Continued.. . . . . .
3. Minutes:<br />
4. Claims:<br />
<strong>11</strong>/22/85 40,593.52<br />
<strong>11</strong>/25/85 9,244.51<br />
TOTALS 157,791.24<br />
5. Oral Communication:<br />
Approval <strong>of</strong> November 20, 1985 Minutes:<br />
-<br />
-- - -<br />
Page 3<br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />
December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />
Moved Seconded Yes - No --<br />
A. Action regarding Payroll #5<br />
Certificated $433,634.23<br />
Classified 177,290.15<br />
TOTAL $610,924.38<br />
B. Claims:<br />
FUND FUND FUND FUND<br />
- 101 - 102 - 105<br />
330 TOTALS<br />
43.20 16,406.81<br />
66.44 548.99 33,890.20<br />
377.67 1,000.00 38,564.00<br />
1,514.10<br />
20.00 19,634.50<br />
176.00 40,769.52<br />
2,932.77 5,210.70 1,148.50 600.00 17,904.18<br />
2,932.77 5,210.70 1,148.50 1,600.00 168,683.21<br />
Moved Seconded Yes No<br />
Continued.. . . . . .
6. Certificated<br />
Personnel:<br />
A. Job Description<br />
For Pantry Chef.<br />
7. Management<br />
Personnel:<br />
Action regarding Certificated Personnel :<br />
A. Job Description for Pantry Chef.<br />
Page 4<br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />
December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />
RECOMMENDING JOB DESCRIPTION FOR A CULINARY ARTS POSITION.<br />
-<br />
Moved Seconded Yes No<br />
B.<br />
Moved Seconded Yes No 1<br />
Moved Seconded Yes -- No<br />
Action regarding Management Personnel:<br />
NO ACTION ANTICIPATED.<br />
Moved Seconded Yes No--<br />
Continued. ...,..<br />
1
8. Classified<br />
Personnel :<br />
A. Placement<br />
Listing:<br />
9. Authorization to<br />
Bid/24 Station<br />
Language Lab:<br />
10. Approval <strong>of</strong><br />
Textbooks:<br />
Action regarding Classified Personnel:<br />
A. Placement Listing:<br />
ROUTINE APPOINTMENTS, REASSIGNMENTS, RESIGNATIONS,<br />
SUBSTITUTES AND SHORT-TERM.<br />
Moved Seconded Yes -- No<br />
Moved Seconded Yes No<br />
Action regarding Authorization to Bid/24 Station<br />
Language Lab:<br />
Page 5<br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />
December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />
REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT BIDS FOR PURCHASE.<br />
Moved Seconded Yes No<br />
- -- --<br />
Action regarding Approval <strong>of</strong> Textbooks:<br />
REOUESTING APPROVAL OF NEW TEXTBOOKS FOR STUDENTS.<br />
Moved Seconded - Yes --No-<br />
Continued
Page 6<br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />
December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />
<strong>11</strong>. Academic Calendars Action regarding Academic Calendars for 1986-87, 1987-88,<br />
for 1986-87, 1987-88, and 1988-89:<br />
1988-89:<br />
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF ACADEMIC CALENDARS.<br />
<strong>12</strong>. Out-<strong>of</strong>-State<br />
Travel :<br />
Moved Seconded Yes_- No -<br />
Action regarding Out-<strong>of</strong>-State Travel:<br />
REqUESTING APPROVAL TO ATTEND CONFERENCE.<br />
Moved Seconded Yes- No-<br />
13. Approval <strong>of</strong> 1986<br />
Action regarding Approval <strong>of</strong> 1986 Spring Schedule <strong>of</strong><br />
Surina Schedule <strong>of</strong> Classes/Both Camuuses:<br />
ciassesl~oth Campuses:<br />
ROUTINE APPROVAL OF CLASS SCHEDULES.<br />
14. Reports and<br />
Information:<br />
Moved Seconded Yes- No -<br />
A. Student Trustee Report.<br />
B. Update <strong>of</strong> Golf Institute.<br />
Continued .......<br />
:
15. O<strong>the</strong>r Items:<br />
A.<br />
**** CLOSED SESSION ****<br />
Action regarding O<strong>the</strong>r 1,tems:<br />
Moved Seconded Yes No<br />
Moved Seconded Yes No<br />
16. Adjournment: Floved Seconded Yes- No<br />
Time<br />
Page 7<br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />
December <strong>11</strong>, 1985
CALL TO ORDER<br />
SALUTE TO THE FLAG<br />
1. Present:<br />
Seating <strong>of</strong> Trustees:<br />
2. Minutes:<br />
3. Claims:<br />
DATE<br />
09/19/85<br />
10/03/85<br />
10/04/85<br />
10/07/85<br />
10/08/85<br />
10/09/85<br />
10/<strong>11</strong>/85<br />
10/14/85<br />
TOTALS<br />
FUND<br />
100<br />
3,643.48<br />
16,239.78<br />
9,886.68<br />
14,770.76<br />
23,055.07<br />
4,927.69<br />
1,592.49<br />
42,658.21<br />
142,275.32<br />
58,595.09<br />
9,914.72<br />
17,142.98<br />
<strong>11</strong>1,140.93<br />
76,418.40<br />
37,644.47<br />
569,906.07<br />
COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT<br />
BOARD OF TRUSTEES<br />
MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING<br />
NOVEMBER 20, 1985 - 9:00 A.M.<br />
BOARD ROOM - ADMINISTRATION BUILDING<br />
Charles Hayden, Virnita McDonald, Jackie Suitt,<br />
Ray House, Eric Meeks, Student Trustee.<br />
Absent: John Anderholt<br />
Also Present: Dr. F. D. Stout, Dr. J. B. Iantorno, Dr. C. A.<br />
Patterson, Mr. J. T. Pulliam, Mr. T. W. Spears<br />
Mr. Ray House, newly elected Trustee, was seated to<br />
complete <strong>the</strong> unexpired term <strong>of</strong> Ole Nordland.<br />
Mr. Eric Meeks, Student Trustee, was seated as a non-voting<br />
member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees.<br />
It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden, and<br />
carried, that <strong>the</strong> Minutes <strong>of</strong> October 16, 1985 be approved.<br />
It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden, and<br />
carried, that Payroll #4 (Item A) and Claims (Item B) be<br />
approved as fol 1 ows :<br />
A. Ratification <strong>of</strong> Payroll $4:<br />
Certificated $519,900.29<br />
Classified 208,370.02<br />
TOTAL $728,270.31<br />
B. Claims:<br />
FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND<br />
- 101 102 - - 105 330 - 900 TOTALS<br />
Continued... ....
Oral Communication:<br />
Certificated<br />
Personnel:<br />
6. Management<br />
Personnel<br />
7. Classified<br />
Personnel:<br />
8. Consultant<br />
Agreement:<br />
Approval to<br />
Adopt Updated<br />
Administrative<br />
Regulation 14152.4/<br />
Personal Necessity<br />
Leave :<br />
Approval to Adopt<br />
Update <strong>of</strong> Faculty<br />
Responsibilities:<br />
Approval to<br />
Accept District Audit:<br />
Authorization to<br />
Purchase Financial<br />
Data S<strong>of</strong>tware:<br />
Authorization to Bid<br />
for Re-Ro<strong>of</strong>ing <strong>of</strong><br />
Student Services &<br />
Shower Locker Bldgs:<br />
Page 2<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
Dr. Iantorno introduced members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Student Senate<br />
who were present.<br />
A. It was moved by Mr. Hayden, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />
and carried, that authorization be given to advertise<br />
for 3 chef instructors. Employment is contingent upon<br />
outside funding.<br />
B. It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. House,<br />
and carried, that Part-time Instructors for 1985 Fall<br />
Semester be employed as listed. (See page 3a)<br />
It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />
and carried, that Department Chairpersons for Spring,<br />
1986 Semester, be appointed as listed. (See page 3b)<br />
It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />
and carried, that <strong>the</strong> placement listing be approved as<br />
presented. (See pages 3c,d)<br />
It was moved by Mr. Hayden, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />
and carried, that Dr. Glenn Gooder and Dr. John McCuen<br />
be employed as consultants to study Institutional Goals<br />
and Objectives and Organizational Structure, and to<br />
make recommendations, for a fee not to exceed $9,000.00,<br />
plus $700.00 per diem. (See page 3e)<br />
It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />
and carried, that Administrative Regulation iY4152.4,<br />
Personal Necessity Leave, be amended as presented.<br />
(See pages 3f,g,h,i)<br />
It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. House,<br />
and carried, that Faculty Responsibilities be adopted<br />
as presented. (See pages 3j,k,l)<br />
It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />
and carried, that <strong>the</strong> 1984-85 Audit be accepted.<br />
It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />
and carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to<br />
purchase financial data s<strong>of</strong>tware system from DSK Inc.,<br />
Riverside. Purchase price $35,000.00.<br />
It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mr. Hayden, and<br />
carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to advertise<br />
for bids for re-ro<strong>of</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> Student Center & Shower Locker<br />
Buildings.<br />
Continued.......
14. Approval <strong>of</strong><br />
Grant Application/<br />
Riverside Arts<br />
Foundation:<br />
15. Nursery School<br />
Education/Child<br />
Care Training<br />
Center:<br />
16. Authorization to<br />
Advertise/Sale <strong>of</strong><br />
Surplus Property:<br />
17. Award <strong>of</strong> Bid/<br />
Purchase <strong>of</strong><br />
Backhoe:<br />
18. Selection <strong>of</strong> Day,<br />
Time and Place <strong>of</strong><br />
Annual Organizational<br />
Meeting:<br />
19. Hearing/<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Counter<br />
Proposal to<br />
CSEA Contract.<br />
20. Adjournment:<br />
Page 3<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />
and carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to<br />
apply for grant from Riverside Arts Foundation to provide<br />
a pr<strong>of</strong>essional string quartet in residence.<br />
It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />
and carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to<br />
seek funding for Nursery School Education/Child Care<br />
Training Center in cooperation with <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> Palm <strong>Desert</strong>.<br />
It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />
and carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to<br />
advertise sale <strong>of</strong> surplus property.<br />
It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. House, and<br />
carried, that purchase award be made to Whitney Machinery<br />
Inc., Riverside, for Backhoe.<br />
It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mrs. McDonald, and<br />
carried, that <strong>the</strong> annual Organization Meeting be held on<br />
December <strong>11</strong>, 1985, at 9:00 a.m., in <strong>the</strong> Palm <strong>Desert</strong> campus<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Room.<br />
Open discussion declared for <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees Counter<br />
proposal to CSEA contract. No comments from audience.<br />
The meeting was adjourned at 10:55 a.m.<br />
Approved By:<br />
Date: /&-I/- f5
PALM DESERT CAMPUS<br />
Subject: Part-Time Faculty - Fall 1905 Semester<br />
NAME COURSE LOCATION<br />
GOLAY, Richard L. (SUB) Air Condtng/Refrg COD<br />
*KERR, Charles Play Production/Tech COD<br />
LUPTON, Cynthia Celebration for Juniors COD<br />
*POOLEY , Phi 1 i p Respiratory Therapy EMC<br />
*SULLIVAN, Mark (SUB) Music Perfor~nar~ce Piano COO<br />
*TAYLOR, Frances (SUB) Preschool Science COD<br />
* First assignment at COD<br />
COPPER MOUNTAIN CAMPUS<br />
- ~~~ - ,~<br />
SUBJ: <strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> Item - Fall 1985<br />
Part-time Instructors<br />
DATE: November 7, 1985<br />
Name Course Title<br />
~~<br />
~~~<br />
Page 3a<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
NON COMM<br />
CREDIT CREDIT SERV<br />
Community Service<br />
Location Credi t/Non Credit<br />
"BELTRANO, Jose Developmental Education MCAGCC Non Credit<br />
*HUFFMAN, Donald Career Center CMC-Li b Non Credit<br />
*First CMC Teaching Assignment<br />
Continued.... ...<br />
X<br />
X<br />
X<br />
X<br />
X<br />
X
SUBJECT : CURRICULAR DEPARTMENT CHAIRPERSONS FOR SPRING 1986<br />
Please recommend to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees at <strong>the</strong> November meeting to<br />
authorize <strong>the</strong> following Department Chairperson positions and persons<br />
recommended to fulfill <strong>the</strong>se important assignments for <strong>the</strong> Spring<br />
semester <strong>of</strong> 1986.<br />
Department Chairperson positions and <strong>the</strong> duties which <strong>the</strong> persons carry<br />
out are essential for management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> college instructional programs.<br />
The one semester assignment has caused unnecessary concern among <strong>the</strong><br />
Chairpersons.<br />
As <strong>the</strong> Spring class schedule is currently being developed and as<br />
preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1986 Fall class schedule must begin in early February,<br />
<strong>the</strong> decision needs to be made now so that necessary planning may take<br />
place. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate<br />
to contact me.<br />
Administration <strong>of</strong> Justice Jim Mills<br />
Agriculture Mike Watling<br />
Art Austin Killian<br />
Business Jose Gallegos<br />
Communications Doug Garrison<br />
Ma<strong>the</strong>matics, Engineering and Technology Bruce Usher<br />
Foreign Language Dan Deti<br />
Health, Physical Education & Recreation John Marman<br />
Home Economics Jim Pel1<br />
blusi c John Norman<br />
Sciences George Meyer<br />
Social Sciences Charles Flatt<br />
Continued .......<br />
Page 3b<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985
CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL PLACEMENT LISTING<br />
FILLMAN, George<br />
Position Title: Typist, Instructional Services<br />
Range and Step: 5-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $1006.00 per month<br />
Effective Date: November 1, 1985<br />
--<br />
FRIAS, Gail<br />
Position Title: Secretary, Community Svs. (Cal State)<br />
Range and Step: 7-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour - 20 hrs/wk.<br />
Effective Date: . October 25, 1985<br />
PIVAR, Corinne<br />
Position Title: Secretary, Business Dept.<br />
Range and Step: 7-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour - 20 hrs/wk. - 10 months<br />
Effective Date: November 8, 1985<br />
B. Reassignment:<br />
COOK,<br />
From: To :<br />
- -<br />
Page 3c<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
PositionTitle: Sr.Typist,Adm.&Records Teach. Assistant I<br />
Range and Step: 6-0 7-8<br />
Beginning Salary: $<strong>11</strong><strong>12</strong>.00 per month $<strong>11</strong>68.00 per month - 10 mo.<br />
Effective Date: November 1 , 1985<br />
C. Resignations:<br />
Ai4BERS , Joan<br />
Position Title: Secretary, Business Dept.<br />
Effective Da'te: October 25, 1985<br />
BUEVENS, Barbara<br />
Position Title: Typist, Campus Parking<br />
Effective Date: November 1, 1985<br />
C. Resignations: (continued)<br />
LAFFOON, Barbara<br />
Position Title: Teaching Assistant I, Office Occupations Center<br />
Effective Date: October 31, 1985<br />
RICKABAUGH, David<br />
Position Title: Grounds Keeper<br />
EffectiveDate: November], 1985
A[<br />
,CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL PLACEMENT LISTING (CONT.)<br />
A. Substitutes:<br />
HALL, Stacey<br />
Position Title: Typist, Instructional Services<br />
Range and Step: 5-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $5.72 per hour<br />
Effective Date: October 28 thru November 8, 1985<br />
PIVAR, Corinne<br />
Position Title: Secretary, Business Dept.<br />
Range and Step: 7-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour - 20 hrs./wk.<br />
Effective Date: October 28 thru November 8, 1985<br />
B. Short-Term:<br />
DAVIES, Tommy<br />
Position Title: Food Service Utility Worker<br />
Range and Step: 3-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $5.19 per hour - not to exceed 30 hrs./wk.<br />
Effective Date: October 14, 1985 thru February 28, 1986<br />
FILLMAN, George<br />
Position Title: Registration Clerk<br />
Range and Step: 5-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $5.72 per hour<br />
Effective Date: October 21, thru October 31, 1985<br />
MILLER, Jewel<br />
Position Title:<br />
Range and Step:<br />
Beginning Salary:<br />
Effective Date:<br />
PAYNE, Mary<br />
Position Title:<br />
Range and Step:<br />
Beginning Salary:<br />
Effective Date:<br />
WELCH, Christine<br />
Position Title:<br />
Range and Step:<br />
Beginning Salary:<br />
Effective Date:<br />
Food Service Utility Worker<br />
3-A<br />
$5.19 per hour - not to exceed 20 hrs./wk.<br />
October 15 thru December 23, 1985<br />
Secretary, Agriculture Dept.<br />
7-D<br />
$7.35 per hour - not to exceed 40 hrs.<br />
October 15, 1985<br />
Registration Clerk<br />
5-A<br />
$5.72 per hour<br />
November 1 thru November 15, 1985<br />
Page 3d<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985
Page 3e<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
November 14, 1985 I<br />
Or. F. D. Stout<br />
Superintendent<br />
Coachella Valley Conlmunity <strong>College</strong> District<br />
43-500 Monterey Avenue<br />
Palm <strong>Desert</strong>, CA 92260<br />
RE: PROPOSAL TO STUDY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATIONAL<br />
STRUCTURE OF COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
Dear Dr. Stout:<br />
He understand that <strong>the</strong> Coachella Valley Community <strong>College</strong> District desires<br />
a study <strong>of</strong> goals and objectives and organizational structure.<br />
ltle have proposed that <strong>the</strong> study be conducted jointly by Dr. Glenn G. Gooder<br />
and Dr. John T. McCuen and have indicated that we anticipate completion<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study within ninety days <strong>of</strong> authorization to proceed.<br />
The consultants expect to devote at least fifteen days each to <strong>the</strong> study.<br />
Even if additional days are required, <strong>the</strong> work will be perforsed at a cost<br />
not to exceed $9,000 plus up to $700 for travel and per diem related to <strong>the</strong><br />
stutly. Travel and Per diem will be billed at cost but not to exceed $700.<br />
The District will be billed upon submission by <strong>the</strong> consultants <strong>of</strong> twentyfive<br />
copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> final report to <strong>the</strong> Trustees and <strong>the</strong> Superintendent.<br />
If this proposal ~neets with your approval, would you please so indicate<br />
below and return one copy to me.<br />
s-<br />
Very sincerely<br />
Glenn G. Gooder, Ph.0<br />
!~!J/vs<br />
Enclosure<br />
AGREEO/AUTliORIZATIOi4 TO PROCEED<br />
-<br />
Title<br />
Continued. ......<br />
I
PERSONAL NECESSITY LEAVE<br />
(Administrative Regulation)<br />
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
Page 3f<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
4152.4<br />
A certificated employee may use any days <strong>of</strong> earned sick leave (not to exceed<br />
six-days in any school year), for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> personal' necessity, as<br />
defined and delineated herein:<br />
1. The employee shall not be required to secure advance permission for<br />
leave taken for any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following reasons:<br />
a. Death or serious illness <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> hls/her immediate family:<br />
(this ruling does not infringe upon <strong>the</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> "Bereavement<br />
Leave: as described in Section 87788 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> - Code or <strong>Board</strong> Pol icy<br />
#4151.3. but may be used to supplement <strong>the</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> aforesaid<br />
Section). For <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this section, serious illness shall<br />
be defined as "Life Threatening."<br />
b. Accident involving his/her person or property, or <strong>the</strong> person or<br />
property <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> hisjher imnediate family (Section 87784).<br />
For <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this section, <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> property shall<br />
coincide with <strong>the</strong> definitions <strong>of</strong> real and personal property as<br />
established for tax purposes.<br />
2. The employee shall, whenever possible, submit a formal written request<br />
prior to <strong>the</strong> taking <strong>of</strong> Personal Necessity Leave. In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>the</strong><br />
leave is based on i tem la or lb, advance permission is not required.<br />
The employee shall, however, submit <strong>the</strong> request as soon as possible<br />
subsequent to <strong>the</strong> leave. All requests for Personal Necessity Leave<br />
shall be submitted on <strong>the</strong> Personal Necessity Request Form and<br />
Continued..
shall be directed to respective administrative Dean<br />
i .e. <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Instruction, <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Students or <strong>the</strong><br />
Dean <strong>of</strong> Educational Services.<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
3. In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>the</strong> request for Personal Necessity Leave clearly falls<br />
within <strong>the</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> la and/or lb, <strong>the</strong> Dean shall approve <strong>the</strong><br />
request and forward signed copies to <strong>the</strong> personnel <strong>of</strong>fice who, in turn,<br />
will advise payroll departments. If <strong>the</strong> Dean has any doubt concerning<br />
<strong>the</strong> propriety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leave, he shall submit <strong>the</strong> request to <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Leaves for review purposes. After a complete review, <strong>the</strong><br />
recomniendation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Leaves shall be returned to <strong>the</strong> Dean for<br />
decision and processing. Whenever possible, <strong>the</strong> Dean's decision<br />
should be rendered prior to <strong>the</strong> absence. All requests, recommendations<br />
and final decisions shall be kept in <strong>the</strong> personnel <strong>of</strong>fice and made<br />
available for use as precedent in subsequent cases. The personnel<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice shall compile a report on a periodic basis and make such report<br />
available to <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Instruction, <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Students, <strong>the</strong><br />
Dean <strong>of</strong> Educational Services and <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Leaves.<br />
4. Personal Necessity Leave shall not impinge upon E.C. Section 87764.<br />
5. If <strong>the</strong>re is any deviation from <strong>the</strong> original leave request, <strong>the</strong><br />
eniployee utilizing Personal Necessity Leave shall report such deviation<br />
to <strong>the</strong> appropriate Dean.<br />
6. Paragraphs 2 through 5 constitute <strong>the</strong> method by which <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />
.has prescribed "pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> personal necessity" for Section 87784<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Education Code.<br />
Written February 1981<br />
Revised January 1985<br />
Continued. ......
Personal Necessity<br />
--<br />
Flow Chart
PERSONAL NECESSITY<br />
Request Form<br />
Date(s) <strong>of</strong> Absence: Hours :<br />
Reason: (Check appropriate item(s))<br />
Page 3i<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
- (a) Death or serious illness <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> my imnediate family.<br />
- (b) Accident, involving my person or property, or <strong>the</strong> person or<br />
property <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> my inmediate family.<br />
-- (c) O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
Action: Request Approved Request Denied<br />
Dean's Signature<br />
Note: Submit both copies to <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> your area i .e. Instruction, Students O r<br />
Educational Services<br />
Continued .......
May 6, 1985 Paae 3.i<br />
~< "<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
4<strong>11</strong>5-Faculty Responsibilities (Policy)<br />
Objective:<br />
The clarification <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional person's duties and responsibilities<br />
is inte18ded to provide a better understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional's role.<br />
The <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> faculty performance expectancies serve <strong>the</strong> same<br />
purpose. The purpose is to provide faculty members and o<strong>the</strong>r parties a<br />
clearer understanding <strong>of</strong> what <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> identifies as faculty<br />
responsibilities during contracted days <strong>of</strong> service. It is recognized that<br />
conflicts may result in meeting <strong>the</strong>se responsibilities. Faculty members<br />
are expected to resolve <strong>the</strong>se conflicts pr<strong>of</strong>essionally.<br />
A. Instructional Responsibilities-<br />
. Provide instruction in accordance with <strong>the</strong> philosophy <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> stated in <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> catalog.<br />
2. Provide instruction in classes according to approved<br />
course outlines.<br />
3. Acquaint all students in writing with course requirements,<br />
student performance evaluation procedures, field trip<br />
demands and attendance requirements during <strong>the</strong> first week<br />
<strong>the</strong> class is in session.<br />
4. Submit all required grade, eligibility and o<strong>the</strong>r reports to<br />
<strong>the</strong> designated <strong>of</strong>fice by <strong>the</strong> time stated in accordance with<br />
standardized procedures for record keeping.<br />
5. Full-time faculty should meet all classes as scheduled and should<br />
post and maintain a minimum <strong>of</strong> five (5) <strong>of</strong>fice hours per week.<br />
6. Assist and guide students beyond regular class and <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
hours.<br />
7. Make timely evaluations <strong>of</strong> student performance to measure<br />
achievement in course work.<br />
8. Maintain security for and during all examinations.<br />
B. Related Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Responsibilities-<br />
1. .Be aware <strong>of</strong> established emergency and safety procedures.<br />
2. Report in accordance with annual contract dates and attend<br />
scheduled faculty meetings, department meetings and meetings<br />
<strong>of</strong> coc~mitiees <strong>of</strong> which one is a member.<br />
3. Attend commencement exercises in academic attire.<br />
4. Clay sponsor or advise in student activities as an alternative<br />
to committee membership responsibilities.<br />
5. Restrict o<strong>the</strong>r outside activities that interfere with faculty<br />
responsibilities.<br />
Continued .......
6. Schedule guest speakers according to <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> policy.<br />
Page 3k<br />
<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />
November 20, 1985<br />
7. Make all requests for <strong>of</strong>f-campus college activities through<br />
tile departnlent chairperson. ff students have to be excused<br />
from classes o<strong>the</strong>r than one for which <strong>the</strong> activity is planned,<br />
a list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se students must be submitted to <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Students<br />
or <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Educational Services at <strong>the</strong> Copper Mountain Campus.<br />
-<br />
8. Take reasonable care <strong>of</strong> district property.<br />
9. Advise students-<br />
a. Assist students with study problems.<br />
b. Refer students to appropriate college sources for<br />
information or fur<strong>the</strong>r counseling.<br />
c. Assist students to evaluate <strong>the</strong>ir potential for successful<br />
achievement in <strong>the</strong> instructor's subject field.<br />
d. Provide inforn~ation concerning vocational opportunities<br />
in <strong>the</strong> instructor's field.<br />
e. Provide full information regarding content <strong>of</strong> courses.<br />
f. Provide inforniatioti regarding post communi ty college<br />
educational and training opportunities and demands in<br />
<strong>the</strong> instructor's field.<br />
10. Initiates and/or participates in-<br />
a. Establishing educational goals for his/her area <strong>of</strong><br />
instruction.<br />
b. Annual updating <strong>of</strong> five-year academic plan and three-year<br />
projection <strong>of</strong> resource needs for his/her area <strong>of</strong> instruction.<br />
c. Evaluating currlcula and proposing new currlcula or<br />
nlodifications to existing curricula.<br />
d. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional evaluation in accordance with district pol icy.<br />
e. Development <strong>of</strong> requests for instructional support services<br />
including 1 ibrary, audio-visual, learning resources and<br />
tutorial services.<br />
f. Preparing information for <strong>College</strong> catalog and schedule<br />
<strong>of</strong> classes.<br />
g. Developing requests for special grants and projects.<br />
ti. Selecting equipment, supplies, books and o<strong>the</strong>r instructional<br />
support materials.<br />
i. Exercising budget control as assigned.<br />
j. Inventorying and recording <strong>of</strong> instructional :resources.<br />
k. Preparing and submitting to <strong>the</strong> department chairpersons<br />
for review a statement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> title, author and publisher<br />
<strong>of</strong> all texts, required reading, workbooks or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
material for purchase by students.<br />
1. Advising students during registration for both semesters.<br />
Continued .......
<strong>11</strong>. Consults, advises and assists in-<br />
Page 31<br />
Bbard Minutes<br />
November 20, 1905<br />
Determination <strong>of</strong> need and assignment <strong>of</strong> staff.<br />
Recruitment, selection, orientation and in-service training<br />
<strong>of</strong> staff.<br />
Maintenance <strong>of</strong> liaison and conununication within area <strong>of</strong><br />
instruction and o<strong>the</strong>r departments, students, college<br />
committees, o<strong>the</strong>r educational institutions, lay advisory<br />
groups, business and industry, related community agencies<br />
and <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> Public Information Office.<br />
Preparation <strong>of</strong> s m s<br />
for personnel, rooms, <strong>of</strong>fices<br />
and special facilities as <strong>the</strong>y relate to his/her area <strong>of</strong><br />
instruction.<br />
Development and improven~ent <strong>of</strong> instructional services.<br />
Plans for improvement and development <strong>of</strong> instructional<br />
facilities.<br />
Develops~ent <strong>of</strong> instructional <strong>of</strong>ferings for special<br />
sessions such as evening division, summer session and<br />
instructional television.<br />
Recruitment and selection <strong>of</strong> students for college career<br />
programs.
TRUSTEES<br />
J. John Anderholt<br />
COLLEkE OF THE DESERl<br />
December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES FOR BOARD APPROVAL<br />
Charles H. Hayden, Jr.<br />
Ray House<br />
Virnita McDonald<br />
Jackie Suitt<br />
OTHERS<br />
F. D. Stout<br />
T. W. Spears<br />
Joseph B. Iantorno<br />
C. A. Patterson<br />
James T. Pulliam<br />
William Kroonen<br />
Jim R. Pel1<br />
Howard Rutan<br />
Terry Green<br />
Jacqulyn Weiss
I RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHUOLS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL UARRAMTS<br />
k Y 1<br />
I<br />
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/06/85<br />
O I STR I CT 01 CUACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />
PAGE: 1<br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
VENDOR<br />
NO.<br />
P29452 07/18/85 1<strong>12</strong>84<br />
P29599<br />
P20964<br />
P29892<br />
P29853<br />
P32068<br />
P32067<br />
P32065<br />
P32062 10/30/85 10572<br />
P32027<br />
P29790<br />
P29653<br />
I P29499<br />
P20943<br />
I P29498<br />
P29420<br />
P32051<br />
1 P29713<br />
I<br />
, P29748<br />
P29988<br />
P29932<br />
FT9924<br />
P29834<br />
08/08/85 <strong>11</strong>968<br />
10/22/85 10329<br />
10/02/85 <strong>12</strong>155<br />
10/02/85 <strong>11</strong>455<br />
10/30/85 <strong>11</strong>346<br />
10/30/85 <strong>11</strong>959<br />
10/30/85 10759<br />
10/30/85 <strong>11</strong>944<br />
09/17/85 10604<br />
08/23/85 10530<br />
1 07/18/85,10013<br />
08/01/85 <strong>12</strong>684<br />
10/29/85 10088<br />
08/01 /85 <strong>12</strong>683<br />
10/24/85 <strong>12</strong>810<br />
09/09/85 10087<br />
09/17/85 <strong>12</strong>723<br />
10/16/85 10184<br />
10/16/85 10191<br />
I<br />
10/10/85 <strong>12</strong>775<br />
09/26/85 <strong>11</strong> 2041<br />
I<br />
VENDOR NAME / CLAIM / FUND 1 L ~ /SITE C<br />
STECK VAUGHN CO X28785 100 3AK 00 4930000000<br />
GMGE~~~&+~G~AC~CCP<br />
-51: 100 4AG 00 01 09000306<br />
OUT PASTEUP SUPPLY CB<br />
SCIENCE RESEARCH I~~~~~~<br />
100 4AE 00 0957300330<br />
001 00 0000000000<br />
SEARS, RBEBUCK AN0 CO. X28789<br />
NO .<br />
STEVES OFFICE SUPPLY X28790<br />
NATIONAL LEAGUE FBR NURSING X28791<br />
STEVES OFFICE SUPPLY X28792<br />
/ PROGRAM<br />
OFCCU CONSTRUCTIBN X28765 100 2BM 00 6500000000<br />
SCIENCE RESEARCH X28766 100 3AK 00 4930000000<br />
MAC MlLLAN PUBLISHING X28767 100 4AZ 00 6105000000<br />
K E S Q TV X28768 100 1FI 00 6837000000<br />
APPLIED AIR ENGINEERING X28769 100 2BM 00 6500000000<br />
K S E S RADIO X28770 100 3EC 00 6003000000<br />
PARKER PUB. CO. X28771 100 50A 00 0000000000<br />
DRAMATIST PLAY SERVICE X28772 100 4AT 00 100700061 1<br />
NATIONAL MUSIC SERVICE. INC. X28773 100 4AU 00 1004300000<br />
PRBDUCTlBN GRAPHICS X28774 100 4AU 00 1004000000<br />
J 8 P GARDEN SUPPLY X28775 100 4AG 00 0109000306<br />
STEVES BFFICE SUPPLY X28776 100 3AK 00 4930000000<br />
3AK 00 4930000000<br />
WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC X28777 100 288 00 67<strong>11</strong>000000<br />
CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY,INC. X28778 100 4AZ 00 6105000000<br />
BAYLESS STATIONERS X28779 100 2BB 00 67<strong>11</strong>000000<br />
CUNSBLI DATE0 ELECTRIC X28780 100 2BM 00 6500000000<br />
NATIONAL IRRIGATION X28781 100 2BM 00 6500000000<br />
AMERICAN SCIENTlFlC PRODUCTS X28782 100 4AS 00 1905000000<br />
S 8 S OPTlKA X28783 100 4AS 00 191 1000000<br />
TWENTIETH CENTURY PLASTICS INC X28784 100 4AB 00 0703000324<br />
CLAl M AMOUNT 1 I WARRANT AMOUNT I
-<br />
RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT BF SCHBBLS<br />
i REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS I<br />
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D I S T R I C T 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CBMM CBLLEGE<br />
VENDOR<br />
NO . VENDOR NAME<br />
I I<br />
10/30/85 <strong>12</strong>557 PRICE CLUB<br />
NB. 1 1 FUND ILBC I I I<br />
X28793<br />
/SITE<br />
I<br />
08/05/85 10321 C ~ , ! & ~ ~ ~ i i ' c ~ i&';'i_= j < ~ ~ ss;:mm<br />
" j _<br />
10/29/85 10630 AMERICAN HBSPlTAL ASSOCIATIBN X28795<br />
10/29/85 <strong>12</strong>820 SAN DlEGB MESA CBLLEGE X28796<br />
09/26/85 10385 CANNON PIANOS X28797<br />
10/10/85 10365 CANNBN PIANOS X28798<br />
09/09/85 10222 ACCENT PRINTING X28799<br />
08/22/85 10248 PALM DESERT PHARMACY X28800<br />
10/16/85 10019 HBUSTON LUMBER X28801<br />
lO/l8/85 10362 DESERT EMPIRE TRACTOR X28802<br />
09/17/85 10255 NOEL BRUSH AWARDS X28803<br />
10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>796 SCIENTIFIC AUOIB ELECTRONICS X28804<br />
10/24/85 <strong>12</strong>613 VIDE0 RESOURCE PACKET X28805<br />
10/29/85 <strong>11</strong>538 J W PEPPER BF LOS ANGELES X28806<br />
10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>102 FBBTLOCKER a7497 X28807<br />
10/29/85 <strong>12</strong>747 BUSINESS WEEK X28808<br />
08/23/85 10008 PALM DESERT STATIONERS X28809<br />
10/29/85 <strong>12</strong>721 MIKE RBONEY X28810<br />
<strong>11</strong>/06/85 <strong>12</strong>498 HENRY BURNETT X288<strong>11</strong><br />
<strong>11</strong>/06/85 <strong>11</strong>905 ELISE HALLINAN X288<strong>12</strong><br />
<strong>11</strong>/06/85 10780 BRUCE USHER X28813<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/06/85<br />
PAGE: 2<br />
PROGRAM 1 BBJECT CLAl M AMOUNT 1 WARRANT WARRANT AMBUNT 1
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
j D I S TR I CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CflMPl COLLEGE<br />
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT BF SCHOOLS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/06/85<br />
PAGE: 3
I COUNTY<br />
1<br />
33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D 1 S T R l C T 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CBMM CBLLEGE<br />
REF<br />
VENDBR NAME<br />
NO.<br />
-965<br />
R R BBWKER<br />
-29992<br />
R 8 B GLASS CB<br />
P29964<br />
SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE<br />
P29963<br />
SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE<br />
-29962<br />
RAY FRANKS PUBLISHING RANCH<br />
RAY FRANKS PUBLISHING RANCH<br />
i HBLMAN INDUSTRIES<br />
PALM OESERT STAT1 BNERS<br />
PRODUCTION GRAPHICS<br />
DESERT PHBTB LAB<br />
TEXAS CHRISTIAN<br />
WESTERN GRBWER AND SHIPPER<br />
B S N CBRPBRATIBN<br />
WESTERN ATHLETIC SUPPLY<br />
OESERT PHBTB LAB<br />
GATEWAY RENTALS<br />
YELLOW MART<br />
DAILY NEWS<br />
OESERT BUSINESS MACHINES<br />
DESERT MBTBR REWIND<br />
STEVES BFFI CE SUPPLY<br />
W9961<br />
P29914<br />
P29903<br />
P29878<br />
-9670<br />
P29954<br />
P32017<br />
P29351<br />
-98<br />
P29969<br />
F32001<br />
732004<br />
'32002<br />
I PW901<br />
VENDBR<br />
NB .<br />
10/24/85 10556<br />
10/16/85 10571<br />
10/16/85 10168<br />
10/18/85 10168<br />
10/16/85 <strong>11</strong>072<br />
10/16/85 <strong>11</strong>072<br />
10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>027<br />
10/ 10/85 10008<br />
10/16/85 <strong>11</strong>944<br />
10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>789<br />
10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>791<br />
10/22/65 <strong>12</strong>807<br />
07/08/85 10422<br />
10/22/85 10887<br />
10/22/85 <strong>12</strong>789<br />
10/22/85 101 70<br />
10/22/85 10100<br />
10/22/85 10066<br />
10/10/85 <strong>11</strong>677<br />
729700 09/17/85 10971<br />
1 P29756 09/17/85 10530<br />
CHAMPlBN PRBDUCTS<br />
CHAMPION PRBDUCTS<br />
AFC SERVl CE CB<br />
MARKSTAT/PETER LAPLACA<br />
RIVERSIDE CBUNTY RBAO DEPT<br />
ACE HARDWARE<br />
BIG A AUTB PARTS<br />
DAYS OFFICE CENTER<br />
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT UF SCHUULS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />
PAGE: 1 I
- I - )<br />
COUNTY 33 RlVERSlDE<br />
D 1 S TR I CT 01 CUACHELLA VALLEY CUMM COLLEGE<br />
REF<br />
NO.<br />
RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPER1 NTENDENT BF SCHBBLS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
I<br />
DATE<br />
VENDOR<br />
NO.<br />
I 1<br />
VENDOR NAME<br />
JOHNSUN PHOTU<br />
/ NO. / FUND<br />
SUNVALCU<br />
SCAN TRUN CURP<br />
EASTMAN INC<br />
GALE RESEARCH CU<br />
STUCKWELL & Bl NNEY<br />
VIVITAR COMPUTER PRODUCTS<br />
PALM DESERT DISPOSAL<br />
U S TREASURY<br />
SU CAL 1 F GAS CB<br />
SU CALIF GAS CO<br />
HI -DESERT DISPOSAL CO<br />
PALM DESERT WATER<br />
C V CUUNTY WATER DISTRICT<br />
*xx*x*l***x*X*x*X*****x**x***x<br />
EXPEND1 TURE SUMMARY BY FUND<br />
FUND AMUUNT<br />
TBTAL WARR<br />
AUTHURIZED BY L K RICHARDS<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />
PAGE: 3 1<br />
----.-------------.-.----- ---------------<br />
NTS 70 33,890.20
I<br />
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIOE<br />
D I S TR I CT 01 CUACHELLA VALLEY CUMM COLLEGE<br />
ENOUF<br />
OATE r NU.<br />
_I<br />
VENOBR NAME<br />
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
CLA 1 M<br />
NO .<br />
I<br />
STEPHANIE LAMAR X28630<br />
TERESA TORRES X28631<br />
MlRlTA SALOIVAR X28632<br />
ANNETTE PAD1 LLA X28814<br />
CUN I TA HERNANDEZ X28815<br />
CAMPUS SERVICES C. B. D. X28816<br />
CAMPUS SERVICES C. U. D. X28817<br />
CAMPUS SERVICES C. 0. 0.<br />
SUN STAR DISPOSAL SERVICES X28819<br />
GENERAL TELEPHONE X28820<br />
SU CA EDl35N X28821<br />
FUND LUC SITE PRBGRAM OBJECT CLAIM AMUUNT<br />
330 5CE 00 7050000063 7520 200.00 6405056<br />
330 5CE 00 7050000063 7520 200.00 6405057<br />
330 5CE 00 7050000063 7520 200.00 6405058<br />
330 5CE 00 7050000063 7520 200.00 6405059<br />
330 5CE 00 7050000060 7520 200.00 6405060<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/<strong>12</strong>/85<br />
PAGE: 1<br />
WARRANT AMOUNT<br />
200.00<br />
200.00 J<br />
200.00J<br />
200.00J
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D l STR l CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />
VENOBR NAME<br />
MARIAN KATZ<br />
JOSl E GALLEGBS<br />
CHARLOTTE FLBRES<br />
RBBBIE MURRELL<br />
LYNN CRAWFORO<br />
CHARLES PALMER<br />
MARCELINB DlAZ<br />
xxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUND<br />
FUND AMBUNT<br />
-<br />
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
CLA 1 M<br />
NB .<br />
-tt<br />
FUND LBC SITE<br />
AUTHORIZED BY B L SAINZ<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/<strong>12</strong>/85<br />
PAGE: 2
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
43 1 STR I CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />
DATE VENDeR NAME<br />
GARY BERTHEBLA<br />
*X*xxII*X****Xxx*****I*****x*x~<br />
EXPEND1,TURE SUMMARY BY FUND<br />
FUND AMOUNT<br />
100 1,514.10<br />
TOTAL 1,514.10<br />
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT O'F SCHOOLS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
-<br />
SITE<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/18/85<br />
PAGE: 1<br />
PROGRAM OBJECT CLAIM AMOUNT<br />
WARRANT AMOUNT --- NO, -<br />
671 1000000 5620 1.51 4.10 6407709 1,514.10
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D I ST R I C T 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY COMM COLLEGE<br />
REF VENDOR<br />
NU.<br />
VENDBR NAME<br />
LIRA INFBRMATION SYSTEMS<br />
CHERI DAWN ALEXANDER D C<br />
DAN WALTERS M D<br />
'JANE BRAOBURY LBRD<br />
RBBERT E GUUDING<br />
RUBAR AND ASSOCIATES<br />
SHIRLEY NI CHULSBN<br />
WALTER C REED 1 1 1<br />
MATT CAOBY<br />
RICHARD P CBDD INC<br />
WILLIAM F LETT<br />
ASCBD<br />
GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />
1 028844 <strong>11</strong> 1 /21/85 <strong>11</strong> 0033 1 GENERAL TELEPHONE 1x28844 1<br />
RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS<br />
REGISTER OF CORMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
CLAIM<br />
NO.<br />
RICHARD L PUPER X28845<br />
MCI TELECBMMUNICATIUNS CURP X28846<br />
MCI TELECOMMUNICATIBNS CBRP<br />
1 028848 <strong>11</strong> 1/21 /85 <strong>11</strong> 0033 / GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />
1 028849 / <strong>11</strong> /21/85 <strong>11</strong> 0035 1 SO CA EDISON<br />
1 028850 <strong>11</strong> /21/85 / 10033 / GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />
1<br />
X28847<br />
1x28848 1<br />
1x28849 1<br />
1x28850 1<br />
PATRICIA L PAIGE<br />
LUCY LBCHHEAD<br />
1<br />
FUND<br />
LBC<br />
SITE<br />
PRBGRAM<br />
OBJECT<br />
CLAIM AMBUNT<br />
100 2BD 00 6800000000 5100 2,187.50 641 0082<br />
100 5DH 00 6410000000 5100 750.00 641 0083<br />
100 4AN 00 <strong>12</strong>45000318 51 10 1,250.00 641 0084<br />
100 3BF 00 7141000000 5100 600.00 641 0085<br />
100 3BF 00 7142000000 5100<br />
1 80.00 84 1 0086<br />
100 2BD 00 6700000000 5100 4,000.00 6410087<br />
100 4AT 00 1007000000 5100 1,250.00 6410088<br />
100 3BF 00 7142000000 5100 2,435.84 6410089<br />
100 2BB 00 67<strong>11</strong>000000 5600 783.80 6410090<br />
100 IFF 00 6836000000 5100 2,625.00 6410091<br />
100 4AU 00 1004300000 5100 762.26 6410092<br />
105 5DS 00 0000000000 8877 20.00 641 0093<br />
100 2BU 00 6500000000 5540 25.50 6410094<br />
100 3BU 00 6500000000 5540 332.46 6410095<br />
100 3BB 00 67<strong>11</strong>000000 6200 188.00 641 0096<br />
100 2BU 00 6500000000 5540 1,445.97 8410097<br />
100 2BU 00 6500000000 5540 83.24 84 1 0098<br />
100 3BU 00 6500000000 5540 <strong>11</strong>4.99 6410099<br />
100 3BU 00 6500000000 5520 296.71 6410100<br />
100 2BU 00 6500000000 5540 168.23 6410101<br />
100 4EX 00 6890000000 8878 45.00 6410102<br />
100 4EX 00 6890000000 8878 45.00 6410103<br />
100 4EX 00 6890000000 8878 45.00 8410104<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/21/85<br />
PAGE: 1<br />
WARRANT AMBUNT<br />
2,187.504<br />
750. OO/<br />
1.250.00/<br />
600. ood<br />
180. OOJ<br />
4,000.00J<br />
1,250.00/<br />
2.435.84 1/<br />
783.80 J<br />
2,625.00J<br />
762.26J<br />
20. ooJ,<br />
25.50
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D 1 S T R I CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY COMM CBLLEGE<br />
REF<br />
NO. -<br />
-<br />
VENDBf<br />
NO. I VENDOR NAME<br />
*x***x***********x*******x****<br />
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUND<br />
FUND AMBUNT<br />
100 19,614.50<br />
105 20.00<br />
TOTAL 19,634.50<br />
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHUULS<br />
REGISTER OF CONnERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
CLAIM<br />
NB.<br />
-<br />
FUND<br />
-&<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/21/85<br />
PAGE: 2<br />
SITE PROGRAM BBJECT CLAIM AMOUNT WARRANT AMOUNT<br />
WAi:y
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D l S T R 1 CT 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CBMM CBLLEGE<br />
REF VENDOR<br />
CLAIM<br />
VENDOR NAME<br />
NB . NB .<br />
BIG A AUTB PARTS<br />
CBNSBLIOATED ELECTRIC<br />
HARPER 8. RBW PUBLISHERS<br />
SIMPLEX TIME RECBROER<br />
DAILY NEWS<br />
ACADEMIC FINANCIAL SERVICES<br />
OESERT SUN<br />
OESERT SUN<br />
OESERT SUN<br />
OESERT SUN<br />
DESERT AUTB & HARDWARE<br />
XEROX CBRPBRATIBN<br />
OAl LY NEWS<br />
SlMUN AN0 SCHUSTER<br />
PASADENA CC BASKETBALL<br />
NEWBURY HBUSE PUBLICATIBNS<br />
- 1<br />
RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHUBLS<br />
STUCKWELL & BINNEY X28872<br />
SUNSET MAGAZINE X28873<br />
RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SCHBBL BOS X28874<br />
GBRTZ FIRE EXTINGUISHER CU. X28875<br />
DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES X28876<br />
DEANS COMPUTER CENTER X28877<br />
GEMCB X28878<br />
ClTlCBRP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT INC X28879<br />
SAN OIEGO CITY CBLLEGE X28880<br />
ACE HARDWARE X28881<br />
ELECTRIC CAR OIST X28882<br />
DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES X28883<br />
OAl LY NEWS X28884<br />
- - . -- -- -<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
FUND LBC SITE PRBGRAM OBJECT CLAIM AMBUNT<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/22/85<br />
PAGE: 1<br />
WARRANT
I RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS k5' I'<br />
I REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRAMTS I<br />
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D I S TR 1 CT 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CUMM CULLEGE<br />
REF<br />
NU.<br />
P25297<br />
P25236<br />
C10094<br />
P29916<br />
P32158<br />
P29918<br />
P32026<br />
P32041<br />
P32042<br />
P32058<br />
P32083<br />
P32084<br />
P32108<br />
P32<strong>12</strong>9<br />
P29813<br />
P32080<br />
P32<strong>12</strong>4<br />
P29909<br />
P29570<br />
P29929<br />
P32022<br />
P32097<br />
P32138<br />
P32145<br />
P29828<br />
P32053<br />
P32131<br />
P32130<br />
P32050<br />
P32046<br />
I<br />
09/17/85<br />
07/08/85<br />
09/10/84<br />
10/31/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/13/85<br />
10/10/85<br />
10/29/85<br />
10/29/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/01/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/01/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/01/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/01/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />
09/26/85<br />
10/29/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />
10/10/85<br />
10/04/85<br />
10/16/85<br />
10/22/85<br />
10/31/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/13/85<br />
09/24/85<br />
10/24/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />
<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />
10/24/85<br />
10/24/85<br />
VENOUR<br />
NU.<br />
10054<br />
10054<br />
<strong>12</strong>078<br />
<strong>11</strong>677<br />
<strong>12</strong>258<br />
<strong>12</strong>782<br />
<strong>12</strong>789<br />
<strong>12</strong>824<br />
<strong>12</strong>836<br />
<strong>12</strong>789<br />
<strong>12</strong>789<br />
10016<br />
10501<br />
<strong>12</strong>835<br />
<strong>12</strong>761<br />
10024<br />
10793<br />
109<strong>11</strong><br />
10387<br />
10387<br />
10017<br />
<strong>12</strong>826<br />
<strong>12</strong>355<br />
<strong>12</strong>591<br />
10320<br />
10366<br />
10168<br />
<strong>12</strong>627<br />
<strong>12</strong>81 5<br />
<strong>11</strong>652<br />
VENDUR NAME 1 I FUND /LUC /SITE I PROGRAM<br />
NU.<br />
B & W HARDWARE<br />
X28885<br />
B 8 W HARDWARE<br />
X28886<br />
LIRA INFORMATIUN SYSTEMS<br />
X28887<br />
DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES<br />
X28888<br />
JUURNAL UF CHEMICAL EOUCATIBN X28889<br />
G C S SERVICE INC<br />
X28890<br />
DESERT PHBTU LAB<br />
X28891<br />
HUME FITNESS CENTER<br />
X28892<br />
MUSICK SAW AN0 TWL SHARPENING X28893<br />
DESERT PHBTU LAB<br />
X28894<br />
DESERT PHUTe LAB<br />
X28895<br />
ELECTRIC CAR OlST<br />
X28896<br />
BILL DUNSTAN<br />
X28897<br />
TWENTYNINE PALMS PARKS<br />
X28898<br />
WACU CHEMICALS<br />
X28899<br />
MUWER WURLD<br />
X28900<br />
OUWNEY WELDING & MFG CU<br />
X28901<br />
MONARCH BUSINESS FURMS<br />
X28902<br />
HIGH DESERT STAR & TRAIL<br />
X28903<br />
HIGH DESERT STAR 8 TRAIL<br />
X28904<br />
W W GRAINGER<br />
X28905<br />
DESERT CBMPUTER SOCIETY<br />
X28906<br />
LINDE HBMECARE<br />
X28907<br />
MAGNAMUSIC-BATON INC<br />
X28908<br />
CARR PAPER<br />
X28909<br />
ZELLERBACH PAPER COMPANY<br />
X28910<br />
SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE X289<strong>11</strong><br />
HI DESERT PUBLISHING<br />
X289<strong>12</strong><br />
WAX1 E<br />
X28913<br />
NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY CB X28914<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
105<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
100<br />
4AG<br />
2BM<br />
2BD<br />
3AK<br />
4AS<br />
4CI<br />
IF1<br />
4AP<br />
4AT<br />
IF1<br />
IF1<br />
2BM<br />
4AP<br />
3BB<br />
2BG<br />
2BG<br />
2BM<br />
288<br />
2BP<br />
2BP<br />
2BM<br />
4AC<br />
4AN<br />
4AU<br />
2BR<br />
2BC<br />
50M<br />
388<br />
2BC<br />
2BC<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
00<br />
01 16100306<br />
6500000000<br />
6600000000<br />
4930000000<br />
040<strong>11</strong>00000<br />
1306100321<br />
6837000000<br />
0835000000<br />
1007000000<br />
6837000000<br />
6837000000<br />
6500000000<br />
0835000000<br />
67<strong>11</strong>000000<br />
6500000000<br />
6500000000<br />
6500000000<br />
67<strong>11</strong>000000<br />
6735000000<br />
6735000000<br />
6500000000<br />
1501000000<br />
<strong>12</strong>03700318<br />
1004000000<br />
671 1000000<br />
6500000000<br />
6947000241<br />
671 1000000<br />
6500000000<br />
6500000000<br />
OBJECT<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/22/85<br />
PAGE: 2
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D 1 S TR I CT 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />
VENDOR NAME<br />
CBNSBLIDATED ELECTRIC<br />
STECK VAUGHN CB<br />
STEVES OFFICE SUPPLY<br />
STEVES BFFICE SUPPLY<br />
HEWLETT PACKARD<br />
KEVl N MCCBRMl CK<br />
J. A. SEXAUER . I NC.<br />
AUOIB GRAPH1 C<br />
MARC GLASSMAN<br />
BUILDER'S HOMECENTER<br />
ALLIED REFRIGERATION<br />
BBEGES<br />
NELSON PHBTBGRAPHIC ART<br />
SIR SPEEDY<br />
VIDEOTAPE PRBDUCTIDNS<br />
COLLEGE B16LBGICAL SUPPLY<br />
STBCKWELL B BINNEY<br />
STBCKWELL B BINNEY<br />
VL SERVICE LIGHTING<br />
STBCKWELL 8 BINNEY<br />
I I 1 FUND AMOUNT<br />
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS<br />
REGISTER OF CODMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
f<br />
BBJECT<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/22/85<br />
PAGE: 3 1<br />
CLAI M AMBUNT / WARRANT /WARRANT AMBUNT<br />
I I I
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D I S T R I CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />
REF VENDOR<br />
NO. I OATE I NU.<br />
VENDOR NAME<br />
APPLE COMPUTER 1NC<br />
CHRUNICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATON<br />
APPLE COMPUTER INC<br />
OEVOKE DATA PRODUCTS<br />
CARRIER CLEARING SERVICE<br />
AUDITOR CONTROLLER<br />
A S C O D<br />
ESEQUIEL CORONEL<br />
RBEL ALEMAN<br />
GILBERT ROMAN<br />
A S C O D<br />
A S C U D<br />
GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />
SO CALIF GAS CB<br />
C V CUUNTY WATER DISTRICT<br />
GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHUNE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHUNE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHUNE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />
SO CA EOISON<br />
GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />
GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />
BRUCE USHER<br />
RIVERSIDE CUUNTY SUPERINTENDENT UF SCHUULS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
I<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/25/85<br />
PAGE: 1
REF VENDOR<br />
NO.<br />
DATE w, VENDOR NAME<br />
B B W HARDWARE<br />
AUD16 SECURITY INC<br />
CHEVRBN U S A<br />
GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />
FILMS INCBRPBRATEO<br />
STUDENT INSURANCE<br />
028970 <strong>11</strong>/25/85 <strong>11</strong>677 DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES<br />
INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER<br />
OAVlO SCHRAGER<br />
DESERT COLLEGIATE BFFICIALS<br />
CBNSBLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS<br />
CON WAY WESTERN EXPRESS<br />
LEE ANN KLBCHENTEGER<br />
HERMIONE GREENE<br />
BERNAROB M PAOILLA<br />
GRETCHEN A GBCKEL<br />
JANICE SHERWIN<br />
CHRISTINE LYMAN<br />
PEGGY ANN PARRA<br />
BARBARA LEE MBRRISBN<br />
VICTBRIA E GBMEZ<br />
OBRBTHY BURKE<br />
- J<br />
RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT BF SCHBBLS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS I<br />
CBUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/25/85<br />
D 1 ST R 1 CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CBMM CBLLEGE<br />
PAGE: 2
COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />
D 1 S T R 1 CT 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY COMM CULLEGE<br />
REF VENDBR<br />
Nel . / DATE I NO. I VENDUR NAME<br />
RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT UF SCHOOLS<br />
REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />
-<br />
CLAIM<br />
NO.<br />
7<br />
PRBGRAM 'OBJECT CLAIM AMOUNT<br />
DATE: <strong>11</strong>/25/85<br />
PAGE: 3<br />
WARRANT 1 WARRANT AMOUNT<br />
NU.
PANTRY CHEF<br />
INSTITUTE OF CULINARY ARTS<br />
Accountability. The Pantry Chef is directly accountable to<br />
<strong>the</strong> Executive Chef <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Culinary Arts in a<br />
line relationship.<br />
Work Days. 230 days<br />
Duties. The Pantry Chef is held accountable for performing <strong>the</strong><br />
duties listed below:<br />
A. Instruction (approximately 75 percent <strong>of</strong> work assignment)<br />
1. Maintains liaison with members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
food service industry for resource<br />
development, instructional program<br />
verification, placing students for<br />
field experience, and placement for<br />
ICA graduates.<br />
2. Meets all classes as scheduled and works<br />
a minimum <strong>of</strong> 40 hours per week.<br />
3. Provides instruction in accordance with<br />
<strong>the</strong> philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Desert</strong> stated in <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> catalog.<br />
4. Provides instruction in classes according<br />
to approved course outlines.<br />
5. Thoroughly acquaints students in writing<br />
with course requirements, student perfor-<br />
mance evaluation procedures, field trip<br />
demands, and attendance requirements, and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r appropriate requirements during <strong>the</strong><br />
first class session.<br />
6. Meets all classes as scheduled and presents<br />
subject matter in an organized and informed<br />
manner, utilizing appropriate learning<br />
activities.<br />
7. Helps and provides guidance for students<br />
beyond regular class and <strong>of</strong>fice hours.<br />
Continued .......
8. Makes timely evaluations <strong>of</strong> student<br />
performance to measure achievement in<br />
course work with <strong>the</strong> intent <strong>of</strong> assisting<br />
<strong>the</strong>m to learn.<br />
9. Maintains control during examinations so as<br />
to insure <strong>the</strong> academic integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
course, <strong>the</strong> program, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>.<br />
B. Related Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
1. Understands and where necessary properly<br />
employs established emergency and safety<br />
procedures.<br />
2. Reports in accordance with annual contract<br />
dates and attends scheduled faculty meetings,<br />
department meetings, and meetings <strong>of</strong><br />
committees <strong>of</strong> which he/she is a member.<br />
3. Participates in commencement exercises in<br />
academic dress.<br />
4. Sponsors or advises in student activities<br />
as an alternative to committee membership<br />
responsibilities.<br />
5. Restricts o<strong>the</strong>r income and/or outside<br />
activities which would interfere with<br />
faculty responsibilities.<br />
6. Schedules guest speakers according to<br />
<strong>College</strong> policy.<br />
7. Makes all requests for <strong>of</strong>f-campus <strong>College</strong><br />
activities through <strong>the</strong> Executive Chef.<br />
If students have to be excused from classes<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r than one for which <strong>the</strong> activity is<br />
planned, a list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se students must be<br />
submitted to <strong>the</strong> Executive Chef.<br />
8. Advises students:<br />
A. Assists students with study problems.<br />
B. Refers students to appropriate <strong>College</strong><br />
services for information or fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
assistance.
C. Assists students to evaluate <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
potential for successful accomplish-<br />
ment in subject field <strong>of</strong> expertise.<br />
D. Provides accurate information concern-<br />
ing vocational opportunities in <strong>the</strong><br />
instructor's field.<br />
E. Provides full information regarding<br />
content <strong>of</strong> courses.<br />
F. Provides information regarding post-<br />
community college educational and<br />
training opportunities and demands in<br />
<strong>the</strong> instructor's field <strong>of</strong> expertise.<br />
9. Initiates and/or participates in:<br />
C. O<strong>the</strong>r Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
A. Establishing <strong>of</strong> educational goals for<br />
his/her area <strong>of</strong> instruction.<br />
B. Annual up-dating <strong>of</strong> five-year academic<br />
and three-year projection <strong>of</strong> resource<br />
needs for his/herareas <strong>of</strong> instruction.<br />
C. Evaluating curricula and proposing new<br />
curricula or modifications to existing<br />
curricula.<br />
D. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional evaluation in accordance<br />
with district policy.<br />
E. Development <strong>of</strong> requests for instructional<br />
support services including library,<br />
audio-visual, learning resources, and<br />
tutorial services.<br />
F. Preparing information for <strong>College</strong> catalog,<br />
schedule <strong>of</strong> classes, and o<strong>the</strong>r appropriate<br />
<strong>College</strong> documents.<br />
G. Developing requests for special grants<br />
and projects.<br />
H. Selecting equipment, supplies, books and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r instructional support materials.<br />
1. Provides placement services for student completers<br />
and former completers.<br />
Continued.. . . .
2. Maintains currency <strong>of</strong> cooking trends and<br />
methods,through pr<strong>of</strong>essional associations<br />
with o<strong>the</strong>r chefs and food service organiza-<br />
tions/associations.<br />
3. Maintains currency as to food service industry<br />
needs.<br />
4. Performs o<strong>the</strong>r duties as may be assigned from<br />
time-to-time by <strong>the</strong> Executive Chef.<br />
Qualifications. The Pantry Chef position requires persons<br />
who have completed an Apprenticeship training program and/or<br />
graduated from a well known culinary school, e.g., <strong>the</strong> Culinary<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> America. To qualify for <strong>the</strong> Pantry Chef position,<br />
a person should have at least 5 to 10 years <strong>of</strong> food production<br />
in quality food service establishments.
MEMORANDUM<br />
TO :<br />
\ i<br />
Dr. F. D. Stout<br />
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
December 2, 1985<br />
FROM: p~acgulyn Weiss, Director <strong>of</strong> Personnel<br />
SUBJECT: Recommendations Concerning Classified Personnel<br />
The following recommendations concerning personnel are submitted for your<br />
consideration:<br />
A. Appointments:<br />
- HALL, Stacey<br />
Position Title:<br />
Range and Step:<br />
Typist, Instructional Services<br />
5 -A<br />
Beginning Salary: $1006.00 per month<br />
Effective Date: November 18, 1985<br />
HERRON, Gwen<br />
Position Title: Typist, Campus Parking<br />
Range and Step: 5 -A<br />
Beginning Salary: $5.72 per hour-20 hrs./wk-10 months<br />
Effective Date: November 22, 1985<br />
RIVERA, Ismael<br />
Position Tit1 e: Grounds Keeper<br />
Range and Step: 8-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $<strong>11</strong>65.00 per month<br />
Effective Date: November 18, 1985<br />
ROYAL, William<br />
Position Title: Prgrammer Analyst Technician<br />
Range and Step: 17-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $1807.00 per month<br />
Effective Date: November 18, 1985<br />
B. Reassignments:<br />
AMICARELLA, Mario<br />
- From:<br />
To :<br />
-<br />
Position Title: Libr. Techn., Public Svs. Programmer Analyst<br />
Ranoe and Steo:<br />
~eginni ng salary:<br />
Effective Date:<br />
7 -A<br />
$6.30 per hour-16 hrs./wk.<br />
17-A .. ..<br />
$1807 .OO per month<br />
November 18, 1985<br />
FILLMAN, George<br />
Position Title: Typist, Instr. Services Sr. Typist, Adm. & Records<br />
Range and Step: 5-A 6-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $1006.00 per month . $1057.00 per month<br />
Effective Date: November 18, 1985<br />
C. Resignations:<br />
FRIAS, Gail<br />
--<br />
Position Title: Sec'y., Com. Svs. (Cal State)<br />
Effective Date: November 26, 1985<br />
Continued. . . . . . .
MEMORANDUM<br />
TO : Dr. F. D. Stout<br />
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
December 2, 1985<br />
FROM: Jacqulyn Weiss, Director <strong>of</strong> Personnel<br />
SUBJECT: Substitute and Short-Term Personnel<br />
The following are submitted for your consideration:<br />
A. Substitutes:<br />
BURSON, Patricia<br />
Position Title: Instructional Support Aide I1<br />
Range and Step: 7-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour<br />
Effective Date: November 18, 1985 thru December 20, 1985<br />
CARNIE, Sandra<br />
Position Title:<br />
Range and Step:<br />
Sec'y.,<br />
7 -A<br />
Student Support Services<br />
Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour<br />
Effective Date:<br />
- HALL, Stacey<br />
November 22, 1985 thru December 6, 1985<br />
Position Title: Instructional Support Aide I1<br />
Range and Step: 7 -A<br />
Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour<br />
Effective Date: November <strong>12</strong>, 1985 thru November 15, 1985<br />
WELCH, Christine<br />
Position Title: Sec'y. Agriculture Dept.<br />
Range and Step:<br />
Beginning Salary:<br />
7-A<br />
$6.30 per hour - 20 hrs./wk.<br />
Effective Date: November 25, 1985 thru December 6, 1985<br />
B. Short-Term:<br />
GRENFELL , - Pat<br />
Position Title: Maintenance, Technical<br />
Range and Step: <strong>12</strong>-A<br />
Beginning Salary: $8.04 per hour<br />
Effective Date: November 20, 1985, thru December 30, 1985<br />
lkr<br />
,
DATE : December 4, 1985<br />
TO : Dr. Stout<br />
FROM : Dean <strong>of</strong> Instruction<br />
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
MEMORANDUM<br />
SUBJECT : BOARD APPROVAL OF TEXTBOOKS<br />
The following textbooks are submitted for <strong>Board</strong> approval:<br />
DEPARTMENT TEXTBOOK<br />
Agriculture Turf Management for Golf Courses<br />
Developmental Education The <strong>College</strong> Student<br />
Social Sciences The Logic <strong>of</strong> International Relations<br />
5th Edition
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
ACADEMIC CALENDAR HISTORICAL COMPARISON<br />
ACADEMIC YEAR SEMESTER STARTED SEMESTER ENDED *ENROLLMENT<br />
1. 1974-75<br />
Fall 1974 9-10-74 1-23-75 6,733<br />
Spring 1975 1-29-75 6-6-75 7,816<br />
2. 1975-76<br />
Fall 1975 9-<strong>12</strong>-75 1-30-76 7,354<br />
Spring 1976 2-9-76 6-18-76 8,<strong>11</strong>4<br />
3. 1976-77<br />
Fall 1976 9-7-76 1-26-77 7,466<br />
Spring 1977 1-31-77 6-10-77 9,096<br />
4. 1977-78<br />
Fall 1977 8-18-77 <strong>12</strong>-23-77 <strong>12</strong>,230<br />
Spring 1978 1-16-78 5-26-78 14,457<br />
5. 1978-79<br />
Fall 1978 8-17-78 <strong>12</strong>-22-78 9,300<br />
Spring 1979 1-1 5-79 5-25-79 <strong>11</strong>,297<br />
6. 1979-80<br />
Fall 1979 8-20-79 <strong>12</strong>-21-79 <strong>11</strong>,149<br />
. , Spring 1980 1-16-80 5-30-80 10,402<br />
><br />
7. 1980-81<br />
Fall 1980 8- 15-80 <strong>12</strong>-19-80 <strong>11</strong>,460<br />
Spring 1981 1-9-81 5-21-81 <strong>11</strong>,044<br />
8. 1981-82<br />
Fall 1981 8-17-81 <strong>12</strong>-18-81 <strong>11</strong>,722<br />
Spring 1982 1-8-82 5-21-82 <strong>11</strong>,543<br />
9. 1982-83<br />
Fall 1982 9-7-82 1-19-83 10,939<br />
Spring 1983 2-4-83 6-1 7-83 9,290<br />
10. 1983-84<br />
Fall 1983 9-6-83 1- 24-84 9,317<br />
Spring 1984 2-3-84 6-1 5-84 8,109<br />
<strong>11</strong> . 1984-85<br />
Fall 1984 8-20-84 <strong>12</strong>-21-84 9,687<br />
Spring 1985 1-17-85 5-31-85 9,529<br />
<strong>12</strong>. 1985-86<br />
Fall 1985 8-19-85 <strong>12</strong>-20-85 9,004<br />
Spring 1986 1-13-86 5-28-86<br />
*Second Census Total Enrollment<br />
<strong>12</strong>-4-85<br />
km<br />
Continued......,
8 MARIA RIIOTNSKV pr ten! 01 Ihr anlI8lulaonl in Mr <strong>11</strong> I~W studtnt, latq start an lhc<br />
I ht &%I lhtnj %urn< rladrnn Wat's ~uwey used il. whdr ihn tumn~rjobm.tk.l<br />
look al uhm <strong>the</strong> col.,e r~lllnaur yclc only 5 wr
FALL 1986<br />
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
ACADEMIC CALENDAR 1986-87<br />
August 18 Monday, Classes Begin<br />
September 1 Monday, Labor Day-Hol iday<br />
November <strong>11</strong> Tuesday, Veterans Day-Hol iday<br />
November 27,28,29 Thursday to Saturday, Thanksgiving Day-Holiday<br />
December 13-1 9 Saturday to Friday, Final. Exams<br />
December 19 Friday, End Of Fall Semester<br />
Week Days Per Semester Working Days Per Month<br />
Monday 17 August 10<br />
Tuesday 17 September 21<br />
Wednesday 18 October 23<br />
Thursday 17 November 17<br />
Friday 17 December 15<br />
Saturday 16 (Not In Total)<br />
- -<br />
86 TOTAL 86 TOTAL<br />
SEMESTER BREAK: DECEMBER 20, 1986 TO JANUARY <strong>11</strong>, 1987<br />
************mfi*******************m***<br />
SPRING 1987<br />
January<br />
January<br />
February<br />
February<br />
March<br />
May<br />
May<br />
May<br />
May<br />
Week Days Per Semester<br />
Monday 16<br />
Tuesday 19<br />
Monday, Classes Begin<br />
Monday, Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r King, Jr. 's Birthday-Hol iday<br />
Friday, Lincoln's Birthday-Hol iday<br />
Monday, Washington's Birthday-Holiday<br />
Monday to Saturday, Spring Break<br />
Wednesday to Wednesday, Final Exams<br />
Monday, Memorial Day-Holiday<br />
Wednesday, End Of Spring Semester<br />
Friday, Spring Graduation<br />
Working Days Per Month<br />
January 14<br />
February 18<br />
March 17<br />
~hursday- 18 Apri 1 22<br />
Friday 17 May 18<br />
Saturday 18 (Not In Total)<br />
- -<br />
89 TOTAL 89 TOTAL<br />
Continued .......
FALL 1987<br />
August 17<br />
September 7<br />
November <strong>11</strong><br />
November 26,27,28<br />
December <strong>12</strong>- 18<br />
December 18<br />
COLLEGE OF THE DESER1<br />
ACADEMIC CALENDAR 1987-88<br />
Week Days Per Semester<br />
Working Days Per Month<br />
M0nda.v 17<br />
Auaust <strong>11</strong><br />
~uesday 18 ~eptember 21<br />
Wednesday 17 October 22<br />
Thursday 17 November 18<br />
Friday<br />
Saturday<br />
17<br />
16 (Not In Total )<br />
December 14<br />
-- -<br />
86 TOTAL 86 TOTAL<br />
Monday, Classes Begin<br />
Monday, Labor Day-Hol iday<br />
Wednesday, Veterans Day-Hol iday<br />
Thursday to Saturday, Thanksgiving Day-Hol iday<br />
Saturday to Friday, Final Exams<br />
Friday, End Of Fall Semester<br />
SEMESTER BREAK: DECEMBER 19, 1987 TO JANUARY 10, 1988<br />
* * * * H * * * * * m M * * H * * * * * * H * * * * n * * * * * M<br />
SPRING 1988<br />
January<br />
January<br />
February<br />
February<br />
March<br />
May<br />
May<br />
May<br />
May<br />
Week Days Per Semester Workinq Days Per Month<br />
Monday 17 January 14<br />
Tuesday 19 February 19<br />
Wednesday 18 March 18<br />
Thursday 18 April 21<br />
Friday 17 May 17<br />
Saturday 18 (Not In Total)<br />
-<br />
89 TOTAL 89 TOTAL<br />
Monday, Classes Begin<br />
Monday, Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r King, Jr. 's Birthday-Holiday<br />
Friday, Lincoln's Birthday-Holiday<br />
Monday, Washington's Birthday-Hol iday<br />
Monday to Saturday, Spring Break<br />
Wednesday to Tuesday, Final Exams<br />
Tuesday, End Of Spring Semester<br />
Tuesday, Spring Graduation<br />
Monday, Memorial Day-Hol iday<br />
I
FALL 1988<br />
August 15<br />
September 5<br />
November <strong>11</strong><br />
November 24,25,26<br />
December 10- 1 6<br />
December 16<br />
Week Days Per Semester<br />
Monday 17<br />
Tuesday 18<br />
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
ACADEMIC CALENDAR 1988-89<br />
Monday, Classes Begin<br />
Monday, Labor Day-Hol iday<br />
Friday, Veterans Day-Hol iday<br />
Thursday to Saturday, Thanksgiving Day-Holiday<br />
Saturday to Friday, Final Exams<br />
Friday, End Of Fall Semester<br />
Working Days Per Month<br />
August 13<br />
~ednesday 18 ~ctober 21<br />
Thursday 17 November 19<br />
Friday 16 December <strong>12</strong><br />
Saturday 16 (Not In Total)<br />
--<br />
86 TOTAL<br />
-<br />
86 TOTAL<br />
SEMESTER BREAK: DECEMBER 17, 1988 TO JANUARY 8, 1989<br />
SPRING 1989<br />
January 9<br />
January 16<br />
February 17<br />
February 20<br />
March 20-25<br />
May 17-23<br />
May 23<br />
May 23<br />
May 29<br />
Week Days Per Semester<br />
Working Days Per Month<br />
Monday 17<br />
January 16<br />
~uesday 19 ~ebruar~ 18<br />
Wednesday 18 March 18<br />
Thursday 18 Apri 1 20<br />
Friday 17 May 17<br />
Saturday 18 (Not In Total)<br />
--<br />
89 TOTAL<br />
Monday, Classes Begin<br />
Monday, Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r King, Jr.'s Birthday-Holiday<br />
Friday, Lincoln's Birthday-Hol iday<br />
Monday, Washington's Birthday-Holiday<br />
Monday to Saturday, Spring Break<br />
Wednesday to Tuesday, Final Exams<br />
Tuesday, End Of Spring Semester<br />
Tuesday, Spring Graduation<br />
Monday, Memorial Day-Hol iday<br />
-<br />
89 TOTAL
DATE : December 4, 1985<br />
TO : Dr. Stout<br />
FROM : Dean <strong>of</strong> Instruction<br />
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
MEMORANDUM<br />
SUBJECT : CONFERENCE PRESENTATION BY DR. HENRY BURNETT<br />
I am very pleased to inform you that Dr. Burnett has been requested<br />
to make a presentation at <strong>the</strong> national conference on Educational<br />
Communications and Technology.<br />
The conference will be held in Las Vegas, Nevada. Dr. Burnett is<br />
requesting that <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> pay half <strong>of</strong> his expenses and<br />
he will pay <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expenses.<br />
Would you please consider requesting from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees at<br />
<strong>the</strong> December 1985 <strong>Board</strong> meeting <strong>the</strong> approval for this out-<strong>of</strong>-state<br />
travel and partial reimbursement?<br />
I am attaching materials from Dr. Burnett to support this request.<br />
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.<br />
k rfl
Date:<br />
To:<br />
From:<br />
Subject:<br />
November 19, 1985<br />
Dr. C.A. Patterson<br />
Dr. Henry J.<br />
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />
Inter-Offlce Memorandum<br />
Conference Presentation<br />
I have been honored by an invitation from <strong>the</strong> President <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association<br />
for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) to give one <strong>of</strong> nine<br />
presidential sessions at <strong>the</strong> upcoming conference in January <strong>of</strong> 1986. AECT<br />
is <strong>the</strong> major national and international pr<strong>of</strong>essional organization for in-<br />
structional technologists. AECT anticipates having over 13,500 individuals<br />
attending <strong>the</strong>ir 1986 Annual Convention and COIiMTEX International Equipment<br />
Exposition.<br />
The selection process for <strong>the</strong> Presidential Session is highly competitive<br />
as <strong>the</strong>re are over three hundred sessions occurring during <strong>the</strong> conference -<br />
only nine are selected as featured Presidential Sessions. The Presidential<br />
Sessions have a prominent place on <strong>the</strong> conference schedule, have a time<br />
length <strong>of</strong> one hour and fifteen minutes, and receive special publicity during<br />
<strong>the</strong> conference.<br />
The topic for my session, Political Dynamics: Crucial Factors for Instructional<br />
Technology in Postsecondary Education is based on <strong>the</strong> research conducted for<br />
my dissertation. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AECT conference session, I have<br />
been asked to submit a manuscript for publication in <strong>the</strong> 1986 Educational<br />
Media and Technology Yearbook.<br />
The conference will be held January 16 through <strong>the</strong> 21st, 1986 in Las Vegas,<br />
Nevada, and I am asking for approval <strong>of</strong> out-<strong>of</strong>-state travel and reimburse-<br />
ment for one half <strong>the</strong> travel expenses ($297.00). Las Vegas is not my pre-<br />
ferred location to deliver an academic paper - I would ra<strong>the</strong>r be traveling<br />
to <strong>the</strong> campus <strong>of</strong> U.C.L.A., U.S.C., Stanford, or Indiana University to deliver<br />
<strong>the</strong> presentation. However, with <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> this particular conference, it<br />
can be held only at five locations nationally: Atlanta, New Orleans, Dallas,<br />
Anaheim, and Las Vegas. It happens to be in Las Vegas this time.<br />
I feel honored by this fantastic opportunity to share my research at AECT's<br />
national conference. The presentation will bring me considerable recognition<br />
within <strong>the</strong> academic community at <strong>the</strong> national level. <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong><br />
will also share in this national recognition.<br />
If I can provide additional information for your consideration, please contact<br />
me immediately.
*<br />
July 3, 1985<br />
aL 9 1985<br />
Association for Educational Communications & Technology<br />
1 <strong>12</strong>6 Sixteenth Street, N.W , Washington, D.C. 20036 a (202) 466-4780<br />
Dr. Henry J. Burnett<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> Learning Resources<br />
<strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> The <strong>Desert</strong><br />
43-500 Monterey Avenue<br />
Palm <strong>Desert</strong>, CA 92260<br />
Dear Dr. Burnett:<br />
I am pleased to inform you that your presentation proposal for<br />
<strong>the</strong> 1986 AECT Annual Conference entitled, "Political Dynamics:<br />
Crucial Factors for Instructional Technology in Postsecondary<br />
Education," has been selected as one <strong>of</strong> nine presidential<br />
sessions.<br />
You will be hearing in <strong>the</strong> near future from Ka<strong>the</strong>rine Wacker,<br />
President-Elect <strong>of</strong> CCAIT, with more detailed information and<br />
requests for your equipment needs. In addl tion, Ms. Wacker<br />
will be asking for a 5 x 7 black and white glossy photograph<br />
for inclusion in our convention program.<br />
I am looking forward to meeting you in Las Vegas in January,<br />
and on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Directors and<br />
myself, I want to thank you for contributing your time and<br />
effort to help make our convention a success.<br />
AECT President<br />
RGH : m<br />
cc: Ka<strong>the</strong>rine Wacker<br />
Lyn Gubser<br />
Frank Dwyer<br />
Elaine Didier
Community <strong>College</strong> Association for Instruction and Technology<br />
President: Joseph Borowskl Secretary: Dr. Robert Lucas<br />
Oakton Community <strong>College</strong> - Illinois Grand Valley State <strong>College</strong> - Michigan<br />
President Elect: Katie Wacker Treasurer: Dr. William Belmore<br />
Kirkwood Community <strong>College</strong> - lowa Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Communlty <strong>College</strong> - Virginia<br />
' July 18, 1985<br />
Dr. Henry J. Burnett<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> Learning Resources<br />
<strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong><br />
43-500 Menterey Avenue<br />
Palm <strong>Desert</strong>, CA 92260<br />
Dear Dr. Burnett:<br />
I assume you have received Bob Hale's letter by now indicating that your<br />
proposal has been selected as a "Presidential Session" at A.E.C.T.'s<br />
January conference in Las Vegas. Congratulations1 Your session is<br />
scheduled for 9:OO-10:15 a.m. on Tuesday, January 21. I have asked Dr.<br />
Robert Lucas, CCAIT's Secretary from Grand Valley State <strong>College</strong> in<br />
Grand Rapids, Michigan, to serve as chair <strong>of</strong> your session. I need to<br />
have you send me several items, Henry:<br />
a. a brief biographical sketch which Bob Lucas may use to prepare his<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> you and your session topic.<br />
b. a 5 x 7 inch glossy black and white photo for use in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> conven-<br />
tion program to highlight your session.<br />
c. a completed "audiovisual request form" (attached) indicating <strong>the</strong><br />
free-loan equipment and room arrangement you desire for you; presenta-<br />
tion.<br />
Bob Hale asked me to communicate to you that he hopes you will be able<br />
to broaden <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> your presentation in order to assure that it is<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest to a variety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> A.E.C.T. membership. I told him that I<br />
was confident you would be able to do so. Let me know if I may be <strong>of</strong><br />
any help or answer any questions for you.<br />
Please mail <strong>the</strong> picture and audio-visual form to me by September 1. The<br />
biographical sketch isn't as essential right away. Thanks.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Ka<strong>the</strong>rine A. lJacker<br />
Instructional Developer<br />
Kirkwood Co~nmunity <strong>College</strong><br />
P. 0. Box 2068<br />
Cedar Rapids, IA 52406
Association for Educational Communications & Technologjp<br />
1<strong>12</strong>6 SLrteetifh Sfreel, N. IV.. !Vashingron. D.C. 20036 * (202) 466-4780<br />
** FACT SHEET **<br />
1986 AECT Annual Conference 4<br />
Over 150 concurrent sessions are scheduled<br />
* Over 300 individual presentations will be given<br />
...<br />
< : .:<br />
.. ' , . :'. . , :<br />
CObbfl'EX international Exposition .,; , . . . ..' .<br />
, ' .' , . 1<br />
January 16 - 21, 1986 . .<br />
.......<br />
Las Vegas, Nevada , ,<br />
, > , 8 ,.. i . :: '; ..I<br />
. . . . . q,;.',<br />
, . . . . , . . . .<br />
25 workshops are scheduled . ?,:
: .~<br />
Friday, Jarluary 17<br />
1 :00 - 2:15 p.rn<br />
Tlie following are sesslons chosen by<br />
AECT Presldenl Bob Hale.<br />
Audlovlsual Educallon In Chlns (INTL)<br />
Chalr: Joanne Velati Dunn<br />
Presenter: LI Nal<br />
The Presldenllnl Sesslons begln wllli an overview <strong>of</strong> llie<br />
education syslern iri China and <strong>the</strong> lncreaslrig role <strong>of</strong> arrdlo-<br />
vlsual praclices. Tlie prese~ilnllon will be lllrrslraled by<br />
examples <strong>of</strong> audiovisual educallon In use In Chlna.<br />
Friday, Jatluary 17<br />
2:30 - 3:43 p.tn. .<br />
Mollday, January 20<br />
9:00 - 1 0: 15 a.m.<br />
Homework Asslslnnce Vla Televlslon (DSMS)<br />
Chalr: Diane Blesol<br />
Presenter: Jerry Nutt<br />
Beaverlon (Oregon) School Dlstrlct devlsed an lnnovallve<br />
melliod <strong>of</strong> liel~lna sludonls wllh homework. A coo~erallve<br />
<strong>of</strong>lorl l)rlbvcr~i llic scltool dfslrlcl and n lncnl cablrcorripafiy<br />
led lo a llvc, opcri telar)lio~in Ilne televislori scriesdeslancd lo<br />
provlde homework assistance to sludent viewers.<br />
Of Course. . . The Productlon Team Includes Evalualors<br />
(DOTI Tuesday, January 21<br />
'Chalr: Marlorle Cnriibre<br />
Presenlers: Koilh Mielke. Larry Walc<strong>of</strong>f<br />
, This presenlnllori llluslrales speclflc exalnples <strong>of</strong> productlon<br />
decisloris thal were changed as a rest<strong>11</strong>1 <strong>of</strong> for~nallve<br />
evalullon. "Ucfore" and "after" cllps from llic Agoricy for<br />
Pollllcal Dyna~iilcs: Cruclal Factors for lnslrucllonal Technology<br />
In Poslsecondary Educallon (CCAIT)<br />
lnslrucllorial Televlslon and llie Children's Telcvlslon Work- Chair: Kalherlne Wacker<br />
shop will be sliown. Presenter: Henry Btrrnell<br />
Saturclay, Jar~uary 18<br />
3:00 - 4:15 p.tri.<br />
Exemplary Media Centers, Exemplary Practices (DEMM)<br />
Chalr: Ttio~nns ntrssell<br />
Presenlers: Andy DiPaolo. William Schmldt<br />
Thls presentallon <strong>of</strong>lers a process for media friarlagers to<br />
evaluate <strong>the</strong> effecllveriess <strong>of</strong> lhelr e~nployees bnscd on a<br />
self-assessrnenl performance appraisal forrri arid a slruclured<br />
Interview leclinlq~te. Also, you wlll lake a look a1 26<br />
exemplary media cenlors lro~n colleges, public school dlstrlcts<br />
and regional media programs.<br />
Parllclpanls wlll leave this session wllh a delalled underslarldirllj<br />
<strong>of</strong> llic pullllcnl arid lrgal dyrtlnnlcs occ~~rrltig wlirri<br />
modllylrig ll~cInw~~ov~r~ilri(~ l~islr~~cllnnnl Tec<strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong>01ogy Tltc<br />
use <strong>of</strong> Iclccot~fscs, cortrprrler asslsled I~islruclol~i. n~lrl Iri<strong>11</strong>Ivldual<br />
lrislrucllo~i labs rvlll serve ns <strong>the</strong> basls for cllscusslori.<br />
Tuesday, Jatluary 21<br />
1030 - 1 1 :A5 a.m.<br />
Core Conipelencles for lnslrucllonal Developers: The Vlew<br />
from Flve Programs (DID)<br />
Chalr: Robin Lawrason<br />
Presenters: Jolin Berllng, Barry Bratton. Waller Dlck, Dennls<br />
Flelds, Alllson Rossetl. Don Srnellle. Robert Relser<br />
The presonlers discuss <strong>the</strong> essenllal cornpelencles In-<br />
structlorial dnveloparn mtlsl possess, ns ldenllflnd hy llvn<br />
grndunfe programs In lnstructlonnl devolopmoril. Tho corri-<br />
petenclcs are lrilended lo rellecl tho skllls 01 a prolosslortal<br />
developer regardless <strong>of</strong> hls or her current lob, academlc<br />
degree, or type <strong>of</strong> training.<br />
!
Williani Edwin Ted<br />
Ridlev Newman Turner<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
QUEST FOR QUALITY
BOARD OF TRllSTEES<br />
MS. DIANA N LOCKARD. PWIDENT<br />
OR W\RY L WOODS VCL PWlDLNT<br />
DR I. PAUL GELtRIS. CLLWSICRLTARY<br />
DR ROOLRT T. McLfAN, h!rh!8c~<br />
OR EDWARD C ORTLLL MCAqBLR<br />
November 15, 1985<br />
Dr. Ioshua L. Smith, Chancellor<br />
CALIEORNIA CtMOJITY 03LLB;F.S<br />
<strong>11</strong>07 Ninth Street<br />
Sacramento, 0\ 95814<br />
Dear Chancellor Smith: -<br />
DR LOUIS L ZELLERS<br />
PRL~IDENT/SUPENN~END~NT<br />
On behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Citrus <strong>College</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees, I am responding to <strong>the</strong><br />
Preliminary Draft <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors 1986 Basic <strong>Agenda</strong>, specifically to<br />
Section 4 which addresses <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> governance. After careful analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
Section 4, we have developed <strong>the</strong> following rationale for leaving governance <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> community colleges at <strong>the</strong> local level.<br />
The essence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agenda, with respect to governance, is to be found on page 6,<br />
recommendation number 2, and portions <strong>of</strong> pages A-9 and A-10, which state that<br />
<strong>the</strong> community college governance structure should be "postsecondary in nature."<br />
Obviously, this is to recommend a "mini-UC" or "mini-state university" system<br />
with reference to structure. This amounts to not recognizing <strong>the</strong> great<br />
difference between <strong>the</strong> four year, strictly academically oriented college, and<br />
an institution like a community college with its diverse student population <strong>of</strong><br />
over a million students.<br />
The Citrus <strong>College</strong> Trustees believe that <strong>the</strong> Basic <strong>Agenda</strong> does not address <strong>the</strong><br />
fact that community colleges provide vocational education for <strong>the</strong>ir students,<br />
retrain re-entry students, give a second chance to high school dropouts, and<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer innumerable community oriented services.<br />
Local control <strong>of</strong> governments is a proud part <strong>of</strong> our American heritage. his is<br />
so for many reasons, not <strong>the</strong> least <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m being that centralization <strong>of</strong> power .<br />
makes it difficult for <strong>the</strong> citizenry to make its interests known to <strong>the</strong> power-<br />
holders because <strong>the</strong>y are geographically remote. This consideration applies to<br />
<strong>the</strong> abolition <strong>of</strong> local control as advocated in <strong>the</strong> report.
Chancellor Joshua L. Finith<br />
November 15, 1985<br />
page two<br />
With reference to governance, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> issues which arises is, what are <strong>the</strong><br />
prudent and proper divisions <strong>of</strong> labor and responsibility between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Governors and <strong>the</strong> local districts? The general answer to such a question giv,en<br />
by <strong>the</strong> dominant ideology <strong>of</strong> democracy would be, "<strong>the</strong> higher level <strong>of</strong> government<br />
should be given power where local authority is incompetent to act." If <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors thinks that local community college boards are incompetent<br />
with reference to governance, let <strong>the</strong>m make <strong>the</strong> case1 It is <strong>the</strong>y who bear <strong>the</strong><br />
burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>, yet one searches in vain for such arguments.<br />
Local boards, administrators and faculties know <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir communities<br />
better than do persons sitting on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors and, hence, are better<br />
able to deal with local issues than is <strong>the</strong> State <strong>Board</strong>. Understanding unique<br />
local problems is an inherent difficulty associated with centralized authority.<br />
An argument as old as Greek civilization bears on <strong>the</strong> present issue. It is that<br />
<strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> a constituency relates to <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> freedom, Smallness is<br />
indispensable to political liberty. This is so because large governmental<br />
bodies arc less responsive to indi"idua1 needs than are smaller governing<br />
agencies.<br />
When power is divided between governing agencies, as it is now between local<br />
districts and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors, local needs can be attended to while, at<br />
<strong>the</strong> same time, common interests can be advanced by <strong>the</strong> larger governing body.<br />
As a practical matter and under current law, California community colleges<br />
should remain under local control. This is so because <strong>the</strong> dominant<br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> any institution will be determined where power is based. We<br />
want our community colleges to meet specific local needs. The present<br />
governance structure <strong>of</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s has created one- <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
finest models for comprehensive community college networks in <strong>the</strong> nation.<br />
When <strong>the</strong> local board has <strong>the</strong> power to hire administrators and faculty, <strong>the</strong>se<br />
persons will best reflect community needs. A "mini-UC" system applied to <strong>the</strong><br />
organization <strong>of</strong> community colleges will not provide for a faculty and<br />
administration that is oriented and accountable to <strong>the</strong>ir communities.<br />
A "mini-UC" system does hot confront <strong>the</strong> ~roblem<br />
that <strong>the</strong> report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong>,<br />
Governors attempts to answer. That issue is, "What is <strong>the</strong> fundamental goal <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s?" Our goal is to meet <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> our<br />
communities, it is not to meet <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> our communities as perceived by a<br />
geographically remote, large bureaucracy1
Chancellor Joshua L. Smith<br />
November 15, 1985<br />
page two<br />
We view <strong>the</strong>se concerns seriously and we encourage you to solicit active<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> all local community colleges in any modification <strong>of</strong> our present<br />
governance structure.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
LEZ: jm<br />
Attaclments (Page 6 and excerpts from pages A-9 and A-10 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Preliminary<br />
Draft <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors 1986 Basic <strong>Agenda</strong>)<br />
cc: All California Community <strong>College</strong> Trustees<br />
Governor George Deukmej ian<br />
All California Legislators<br />
All California Cmmunity <strong>College</strong> chief Executive Officers<br />
?he Ccmmission for <strong>the</strong> Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Master Plan for Higher Education
4. GOVERNANCE<br />
- Goal<br />
CZa14fy and improve tie governattoe structure for cornunit!! coZLegee.<br />
The governance structure for community colleges should provide <strong>the</strong><br />
powers, duties and decisionmaking structures necessary to deliver <strong>the</strong><br />
mission with excellence and accountability. Governance, <strong>the</strong>refore,<br />
should not be fully delineated until <strong>the</strong> mission is known. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
hand, attempting to conceive and implement major reforms for community<br />
colleges in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> a clear governance structure has complicated<br />
and will continue to complicate and under,itine <strong>the</strong> potential success <strong>of</strong><br />
reforms. For purposes <strong>of</strong> shaping an3 deciding reforms in mission, fi-<br />
nance, excellence and accountability, it is critical that at least some<br />
minim1 delineation <strong>of</strong> governance responsibilities be adhered to.<br />
Governance responsibilities can most simply and directly be delineated in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Stdte's role and tile system's role. The State, which essen-<br />
tially consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Legislature and Governor, retains plenary tontrol,<br />
but should focus. on <strong>the</strong> following: deciding <strong>the</strong> broad mission <strong>of</strong> corflmu-<br />
nity colleges; expressing broad expectations to <strong>the</strong> system; indicating<br />
generally how <strong>the</strong> system should interact with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r segments Of edu-<br />
cation; determtning <strong>the</strong> broad finance mechanism for <strong>the</strong> system; and<br />
appropriating revenues to <strong>the</strong> system. The system, which consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
local districts and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors, is one <strong>of</strong> shared governance.<br />
The <strong>Board</strong>'s primary roles are to provide leadership, direction, and over-<br />
sight for <strong>the</strong> system and to represent <strong>the</strong> system tn <strong>the</strong> State. The pri -<br />
mary role <strong>of</strong> districts is to operate <strong>the</strong> colleges -- to be primarily re-<br />
sponsible to <strong>the</strong>ir colnmunities dnd <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors for providing<br />
<strong>the</strong> mission, governance, excellence and accountability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
institutions.<br />
Recommends tions<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors recommends <strong>the</strong> following initiatives to clarify<br />
and improve <strong>the</strong> governance structure <strong>of</strong> community colleges:<br />
1. The <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors will adopt processes for consultation and<br />
Comnunication with local districts in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> systemide<br />
polf cies adopted or administered by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong>, including consul ta-<br />
tive processes for board recorrmndations to <strong>the</strong> State regarding<br />
changes in State policy.<br />
2. The<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors, in consultation with both <strong>the</strong> community<br />
colleges and <strong>the</strong> State, will conduct a review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Education Code<br />
with <strong>the</strong> dim <strong>of</strong> identifying revisions to clarify governance and to<br />
provide a governance structure which is postsecondary in nature,<br />
The review w i l l be completed during 1986, with legislation being<br />
introduced in 1987.
EXCERPTS PRW<br />
PRELIMINARY DRAET OF THH BOARD OP OOVBR~ORS 1986 BASIC AGENDA<br />
Page A-9<br />
"In a postsecondary structure <strong>of</strong> governance, <strong>the</strong> Legislature<br />
speaks more exclusively to <strong>the</strong> state governing board. It<br />
delegates broad authority to <strong>the</strong> state governing board, and does<br />
much less to specify <strong>the</strong> powers and duties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local delivery<br />
entity (when <strong>the</strong> Legislature delegates major authority to a state<br />
governing board and is silent on <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local<br />
delivery entity, such structures are sometimes referred to as<br />
'state-controlled systenls') ."<br />
Page A-10<br />
"The position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors is that a postsecondary<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> governance should be applied to shaping and deciding<br />
responsibilities for community college reforms. This structure<br />
reflects a greater concentration <strong>of</strong> authority in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Governors, with <strong>the</strong> Legislature reserving less <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specifics<br />
to itself, and with districts retaining essential control to<br />
operate <strong>the</strong> colleges."
0 T I ' COLLEGE<br />
C&+ltflISSION - HOLDS IMPORTAllT MEE.rIElG - IN NOVEMREll<br />
lie as a "Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> WholeN'ifor<br />
teeport and study received considerable<br />
The Commi ssion took action to eliminate,<br />
n adzlition, <strong>the</strong> Commission asked staff for<br />
sophical undergirding for Commission :<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> high school drop outs and<br />
s that require serious Commission<br />
December3-4: MeetingorlThirdDraftOutline<br />
January 7-0: Neetiny 0<strong>11</strong> "Draft Report"<br />
Pub1 i c He.lrin(~ - Sacramento<br />
Public tle?ring - San Diego<br />
Public He.jrin(l - San Francisco<br />
February 20: Submission <strong>of</strong> Report to Legislature<br />
-1;10re-
Master Plan Cotnmission<br />
2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2<br />
Some OF <strong>the</strong> more i~npoi'tant actions or discussion that took place were:<br />
1. Open Access and Student Succes~. There was hroad Commission support<br />
fiir;-cX%a%nTT€6 T i m o f not restrictina admission to tlie<br />
colleqes, hut instead limitinb access to proqram; arid classes. Various<br />
assessment activi ties were discussed along with <strong>the</strong> rmtriculation<br />
model. 5ome Commissioners stressed <strong>the</strong> need for accountability<br />
by students throuqll performance and <strong>the</strong> need for districts to he<br />
funded and held accountabl~~ for adequate assistance to students.<br />
-.-<br />
?. Tralisfer. The Commi ssion continues to support s trorig transfer programs<br />
in com~~~uriity colleges. Discussion centered on barriers to<br />
transfer (some OF ~.rliicli i~n,~act <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r segwnts) and possible<br />
solutions. Particular corisern was expressed on <strong>the</strong> special problems<br />
<strong>of</strong> ininori ty students.<br />
- -<br />
3. Vocational Education. The Comnli ssiori eliminated options that would<br />
give aTVocationa'l" education to ei<strong>the</strong>r community colleges or high<br />
schools and adult schools.<br />
1. Re~nedidl Education. Com~ni :;sion mwml)ers are divided on this issue.<br />
'%i?-Eoi?T%??ide~nic floor" ; o tliers would 1 i ke no floor, b<strong>11</strong> t<br />
\~oulcl place a1 1 work below a certain level into a separate insti tutional<br />
structure within tlie college. No wmbers favor elimination<br />
<strong>of</strong> remetli,ttion fran <strong>the</strong> colleges' function. lnterest was sliown in a<br />
new proposal that ~ould permit courses (programs) at any level with,<br />
a 1in1i t on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> ci~mula tive uni ts OF remedial courses.<br />
5. State Funded Adult Education. The Comtnission appears to favor con-<br />
mtTn-C? TEXTTTm)oth K-l? adul t schools and comeuni tv<br />
colleqes to <strong>of</strong>fer tile i,rograms with a strengtlieriing <strong>of</strong> delineation<br />
aqreements atid all enforcemt:nt nlechanisni to assure compliance.<br />
6. Faculty and Ad~tlitii stva tors. The Cornmi ssion extensively discussed<br />
issues o ' F - E e ~ instructor ~ i ~ limits, credentials and tlie<br />
50% Law. !to consetisus was rzi~ched, hut <strong>the</strong>re appears to be a strong<br />
iliteres t i <strong>11</strong> a longer probd tionary period and peer review for tenure.<br />
7. Comlnuni ty <strong>College</strong> Finance. The options represented were divided<br />
r e : (1) sources <strong>of</strong> support, (2) distri-<br />
bution <strong>of</strong> State slrpport, atid (3) allocdtinn neth hod <strong>of</strong> State support.<br />
While some options were eliminated, <strong>the</strong> Commission spent <strong>the</strong> no st<br />
time ill witle-ranging discussions on all possi!)ilities. This itein is<br />
likely to be one <strong>of</strong> tlie first tliscussed at tlie next meeting.<br />
Governance. Again, <strong>the</strong> discussion was wide ra~iging v ~ th i no clear<br />
consens6 except that <strong>the</strong>re should be less legislative direct con<br />
trol and <strong>the</strong> delineation between <strong>the</strong> lloard <strong>of</strong> Governors and local<br />
hoards sl~o~rld he clear. There nras little sentiment for tlie elimina<br />
tion <strong>of</strong> locally elected boards, hut regional planning activity was<br />
discussed.
BOARD OF TRUSTEE<br />
MS. DIANA N. LOCUARD. PRLSlDtNr<br />
OR GARY 1. WOODS. MCL PRLSIOINT<br />
OR I. PAUL GLLLRIS. CLIMSCCMTARY<br />
DR ROBERT T. McLEAN. Alu4OLR<br />
DR LOWARD C ORTELL h4UlOLR<br />
November 15, 1985<br />
Ms. Jackie Suitt<br />
1600 Beverly Drive<br />
Palm Springs. CA 92262<br />
Dear trustee Suitt:<br />
DR. LOUIS t ZELLERS<br />
PRLIIDtM/SUPtRINTLNOCNT<br />
On behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Citrus <strong>College</strong> trustees, we are writing to you today to urge<br />
you to place <strong>the</strong> enclosed analysis on your next board agenda.<br />
Have you read carefully <strong>the</strong> Preliminary Draft <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governorst 1986<br />
Basic <strong>Agenda</strong>, specifically page 6 which relates to -? Do you realize<br />
that <strong>the</strong> existing structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California community colleges is under fire?<br />
Statements on page 6, and on portions <strong>of</strong> pages A-9 and A-10, threaten to<br />
undermine your authority as a trustee by destroying local control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
community colleges through <strong>the</strong> imposition <strong>of</strong> a "mini-UC <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> ~egents"!<br />
Coachella Valley Community <strong>College</strong> District, which has been carefully nurtured<br />
by your local board, could become a cog in a statewide machine. If we do not<br />
act immediately, we predict we will see <strong>the</strong> day when our district will become<br />
s.<br />
State Community <strong>College</strong> District Number 641"<br />
Consider this letter to be a call to action for your college. We mYkt involve<br />
our campus communities, local community leaders, pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, local<br />
legislators and o<strong>the</strong>r elected <strong>of</strong>ficials who support community colleges, in<br />
voicing our concerns.<br />
Trustees are elected to a public trust to discharge <strong>the</strong>ir responsibilities and<br />
to see that <strong>the</strong>ir colleges function to meet community needs. If <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Governorst plan succeeds, state-appointed <strong>of</strong>ficials will determine local policy.<br />
There w i l l be little or no local accountability, and <strong>the</strong> citizens who elected<br />
you will have no recourse.<br />
We realize this is a time-consuming item for you to place on your agenda;<br />
however, all o<strong>the</strong>r items will be meaningless if we lose authority to govern our<br />
districts1
November 15, 1985<br />
page two<br />
The Citrus <strong>College</strong> trustees will be happy to assist you in any way and encourage<br />
you to voice your concerns about <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> governance to <strong>the</strong> Chancellor and<br />
your local legislators.<br />
We would be pleased to know <strong>of</strong> your response to this letter and whe<strong>the</strong>r you are<br />
considering placing this matter on your agenda.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
I. Paul Geleris. M.D.<br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees<br />
g.Q d~-&'<br />
Edward C. Ortell. Ph.D.<br />
<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees<br />
Enclosure (Letter to Chancellor smith)
POLITICAL OYNAI~lICS: CRUCIAL FACTORS FOR<br />
IFJSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN POSTSECONOARY EOIJCATION<br />
Political Power Reelities<br />
The status <strong>of</strong> political relationehips in <strong>the</strong> governance <strong>of</strong><br />
Instructionel Technology in postsecondary education, partioularly in<br />
<strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s, ia marked by a dynemic tension.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> best tradition <strong>of</strong> a democratic ecciety, many<br />
forces--supportive, neutrel, and opposing--converge in <strong>the</strong> political<br />
arena. There are few certainties when reviewing <strong>the</strong> statue <strong>of</strong><br />
Educational Technology and Instructionel Technology [AECT, 1977,<br />
1979) in <strong>the</strong> Californie Community <strong>College</strong>s. The proponent8 <strong>of</strong><br />
Educational Technology and Instructional TeChnology have not gained<br />
a predominance <strong>of</strong> authority when putting <strong>the</strong>se educational<br />
strategies in place. Their efforte mre characterized by <strong>the</strong><br />
recognition <strong>of</strong> technologicsl develcpment, <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
technologicel applications, evelustion, fur<strong>the</strong>r develcpment, and<br />
permanent application. Opponents have not been successful in<br />
removing Educational Technology or Inetructional Technology from <strong>the</strong><br />
Community <strong>College</strong> oduoational scene. Their efforts usually rely<br />
upon <strong>the</strong> strategies <strong>of</strong> delay, extended essesement, and containment.<br />
However, <strong>the</strong> pervasive power <strong>of</strong> newer communications technology is<br />
eo strong that sweeping changee are being mads and, in fact, <strong>the</strong><br />
changes are becoming integral componente <strong>of</strong> society.<br />
Interviews conducted for this research chronicle <strong>the</strong> depth and<br />
diversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> politicel relationships in <strong>the</strong> governence <strong>of</strong>
Snstructional Technology. The excitement and confusion <strong>of</strong> being on<br />
<strong>the</strong> frontier is evident. Often individuals with similar positions<br />
and perceptions have diverse approaches to Instruotional Teohnology.<br />
Technology has <strong>of</strong>ten been viewed as <strong>the</strong> mechine since <strong>the</strong><br />
Induetriel Revolution. Charlie Chaplin's movie Modern Times gives a<br />
humorous, graphic juxtaposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> men/mschine<br />
conflict--perticularly in <strong>the</strong> scenes where Chaplin tries to keep<br />
paoe with <strong>the</strong> assembly line. The metaphor is so etrong that IDtI<br />
uees this <strong>the</strong>me in <strong>the</strong> advertising campaign for <strong>the</strong> IBM Personal<br />
Computer. The Chaplln figure has learned to love <strong>the</strong> machine and<br />
make <strong>the</strong> machine work for him. Eduoational Teohnology is reusonebly<br />
well accepted in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s. Inetruotional<br />
Technology is still perceived to be a threat by some.<br />
The perception that Instructional Technology will change<br />
education overnight is quite shortsighted. Change will not come in<br />
a clep <strong>of</strong> thunder and a blinding flash <strong>of</strong> light. The evolutionery<br />
trend similar to <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> printed textbooks is probably a<br />
more appropriate model for <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> Instructionel<br />
Technology in historicel perspective. The Communications Revolution<br />
is fully underway and <strong>the</strong> changee will accelerate. However, when<br />
Generel Motors introduced <strong>the</strong> dieael eleotric locomotive in <strong>the</strong><br />
1940'6, it took ten years to eliminate all steam powered treine in<br />
<strong>the</strong> United Staten. The steam locomotive had dominated rail travel<br />
for over one hundred yeare.<br />
The rapid growth and tremendous power <strong>of</strong> communication5<br />
technology emerged as <strong>the</strong> most pervesive factor in <strong>the</strong> discussion es<br />
revealed in <strong>the</strong> document research and interviews. No individual who
was interviewed sew this mejor societal trend dooreusing for <strong>the</strong><br />
short or long term. The Communications Revolution is in Full swing<br />
end shows few signs <strong>of</strong> stabilizing or slowing. Recent Federal end<br />
state legislation hae allowed corporstions to make tax reducing<br />
donations <strong>of</strong> equipment to schools. Recently, Apple Computer gave<br />
every K-<strong>12</strong> school in CaliFornia en Apple IIe computer. The<br />
donetion <strong>of</strong> more than twenty million dollers worth <strong>of</strong> computers<br />
stipuleted that <strong>the</strong> computers be used'in direct instruction with<br />
students. IDt.1, Digitel, and o<strong>the</strong>r menufaoturers heve speoiel grants<br />
and discounts for eduction. The growth potential for both<br />
Educational Technology end Instructions1 Technology is obvious.<br />
This broed societal trend will have many ramifioations for <strong>the</strong><br />
acceptance <strong>of</strong> Educetionel Technology and Instruotionel Teohnology.<br />
Societal Trends ere s mejor political edventage for <strong>the</strong> acceptance<br />
<strong>of</strong> Instructional Teohnology.<br />
All sectors <strong>of</strong> society will see tremendous pressure8 for<br />
increased productivity at equal or lees cost. Thle issue hss<br />
reshaped <strong>the</strong> auto manufacturing industry in Jspan in <strong>the</strong> mid 1970's<br />
and in <strong>the</strong> United States in <strong>the</strong> early 1980's. Robotics end computer<br />
controlled assembly are evident in msny industries. The Daumol<br />
Crunch as described by Heinich (1976) is continuing to shepe many<br />
fields. Tho private sector <strong>of</strong> tho economy may become increasingly<br />
intolerant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leck <strong>of</strong> significant increeses in productivitx in<br />
<strong>the</strong> public sector--and particularly in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> eduoation.
Institutions, Organizations, and Actors<br />
California has a proliferation <strong>of</strong> Organizations operating in<br />
<strong>the</strong> political arena. The California Community <strong>College</strong>s, as a group,<br />
are <strong>the</strong> largest postsecondary educational system in <strong>the</strong> world.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> size and complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />
<strong>College</strong>s <strong>the</strong>re is a marked tendency in California to form various<br />
organizational structures. Thie organizational trend is emphseized<br />
by state agencies and <strong>the</strong> legislature who encourage oommunioation in<br />
lsrge repranantative struotures ra<strong>the</strong>r than by individual or<br />
splinter groups.<br />
Institutions and organizations represent <strong>the</strong> power bseo for<br />
most individual actors and are sxtramely influential when<br />
aetablishing operational parameters for an individual sctor. For<br />
this study, <strong>the</strong> term institutions means a grouping whioh is created<br />
by code law. The term organizations means groupings which have<br />
significant political motivation but are not created by code law.<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> inetitutions are district governing boards, state<br />
governing boards, colleges, universities, and state commissions.<br />
Organizations include pr<strong>of</strong>esaionsl organizations, accreditation<br />
commission, task forces, consortia, and ad hoc groups.<br />
The study deecribed and enalyzed individual actors as <strong>the</strong>y<br />
executed a particular role on <strong>the</strong> political stage and did not<br />
attempt to pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>the</strong> personal traits and 0h~r~cteriStics <strong>of</strong> those<br />
individuals. Identification <strong>of</strong> individual actors should reveal most<br />
political interaotiona; however, conoentration wholly upon actors<br />
yields a single dimension without <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> organizations and<br />
inetitutions.
Pnedictably, <strong>the</strong> Institutions which were identified in this<br />
study were found to be most central to <strong>the</strong> politioel disouesion<br />
regarding Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />
<strong>College</strong>s. These Institutions tend to be very influential end very<br />
stable ,over a period <strong>of</strong> time. Organizations vary, to some degree,<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir goals and purpose over time. Coneequently, <strong>the</strong><br />
influence and importenoe <strong>of</strong> any Organization is subjeot to more<br />
relative change when compared with Institutions. Individual ectors<br />
are subject to more ohange ainoe rolea change within en Institution<br />
or Organization and incfividuels assume o<strong>the</strong>r roles. Overall,<br />
Institutions tend to be atable, Organizations less stable, and<br />
Actore are highly variabia.<br />
Overtly Stated and Underlying Self-Interests<br />
The Matrix Analysis <strong>of</strong> Overtly Stated Self-Intereets <strong>of</strong><br />
Institutions indicated support for Educetional Technology and<br />
Inetructional Technology. This perception was verified by <strong>the</strong><br />
interviews. Major reporte by <strong>the</strong> California Postsecondery Eduoation<br />
Commission (CPEC, 1979 end CPEC, 1981) ere supportive end<br />
promotional in tone. An eveluative report <strong>of</strong> Independent Study<br />
courses by <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong> Chancellors Office<br />
(CCCCO, 1981) ie equally supportive end makes reoomrnendatione for<br />
expending Instructional Technology within <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />
<strong>College</strong>s.<br />
Most Organizations ere overtly supportive <strong>of</strong> Educational<br />
Technology. The major disunity is found in <strong>the</strong> support or<br />
opposition regarding Inetructional Technology. Generally, <strong>the</strong>re is
support for Instructional Technology among Organizetions with tho<br />
exception <strong>of</strong> faculty groups. There is evidence that <strong>the</strong> Academic<br />
Senate and <strong>the</strong> Faculty Association may be moving toward a more<br />
neutral position.<br />
The perception <strong>of</strong> job security, certainly, is a powerful<br />
motivating force. Potential displacement in <strong>the</strong> work<br />
force is not mentioned in most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> documents addressing <strong>the</strong><br />
application <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology. However, this issue was<br />
frequently one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first items mentioned during <strong>the</strong> interviews.<br />
Faculty perceive <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology as a<br />
men/machine confronttation. Politically this is a most volatile<br />
issue for faculty to eddress directly in <strong>the</strong> political arena.<br />
Support for job security among faculty will be strong--giving <strong>the</strong><br />
faculty a positive political leverage. With <strong>the</strong> public at large,<br />
however, <strong>the</strong>re will be little sympathy for faculty job security. IF<br />
<strong>the</strong> issue is brought into <strong>the</strong> political arena, it will function at<br />
two levels. The first level will be supportive within <strong>the</strong> education<br />
comnunity, <strong>the</strong> second hostile with <strong>the</strong> public at largo.<br />
The underlying self-interests arc not always parellel with<br />
overtly expressed self-interests. Job security emerges as <strong>the</strong> major<br />
underlying self-interest. Almost as if a "gentlemanls agreement <strong>of</strong><br />
silence" had been struck, <strong>the</strong> iesua <strong>of</strong> job displacement rarely<br />
occurs in <strong>the</strong> formal discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> governance <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />
Technology. tiowever, during <strong>the</strong> face-to-face interviews, job<br />
displacement for faculty was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first and most frequent<br />
concerns raised. Public discussion does not eddress <strong>the</strong> job<br />
displacoment issue, but most assuredly, this issue woe on everyono's
mind in private. It is extremely important to note that public<br />
documents and statements do not always reveal <strong>the</strong> actual positions<br />
on a particular issue. Behevior <strong>of</strong> en Institution, Organization, or<br />
Actor can not he predicted exclusively from publicly stated<br />
positions. Issues that sre overt may mask more basic issues.<br />
Fac~rlty raise issues <strong>of</strong> "comparability" and "quslity" while ignoring<br />
issues <strong>of</strong> "cost" and iproductivity.''<br />
Fundin2<br />
Funding for Educational Technology and Instructional Teohnology<br />
is quite stable and well established in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />
<strong>College</strong>s. regulation^ which would govern and control Educational<br />
Technology are left exclusively to <strong>the</strong> discretion <strong>of</strong> looal<br />
districts. Budgets for Educational Teohnology are developed<br />
locolly, without a formula from <strong>the</strong> state, and reflect <strong>the</strong><br />
comnitment to this activity as determined by each oempus and<br />
district. However, <strong>the</strong> law and administrative regulations<br />
specifying <strong>the</strong> reimbursement <strong>of</strong> Average Daily Attendance (AOA) are<br />
quite specific and highly structured for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />
Technology. Chapter 1055, Section A4500 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California Education<br />
Coda and Chapter 4 in <strong>the</strong> California Administrative Code give <strong>the</strong><br />
complete regulations for Instructional Technology.<br />
The California Education Coda and <strong>the</strong> Administrative Code<br />
indicate that <strong>the</strong>re is a strong commitment to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
Instructional Technology, under certain conditions as <strong>the</strong> primary<br />
source for delivering educational presentations. In 1970, changes<br />
in <strong>the</strong> law included granting Average Daily Attendance (ADA]
eimbursement bnsed upon units <strong>of</strong> credit and not clock hours <strong>of</strong><br />
attendance. Previous provisions based a funding formula on<br />
reimhursing a district for less than one half <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering<br />
courses using Instructional Technology. These provisions were<br />
contained in Chepter 157fi Sootion 1<strong>12</strong>51 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Statutes <strong>of</strong> 1970<br />
regulating <strong>the</strong> prooursor <strong>of</strong> Independent Study, <strong>the</strong> Coordinated<br />
Instructional System format. Changing <strong>the</strong> funding formula to<br />
reflect apportionment based upon units ra<strong>the</strong>r than clock hours and<br />
funding <strong>the</strong> full amount, ra<strong>the</strong>r than less than one half, would<br />
demonstrate an increase in value placed on Instructional Technology<br />
in <strong>the</strong> California Community Collegos.<br />
Two major disadvantages remain in Chapter 1055, section 84500.<br />
One is <strong>the</strong> fact that only transfer courses may be <strong>of</strong>fered in<br />
Indepenrlent Study format. Tho eecond major disadvantage is that<br />
class sections are limited to <strong>12</strong>5 students unless a speoial waiver<br />
is granted by <strong>the</strong> Chancellor's Office. These restrictions indicate<br />
a reluctance to allovl expanded use <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology.<br />
This reluctance is manifest in <strong>the</strong> low and represents a compromise<br />
between supporters and opponents <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology. The<br />
concerns for cost and productivity in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />
<strong>College</strong>s may have an influence on funding formulas for Independent<br />
Study format classes.<br />
Political Dynamics<br />
As be expected in a democratic society, <strong>the</strong>re are few<br />
absolutes when reviewing <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> Educationel Technology and<br />
Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s. A
dynamic tension exists. The proponents <strong>of</strong> Educational Technology<br />
end Instructional Technology have not gained a predomin~nce <strong>of</strong><br />
authority when putting <strong>the</strong>se educational strategies in place.<br />
Opponents have not been successful in removing Educational<br />
Technology or Instructional Technclogy from <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />
<strong>College</strong> educational scene. However, <strong>the</strong> pervasive power <strong>of</strong> newer<br />
communications technology is so etrong that sweeping changes era<br />
being made end, in fact, <strong>the</strong> changes are becoming integral<br />
components <strong>of</strong> society.<br />
Eduoational Technclogy end Instructional Technology are firmly<br />
entrnnchnd in <strong>the</strong> Community <strong>College</strong> educational scene. fluring <strong>the</strong><br />
Fall Semester <strong>of</strong> 1079, students numbering <strong>11</strong>,339 enrolled in oourses<br />
using Instructional Technology and G,098 completed <strong>the</strong> courser:; in<br />
<strong>the</strong> 1900 Spring Semester, 15,452 enrolled and 9,033 completed<br />
distance learning throughout <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s<br />
(CCCCO, 1901, p. 16). Fur<strong>the</strong>r, elmost every student hee come into<br />
contact with Educational Technology while enrolled in <strong>the</strong> California<br />
Community <strong>College</strong>s. There is a stable, permanent law regulating <strong>the</strong><br />
use <strong>of</strong> Instruoticnal Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />
<strong>College</strong>s.<br />
The interactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institutions and Organizations w i l l<br />
tend to he aligned as chronicled in <strong>the</strong> findings. Faculty w i l l<br />
remain suspicious <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology until incentivee can<br />
be identified thmt would show Instructional Technology to be more to<br />
thoir pereonal advantage. This position w i l l be reflected in thsir<br />
organizations, particularly in <strong>the</strong> CTA end CFT. The Academic Senate<br />
has made attempts to become more supportive OF Instructional
Technology. The Faculty Association also shows signs <strong>of</strong> becoming<br />
more supportive as expressed by <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> "concerned" ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than "opposed ."<br />
support from Institutions continues end is stable for<br />
Instruotional Technology. The Association <strong>of</strong> California Community<br />
college Administrators, <strong>the</strong> Learninj Resources ~asociation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
California Community <strong>College</strong>s, and concerned district Chencellors<br />
and Presidente seem more determined than ever to streng<strong>the</strong>n<br />
Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s. The<br />
question is not will Educational Teohnology and Instructional<br />
Technology be utilized in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s; <strong>the</strong><br />
question is what will be <strong>the</strong> growth rate over <strong>the</strong> short and long<br />
term?<br />
Synchronization <strong>of</strong> Educational Technology/Instructional Tschnoloa<br />
with <strong>the</strong> Political Process<br />
There is widespread support for Educational Technology in <strong>the</strong><br />
California Community <strong>College</strong>s. The interviews veriFied <strong>the</strong> support<br />
<strong>of</strong> Educational Technology as presented in <strong>the</strong> Matrix Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
Overtly Stated Self-Intereeb <strong>of</strong> Institutions and <strong>the</strong> Analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> Overtly Statad Self-Interests <strong>of</strong> Organizations. There were only<br />
a fevt exceptions: one respondent perceived <strong>the</strong> Student Government<br />
Association as being neutral to Educational Technology; one<br />
perceived <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governora as being neutral; a third<br />
perceived <strong>the</strong> Academic Senate, <strong>the</strong> California Federation <strong>of</strong><br />
Teachers, <strong>the</strong> California Teachers Association, end <strong>the</strong> Faculty<br />
Association as neutral when relating to Educational Technology.<br />
I
The assessment <strong>of</strong> tho Matrices in <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong><br />
Instructional Technology is, predictably, less conclusive.<br />
Gonerally, <strong>the</strong> perceptions from <strong>the</strong> interview tended to move some<br />
institutions toward a more neutral rating. A very significant<br />
movement, however, may be with regard to <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Academic Senate and <strong>the</strong> Faculty Assooiation [both <strong>of</strong> whom are<br />
presumed to oppose) Instructional Teohnology. Two individuals moved<br />
<strong>the</strong> Academic Senate to a neutral position. One individual moved<br />
both <strong>the</strong> Academic Senate and <strong>the</strong> Faculty Association to a neutral<br />
position. One individual felt <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Academic Senate<br />
and Fsculty Association was more appropriately described aa<br />
"concerned" ra<strong>the</strong>r than "opposed." Meet reepondente agreed with <strong>the</strong><br />
rankings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institutione and Organizatione over <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong><br />
Instructional Technology as presented in <strong>the</strong> matrices. Support from<br />
various institutions and organizations for Educational Technology<br />
form a political base for more support fdr Instructional Technology.<br />
Participation <strong>of</strong> Educational Technology/Instructional Technology in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Political Process<br />
The advantages for using Educational Technology and<br />
Instructional Tochnology in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s are<br />
overwhelming; however, <strong>the</strong> present incentives for faculty<br />
involvement remains minimal. The major political problem is that<br />
faculty in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s and in all <strong>of</strong><br />
postsecondary education do not percaive "that a deal has been cut"<br />
to make Instructional Teohnology a clear choice for existing<br />
faculty. Acceptance and resistance are two sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>
motivational coin. The resistance can he simply viewad as lack <strong>of</strong><br />
appropriate incentive. Instructional Technology when manifest in<br />
<strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> quality telecourses or quality computer assisted<br />
instruction does have all <strong>the</strong> faculty incentives in plaoe for<br />
those faculty who participate as content specialists and presenters.<br />
These faculty are in a small minority campared with all California<br />
Community <strong>College</strong> faculty. The forces which will broaden that<br />
participation aro many, but must be aligned by what John Gall (1977)<br />
describes as <strong>the</strong> Vector Theory <strong>of</strong> Systems!<br />
Systems run better when designed to run downhill.<br />
Corollary:<br />
Systems aligned with human motivstional vectors will<br />
sometimes work. Systema opposing such vectors work poorly<br />
or not at all. (p. 931<br />
The alignment <strong>of</strong>' human motivational vectors must be carefully<br />
considered in any system. Motivational veotors must be considered<br />
for all aspects <strong>of</strong> human interaction. Plotivational vectors are <strong>the</strong><br />
determining elements <strong>of</strong> politicel action. Political relationships<br />
will bs <strong>of</strong> vital importance in <strong>the</strong> governance <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />
Technology in postsecondsry education. In fact, <strong>the</strong> governance<br />
issue begins in <strong>the</strong> course approval process. Major decisions are<br />
predominantly made by an individual faculty member and at <strong>the</strong><br />
departmental level as to how instruction will be delivered to<br />
students. Typically, a faculty member formulates an idea for a<br />
course, presents <strong>the</strong> course to an appropriate department, <strong>the</strong><br />
department submits <strong>the</strong> course to <strong>the</strong> campus currioulum committee for<br />
review, <strong>the</strong> course <strong>the</strong>n goes to appropriate administrator, local<br />
board, and state <strong>of</strong>ficials for approval. In this configuration <strong>the</strong><br />
primary decision making power lies with <strong>the</strong> individual faculty
member who formulates an idea for a course. Since few incentives<br />
oxist for faculty to choose Instructionel Technology in <strong>the</strong> current<br />
governance configuration, minLmal expansion OF Instructional<br />
Technology w i l l occur unless this decision process is changed.<br />
Changes in faculty incentive ayotems for increased productivity and<br />
use <strong>of</strong> Instruction01 Technology are headed.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> Orenge Coast District e separate college, Coastline<br />
Community college, was established to <strong>of</strong>fer a variety <strong>of</strong> alternative<br />
learning environments, including telecourses, <strong>of</strong>fered under <strong>the</strong><br />
Independent Study law. Faculty and staff were selected who<br />
supported <strong>the</strong> Instructional Technology configuration. Courses ere<br />
planned with a curriculum team ra<strong>the</strong>r than a single faoulty member<br />
and <strong>the</strong> tolecourse format is used frequently. The governance<br />
structure has more faculty incentives for Instructional Technology<br />
with <strong>the</strong> Coastline model.<br />
The major forces acting as political resouroes--Societal Trends<br />
and Ideas--are key elements <strong>of</strong> political control. Public Opinion i s<br />
an important factor because political figures must be responsive to<br />
<strong>the</strong> voting public. Access to <strong>the</strong> Legislative Process is vital and<br />
communications w i l l be channeled through <strong>the</strong> Chancellor's OfFice and<br />
Ooard <strong>of</strong> Governors. 'lass Communicetions bledia are important<br />
political rssources since Societal Trends and Ideas are conveyed<br />
through <strong>the</strong> mass media to shape Public Opinion. Money can be an<br />
important resource but for Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong><br />
California Community <strong>College</strong>s <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> cash contributions w i l l<br />
be minimal. The Electoral Process w i l l have little direct<br />
consequence on <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology in tho
California Community <strong>College</strong>s as <strong>the</strong> distinction drawn between<br />
Educational Technology and Instruotional Teohnology are ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
complex.<br />
The broad governance structure in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />
<strong>College</strong>s supports Instructional Teohnology. The California<br />
Postsecondary Education Commission, <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />
<strong>College</strong>s Chancellors1 Offioe, along with many organizations support<br />
Instructional Technology. The Legielature has paseed a law<br />
authorizing Independent Study format courses. Alliances with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
organizations external to tho education world, such as <strong>the</strong><br />
Celifornia 14anufecturee Aescoiation, could prova to be supportive to<br />
Instruotionel Technology.<br />
Predictions About Future Actions<br />
The pressures <strong>of</strong> cost may prove to be <strong>of</strong> some political<br />
advantage for- Instructionel Technology. Although most educators<br />
state that cost should not be <strong>the</strong> deciding factor in <strong>the</strong> applicetion<br />
<strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology, <strong>the</strong> motivation is powerful. High<br />
initial costs, as identified .by CPEC (CPEC, 2982, pp. 70-741, are<br />
regained by mess distribution over a period <strong>of</strong> time. The high<br />
initial costs <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology are political liabilities;<br />
<strong>the</strong> low cost per student over a period <strong>of</strong> time is a persuasive<br />
political asset. The assessment <strong>of</strong> long term geina or short term<br />
gains will determine <strong>the</strong> political posture toward cost.<br />
Quality as a political issue will dissipate as evaluations<br />
focus upon student performance ra<strong>the</strong>r than upon instruotional<br />
methodology. The quality issue is really a transfer <strong>of</strong> "g~ilt by
association." Many people confuse <strong>the</strong> entertainment content <strong>of</strong><br />
commercial television with <strong>the</strong> technical medium <strong>of</strong> television. The<br />
assumption equates anything on telavision with something that has<br />
little intellectual value. This is a false assumption. The quality<br />
intellectual <strong>of</strong>Porings from Public Brosdcasting System (PUS) are<br />
rapidly ohanging that notion for a widening mass audience. An<br />
interesting comparison is <strong>the</strong> attitude toward TV and computers.<br />
Television started an a mass medium on <strong>the</strong> heels <strong>of</strong> radio. Computer<br />
applicetions were started in highly specialized, limited Fiolds.<br />
Computers are rapidly becoming a mass technology, while tslevision,<br />
particularly cahls television, is sweking incraasingly specielizsd<br />
markets. Uecsuse computers started with tfserious" applications in<br />
<strong>the</strong> military, science, and business, <strong>the</strong>re is a more intellectual<br />
oonnotation to computers. These are subtle but important<br />
observations as feculty ere enthusiaetically applying computers in<br />
<strong>the</strong> instructional proceae. There is less reeietance to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
computaro in instruction end leso <strong>of</strong>' a perception that quality will<br />
be hampered with <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong>' this technology. These<br />
attitudes have significant political implications For <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
Inetructional Technology.<br />
Contract education, although neutral on tho ourfaoe, may have<br />
some important leverages For Inetructionel Teohnology. Corporations<br />
are finding <strong>the</strong> training and retreining mission very important as<br />
industrial operations rapidly change and require new, more complex<br />
skills. Joint efforts by industry and <strong>the</strong> community colleges bring<br />
relevant training to <strong>the</strong> corporate site. Muoh <strong>of</strong> thin training is<br />
delivered by Instructional Taohnology. Positive experiences for
corporatione and community colleges may be converted to political<br />
support for Instructional Technology from groups such as tho<br />
California I.lanufacturers Association.<br />
The opportunities for pr<strong>of</strong>essional development for faculty<br />
through Educational Technology and ~netructional Technology are<br />
related to issues <strong>of</strong> quality and can he used to augment political<br />
support. The content reseerch and presentation rigor <strong>the</strong>t must be<br />
an integral part <strong>of</strong> good inntructional materials or telecourses are<br />
powerful motivational forces. The racognition for media development<br />
is a creative challenge most faculty find rewarding. Appropriate<br />
Financial incentive in royalty agreements for faoulty can compensate<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir extra effort for creating alternative learning syeterns.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>r, opportunities for increased student and faculty interaction<br />
is a distinct part <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology. The human,<br />
integrated with s<strong>of</strong>tware and hardware systems, is vital for<br />
effective Instructional Technology. Instructional Technology can<br />
divert faoulty efforts from repetitious delivery <strong>of</strong> information to<br />
stimulating discussion with students at levels <strong>of</strong> higher cognitive<br />
activities. These advances can be political assets for students and<br />
faculty.<br />
The issue <strong>of</strong> job security may hold some points <strong>of</strong> compromine<br />
with regard to <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> full-time instructors to part-time<br />
instructors. Currently, in <strong>the</strong> Celifornie Community <strong>College</strong>s<br />
nun-tenured, part-time faculty outnumber full-time faoulty. As<br />
financial pressures mount, more and mora classes are being taught by<br />
<strong>the</strong> part-tine instructore. If produotivity can be increased through<br />
<strong>the</strong> use OF Instructional Tachnology by <strong>the</strong> full-time Faculty, <strong>the</strong>n
<strong>the</strong> need for pert-time faculty would he reduced. This would<br />
stabilize <strong>the</strong> employment <strong>of</strong> full-time faculty and give some needed<br />
incentives for using full-time faculty ra<strong>the</strong>r than part-time<br />
faculty. This is a strong political argument for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s.<br />
One important area for examination is <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> technology<br />
and differentiated etaffing in o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>of</strong>essions. The use <strong>of</strong><br />
technology is rapidly expanding in <strong>the</strong> medical and legal<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essions, Both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se fields also make extonaive use <strong>of</strong><br />
differentiated staffing. However, upon close obeervation no job<br />
displacement or reduction in salary has occurred while productivity<br />
and quality <strong>of</strong> services <strong>of</strong>fered has increased. Parallels might he<br />
drawn from <strong>the</strong> medical end legel pr<strong>of</strong>essions and be applied to<br />
education.<br />
Alliances with supportive organizations and incentives for<br />
faculty hold <strong>the</strong> key for future axpansion <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />
Technology. The organizational alliences w i l l be Found with<br />
organizations external to <strong>the</strong> current education scene or with<br />
emerging educetional orgenizationa. Currently alliances are stable<br />
with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> some poeitive movement by <strong>the</strong> Academic Senate<br />
and Faculty Association toward more support nF Instructional<br />
Technology.<br />
If <strong>the</strong> debate regarding Eduoational Technology and<br />
Instructional Technology ever ends, it w i l l be <strong>the</strong> values and <strong>the</strong><br />
-<br />
idaels <strong>the</strong>t <strong>the</strong> society deems importent which w i l l datermine tho<br />
outcomen--not <strong>the</strong> technologioel means used to shape <strong>the</strong> outcomes.<br />
Technology in merely a tool to be used or not used, st <strong>the</strong>
discretion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> society. Values and idsala drive <strong>the</strong> system.<br />
These values and ideals combined v~ith technological advances arc<br />
pert <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> continuing evolutionary change, <strong>of</strong> education. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />
innovation, such as <strong>the</strong> universal adoption <strong>of</strong> textbooks, did not<br />
occur in one day. Placing <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />
Technology in perspective Dr. Bernie Luskln has said, '~Uoll, changa<br />
<strong>the</strong>ory says it takes a generation to live--and a generation to die."
BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />
ACCT Tesk Force on Definition and Terminology. Educational<br />
Technology: A Glossary <strong>of</strong> Terms. Washington, 0. C.: AECT,<br />
1977, 1979.<br />
nailey, S. K. Education Interest Groups in <strong>the</strong> Nation's Capital.<br />
Washington, 0. C.f American Council on Education, 1975.<br />
Berg, E. <strong>11</strong>. Report to <strong>the</strong> Legislature on <strong>the</strong> tducationel and<br />
Fiscal EfFects <strong>of</strong> Inclepend~nt Studx. IJnpublished report to<br />
<strong>the</strong> bard <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s.<br />
Sacramento, June 1901.<br />
CaliPornia Community Collage Chancellor's Office. The Educational<br />
and Fincal Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Legislation Authorizing Independent<br />
Study, 1970-00. Sacramento: California Community <strong>College</strong><br />
Chancellor's Office, 1901.<br />
California Postsecondary Education Commission.<br />
Instructional tledia Osycnd Campus. Sacramento: California<br />
Postsecondary Education Commieeion, 1979.<br />
California Postsecondary Education Commission. Linking<br />
Californians for Learning. Sacramento: California<br />
Postsecondary Education Commission, 1901.<br />
Coder, A. Why Do Community <strong>College</strong> Faculty Resint Media as an<br />
Instructional Delivery System? Educetionel Technology, May<br />
1903, pp. 7-<strong>11</strong>.<br />
flalil, R. Mcdorn Political Analysis. Englevrood Cliffs, Nevi<br />
Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963.<br />
Gall, J. Systemetics. New York: The New York Times nook Co.,<br />
1577.<br />
Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y. S. Effective Evaluation. Sen<br />
Francisco: Jossey-Bass P~lblishers, 1901.<br />
Heinich, R. Instructional Technology and Decision<br />
Educational Considerations, Spring 1903, z(2), 25-25.<br />
Ileinich, R. and Ebert, K. Legal Barriers to Educational<br />
Technology and Instructional Productivity. Rloomington,<br />
Indiana: National Institute for Education, 1976.<br />
Japan Computer llsage Development Institute. The Plan for an<br />
Information Society: A Notional Goal Toward <strong>the</strong> Year 2000.<br />
Ekistics 226, September 1974.
I
To: Trustees<br />
From : Jackie Suitt<br />
Subject: The Great Policy Debate<br />
A CCGT Regional Workshop<br />
held in San Diego on<br />
December 4, 1905<br />
Workshop presentor: Dan Weiler who reviewed<br />
key findings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community college study sponsored<br />
by <strong>the</strong> California Business l{oundtable,(86 largest<br />
corporations in California which adopt positions on<br />
public policy issues).<br />
Bernian-iiileiler is a private policy research corporation<br />
which did <strong>the</strong> 1980 study on educational policy for<br />
<strong>the</strong> Roundtable on I{-<strong>12</strong>'s. Their recommendations resulted<br />
in SB813; major reform legislation for public schools<br />
in California. I<br />
Their study on col~~n~unity colleges included<br />
cost effectiveness, This study is a major source<br />
<strong>of</strong> information for <strong>the</strong> Masterrplan Commission and<br />
included research on Governance; Finance; Faculty;<br />
Hemediation and Students.<br />
CONGLUBIONB: Community colleges have too many1:missions.<br />
Public relations efforts need great improvement. There<br />
is much mis-information,<br />
A. Governqnce : .<br />
Governance is shargd today with overlapping<br />
authority. A t least 1600 code changes since 197%-<br />
more authority given to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors by<br />
<strong>the</strong> Legislature. Money authority shifted to <strong>the</strong><br />
Legislature. l%esponsibilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors<br />
and local boards almost identical. No detailed oversite:<br />
authority. <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors may be forced by <strong>the</strong><br />
Legislature to make inroads into local authority. !<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> uncertain governance authority,<br />
key decisions are made in <strong>the</strong> Legislature--decisions<br />
whose outcome may or may not benefit colleges. The<br />
Legislature is not <strong>the</strong> arena where key decisions<br />
should be made. But <strong>the</strong>re is no CLEAR power to<br />
enforce by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors.
Page 2<br />
B. Finance<br />
lievenues are down 10% per ADA since 1978.<br />
Attendance-based funding has lowered <strong>the</strong> quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> educational program; with a tendency to bring<br />
in as many students as possible with lower academic<br />
quality to encourage students to stay in class.<br />
C. Students<br />
Increased part-time. Pull-time declined in 10<br />
years with enough part-time gains to make up for<br />
full-time losses. Over 76% work: more than half are<br />
over 30 years old. vocational students increased from<br />
39$ in 1970 to 50% in 1984.<br />
There is a decline in students who tramsfer; most<br />
who transfer are full-time community college students.<br />
Typical students at four-year institytions do not<br />
work.<br />
STUDY FOINTED OUT INADEQUATE COUNSLXING AND<br />
SCREENING. STUDENT-COUNSL%OI? RAT I0 AVERAGE 1-900<br />
MINIMUQI. AHTICULATION IINKVLN WITH FOUR-YEAH SCIIOOLS.<br />
STUDY IiECOIU'IMlCNDEU I\lORI< bVOI
Community <strong>College</strong>s continue to be flexible and<br />
diverse--but <strong>the</strong>re are problem areas:<br />
1. Transfer programs--articulation<br />
2. Counseling--too many students per counselor<br />
3. Outdated vocational programs and equipment<br />
4. Growing rate <strong>of</strong> minority students<br />
Obstacles include uncertain priorities; uncertain<br />
financing; inadequate academic programs; weak articulation<br />
between feeder high schools and four-year institutions.<br />
liecon~mendations <strong>the</strong> ?,laster Plan Commission<br />
is examining:<br />
1. Access<br />
2. Matriculation<br />
3. Core curriculum<br />
4. Transfer centers<br />
5. Technical institutes<br />
6. Remedial; including separate centers on or <strong>of</strong>f campus<br />
. Mandatory testing ; assessment<br />
8. Maximum number <strong>of</strong> units for remedial (24-36 units) :<br />
9. Academic floor<br />
10. Fur<strong>the</strong>r restricting or increasing part-time teachers<br />
<strong>11</strong>. Increase tenure from 2 to 4-6 years before granting :<br />
<strong>12</strong>. Peer review before granting tenure<br />
13. Abolish tenure--use contract system<br />
14. State Salary schedule<br />
15. , Collective bargaining<br />
16. Faculty development including money for this area<br />
1. Student fees<br />
1.8. Funding<br />
19. MORE POWER TO BOARD OP GOVERNORS<br />
20. Add people to B <strong>of</strong> G. Regional <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees<br />
with regional chancellors appointed by Chancellor's<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice,<br />
Comrnents: Effects <strong>of</strong> Prop. 13 only NOW affecting community<br />
colleges as far a public is concerned.<br />
Legislature BEE going around local boards in making<br />
decisions affecting local colleges.<br />
Absence <strong>of</strong> yardsticks to measure accountability. No<br />
standards to which changes can be measured.<br />
Reacting instead <strong>of</strong> moving forward<br />
Bad press.
Fage It<br />
Cotnrnunity colleges are NOT a system. They ARE a<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> individual colleges--must have local<br />
decision-making; but also must be held acoountable.<br />
No agreement. Lots <strong>of</strong> diversity--we must build a<br />
cotnnlon vision. What should mission be? In <strong>the</strong><br />
attempt to meet ALL missions, a failure to have<br />
a sense <strong>of</strong> priority. Too much for too many.<br />
We must stop defining mission in terms <strong>of</strong> client<br />
group--missions Beep shifting as clients shift. No<br />
clear definition, Clients have changed in last<br />
20 years.<br />
We must become inner directed. Have an academic<br />
mission and a vocational mission, Teach from<br />
basics to advanced courses. We educate people<br />
from different levels <strong>of</strong> academic background.<br />
State should set standards and allovi local boards<br />
to make decisions how to carry out. We need to<br />
work more closely with k-<strong>12</strong>'s to develop academic<br />
standards. Have ei<strong>the</strong>r high school exit or<br />
community college entrance testing. Defining<br />
academic standards is elusive. What do students<br />
knovi and at what educational level should <strong>the</strong>y<br />
be placed?<br />
COMMUNITY COLLEGES IXJ~SPONSIBLE FOR TAKING STUDENTS<br />
AT THEIR OdN PACE AND MAKING THl91 SUCCESSFUL.<br />
Teach students how to adapt to new information.<br />
Tremendous infighting for funds between academic and<br />
vocational on campus--hurting students. May need<br />
separate administration for vocational.
, .:<br />
.. . , ~ . .<br />
, ,<br />
, .<br />
I I<br />
, . ,<br />
, , , ': . ,<br />
. , 1<br />
, ,<br />
THE GREAT POLICY DEBAT<br />
A CCCT REGIONAL WORKSHOP<br />
WORI
POLICY QUESTIONS FOR CALIFORNIA'S COMMUNITY COLLEGES<br />
The California Roundtable<br />
May 1985
POLICY QUESTIONS<br />
FOR<br />
CALIFORNIA'S cwnwxTY COLLEGES<br />
The California Roundtable, an organization <strong>of</strong> senior exacutives <strong>of</strong> major<br />
California corporations, recently sponsored an independent six-month study <strong>of</strong><br />
California's cmmunity colleges. The swdy was conducted by Bennan, Weiler<br />
Associates, Berkeley, California. This paper sets forth <strong>the</strong>-key policy<br />
questions that have emerged from that study, for <strong>the</strong> cone ideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Commission for <strong>the</strong> Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hater Plan for Higher Education -- and for<br />
<strong>the</strong> caamuni ty colleges, <strong>the</strong> legisla are, and o<strong>the</strong>r interes ted parties. The<br />
Roundtable believes tha t <strong>the</strong>se questions must be addressed if significant<br />
improvements are to be realized in <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> cammunity college<br />
education. Before turning to <strong>the</strong>se questions, a brief review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study<br />
conclusions is in order.<br />
Overview <strong>of</strong> S tudp Conclusions /<br />
The Berman, Wailer Associates study showed that cmmunity colleges have<br />
mny strengths, including institutional adaptability, a number <strong>of</strong> high quality<br />
programs, many competent and dedicated instructors, and a tradition <strong>of</strong><br />
commitment to educational opportuoi ty for all students.<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> serious problems were also discussed: Weaknesses in transfer<br />
education, counseling and assessment, and special programs for underprepared<br />
minorltles; vocational programs that emphasize specific skill training at <strong>the</strong><br />
expense <strong>of</strong> broader competencies; widely varying standards for remedial<br />
education; and a need for greater faculty effectiveness.<br />
The study concluded that, while individual colleges could take many steps<br />
to improve <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir programs, subs tantial sys tern-wide improvement
was baing impeded by a number <strong>of</strong> obstacles whose resolution vould require<br />
state level policies and leadership. These obstacles include inefficiencies<br />
in governance, finance, snd personnel rules; a decline in financial eupport,<br />
varying academic standards, weak intersegmental coordination, and a need to<br />
agree on major priorities.<br />
issues.<br />
The policy questions set forth below address <strong>the</strong>se topics and related
MISSIONS AND PRIORITIES<br />
WHAT HISSIONS AND PRIORITIES SHOULD THE Q)HllUNITX<br />
COLLEGES HAVE THROUGH THE END OF THIS CENTURY?<br />
What overall vision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community colleges should guide state<br />
and local policymakers?<br />
Discussions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community colleges are <strong>of</strong>ten marked by uncertainty about<br />
<strong>the</strong> colleges' identity. Should <strong>the</strong> colleges be primsrily higher education<br />
institutions; community-oriented institutions; "bridges" be ween secondary and<br />
postsecondary education; centers <strong>of</strong> employment training; genuinely multi-<br />
faceted fns titu tions that attempt to embrace all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se roles; or<br />
institutions defined by an entirely different vision?<br />
Should all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' present missions -- transfer, vocational,<br />
remedial, adult and communLCy education -- be retained?<br />
These major missions have been endorsed by four different legislative reviews<br />
over <strong>the</strong> past sixty-five years. But times have changed, and some observers<br />
fear that <strong>the</strong> colleges are trying to do too much, vi th a consequent erosion <strong>of</strong><br />
educational program quality.<br />
Should one or more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' missions be emphasized more than o<strong>the</strong>rs?<br />
Some observers believe that <strong>the</strong> colleges' identity and roles could be<br />
clarified, and <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> trying to do too much reduced, if one or two<br />
missions were selected as <strong>the</strong> colleges' main tasks, with o<strong>the</strong>rs clearly<br />
treated as ancillary or supportive. O<strong>the</strong>r analysts worry that a system-wide<br />
decision Eo emphasize one or two missions would not be wise because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
varying needs <strong>of</strong> diverse local communities.<br />
Should <strong>the</strong> purposes and objectives <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' missions be re-<br />
evaluated?<br />
The evidence shows that <strong>the</strong>re have been a number <strong>of</strong> important changes in <strong>the</strong><br />
interests and characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' clients. More students are<br />
currently interested in "quick turuaround" vocational training; more students<br />
are underprepared for college-level work; minority student populations are<br />
growing. Much enrollment growth in <strong>the</strong> future may be among minority and<br />
immigrant populations, who have historically been among <strong>the</strong> least well<br />
prepared for postsecondary work. These changes suggest <strong>the</strong> possibility that<br />
at least some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' missions -- particularly vocational and<br />
remadial. education -- might need to be re-examined.
GOVERNANCE, ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION<br />
HOW CAN THE GOVERNANCE, ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION<br />
OF THE conmxm (X~LLEGES BE MADE MORE EFFICIENT?<br />
What is <strong>the</strong> right balance between state and local control?<br />
I<br />
Since 1978, much control over cmmunity college policies has shifted from <strong>the</strong><br />
local to <strong>the</strong> state level, where it is shared by <strong>the</strong> legislabire and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Governors. The study findings suggest that some decisions can only be made<br />
efficiently at <strong>the</strong> state level. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> great ccmplexitg and<br />
diversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges argue in favor '<strong>of</strong> highly decentralized governance<br />
and administretion. Most study respondents felt that <strong>the</strong> right balance<br />
bebeen state and local control had not yet been achieved.<br />
What changes, if any, are desirable in <strong>the</strong> roles and authoritp <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Governors re s ature<br />
SNdy findings show that both local trustees and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors lack<br />
key elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> capacity to govern, and that key decisions affecting <strong>the</strong><br />
colleges are consequently <strong>of</strong>ten made in <strong>the</strong> political arena. California '<br />
appears to be <strong>the</strong> only state with both complete state financing and locally<br />
elected trustees. The findings also showed a number <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> overlapping<br />
authority between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors and local trustees. There was broad<br />
agreement among sb~dy respondents that this system <strong>of</strong> governance does not work<br />
efficiently.<br />
What changes, if any, are desirable in <strong>the</strong> organiza tion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Off ice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Chancallor?<br />
Unlike <strong>the</strong> systemuide administrative <strong>of</strong> fices for UC and CSU, <strong>the</strong> community<br />
colleges' Chancellor's Office is located in Sacramento and utilizes civil<br />
service ra <strong>the</strong>r than cmmunity college system employees. Some analysts have<br />
expressed concern that <strong>the</strong>se arrangeman ts reduce administrative efficiency and<br />
blur <strong>the</strong> distinction be ween cmmuni ty college and state poll tical authority.<br />
What efficiencies, if any, could be realized through <strong>the</strong> reorganization <strong>of</strong><br />
districts or services?<br />
While many key educational policy decisions continue to be made by locally<br />
elected trus teas, <strong>the</strong> administrative functions <strong>of</strong> single-college districts 'are<br />
virtually identical to those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir colleges. This has pranpted some<br />
analysts to call for an examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential efficiencies <strong>of</strong> regional<br />
governance structures andlor <strong>the</strong> consolidation <strong>of</strong> some single-college I<br />
districts. In larger districts, attempts have been made to avoid costly<br />
duplication <strong>of</strong> services by restricting some programs to one or two campuses<br />
ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>the</strong>m at all colleges in <strong>the</strong> district.
llov can more complete data be developed to support <strong>the</strong> evaluation and<br />
adminis tm tion <strong>of</strong> cmmunf ty college programs?<br />
The study found that data collection and raporting was not uniform, and much<br />
data was not comparable, across <strong>the</strong> three segments <strong>of</strong> public higher<br />
education. Coramunity college data collection and analysis is also not closely<br />
coordinated with similar activities performed by <strong>the</strong> State Dapartment <strong>of</strong><br />
Education and o<strong>the</strong>r agencies for <strong>the</strong> K-<strong>12</strong> system. Within <strong>the</strong> cmmuni ty ,<br />
college system, much data was missing or incomplete.
(5<br />
FINANCE AND FUNDIN<br />
HOW SHOULD COMMINIlY mLLEGE FINANCIS BE QiANGED SO AS<br />
TO PROVIDE A HORE EFFICIENT, FAIR, STABLE, AND ADEQUATE .<br />
SYSTM OF FUNDIN?<br />
Can <strong>the</strong> ADA-based funding formula be altered so as to make it laore neutral in<br />
its impact on college course and program planning7 "-,<br />
So+..c Lcue sc .,rci \.<br />
0 ~he-eWd&ed that <strong>the</strong> ADA-based funding formula, which ties college income<br />
to student classroom a ttendanca, has created strong incentives for <strong>the</strong><br />
colleges to emphasize popular, inexpensiie courses, and to refrain from<br />
-<br />
/<br />
<strong>of</strong>fering advanced, high-quality courses that do not attract lnrge numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
students. 13 t.:, sn rccr.-a& rcL1-choir *nd 8 ZSu cad . . 1'<br />
If <strong>the</strong> ADA-based funding formula is discarded, what should replace it as <strong>the</strong><br />
basis for funding college programs and services? r<br />
?<br />
3L" L", r%,grrk, +
materials) have ken suspended. Some analysts believe that districts should<br />
be allowed to reinstate soma uaer fees, or have <strong>the</strong> option <strong>of</strong> charging limited<br />
additional general fees, with any new feas retained locally. Pees have also<br />
been widely discussed as a mechanism for discriminating between caausl and<br />
serious students, and between smdents who already have college degrees a-frrl<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs who are in college for <strong>the</strong> first time. Many 7<br />
that<br />
<strong>the</strong> mandatory sh~dent fee imposed for <strong>the</strong> first time in 1984-85 has<br />
contributed to enrollment declines this year, particularly among minority<br />
smdents. O<strong>the</strong>rs felt that this impact will decline as more students learn 1<br />
about available financial aid. .Ch-14 ,kd4,.t cis . . . ,<br />
How can interdistrict funding disparities be reduced or eliminated? I<br />
The shldy found substantial variation among districts in expenditures per ADA,<br />
as <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> state funding formulas put in place in <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong><br />
Proposition 13. These formulas have left some districts particularly<br />
underfunded relative to <strong>the</strong>ir needs. The leglslsture has periodically tried<br />
to equalize funding rates by varying <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> inflation allowance provided<br />
to districts, with low expenditure districts given a higher allowance than '<br />
high expenditure districts.<br />
How can reasonable stability and predictability <strong>of</strong> funding be assured?<br />
Since 1973, <strong>the</strong> legislature has passed ten major bills affecting ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />
allocation provisions or level <strong>of</strong> funding for canmunity colleges, Final and<br />
supplemental appropriations decisions are <strong>of</strong> ten not made until well into <strong>the</strong><br />
school year. Tha study found <strong>the</strong>t <strong>the</strong>se uncertainties have made program<br />
planning difficult, have discouraged <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> neu or innovative<br />
programs, and have created incentives to rely heavily on part-time staff, who<br />
can be hired or laid <strong>of</strong>f quickly.
ACADEMIC STANDARDS AND SNDENT ACCESS<br />
HOW CAN ACADMIC STANDARDS BE IMPROVED WITHOUT RRIUCINC<br />
ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION FOR SOME STUDENTS?<br />
Is some reduction in access to community colleges acceptable in order to<br />
achieve higher standards?<br />
There was strong bslief among s tudy respondante that some higher standards --<br />
notably tougher grading, probation and dismissal policies -- have contributed<br />
to recant declines in student enrollment. If this is true, some students who<br />
have traditionally had access to canmuniCy colleges have Left, whereas <strong>the</strong><br />
quality <strong>of</strong> education for those who remain may have improved (though <strong>the</strong> impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> higher standards has not been studied), Higher academic standards have<br />
typically been thought <strong>of</strong> as associated with transfereligible courses, but<br />
many observers have also raised <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> stendards in connection with '<br />
voca tional and o<strong>the</strong>r programs. -<br />
What form should higher standards take?<br />
Higher academic standards adopted by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors in 1981 and 1983<br />
concentrated on insuring that failing grades would be issued for<br />
unsatisfactory perfomnce, that students would uaintain a minimum grade point<br />
average or be subject to protetion or dismissal, and that students enroll in a<br />
minimum number <strong>of</strong> graded credit courses each semester. There has been no<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r tightening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se standards (though districts or colleges can impose<br />
higher standards on <strong>the</strong>ir own), and <strong>the</strong> Boacd has not addressed <strong>the</strong> standards<br />
currently applied to course prerequisites, course sequance requirements, or<br />
curricula.<br />
What roles should counseling and assessment, remedial education, and special<br />
programs play in helping to maintain access for undetprepared students despite<br />
<strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> higher standards?<br />
The study found that assessment <strong>of</strong> student skills was rarely used to determine<br />
what courses a student would be allowed to enroll in, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong><br />
some mathmatics and English placement. Students <strong>of</strong>ten enroll in remedial<br />
level courses at <strong>the</strong> same time that <strong>the</strong>y enroll in courses requiring <strong>the</strong> same<br />
academic skills in which <strong>the</strong>y are deficient, and for which <strong>the</strong>y require<br />
remedial assistance. The findings also showed that special programs for<br />
underprepared minority students had not, on <strong>the</strong> whole, been sufficiently<br />
thorough or concentrated to bring Black and Hispanic transfer races up to <strong>the</strong><br />
whitelAsian average.
materials) have been suspended. Some analysts believe that districts should<br />
be elloved to reinstate some user fees, or have tha option <strong>of</strong> charging limited<br />
additional general fees, with any new fees retained locally. Pees have also<br />
been widely discussed as a mechanism for discriminating betueen casual and<br />
serious students, and between students who already have college degrees a-&el<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs who are in college for <strong>the</strong> first time. Many 7<br />
that<br />
<strong>the</strong> man& tory sb~dent fae imposed for <strong>the</strong> first time in 1984-85 has<br />
contributed to enrollment declines this year, particularly among minority<br />
shldents. O<strong>the</strong>rs felt that this impact will decline as more students learn<br />
about available financial aid. rhoid ce~<br />
. . .<br />
How can interdistrict funding disparities be reduced or eliminated?<br />
,<br />
The study found substantial variation among districts in expenditures per ADA,<br />
as <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> state funding formulas put in place in <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong><br />
Proposition 13. These formulas have left some districts particularly<br />
underfunded relative to <strong>the</strong>ir needs. The legislature has periodically tried<br />
to equalize funding rates by varying <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> inflation allowance provided<br />
to districts, with lw expenditure districts given a higher allowance than<br />
high expenditure districts.<br />
Iiow can reasonable stability and predictability <strong>of</strong> funding be assured?<br />
Since 1973, <strong>the</strong> legislature has passed ten major bills affecting ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />
allocation provisions or level <strong>of</strong> funding for cmmunity colleges. Final and<br />
supplemental appropriations decisions are <strong>of</strong>ten not made until well into <strong>the</strong><br />
school year. Tha study found that <strong>the</strong>se uncertainties have made program<br />
planning difficult, have discouraged <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> new or innovative<br />
programs, and have created incentives to rely heavily on part-time staff, who<br />
can be hired or laid <strong>of</strong>f quickly.
VOCATIONAL EDUCATION<br />
TO %IAT EXTENT SHOULD VOCATIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAHS<br />
CONCENTRATE ON GENERAL COHPEI'ENCIES AS WELL AS SPECIFIC<br />
VOCATIONAL SKILLS?<br />
What role should <strong>the</strong> community colleges play in overall state employment<br />
training efforts?<br />
Recent studies have identified seventeen different employment training<br />
programs for adults authorized, operated, funded, or administered by <strong>the</strong><br />
state. The cmmunity colleges are by far <strong>the</strong> largest provider <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
services; about half <strong>of</strong> all community college students are enrolled in<br />
vocational or job training programs. Statewide, this employment training ,<br />
effort involves a complex netuork <strong>of</strong> agencies and organizations, with<br />
different and sometimes conflicting missions, clients, financing, and<br />
reporting structures. Coordination is loose and sporadic.<br />
How much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' vocational education resources should be devoted to<br />
specific job training?<br />
The cmmunity colleges provide specific job trainirq through programs<br />
supported by <strong>the</strong> state Employmen t Training Panel (ETP) , through <strong>the</strong> federally<br />
funded Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), and through performance-based<br />
contracts with industry. The study found that <strong>the</strong>se job training programs ,<br />
compe te w i th regular voca tional programs for campus resources, and are<br />
controversial at may colleges.<br />
Should vocational programs -- course sequences, curricula, prerequisites -- be<br />
reorganized to insure <strong>the</strong> teaching <strong>of</strong> general cmpetencies?<br />
The study found that workers in <strong>the</strong> future will need to have a high level <strong>of</strong><br />
general competence, including <strong>the</strong> ability to learn, to solve problems, and tb<br />
adapt to changing working conditions. Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current effort in<br />
vocational programs focuses on specific vocational skills, or training<br />
tailored to particular jobs, and does no't address <strong>the</strong> competencies that ace<br />
likely to be required in tho future for job securicj and advancement, and for<br />
<strong>the</strong> maintenance <strong>of</strong> a competitive economy.<br />
What role should business and industry play in <strong>the</strong> shaplng <strong>of</strong> vocational<br />
programs and <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> vocational curricula?<br />
Business and industry representatives serve on advisory committees that <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
work with <strong>the</strong> colleges on vocational program planning and curriculum<br />
decisions. The study found that some colleges had established close workin<br />
rela tionshtps ui th local business and industry, with results that pleased bo<br />
parties, whereas many o<strong>the</strong>r colleges did not have many active programs <strong>of</strong> th<br />
kind, or were not making full use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir vocational advisory eanmiteees.
FACULTY I<br />
HOW SHOULD PERSONNEL RULES AND PRACTICES BE CHANGED SO AS<br />
TO HELP INCREASE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITX<br />
COLLEGE FACULTY?<br />
Should changes be made in <strong>the</strong> rules affectiw tenure, credentialing, and ,<br />
salarp formulas?<br />
The study found that rules and practices in <strong>the</strong>se areas resemble those found<br />
in <strong>the</strong> K-<strong>12</strong> system ra<strong>the</strong>r than in o<strong>the</strong>r segments <strong>of</strong> higher education.<br />
Community college faculty becane fully tenured in two years without peer<br />
review, They must obtain one <strong>of</strong> 76 subject area credentials in order to teach<br />
a credit class; California appears to be <strong>the</strong> only state that requires a state<br />
credential for community college instructors. Faculty are paid on <strong>the</strong> basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> salary schedules that vary widely from district to distt%ct, with salary<br />
levels tied to <strong>the</strong> instructor's level <strong>of</strong> education and number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong><br />
academic service. In 1983-84, <strong>the</strong> difference in average salary betwee6 <strong>the</strong><br />
highest and lowest paying districts was more than 37 percan:.<br />
Should <strong>the</strong> rules affecting <strong>the</strong> roles, responsibilities and compensation <strong>of</strong>,<br />
part-time faculty be changed?<br />
Part-time faculty may not teach more than 60 percent <strong>of</strong> a full-time work load;<br />
this typically translates to a mximum <strong>of</strong> nine classroom hours per week.<br />
Study findings indicate that part-time faculty generally do not hold <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
hours for students or participate in campus academic planning activities.<br />
They typically receive less supervision and support, and <strong>the</strong>ir compensation is<br />
estimted to average 38 percent <strong>of</strong> that paid to full-time instructors. With<br />
<strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> some categorical programs, <strong>the</strong>re are no provisions for <strong>the</strong><br />
employment <strong>of</strong> full-time non-tenured faculty on l i m i tad contracts.<br />
Should faculties play a larger role in academic program decisions?<br />
Study f indings show that though <strong>the</strong>re are s tate-au thorized faculty senates' and<br />
faculty associations, <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir active participation in campus<br />
academic planning and program decisions varies widely £run college to college,<br />
and is highly dependent on <strong>the</strong> administrative style <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> college<br />
president. In general, ccmmuni ty college faculty senates do not play <strong>the</strong> same<br />
role as faculty senates at UC or CSU.<br />
Should changes be considered in <strong>the</strong> rules affecting faculty lay<strong>of</strong>f and<br />
senior1 ty?<br />
Current law provides that a faculty member may not be laid <strong>of</strong>f if a less<br />
senior faculty member is teaching a course that <strong>the</strong> more senior inst~ctor is<br />
credentialed to teach. The shldy found that faculty canmonly hold multiple<br />
credentials, and that when lay<strong>of</strong>fs are necessary, faculty with little or no<br />
'/!!,'<br />
'9 ',
teaching experfence in a subject area <strong>of</strong>ten "bump" less senior staff who may '<br />
have been teaching competently in that area for some time.<br />
What steps should bo taken to improve <strong>the</strong> likelihood that faculty will stay up<br />
to date in <strong>the</strong>ir fields?<br />
Faculty pr<strong>of</strong>essional development is supported out <strong>of</strong> each college's general<br />
apportionment; <strong>the</strong>re are (uith one recent exception) no state funds earmarked<br />
for this purpose. The study found that college support for <strong>the</strong>se activities<br />
has declined over <strong>the</strong> last several years, and that <strong>the</strong>y are rarely coordinated<br />
uith csmpus long range planning or linked to staff evalua tioas.<br />
Administrators do not have <strong>the</strong> authority to require faculty to improve <strong>the</strong>ir !,<br />
skills or update <strong>the</strong>ir knowledge; all such activities are voluntary.<br />
What staff evaluation procedures should be encouraged and supported?<br />
The Education Code requires tenured faculty to be evaluated at least once<br />
every No years, The study found that <strong>the</strong>se evaluations usually coinbined<br />
ei<strong>the</strong>r a team (administrator and peer) or administrative assessment with<br />
student andlor self evaluations, with wide variation in sequence and<br />
frequency. Part-time faculty were evaluated less frequently and<br />
systematically, and <strong>the</strong>ir evaluation processes varied widely. Systematic data<br />
on staff quality were not available in most districts, and data were not<br />
canparable between districts.<br />
What steps should be taken to insure an adequate supply <strong>of</strong> competent full-time<br />
staff in <strong>the</strong> future?<br />
Data cited by <strong>the</strong> sbdy suggest that <strong>the</strong> full-time faculty are "greying" --<br />
with a decline both in relatively junior and very senior staff, and an<br />
increase in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> faculty between <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> 35 and 54. Study<br />
panelists pointed out that while some older full-time faculty will soon be<br />
retiring, little is currently being done to induct new qualified instructors.
HOW CAN COMMINITY DOLLEGE ARTI~ILATION WITH FOUR-YEAR<br />
INSTI'NTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND HIGH SGIOOLS<br />
BE IMPROVED?<br />
Should new articulation procedures be arranged between <strong>the</strong> community colleges<br />
and <strong>the</strong> publlc four-year ins titu tions <strong>of</strong> higher education7<br />
There are currently no statewide agreements on articulation procedures betueen<br />
UCICSU and <strong>the</strong> community colleges, and <strong>the</strong> study found that <strong>the</strong>se procedures<br />
varied widely, Community college respondents expressed concern that changes<br />
in UC or CSU transfer requirements were <strong>of</strong>ten not coordinated wf th <strong>the</strong><br />
community colleges, and that information on <strong>the</strong> progress <strong>of</strong> transfer students<br />
at <strong>the</strong> four-year institutions was <strong>of</strong> ten difficult to obtain and reported in<br />
non-canparable ways by different four-year campuses.<br />
What steps could <strong>the</strong> community colleges take to improve articulation with <strong>the</strong><br />
four-year ins ti tutions?<br />
Some colleges in <strong>the</strong> smdy sample coordinated <strong>the</strong>ir counseling efforts with<br />
staff from four-year institutions, provided individualized assistance to<br />
smdents wishing to transfer, or tried to insure that <strong>the</strong> curriculum in<br />
transfereligible courses paralleled <strong>the</strong> material covered in similar courses<br />
at UC or CSU. Most colleges in <strong>the</strong> sample, however, largely res tticted <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
articulation activities to <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> courses that would qualify<br />
for transfer credit £ran <strong>the</strong> fouryear instim tions.<br />
Should system-wide policies be implemented for community college articulation<br />
with high schools?<br />
Community college work wi th local high schools was cited by many smdy<br />
respondents as a way <strong>of</strong> helping high school students understand important<br />
options for pas tsecondary education, as well as <strong>the</strong> colleges' academic<br />
expectations. Most colleges in <strong>the</strong> study sample provided written information<br />
to local high school students and occasionally made some form <strong>of</strong> personal<br />
presentation. A feu also administered placement tests, worked with high<br />
school counselors, or took o<strong>the</strong>r steps to coordinate information and<br />
activities.