Board Agenda - 12-11-1985.pdf - College of the Desert

Board Agenda - 12-11-1985.pdf - College of the Desert Board Agenda - 12-11-1985.pdf - College of the Desert

collegeofthedesert.edu
from collegeofthedesert.edu More from this publisher
06.05.2013 Views

CALL TO ORDER SALUTE TO THE FLAG 1. Present: COACHELLA VALLEY COhlMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES AGENDA - ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING DECEMBER 11, 1985 - 9:00 A.M. BOARD ROOM - ADMINISTRATION'BUILDING John Anderholt, Charles Hayden, Ray House, Virnita McDonald, Jackie Suitt, Eric Meeks, Student Trustee. Absent: Also Present: F. D. Stout, J. 8. Iantorno, C. A. Patterson, J. T. Pulliam, T. W. Spears 2. Organization for 1986: ELECTION OF OFFICERS REQUIRED AT ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING, A. Election of PER EDUCATION CODE. Officers: Chairman: Action: Election of Board Chairman: Moved Seconded Yes- No -- Vice-chairman: Action: Election of Board Vice-chairman: Clerk: Moved Seconded Yes- No Action: Election of Board Clerk: Moved Seconded Yes Continued.. . . . . .

CALL TO ORDER<br />

SALUTE TO THE FLAG<br />

1. Present:<br />

COACHELLA VALLEY COhlMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT<br />

BOARD OF TRUSTEES<br />

AGENDA - ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING<br />

DECEMBER <strong>11</strong>, 1985 - 9:00 A.M.<br />

BOARD ROOM - ADMINISTRATION'BUILDING<br />

John Anderholt, Charles Hayden, Ray House, Virnita McDonald,<br />

Jackie Suitt, Eric Meeks, Student Trustee.<br />

Absent:<br />

Also Present: F. D. Stout, J. 8. Iantorno, C. A. Patterson,<br />

J. T. Pulliam, T. W. Spears<br />

2. Organization for 1986: ELECTION OF OFFICERS REQUIRED AT ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING,<br />

A. Election <strong>of</strong> PER EDUCATION CODE.<br />

Officers:<br />

Chairman: Action: Election <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Chairman:<br />

Moved Seconded Yes- No --<br />

Vice-chairman: Action: Election <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Vice-chairman:<br />

Clerk:<br />

Moved Seconded Yes- No<br />

Action: Election <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Clerk:<br />

Moved Seconded Yes<br />

Continued.. . . . . .


2. Organization for 1986:<br />

A. Election <strong>of</strong> Officers:<br />

(Cont .)<br />

Secretary: Action: Election <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> Secretary:<br />

Moved - Seconded YesNo-<br />

Representative/ Action: Election <strong>of</strong> Representative/County Committee:<br />

County Committee :<br />

1-loved Seconded YesNo-<br />

Representative/ Action: Election <strong>of</strong> Representative/California<br />

CACC : Association <strong>of</strong> Community <strong>College</strong>s:<br />

Moved Seconded Yes No<br />

B. Determination <strong>of</strong> Action: Determination <strong>of</strong> Meeting Dates, Times,<br />

Meeting Dates, and Locations, 1986:<br />

iimes ,-and Locations,<br />

1986:<br />

REQUIRED BY EDUCATION CODE.<br />

C. Naming <strong>of</strong><br />

Authorized<br />

Agents:<br />

Page 2<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> ,<br />

December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />

Moved Seconded Yes- No -<br />

Action: Naming <strong>of</strong> Authorized Agents:<br />

OFFICERS MUST BE NAMED BY BOARD - PER EDUCATION CODE.<br />

Moved Seconded YesNo-<br />

Continued.. . . . . .


3. Minutes:<br />

4. Claims:<br />

<strong>11</strong>/22/85 40,593.52<br />

<strong>11</strong>/25/85 9,244.51<br />

TOTALS 157,791.24<br />

5. Oral Communication:<br />

Approval <strong>of</strong> November 20, 1985 Minutes:<br />

-<br />

-- - -<br />

Page 3<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />

December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />

Moved Seconded Yes - No --<br />

A. Action regarding Payroll #5<br />

Certificated $433,634.23<br />

Classified 177,290.15<br />

TOTAL $610,924.38<br />

B. Claims:<br />

FUND FUND FUND FUND<br />

- 101 - 102 - 105<br />

330 TOTALS<br />

43.20 16,406.81<br />

66.44 548.99 33,890.20<br />

377.67 1,000.00 38,564.00<br />

1,514.10<br />

20.00 19,634.50<br />

176.00 40,769.52<br />

2,932.77 5,210.70 1,148.50 600.00 17,904.18<br />

2,932.77 5,210.70 1,148.50 1,600.00 168,683.21<br />

Moved Seconded Yes No<br />

Continued.. . . . . .


6. Certificated<br />

Personnel:<br />

A. Job Description<br />

For Pantry Chef.<br />

7. Management<br />

Personnel:<br />

Action regarding Certificated Personnel :<br />

A. Job Description for Pantry Chef.<br />

Page 4<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />

December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />

RECOMMENDING JOB DESCRIPTION FOR A CULINARY ARTS POSITION.<br />

-<br />

Moved Seconded Yes No<br />

B.<br />

Moved Seconded Yes No 1<br />

Moved Seconded Yes -- No<br />

Action regarding Management Personnel:<br />

NO ACTION ANTICIPATED.<br />

Moved Seconded Yes No--<br />

Continued. ...,..<br />

1


8. Classified<br />

Personnel :<br />

A. Placement<br />

Listing:<br />

9. Authorization to<br />

Bid/24 Station<br />

Language Lab:<br />

10. Approval <strong>of</strong><br />

Textbooks:<br />

Action regarding Classified Personnel:<br />

A. Placement Listing:<br />

ROUTINE APPOINTMENTS, REASSIGNMENTS, RESIGNATIONS,<br />

SUBSTITUTES AND SHORT-TERM.<br />

Moved Seconded Yes -- No<br />

Moved Seconded Yes No<br />

Action regarding Authorization to Bid/24 Station<br />

Language Lab:<br />

Page 5<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />

December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />

REQUESTING AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT BIDS FOR PURCHASE.<br />

Moved Seconded Yes No<br />

- -- --<br />

Action regarding Approval <strong>of</strong> Textbooks:<br />

REOUESTING APPROVAL OF NEW TEXTBOOKS FOR STUDENTS.<br />

Moved Seconded - Yes --No-<br />

Continued


Page 6<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />

December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />

<strong>11</strong>. Academic Calendars Action regarding Academic Calendars for 1986-87, 1987-88,<br />

for 1986-87, 1987-88, and 1988-89:<br />

1988-89:<br />

REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF ACADEMIC CALENDARS.<br />

<strong>12</strong>. Out-<strong>of</strong>-State<br />

Travel :<br />

Moved Seconded Yes_- No -<br />

Action regarding Out-<strong>of</strong>-State Travel:<br />

REqUESTING APPROVAL TO ATTEND CONFERENCE.<br />

Moved Seconded Yes- No-<br />

13. Approval <strong>of</strong> 1986<br />

Action regarding Approval <strong>of</strong> 1986 Spring Schedule <strong>of</strong><br />

Surina Schedule <strong>of</strong> Classes/Both Camuuses:<br />

ciassesl~oth Campuses:<br />

ROUTINE APPROVAL OF CLASS SCHEDULES.<br />

14. Reports and<br />

Information:<br />

Moved Seconded Yes- No -<br />

A. Student Trustee Report.<br />

B. Update <strong>of</strong> Golf Institute.<br />

Continued .......<br />

:


15. O<strong>the</strong>r Items:<br />

A.<br />

**** CLOSED SESSION ****<br />

Action regarding O<strong>the</strong>r 1,tems:<br />

Moved Seconded Yes No<br />

Moved Seconded Yes No<br />

16. Adjournment: Floved Seconded Yes- No<br />

Time<br />

Page 7<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong><br />

December <strong>11</strong>, 1985


CALL TO ORDER<br />

SALUTE TO THE FLAG<br />

1. Present:<br />

Seating <strong>of</strong> Trustees:<br />

2. Minutes:<br />

3. Claims:<br />

DATE<br />

09/19/85<br />

10/03/85<br />

10/04/85<br />

10/07/85<br />

10/08/85<br />

10/09/85<br />

10/<strong>11</strong>/85<br />

10/14/85<br />

TOTALS<br />

FUND<br />

100<br />

3,643.48<br />

16,239.78<br />

9,886.68<br />

14,770.76<br />

23,055.07<br />

4,927.69<br />

1,592.49<br />

42,658.21<br />

142,275.32<br />

58,595.09<br />

9,914.72<br />

17,142.98<br />

<strong>11</strong>1,140.93<br />

76,418.40<br />

37,644.47<br />

569,906.07<br />

COACHELLA VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT<br />

BOARD OF TRUSTEES<br />

MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING<br />

NOVEMBER 20, 1985 - 9:00 A.M.<br />

BOARD ROOM - ADMINISTRATION BUILDING<br />

Charles Hayden, Virnita McDonald, Jackie Suitt,<br />

Ray House, Eric Meeks, Student Trustee.<br />

Absent: John Anderholt<br />

Also Present: Dr. F. D. Stout, Dr. J. B. Iantorno, Dr. C. A.<br />

Patterson, Mr. J. T. Pulliam, Mr. T. W. Spears<br />

Mr. Ray House, newly elected Trustee, was seated to<br />

complete <strong>the</strong> unexpired term <strong>of</strong> Ole Nordland.<br />

Mr. Eric Meeks, Student Trustee, was seated as a non-voting<br />

member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees.<br />

It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden, and<br />

carried, that <strong>the</strong> Minutes <strong>of</strong> October 16, 1985 be approved.<br />

It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden, and<br />

carried, that Payroll #4 (Item A) and Claims (Item B) be<br />

approved as fol 1 ows :<br />

A. Ratification <strong>of</strong> Payroll $4:<br />

Certificated $519,900.29<br />

Classified 208,370.02<br />

TOTAL $728,270.31<br />

B. Claims:<br />

FUND FUND FUND FUND FUND<br />

- 101 102 - - 105 330 - 900 TOTALS<br />

Continued... ....


Oral Communication:<br />

Certificated<br />

Personnel:<br />

6. Management<br />

Personnel<br />

7. Classified<br />

Personnel:<br />

8. Consultant<br />

Agreement:<br />

Approval to<br />

Adopt Updated<br />

Administrative<br />

Regulation 14152.4/<br />

Personal Necessity<br />

Leave :<br />

Approval to Adopt<br />

Update <strong>of</strong> Faculty<br />

Responsibilities:<br />

Approval to<br />

Accept District Audit:<br />

Authorization to<br />

Purchase Financial<br />

Data S<strong>of</strong>tware:<br />

Authorization to Bid<br />

for Re-Ro<strong>of</strong>ing <strong>of</strong><br />

Student Services &<br />

Shower Locker Bldgs:<br />

Page 2<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

Dr. Iantorno introduced members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Student Senate<br />

who were present.<br />

A. It was moved by Mr. Hayden, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />

and carried, that authorization be given to advertise<br />

for 3 chef instructors. Employment is contingent upon<br />

outside funding.<br />

B. It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. House,<br />

and carried, that Part-time Instructors for 1985 Fall<br />

Semester be employed as listed. (See page 3a)<br />

It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />

and carried, that Department Chairpersons for Spring,<br />

1986 Semester, be appointed as listed. (See page 3b)<br />

It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />

and carried, that <strong>the</strong> placement listing be approved as<br />

presented. (See pages 3c,d)<br />

It was moved by Mr. Hayden, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />

and carried, that Dr. Glenn Gooder and Dr. John McCuen<br />

be employed as consultants to study Institutional Goals<br />

and Objectives and Organizational Structure, and to<br />

make recommendations, for a fee not to exceed $9,000.00,<br />

plus $700.00 per diem. (See page 3e)<br />

It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />

and carried, that Administrative Regulation iY4152.4,<br />

Personal Necessity Leave, be amended as presented.<br />

(See pages 3f,g,h,i)<br />

It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. House,<br />

and carried, that Faculty Responsibilities be adopted<br />

as presented. (See pages 3j,k,l)<br />

It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />

and carried, that <strong>the</strong> 1984-85 Audit be accepted.<br />

It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />

and carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to<br />

purchase financial data s<strong>of</strong>tware system from DSK Inc.,<br />

Riverside. Purchase price $35,000.00.<br />

It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mr. Hayden, and<br />

carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to advertise<br />

for bids for re-ro<strong>of</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> Student Center & Shower Locker<br />

Buildings.<br />

Continued.......


14. Approval <strong>of</strong><br />

Grant Application/<br />

Riverside Arts<br />

Foundation:<br />

15. Nursery School<br />

Education/Child<br />

Care Training<br />

Center:<br />

16. Authorization to<br />

Advertise/Sale <strong>of</strong><br />

Surplus Property:<br />

17. Award <strong>of</strong> Bid/<br />

Purchase <strong>of</strong><br />

Backhoe:<br />

18. Selection <strong>of</strong> Day,<br />

Time and Place <strong>of</strong><br />

Annual Organizational<br />

Meeting:<br />

19. Hearing/<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Counter<br />

Proposal to<br />

CSEA Contract.<br />

20. Adjournment:<br />

Page 3<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />

and carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to<br />

apply for grant from Riverside Arts Foundation to provide<br />

a pr<strong>of</strong>essional string quartet in residence.<br />

It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mrs. McDonald,<br />

and carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to<br />

seek funding for Nursery School Education/Child Care<br />

Training Center in cooperation with <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> Palm <strong>Desert</strong>.<br />

It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. Hayden,<br />

and carried, that <strong>the</strong> administration be authorized to<br />

advertise sale <strong>of</strong> surplus property.<br />

It was moved by Mrs. McDonald, seconded by Mr. House, and<br />

carried, that purchase award be made to Whitney Machinery<br />

Inc., Riverside, for Backhoe.<br />

It was moved by Mr. House, seconded by Mrs. McDonald, and<br />

carried, that <strong>the</strong> annual Organization Meeting be held on<br />

December <strong>11</strong>, 1985, at 9:00 a.m., in <strong>the</strong> Palm <strong>Desert</strong> campus<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Room.<br />

Open discussion declared for <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees Counter<br />

proposal to CSEA contract. No comments from audience.<br />

The meeting was adjourned at 10:55 a.m.<br />

Approved By:<br />

Date: /&-I/- f5


PALM DESERT CAMPUS<br />

Subject: Part-Time Faculty - Fall 1905 Semester<br />

NAME COURSE LOCATION<br />

GOLAY, Richard L. (SUB) Air Condtng/Refrg COD<br />

*KERR, Charles Play Production/Tech COD<br />

LUPTON, Cynthia Celebration for Juniors COD<br />

*POOLEY , Phi 1 i p Respiratory Therapy EMC<br />

*SULLIVAN, Mark (SUB) Music Perfor~nar~ce Piano COO<br />

*TAYLOR, Frances (SUB) Preschool Science COD<br />

* First assignment at COD<br />

COPPER MOUNTAIN CAMPUS<br />

- ~~~ - ,~<br />

SUBJ: <strong>Board</strong> <strong>Agenda</strong> Item - Fall 1985<br />

Part-time Instructors<br />

DATE: November 7, 1985<br />

Name Course Title<br />

~~<br />

~~~<br />

Page 3a<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

NON COMM<br />

CREDIT CREDIT SERV<br />

Community Service<br />

Location Credi t/Non Credit<br />

"BELTRANO, Jose Developmental Education MCAGCC Non Credit<br />

*HUFFMAN, Donald Career Center CMC-Li b Non Credit<br />

*First CMC Teaching Assignment<br />

Continued.... ...<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X<br />

X


SUBJECT : CURRICULAR DEPARTMENT CHAIRPERSONS FOR SPRING 1986<br />

Please recommend to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees at <strong>the</strong> November meeting to<br />

authorize <strong>the</strong> following Department Chairperson positions and persons<br />

recommended to fulfill <strong>the</strong>se important assignments for <strong>the</strong> Spring<br />

semester <strong>of</strong> 1986.<br />

Department Chairperson positions and <strong>the</strong> duties which <strong>the</strong> persons carry<br />

out are essential for management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> college instructional programs.<br />

The one semester assignment has caused unnecessary concern among <strong>the</strong><br />

Chairpersons.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> Spring class schedule is currently being developed and as<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1986 Fall class schedule must begin in early February,<br />

<strong>the</strong> decision needs to be made now so that necessary planning may take<br />

place. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate<br />

to contact me.<br />

Administration <strong>of</strong> Justice Jim Mills<br />

Agriculture Mike Watling<br />

Art Austin Killian<br />

Business Jose Gallegos<br />

Communications Doug Garrison<br />

Ma<strong>the</strong>matics, Engineering and Technology Bruce Usher<br />

Foreign Language Dan Deti<br />

Health, Physical Education & Recreation John Marman<br />

Home Economics Jim Pel1<br />

blusi c John Norman<br />

Sciences George Meyer<br />

Social Sciences Charles Flatt<br />

Continued .......<br />

Page 3b<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985


CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL PLACEMENT LISTING<br />

FILLMAN, George<br />

Position Title: Typist, Instructional Services<br />

Range and Step: 5-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $1006.00 per month<br />

Effective Date: November 1, 1985<br />

--<br />

FRIAS, Gail<br />

Position Title: Secretary, Community Svs. (Cal State)<br />

Range and Step: 7-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour - 20 hrs/wk.<br />

Effective Date: . October 25, 1985<br />

PIVAR, Corinne<br />

Position Title: Secretary, Business Dept.<br />

Range and Step: 7-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour - 20 hrs/wk. - 10 months<br />

Effective Date: November 8, 1985<br />

B. Reassignment:<br />

COOK,<br />

From: To :<br />

- -<br />

Page 3c<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

PositionTitle: Sr.Typist,Adm.&Records Teach. Assistant I<br />

Range and Step: 6-0 7-8<br />

Beginning Salary: $<strong>11</strong><strong>12</strong>.00 per month $<strong>11</strong>68.00 per month - 10 mo.<br />

Effective Date: November 1 , 1985<br />

C. Resignations:<br />

Ai4BERS , Joan<br />

Position Title: Secretary, Business Dept.<br />

Effective Da'te: October 25, 1985<br />

BUEVENS, Barbara<br />

Position Title: Typist, Campus Parking<br />

Effective Date: November 1, 1985<br />

C. Resignations: (continued)<br />

LAFFOON, Barbara<br />

Position Title: Teaching Assistant I, Office Occupations Center<br />

Effective Date: October 31, 1985<br />

RICKABAUGH, David<br />

Position Title: Grounds Keeper<br />

EffectiveDate: November], 1985


A[<br />

,CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL PLACEMENT LISTING (CONT.)<br />

A. Substitutes:<br />

HALL, Stacey<br />

Position Title: Typist, Instructional Services<br />

Range and Step: 5-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $5.72 per hour<br />

Effective Date: October 28 thru November 8, 1985<br />

PIVAR, Corinne<br />

Position Title: Secretary, Business Dept.<br />

Range and Step: 7-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour - 20 hrs./wk.<br />

Effective Date: October 28 thru November 8, 1985<br />

B. Short-Term:<br />

DAVIES, Tommy<br />

Position Title: Food Service Utility Worker<br />

Range and Step: 3-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $5.19 per hour - not to exceed 30 hrs./wk.<br />

Effective Date: October 14, 1985 thru February 28, 1986<br />

FILLMAN, George<br />

Position Title: Registration Clerk<br />

Range and Step: 5-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $5.72 per hour<br />

Effective Date: October 21, thru October 31, 1985<br />

MILLER, Jewel<br />

Position Title:<br />

Range and Step:<br />

Beginning Salary:<br />

Effective Date:<br />

PAYNE, Mary<br />

Position Title:<br />

Range and Step:<br />

Beginning Salary:<br />

Effective Date:<br />

WELCH, Christine<br />

Position Title:<br />

Range and Step:<br />

Beginning Salary:<br />

Effective Date:<br />

Food Service Utility Worker<br />

3-A<br />

$5.19 per hour - not to exceed 20 hrs./wk.<br />

October 15 thru December 23, 1985<br />

Secretary, Agriculture Dept.<br />

7-D<br />

$7.35 per hour - not to exceed 40 hrs.<br />

October 15, 1985<br />

Registration Clerk<br />

5-A<br />

$5.72 per hour<br />

November 1 thru November 15, 1985<br />

Page 3d<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985


Page 3e<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

November 14, 1985 I<br />

Or. F. D. Stout<br />

Superintendent<br />

Coachella Valley Conlmunity <strong>College</strong> District<br />

43-500 Monterey Avenue<br />

Palm <strong>Desert</strong>, CA 92260<br />

RE: PROPOSAL TO STUDY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATIONAL<br />

STRUCTURE OF COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

Dear Dr. Stout:<br />

He understand that <strong>the</strong> Coachella Valley Community <strong>College</strong> District desires<br />

a study <strong>of</strong> goals and objectives and organizational structure.<br />

ltle have proposed that <strong>the</strong> study be conducted jointly by Dr. Glenn G. Gooder<br />

and Dr. John T. McCuen and have indicated that we anticipate completion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study within ninety days <strong>of</strong> authorization to proceed.<br />

The consultants expect to devote at least fifteen days each to <strong>the</strong> study.<br />

Even if additional days are required, <strong>the</strong> work will be perforsed at a cost<br />

not to exceed $9,000 plus up to $700 for travel and per diem related to <strong>the</strong><br />

stutly. Travel and Per diem will be billed at cost but not to exceed $700.<br />

The District will be billed upon submission by <strong>the</strong> consultants <strong>of</strong> twentyfive<br />

copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> final report to <strong>the</strong> Trustees and <strong>the</strong> Superintendent.<br />

If this proposal ~neets with your approval, would you please so indicate<br />

below and return one copy to me.<br />

s-<br />

Very sincerely<br />

Glenn G. Gooder, Ph.0<br />

!~!J/vs<br />

Enclosure<br />

AGREEO/AUTliORIZATIOi4 TO PROCEED<br />

-<br />

Title<br />

Continued. ......<br />

I


PERSONAL NECESSITY LEAVE<br />

(Administrative Regulation)<br />

COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

Page 3f<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

4152.4<br />

A certificated employee may use any days <strong>of</strong> earned sick leave (not to exceed<br />

six-days in any school year), for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> personal' necessity, as<br />

defined and delineated herein:<br />

1. The employee shall not be required to secure advance permission for<br />

leave taken for any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following reasons:<br />

a. Death or serious illness <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> hls/her immediate family:<br />

(this ruling does not infringe upon <strong>the</strong> utilization <strong>of</strong> "Bereavement<br />

Leave: as described in Section 87788 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> - Code or <strong>Board</strong> Pol icy<br />

#4151.3. but may be used to supplement <strong>the</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> aforesaid<br />

Section). For <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this section, serious illness shall<br />

be defined as "Life Threatening."<br />

b. Accident involving his/her person or property, or <strong>the</strong> person or<br />

property <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> hisjher imnediate family (Section 87784).<br />

For <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this section, <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> property shall<br />

coincide with <strong>the</strong> definitions <strong>of</strong> real and personal property as<br />

established for tax purposes.<br />

2. The employee shall, whenever possible, submit a formal written request<br />

prior to <strong>the</strong> taking <strong>of</strong> Personal Necessity Leave. In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>the</strong><br />

leave is based on i tem la or lb, advance permission is not required.<br />

The employee shall, however, submit <strong>the</strong> request as soon as possible<br />

subsequent to <strong>the</strong> leave. All requests for Personal Necessity Leave<br />

shall be submitted on <strong>the</strong> Personal Necessity Request Form and<br />

Continued..


shall be directed to respective administrative Dean<br />

i .e. <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Instruction, <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Students or <strong>the</strong><br />

Dean <strong>of</strong> Educational Services.<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

3. In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>the</strong> request for Personal Necessity Leave clearly falls<br />

within <strong>the</strong> provisions <strong>of</strong> la and/or lb, <strong>the</strong> Dean shall approve <strong>the</strong><br />

request and forward signed copies to <strong>the</strong> personnel <strong>of</strong>fice who, in turn,<br />

will advise payroll departments. If <strong>the</strong> Dean has any doubt concerning<br />

<strong>the</strong> propriety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leave, he shall submit <strong>the</strong> request to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Leaves for review purposes. After a complete review, <strong>the</strong><br />

recomniendation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Leaves shall be returned to <strong>the</strong> Dean for<br />

decision and processing. Whenever possible, <strong>the</strong> Dean's decision<br />

should be rendered prior to <strong>the</strong> absence. All requests, recommendations<br />

and final decisions shall be kept in <strong>the</strong> personnel <strong>of</strong>fice and made<br />

available for use as precedent in subsequent cases. The personnel<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice shall compile a report on a periodic basis and make such report<br />

available to <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Instruction, <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Students, <strong>the</strong><br />

Dean <strong>of</strong> Educational Services and <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Leaves.<br />

4. Personal Necessity Leave shall not impinge upon E.C. Section 87764.<br />

5. If <strong>the</strong>re is any deviation from <strong>the</strong> original leave request, <strong>the</strong><br />

eniployee utilizing Personal Necessity Leave shall report such deviation<br />

to <strong>the</strong> appropriate Dean.<br />

6. Paragraphs 2 through 5 constitute <strong>the</strong> method by which <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong><br />

.has prescribed "pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> personal necessity" for Section 87784<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Education Code.<br />

Written February 1981<br />

Revised January 1985<br />

Continued. ......


Personal Necessity<br />

--<br />

Flow Chart


PERSONAL NECESSITY<br />

Request Form<br />

Date(s) <strong>of</strong> Absence: Hours :<br />

Reason: (Check appropriate item(s))<br />

Page 3i<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

- (a) Death or serious illness <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> my imnediate family.<br />

- (b) Accident, involving my person or property, or <strong>the</strong> person or<br />

property <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> my inmediate family.<br />

-- (c) O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Action: Request Approved Request Denied<br />

Dean's Signature<br />

Note: Submit both copies to <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> your area i .e. Instruction, Students O r<br />

Educational Services<br />

Continued .......


May 6, 1985 Paae 3.i<br />

~< "<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

4<strong>11</strong>5-Faculty Responsibilities (Policy)<br />

Objective:<br />

The clarification <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional person's duties and responsibilities<br />

is inte18ded to provide a better understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional's role.<br />

The <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> faculty performance expectancies serve <strong>the</strong> same<br />

purpose. The purpose is to provide faculty members and o<strong>the</strong>r parties a<br />

clearer understanding <strong>of</strong> what <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> identifies as faculty<br />

responsibilities during contracted days <strong>of</strong> service. It is recognized that<br />

conflicts may result in meeting <strong>the</strong>se responsibilities. Faculty members<br />

are expected to resolve <strong>the</strong>se conflicts pr<strong>of</strong>essionally.<br />

A. Instructional Responsibilities-<br />

. Provide instruction in accordance with <strong>the</strong> philosophy <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> stated in <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> catalog.<br />

2. Provide instruction in classes according to approved<br />

course outlines.<br />

3. Acquaint all students in writing with course requirements,<br />

student performance evaluation procedures, field trip<br />

demands and attendance requirements during <strong>the</strong> first week<br />

<strong>the</strong> class is in session.<br />

4. Submit all required grade, eligibility and o<strong>the</strong>r reports to<br />

<strong>the</strong> designated <strong>of</strong>fice by <strong>the</strong> time stated in accordance with<br />

standardized procedures for record keeping.<br />

5. Full-time faculty should meet all classes as scheduled and should<br />

post and maintain a minimum <strong>of</strong> five (5) <strong>of</strong>fice hours per week.<br />

6. Assist and guide students beyond regular class and <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

hours.<br />

7. Make timely evaluations <strong>of</strong> student performance to measure<br />

achievement in course work.<br />

8. Maintain security for and during all examinations.<br />

B. Related Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Responsibilities-<br />

1. .Be aware <strong>of</strong> established emergency and safety procedures.<br />

2. Report in accordance with annual contract dates and attend<br />

scheduled faculty meetings, department meetings and meetings<br />

<strong>of</strong> coc~mitiees <strong>of</strong> which one is a member.<br />

3. Attend commencement exercises in academic attire.<br />

4. Clay sponsor or advise in student activities as an alternative<br />

to committee membership responsibilities.<br />

5. Restrict o<strong>the</strong>r outside activities that interfere with faculty<br />

responsibilities.<br />

Continued .......


6. Schedule guest speakers according to <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> policy.<br />

Page 3k<br />

<strong>Board</strong> Minutes<br />

November 20, 1985<br />

7. Make all requests for <strong>of</strong>f-campus college activities through<br />

tile departnlent chairperson. ff students have to be excused<br />

from classes o<strong>the</strong>r than one for which <strong>the</strong> activity is planned,<br />

a list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se students must be submitted to <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Students<br />

or <strong>the</strong> Dean <strong>of</strong> Educational Services at <strong>the</strong> Copper Mountain Campus.<br />

-<br />

8. Take reasonable care <strong>of</strong> district property.<br />

9. Advise students-<br />

a. Assist students with study problems.<br />

b. Refer students to appropriate college sources for<br />

information or fur<strong>the</strong>r counseling.<br />

c. Assist students to evaluate <strong>the</strong>ir potential for successful<br />

achievement in <strong>the</strong> instructor's subject field.<br />

d. Provide inforn~ation concerning vocational opportunities<br />

in <strong>the</strong> instructor's field.<br />

e. Provide full information regarding content <strong>of</strong> courses.<br />

f. Provide inforniatioti regarding post communi ty college<br />

educational and training opportunities and demands in<br />

<strong>the</strong> instructor's field.<br />

10. Initiates and/or participates in-<br />

a. Establishing educational goals for his/her area <strong>of</strong><br />

instruction.<br />

b. Annual updating <strong>of</strong> five-year academic plan and three-year<br />

projection <strong>of</strong> resource needs for his/her area <strong>of</strong> instruction.<br />

c. Evaluating currlcula and proposing new currlcula or<br />

nlodifications to existing curricula.<br />

d. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional evaluation in accordance with district pol icy.<br />

e. Development <strong>of</strong> requests for instructional support services<br />

including 1 ibrary, audio-visual, learning resources and<br />

tutorial services.<br />

f. Preparing information for <strong>College</strong> catalog and schedule<br />

<strong>of</strong> classes.<br />

g. Developing requests for special grants and projects.<br />

ti. Selecting equipment, supplies, books and o<strong>the</strong>r instructional<br />

support materials.<br />

i. Exercising budget control as assigned.<br />

j. Inventorying and recording <strong>of</strong> instructional :resources.<br />

k. Preparing and submitting to <strong>the</strong> department chairpersons<br />

for review a statement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> title, author and publisher<br />

<strong>of</strong> all texts, required reading, workbooks or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

material for purchase by students.<br />

1. Advising students during registration for both semesters.<br />

Continued .......


<strong>11</strong>. Consults, advises and assists in-<br />

Page 31<br />

Bbard Minutes<br />

November 20, 1905<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> need and assignment <strong>of</strong> staff.<br />

Recruitment, selection, orientation and in-service training<br />

<strong>of</strong> staff.<br />

Maintenance <strong>of</strong> liaison and conununication within area <strong>of</strong><br />

instruction and o<strong>the</strong>r departments, students, college<br />

committees, o<strong>the</strong>r educational institutions, lay advisory<br />

groups, business and industry, related community agencies<br />

and <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> Public Information Office.<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> s m s<br />

for personnel, rooms, <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

and special facilities as <strong>the</strong>y relate to his/her area <strong>of</strong><br />

instruction.<br />

Development and improven~ent <strong>of</strong> instructional services.<br />

Plans for improvement and development <strong>of</strong> instructional<br />

facilities.<br />

Develops~ent <strong>of</strong> instructional <strong>of</strong>ferings for special<br />

sessions such as evening division, summer session and<br />

instructional television.<br />

Recruitment and selection <strong>of</strong> students for college career<br />

programs.


TRUSTEES<br />

J. John Anderholt<br />

COLLEkE OF THE DESERl<br />

December <strong>11</strong>, 1985<br />

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURES FOR BOARD APPROVAL<br />

Charles H. Hayden, Jr.<br />

Ray House<br />

Virnita McDonald<br />

Jackie Suitt<br />

OTHERS<br />

F. D. Stout<br />

T. W. Spears<br />

Joseph B. Iantorno<br />

C. A. Patterson<br />

James T. Pulliam<br />

William Kroonen<br />

Jim R. Pel1<br />

Howard Rutan<br />

Terry Green<br />

Jacqulyn Weiss


I RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHUOLS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL UARRAMTS<br />

k Y 1<br />

I<br />

COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/06/85<br />

O I STR I CT 01 CUACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />

PAGE: 1<br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

VENDOR<br />

NO.<br />

P29452 07/18/85 1<strong>12</strong>84<br />

P29599<br />

P20964<br />

P29892<br />

P29853<br />

P32068<br />

P32067<br />

P32065<br />

P32062 10/30/85 10572<br />

P32027<br />

P29790<br />

P29653<br />

I P29499<br />

P20943<br />

I P29498<br />

P29420<br />

P32051<br />

1 P29713<br />

I<br />

, P29748<br />

P29988<br />

P29932<br />

FT9924<br />

P29834<br />

08/08/85 <strong>11</strong>968<br />

10/22/85 10329<br />

10/02/85 <strong>12</strong>155<br />

10/02/85 <strong>11</strong>455<br />

10/30/85 <strong>11</strong>346<br />

10/30/85 <strong>11</strong>959<br />

10/30/85 10759<br />

10/30/85 <strong>11</strong>944<br />

09/17/85 10604<br />

08/23/85 10530<br />

1 07/18/85,10013<br />

08/01/85 <strong>12</strong>684<br />

10/29/85 10088<br />

08/01 /85 <strong>12</strong>683<br />

10/24/85 <strong>12</strong>810<br />

09/09/85 10087<br />

09/17/85 <strong>12</strong>723<br />

10/16/85 10184<br />

10/16/85 10191<br />

I<br />

10/10/85 <strong>12</strong>775<br />

09/26/85 <strong>11</strong> 2041<br />

I<br />

VENDOR NAME / CLAIM / FUND 1 L ~ /SITE C<br />

STECK VAUGHN CO X28785 100 3AK 00 4930000000<br />

GMGE~~~&+~G~AC~CCP<br />

-51: 100 4AG 00 01 09000306<br />

OUT PASTEUP SUPPLY CB<br />

SCIENCE RESEARCH I~~~~~~<br />

100 4AE 00 0957300330<br />

001 00 0000000000<br />

SEARS, RBEBUCK AN0 CO. X28789<br />

NO .<br />

STEVES OFFICE SUPPLY X28790<br />

NATIONAL LEAGUE FBR NURSING X28791<br />

STEVES OFFICE SUPPLY X28792<br />

/ PROGRAM<br />

OFCCU CONSTRUCTIBN X28765 100 2BM 00 6500000000<br />

SCIENCE RESEARCH X28766 100 3AK 00 4930000000<br />

MAC MlLLAN PUBLISHING X28767 100 4AZ 00 6105000000<br />

K E S Q TV X28768 100 1FI 00 6837000000<br />

APPLIED AIR ENGINEERING X28769 100 2BM 00 6500000000<br />

K S E S RADIO X28770 100 3EC 00 6003000000<br />

PARKER PUB. CO. X28771 100 50A 00 0000000000<br />

DRAMATIST PLAY SERVICE X28772 100 4AT 00 100700061 1<br />

NATIONAL MUSIC SERVICE. INC. X28773 100 4AU 00 1004300000<br />

PRBDUCTlBN GRAPHICS X28774 100 4AU 00 1004000000<br />

J 8 P GARDEN SUPPLY X28775 100 4AG 00 0109000306<br />

STEVES BFFICE SUPPLY X28776 100 3AK 00 4930000000<br />

3AK 00 4930000000<br />

WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC X28777 100 288 00 67<strong>11</strong>000000<br />

CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY,INC. X28778 100 4AZ 00 6105000000<br />

BAYLESS STATIONERS X28779 100 2BB 00 67<strong>11</strong>000000<br />

CUNSBLI DATE0 ELECTRIC X28780 100 2BM 00 6500000000<br />

NATIONAL IRRIGATION X28781 100 2BM 00 6500000000<br />

AMERICAN SCIENTlFlC PRODUCTS X28782 100 4AS 00 1905000000<br />

S 8 S OPTlKA X28783 100 4AS 00 191 1000000<br />

TWENTIETH CENTURY PLASTICS INC X28784 100 4AB 00 0703000324<br />

CLAl M AMOUNT 1 I WARRANT AMOUNT I


-<br />

RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT BF SCHBBLS<br />

i REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS I<br />

COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D I S T R I C T 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CBMM CBLLEGE<br />

VENDOR<br />

NO . VENDOR NAME<br />

I I<br />

10/30/85 <strong>12</strong>557 PRICE CLUB<br />

NB. 1 1 FUND ILBC I I I<br />

X28793<br />

/SITE<br />

I<br />

08/05/85 10321 C ~ , ! & ~ ~ ~ i i ' c ~ i&';'i_= j < ~ ~ ss;:mm<br />

" j _<br />

10/29/85 10630 AMERICAN HBSPlTAL ASSOCIATIBN X28795<br />

10/29/85 <strong>12</strong>820 SAN DlEGB MESA CBLLEGE X28796<br />

09/26/85 10385 CANNON PIANOS X28797<br />

10/10/85 10365 CANNBN PIANOS X28798<br />

09/09/85 10222 ACCENT PRINTING X28799<br />

08/22/85 10248 PALM DESERT PHARMACY X28800<br />

10/16/85 10019 HBUSTON LUMBER X28801<br />

lO/l8/85 10362 DESERT EMPIRE TRACTOR X28802<br />

09/17/85 10255 NOEL BRUSH AWARDS X28803<br />

10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>796 SCIENTIFIC AUOIB ELECTRONICS X28804<br />

10/24/85 <strong>12</strong>613 VIDE0 RESOURCE PACKET X28805<br />

10/29/85 <strong>11</strong>538 J W PEPPER BF LOS ANGELES X28806<br />

10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>102 FBBTLOCKER a7497 X28807<br />

10/29/85 <strong>12</strong>747 BUSINESS WEEK X28808<br />

08/23/85 10008 PALM DESERT STATIONERS X28809<br />

10/29/85 <strong>12</strong>721 MIKE RBONEY X28810<br />

<strong>11</strong>/06/85 <strong>12</strong>498 HENRY BURNETT X288<strong>11</strong><br />

<strong>11</strong>/06/85 <strong>11</strong>905 ELISE HALLINAN X288<strong>12</strong><br />

<strong>11</strong>/06/85 10780 BRUCE USHER X28813<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/06/85<br />

PAGE: 2<br />

PROGRAM 1 BBJECT CLAl M AMOUNT 1 WARRANT WARRANT AMBUNT 1


COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

j D I S TR I CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CflMPl COLLEGE<br />

RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT BF SCHOOLS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/06/85<br />

PAGE: 3


I COUNTY<br />

1<br />

33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D 1 S T R l C T 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CBMM CBLLEGE<br />

REF<br />

VENDBR NAME<br />

NO.<br />

-965<br />

R R BBWKER<br />

-29992<br />

R 8 B GLASS CB<br />

P29964<br />

SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE<br />

P29963<br />

SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE<br />

-29962<br />

RAY FRANKS PUBLISHING RANCH<br />

RAY FRANKS PUBLISHING RANCH<br />

i HBLMAN INDUSTRIES<br />

PALM OESERT STAT1 BNERS<br />

PRODUCTION GRAPHICS<br />

DESERT PHBTB LAB<br />

TEXAS CHRISTIAN<br />

WESTERN GRBWER AND SHIPPER<br />

B S N CBRPBRATIBN<br />

WESTERN ATHLETIC SUPPLY<br />

OESERT PHBTB LAB<br />

GATEWAY RENTALS<br />

YELLOW MART<br />

DAILY NEWS<br />

OESERT BUSINESS MACHINES<br />

DESERT MBTBR REWIND<br />

STEVES BFFI CE SUPPLY<br />

W9961<br />

P29914<br />

P29903<br />

P29878<br />

-9670<br />

P29954<br />

P32017<br />

P29351<br />

-98<br />

P29969<br />

F32001<br />

732004<br />

'32002<br />

I PW901<br />

VENDBR<br />

NB .<br />

10/24/85 10556<br />

10/16/85 10571<br />

10/16/85 10168<br />

10/18/85 10168<br />

10/16/85 <strong>11</strong>072<br />

10/16/85 <strong>11</strong>072<br />

10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>027<br />

10/ 10/85 10008<br />

10/16/85 <strong>11</strong>944<br />

10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>789<br />

10/16/85 <strong>12</strong>791<br />

10/22/65 <strong>12</strong>807<br />

07/08/85 10422<br />

10/22/85 10887<br />

10/22/85 <strong>12</strong>789<br />

10/22/85 101 70<br />

10/22/85 10100<br />

10/22/85 10066<br />

10/10/85 <strong>11</strong>677<br />

729700 09/17/85 10971<br />

1 P29756 09/17/85 10530<br />

CHAMPlBN PRBDUCTS<br />

CHAMPION PRBDUCTS<br />

AFC SERVl CE CB<br />

MARKSTAT/PETER LAPLACA<br />

RIVERSIDE CBUNTY RBAO DEPT<br />

ACE HARDWARE<br />

BIG A AUTB PARTS<br />

DAYS OFFICE CENTER<br />

RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT UF SCHUULS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />

PAGE: 1 I


- I - )<br />

COUNTY 33 RlVERSlDE<br />

D 1 S TR I CT 01 CUACHELLA VALLEY CUMM COLLEGE<br />

REF<br />

NO.<br />

RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPER1 NTENDENT BF SCHBBLS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

I<br />

DATE<br />

VENDOR<br />

NO.<br />

I 1<br />

VENDOR NAME<br />

JOHNSUN PHOTU<br />

/ NO. / FUND<br />

SUNVALCU<br />

SCAN TRUN CURP<br />

EASTMAN INC<br />

GALE RESEARCH CU<br />

STUCKWELL & Bl NNEY<br />

VIVITAR COMPUTER PRODUCTS<br />

PALM DESERT DISPOSAL<br />

U S TREASURY<br />

SU CAL 1 F GAS CB<br />

SU CALIF GAS CO<br />

HI -DESERT DISPOSAL CO<br />

PALM DESERT WATER<br />

C V CUUNTY WATER DISTRICT<br />

*xx*x*l***x*X*x*X*****x**x***x<br />

EXPEND1 TURE SUMMARY BY FUND<br />

FUND AMUUNT<br />

TBTAL WARR<br />

AUTHURIZED BY L K RICHARDS<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />

PAGE: 3 1<br />

----.-------------.-.----- ---------------<br />

NTS 70 33,890.20


I<br />

COUNTY 33 RIVERSIOE<br />

D I S TR I CT 01 CUACHELLA VALLEY CUMM COLLEGE<br />

ENOUF<br />

OATE r NU.<br />

_I<br />

VENOBR NAME<br />

RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

CLA 1 M<br />

NO .<br />

I<br />

STEPHANIE LAMAR X28630<br />

TERESA TORRES X28631<br />

MlRlTA SALOIVAR X28632<br />

ANNETTE PAD1 LLA X28814<br />

CUN I TA HERNANDEZ X28815<br />

CAMPUS SERVICES C. B. D. X28816<br />

CAMPUS SERVICES C. U. D. X28817<br />

CAMPUS SERVICES C. 0. 0.<br />

SUN STAR DISPOSAL SERVICES X28819<br />

GENERAL TELEPHONE X28820<br />

SU CA EDl35N X28821<br />

FUND LUC SITE PRBGRAM OBJECT CLAIM AMUUNT<br />

330 5CE 00 7050000063 7520 200.00 6405056<br />

330 5CE 00 7050000063 7520 200.00 6405057<br />

330 5CE 00 7050000063 7520 200.00 6405058<br />

330 5CE 00 7050000063 7520 200.00 6405059<br />

330 5CE 00 7050000060 7520 200.00 6405060<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/<strong>12</strong>/85<br />

PAGE: 1<br />

WARRANT AMOUNT<br />

200.00<br />

200.00 J<br />

200.00J<br />

200.00J


COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D l STR l CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />

VENOBR NAME<br />

MARIAN KATZ<br />

JOSl E GALLEGBS<br />

CHARLOTTE FLBRES<br />

RBBBIE MURRELL<br />

LYNN CRAWFORO<br />

CHARLES PALMER<br />

MARCELINB DlAZ<br />

xxxxxxxxxxxxrxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUND<br />

FUND AMBUNT<br />

-<br />

RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

CLA 1 M<br />

NB .<br />

-tt<br />

FUND LBC SITE<br />

AUTHORIZED BY B L SAINZ<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/<strong>12</strong>/85<br />

PAGE: 2


COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

43 1 STR I CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />

DATE VENDeR NAME<br />

GARY BERTHEBLA<br />

*X*xxII*X****Xxx*****I*****x*x~<br />

EXPEND1,TURE SUMMARY BY FUND<br />

FUND AMOUNT<br />

100 1,514.10<br />

TOTAL 1,514.10<br />

RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT O'F SCHOOLS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

-<br />

SITE<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/18/85<br />

PAGE: 1<br />

PROGRAM OBJECT CLAIM AMOUNT<br />

WARRANT AMOUNT --- NO, -<br />

671 1000000 5620 1.51 4.10 6407709 1,514.10


COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D I ST R I C T 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY COMM COLLEGE<br />

REF VENDOR<br />

NU.<br />

VENDBR NAME<br />

LIRA INFBRMATION SYSTEMS<br />

CHERI DAWN ALEXANDER D C<br />

DAN WALTERS M D<br />

'JANE BRAOBURY LBRD<br />

RBBERT E GUUDING<br />

RUBAR AND ASSOCIATES<br />

SHIRLEY NI CHULSBN<br />

WALTER C REED 1 1 1<br />

MATT CAOBY<br />

RICHARD P CBDD INC<br />

WILLIAM F LETT<br />

ASCBD<br />

GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />

1 028844 <strong>11</strong> 1 /21/85 <strong>11</strong> 0033 1 GENERAL TELEPHONE 1x28844 1<br />

RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS<br />

REGISTER OF CORMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

CLAIM<br />

NO.<br />

RICHARD L PUPER X28845<br />

MCI TELECBMMUNICATIUNS CURP X28846<br />

MCI TELECOMMUNICATIBNS CBRP<br />

1 028848 <strong>11</strong> 1/21 /85 <strong>11</strong> 0033 / GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />

1 028849 / <strong>11</strong> /21/85 <strong>11</strong> 0035 1 SO CA EDISON<br />

1 028850 <strong>11</strong> /21/85 / 10033 / GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />

1<br />

X28847<br />

1x28848 1<br />

1x28849 1<br />

1x28850 1<br />

PATRICIA L PAIGE<br />

LUCY LBCHHEAD<br />

1<br />

FUND<br />

LBC<br />

SITE<br />

PRBGRAM<br />

OBJECT<br />

CLAIM AMBUNT<br />

100 2BD 00 6800000000 5100 2,187.50 641 0082<br />

100 5DH 00 6410000000 5100 750.00 641 0083<br />

100 4AN 00 <strong>12</strong>45000318 51 10 1,250.00 641 0084<br />

100 3BF 00 7141000000 5100 600.00 641 0085<br />

100 3BF 00 7142000000 5100<br />

1 80.00 84 1 0086<br />

100 2BD 00 6700000000 5100 4,000.00 6410087<br />

100 4AT 00 1007000000 5100 1,250.00 6410088<br />

100 3BF 00 7142000000 5100 2,435.84 6410089<br />

100 2BB 00 67<strong>11</strong>000000 5600 783.80 6410090<br />

100 IFF 00 6836000000 5100 2,625.00 6410091<br />

100 4AU 00 1004300000 5100 762.26 6410092<br />

105 5DS 00 0000000000 8877 20.00 641 0093<br />

100 2BU 00 6500000000 5540 25.50 6410094<br />

100 3BU 00 6500000000 5540 332.46 6410095<br />

100 3BB 00 67<strong>11</strong>000000 6200 188.00 641 0096<br />

100 2BU 00 6500000000 5540 1,445.97 8410097<br />

100 2BU 00 6500000000 5540 83.24 84 1 0098<br />

100 3BU 00 6500000000 5540 <strong>11</strong>4.99 6410099<br />

100 3BU 00 6500000000 5520 296.71 6410100<br />

100 2BU 00 6500000000 5540 168.23 6410101<br />

100 4EX 00 6890000000 8878 45.00 6410102<br />

100 4EX 00 6890000000 8878 45.00 6410103<br />

100 4EX 00 6890000000 8878 45.00 8410104<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/21/85<br />

PAGE: 1<br />

WARRANT AMBUNT<br />

2,187.504<br />

750. OO/<br />

1.250.00/<br />

600. ood<br />

180. OOJ<br />

4,000.00J<br />

1,250.00/<br />

2.435.84 1/<br />

783.80 J<br />

2,625.00J<br />

762.26J<br />

20. ooJ,<br />

25.50


COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D 1 S T R I CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY COMM CBLLEGE<br />

REF<br />

NO. -<br />

-<br />

VENDBf<br />

NO. I VENDOR NAME<br />

*x***x***********x*******x****<br />

EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUND<br />

FUND AMBUNT<br />

100 19,614.50<br />

105 20.00<br />

TOTAL 19,634.50<br />

RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHUULS<br />

REGISTER OF CONnERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

CLAIM<br />

NB.<br />

-<br />

FUND<br />

-&<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/21/85<br />

PAGE: 2<br />

SITE PROGRAM BBJECT CLAIM AMOUNT WARRANT AMOUNT<br />

WAi:y


COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D l S T R 1 CT 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CBMM CBLLEGE<br />

REF VENDOR<br />

CLAIM<br />

VENDOR NAME<br />

NB . NB .<br />

BIG A AUTB PARTS<br />

CBNSBLIOATED ELECTRIC<br />

HARPER 8. RBW PUBLISHERS<br />

SIMPLEX TIME RECBROER<br />

DAILY NEWS<br />

ACADEMIC FINANCIAL SERVICES<br />

OESERT SUN<br />

OESERT SUN<br />

OESERT SUN<br />

OESERT SUN<br />

DESERT AUTB & HARDWARE<br />

XEROX CBRPBRATIBN<br />

OAl LY NEWS<br />

SlMUN AN0 SCHUSTER<br />

PASADENA CC BASKETBALL<br />

NEWBURY HBUSE PUBLICATIBNS<br />

- 1<br />

RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHUBLS<br />

STUCKWELL & BINNEY X28872<br />

SUNSET MAGAZINE X28873<br />

RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SCHBBL BOS X28874<br />

GBRTZ FIRE EXTINGUISHER CU. X28875<br />

DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES X28876<br />

DEANS COMPUTER CENTER X28877<br />

GEMCB X28878<br />

ClTlCBRP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT INC X28879<br />

SAN OIEGO CITY CBLLEGE X28880<br />

ACE HARDWARE X28881<br />

ELECTRIC CAR OIST X28882<br />

DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES X28883<br />

OAl LY NEWS X28884<br />

- - . -- -- -<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

FUND LBC SITE PRBGRAM OBJECT CLAIM AMBUNT<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/22/85<br />

PAGE: 1<br />

WARRANT


I RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS k5' I'<br />

I REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRAMTS I<br />

COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D I S TR 1 CT 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CUMM CULLEGE<br />

REF<br />

NU.<br />

P25297<br />

P25236<br />

C10094<br />

P29916<br />

P32158<br />

P29918<br />

P32026<br />

P32041<br />

P32042<br />

P32058<br />

P32083<br />

P32084<br />

P32108<br />

P32<strong>12</strong>9<br />

P29813<br />

P32080<br />

P32<strong>12</strong>4<br />

P29909<br />

P29570<br />

P29929<br />

P32022<br />

P32097<br />

P32138<br />

P32145<br />

P29828<br />

P32053<br />

P32131<br />

P32130<br />

P32050<br />

P32046<br />

I<br />

09/17/85<br />

07/08/85<br />

09/10/84<br />

10/31/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/13/85<br />

10/10/85<br />

10/29/85<br />

10/29/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/01/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/01/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/01/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/01/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />

09/26/85<br />

10/29/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />

10/10/85<br />

10/04/85<br />

10/16/85<br />

10/22/85<br />

10/31/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/13/85<br />

09/24/85<br />

10/24/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />

<strong>11</strong>/05/85<br />

10/24/85<br />

10/24/85<br />

VENOUR<br />

NU.<br />

10054<br />

10054<br />

<strong>12</strong>078<br />

<strong>11</strong>677<br />

<strong>12</strong>258<br />

<strong>12</strong>782<br />

<strong>12</strong>789<br />

<strong>12</strong>824<br />

<strong>12</strong>836<br />

<strong>12</strong>789<br />

<strong>12</strong>789<br />

10016<br />

10501<br />

<strong>12</strong>835<br />

<strong>12</strong>761<br />

10024<br />

10793<br />

109<strong>11</strong><br />

10387<br />

10387<br />

10017<br />

<strong>12</strong>826<br />

<strong>12</strong>355<br />

<strong>12</strong>591<br />

10320<br />

10366<br />

10168<br />

<strong>12</strong>627<br />

<strong>12</strong>81 5<br />

<strong>11</strong>652<br />

VENDUR NAME 1 I FUND /LUC /SITE I PROGRAM<br />

NU.<br />

B & W HARDWARE<br />

X28885<br />

B 8 W HARDWARE<br />

X28886<br />

LIRA INFORMATIUN SYSTEMS<br />

X28887<br />

DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES<br />

X28888<br />

JUURNAL UF CHEMICAL EOUCATIBN X28889<br />

G C S SERVICE INC<br />

X28890<br />

DESERT PHBTU LAB<br />

X28891<br />

HUME FITNESS CENTER<br />

X28892<br />

MUSICK SAW AN0 TWL SHARPENING X28893<br />

DESERT PHBTU LAB<br />

X28894<br />

DESERT PHUTe LAB<br />

X28895<br />

ELECTRIC CAR OlST<br />

X28896<br />

BILL DUNSTAN<br />

X28897<br />

TWENTYNINE PALMS PARKS<br />

X28898<br />

WACU CHEMICALS<br />

X28899<br />

MUWER WURLD<br />

X28900<br />

OUWNEY WELDING & MFG CU<br />

X28901<br />

MONARCH BUSINESS FURMS<br />

X28902<br />

HIGH DESERT STAR & TRAIL<br />

X28903<br />

HIGH DESERT STAR 8 TRAIL<br />

X28904<br />

W W GRAINGER<br />

X28905<br />

DESERT CBMPUTER SOCIETY<br />

X28906<br />

LINDE HBMECARE<br />

X28907<br />

MAGNAMUSIC-BATON INC<br />

X28908<br />

CARR PAPER<br />

X28909<br />

ZELLERBACH PAPER COMPANY<br />

X28910<br />

SPRINGS AMBULANCE SERVICE X289<strong>11</strong><br />

HI DESERT PUBLISHING<br />

X289<strong>12</strong><br />

WAX1 E<br />

X28913<br />

NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY CB X28914<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

105<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

100<br />

4AG<br />

2BM<br />

2BD<br />

3AK<br />

4AS<br />

4CI<br />

IF1<br />

4AP<br />

4AT<br />

IF1<br />

IF1<br />

2BM<br />

4AP<br />

3BB<br />

2BG<br />

2BG<br />

2BM<br />

288<br />

2BP<br />

2BP<br />

2BM<br />

4AC<br />

4AN<br />

4AU<br />

2BR<br />

2BC<br />

50M<br />

388<br />

2BC<br />

2BC<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

00<br />

01 16100306<br />

6500000000<br />

6600000000<br />

4930000000<br />

040<strong>11</strong>00000<br />

1306100321<br />

6837000000<br />

0835000000<br />

1007000000<br />

6837000000<br />

6837000000<br />

6500000000<br />

0835000000<br />

67<strong>11</strong>000000<br />

6500000000<br />

6500000000<br />

6500000000<br />

67<strong>11</strong>000000<br />

6735000000<br />

6735000000<br />

6500000000<br />

1501000000<br />

<strong>12</strong>03700318<br />

1004000000<br />

671 1000000<br />

6500000000<br />

6947000241<br />

671 1000000<br />

6500000000<br />

6500000000<br />

OBJECT<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/22/85<br />

PAGE: 2


COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D 1 S TR I CT 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />

VENDOR NAME<br />

CBNSBLIDATED ELECTRIC<br />

STECK VAUGHN CB<br />

STEVES OFFICE SUPPLY<br />

STEVES BFFICE SUPPLY<br />

HEWLETT PACKARD<br />

KEVl N MCCBRMl CK<br />

J. A. SEXAUER . I NC.<br />

AUOIB GRAPH1 C<br />

MARC GLASSMAN<br />

BUILDER'S HOMECENTER<br />

ALLIED REFRIGERATION<br />

BBEGES<br />

NELSON PHBTBGRAPHIC ART<br />

SIR SPEEDY<br />

VIDEOTAPE PRBDUCTIDNS<br />

COLLEGE B16LBGICAL SUPPLY<br />

STBCKWELL B BINNEY<br />

STBCKWELL B BINNEY<br />

VL SERVICE LIGHTING<br />

STBCKWELL 8 BINNEY<br />

I I 1 FUND AMOUNT<br />

RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS<br />

REGISTER OF CODMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

f<br />

BBJECT<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/22/85<br />

PAGE: 3 1<br />

CLAI M AMBUNT / WARRANT /WARRANT AMBUNT<br />

I I I


COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D I S T R I CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CBMM COLLEGE<br />

REF VENDOR<br />

NO. I OATE I NU.<br />

VENDOR NAME<br />

APPLE COMPUTER 1NC<br />

CHRUNICLE OF HIGHER EDUCATON<br />

APPLE COMPUTER INC<br />

OEVOKE DATA PRODUCTS<br />

CARRIER CLEARING SERVICE<br />

AUDITOR CONTROLLER<br />

A S C O D<br />

ESEQUIEL CORONEL<br />

RBEL ALEMAN<br />

GILBERT ROMAN<br />

A S C O D<br />

A S C U D<br />

GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />

SO CALIF GAS CB<br />

C V CUUNTY WATER DISTRICT<br />

GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHUNE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHUNE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHUNE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />

SO CA EOISON<br />

GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />

GENERAL TELEPHONE<br />

BRUCE USHER<br />

RIVERSIDE CUUNTY SUPERINTENDENT UF SCHUULS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

I<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/25/85<br />

PAGE: 1


REF VENDOR<br />

NO.<br />

DATE w, VENDOR NAME<br />

B B W HARDWARE<br />

AUD16 SECURITY INC<br />

CHEVRBN U S A<br />

GENERAL TELEPHBNE<br />

FILMS INCBRPBRATEO<br />

STUDENT INSURANCE<br />

028970 <strong>11</strong>/25/85 <strong>11</strong>677 DESERT BUSINESS MACHINES<br />

INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER<br />

OAVlO SCHRAGER<br />

DESERT COLLEGIATE BFFICIALS<br />

CBNSBLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS<br />

CON WAY WESTERN EXPRESS<br />

LEE ANN KLBCHENTEGER<br />

HERMIONE GREENE<br />

BERNAROB M PAOILLA<br />

GRETCHEN A GBCKEL<br />

JANICE SHERWIN<br />

CHRISTINE LYMAN<br />

PEGGY ANN PARRA<br />

BARBARA LEE MBRRISBN<br />

VICTBRIA E GBMEZ<br />

OBRBTHY BURKE<br />

- J<br />

RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT BF SCHBBLS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS I<br />

CBUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/25/85<br />

D 1 ST R 1 CT 01 COACHELLA VALLEY CBMM CBLLEGE<br />

PAGE: 2


COUNTY 33 RIVERSIDE<br />

D 1 S T R 1 CT 01 CBACHELLA VALLEY COMM CULLEGE<br />

REF VENDBR<br />

Nel . / DATE I NO. I VENDUR NAME<br />

RIVERSIDE CBUNTY SUPERINTENDENT UF SCHOOLS<br />

REGISTER OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTS<br />

-<br />

CLAIM<br />

NO.<br />

7<br />

PRBGRAM 'OBJECT CLAIM AMOUNT<br />

DATE: <strong>11</strong>/25/85<br />

PAGE: 3<br />

WARRANT 1 WARRANT AMOUNT<br />

NU.


PANTRY CHEF<br />

INSTITUTE OF CULINARY ARTS<br />

Accountability. The Pantry Chef is directly accountable to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Executive Chef <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong> Culinary Arts in a<br />

line relationship.<br />

Work Days. 230 days<br />

Duties. The Pantry Chef is held accountable for performing <strong>the</strong><br />

duties listed below:<br />

A. Instruction (approximately 75 percent <strong>of</strong> work assignment)<br />

1. Maintains liaison with members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

food service industry for resource<br />

development, instructional program<br />

verification, placing students for<br />

field experience, and placement for<br />

ICA graduates.<br />

2. Meets all classes as scheduled and works<br />

a minimum <strong>of</strong> 40 hours per week.<br />

3. Provides instruction in accordance with<br />

<strong>the</strong> philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Desert</strong> stated in <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong> catalog.<br />

4. Provides instruction in classes according<br />

to approved course outlines.<br />

5. Thoroughly acquaints students in writing<br />

with course requirements, student perfor-<br />

mance evaluation procedures, field trip<br />

demands, and attendance requirements, and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r appropriate requirements during <strong>the</strong><br />

first class session.<br />

6. Meets all classes as scheduled and presents<br />

subject matter in an organized and informed<br />

manner, utilizing appropriate learning<br />

activities.<br />

7. Helps and provides guidance for students<br />

beyond regular class and <strong>of</strong>fice hours.<br />

Continued .......


8. Makes timely evaluations <strong>of</strong> student<br />

performance to measure achievement in<br />

course work with <strong>the</strong> intent <strong>of</strong> assisting<br />

<strong>the</strong>m to learn.<br />

9. Maintains control during examinations so as<br />

to insure <strong>the</strong> academic integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

course, <strong>the</strong> program, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>College</strong>.<br />

B. Related Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

1. Understands and where necessary properly<br />

employs established emergency and safety<br />

procedures.<br />

2. Reports in accordance with annual contract<br />

dates and attends scheduled faculty meetings,<br />

department meetings, and meetings <strong>of</strong><br />

committees <strong>of</strong> which he/she is a member.<br />

3. Participates in commencement exercises in<br />

academic dress.<br />

4. Sponsors or advises in student activities<br />

as an alternative to committee membership<br />

responsibilities.<br />

5. Restricts o<strong>the</strong>r income and/or outside<br />

activities which would interfere with<br />

faculty responsibilities.<br />

6. Schedules guest speakers according to<br />

<strong>College</strong> policy.<br />

7. Makes all requests for <strong>of</strong>f-campus <strong>College</strong><br />

activities through <strong>the</strong> Executive Chef.<br />

If students have to be excused from classes<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r than one for which <strong>the</strong> activity is<br />

planned, a list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se students must be<br />

submitted to <strong>the</strong> Executive Chef.<br />

8. Advises students:<br />

A. Assists students with study problems.<br />

B. Refers students to appropriate <strong>College</strong><br />

services for information or fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

assistance.


C. Assists students to evaluate <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

potential for successful accomplish-<br />

ment in subject field <strong>of</strong> expertise.<br />

D. Provides accurate information concern-<br />

ing vocational opportunities in <strong>the</strong><br />

instructor's field.<br />

E. Provides full information regarding<br />

content <strong>of</strong> courses.<br />

F. Provides information regarding post-<br />

community college educational and<br />

training opportunities and demands in<br />

<strong>the</strong> instructor's field <strong>of</strong> expertise.<br />

9. Initiates and/or participates in:<br />

C. O<strong>the</strong>r Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

A. Establishing <strong>of</strong> educational goals for<br />

his/her area <strong>of</strong> instruction.<br />

B. Annual up-dating <strong>of</strong> five-year academic<br />

and three-year projection <strong>of</strong> resource<br />

needs for his/herareas <strong>of</strong> instruction.<br />

C. Evaluating curricula and proposing new<br />

curricula or modifications to existing<br />

curricula.<br />

D. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional evaluation in accordance<br />

with district policy.<br />

E. Development <strong>of</strong> requests for instructional<br />

support services including library,<br />

audio-visual, learning resources, and<br />

tutorial services.<br />

F. Preparing information for <strong>College</strong> catalog,<br />

schedule <strong>of</strong> classes, and o<strong>the</strong>r appropriate<br />

<strong>College</strong> documents.<br />

G. Developing requests for special grants<br />

and projects.<br />

H. Selecting equipment, supplies, books and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r instructional support materials.<br />

1. Provides placement services for student completers<br />

and former completers.<br />

Continued.. . . .


2. Maintains currency <strong>of</strong> cooking trends and<br />

methods,through pr<strong>of</strong>essional associations<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r chefs and food service organiza-<br />

tions/associations.<br />

3. Maintains currency as to food service industry<br />

needs.<br />

4. Performs o<strong>the</strong>r duties as may be assigned from<br />

time-to-time by <strong>the</strong> Executive Chef.<br />

Qualifications. The Pantry Chef position requires persons<br />

who have completed an Apprenticeship training program and/or<br />

graduated from a well known culinary school, e.g., <strong>the</strong> Culinary<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> America. To qualify for <strong>the</strong> Pantry Chef position,<br />

a person should have at least 5 to 10 years <strong>of</strong> food production<br />

in quality food service establishments.


MEMORANDUM<br />

TO :<br />

\ i<br />

Dr. F. D. Stout<br />

COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

December 2, 1985<br />

FROM: p~acgulyn Weiss, Director <strong>of</strong> Personnel<br />

SUBJECT: Recommendations Concerning Classified Personnel<br />

The following recommendations concerning personnel are submitted for your<br />

consideration:<br />

A. Appointments:<br />

- HALL, Stacey<br />

Position Title:<br />

Range and Step:<br />

Typist, Instructional Services<br />

5 -A<br />

Beginning Salary: $1006.00 per month<br />

Effective Date: November 18, 1985<br />

HERRON, Gwen<br />

Position Title: Typist, Campus Parking<br />

Range and Step: 5 -A<br />

Beginning Salary: $5.72 per hour-20 hrs./wk-10 months<br />

Effective Date: November 22, 1985<br />

RIVERA, Ismael<br />

Position Tit1 e: Grounds Keeper<br />

Range and Step: 8-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $<strong>11</strong>65.00 per month<br />

Effective Date: November 18, 1985<br />

ROYAL, William<br />

Position Title: Prgrammer Analyst Technician<br />

Range and Step: 17-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $1807.00 per month<br />

Effective Date: November 18, 1985<br />

B. Reassignments:<br />

AMICARELLA, Mario<br />

- From:<br />

To :<br />

-<br />

Position Title: Libr. Techn., Public Svs. Programmer Analyst<br />

Ranoe and Steo:<br />

~eginni ng salary:<br />

Effective Date:<br />

7 -A<br />

$6.30 per hour-16 hrs./wk.<br />

17-A .. ..<br />

$1807 .OO per month<br />

November 18, 1985<br />

FILLMAN, George<br />

Position Title: Typist, Instr. Services Sr. Typist, Adm. & Records<br />

Range and Step: 5-A 6-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $1006.00 per month . $1057.00 per month<br />

Effective Date: November 18, 1985<br />

C. Resignations:<br />

FRIAS, Gail<br />

--<br />

Position Title: Sec'y., Com. Svs. (Cal State)<br />

Effective Date: November 26, 1985<br />

Continued. . . . . . .


MEMORANDUM<br />

TO : Dr. F. D. Stout<br />

COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

December 2, 1985<br />

FROM: Jacqulyn Weiss, Director <strong>of</strong> Personnel<br />

SUBJECT: Substitute and Short-Term Personnel<br />

The following are submitted for your consideration:<br />

A. Substitutes:<br />

BURSON, Patricia<br />

Position Title: Instructional Support Aide I1<br />

Range and Step: 7-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour<br />

Effective Date: November 18, 1985 thru December 20, 1985<br />

CARNIE, Sandra<br />

Position Title:<br />

Range and Step:<br />

Sec'y.,<br />

7 -A<br />

Student Support Services<br />

Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour<br />

Effective Date:<br />

- HALL, Stacey<br />

November 22, 1985 thru December 6, 1985<br />

Position Title: Instructional Support Aide I1<br />

Range and Step: 7 -A<br />

Beginning Salary: $6.30 per hour<br />

Effective Date: November <strong>12</strong>, 1985 thru November 15, 1985<br />

WELCH, Christine<br />

Position Title: Sec'y. Agriculture Dept.<br />

Range and Step:<br />

Beginning Salary:<br />

7-A<br />

$6.30 per hour - 20 hrs./wk.<br />

Effective Date: November 25, 1985 thru December 6, 1985<br />

B. Short-Term:<br />

GRENFELL , - Pat<br />

Position Title: Maintenance, Technical<br />

Range and Step: <strong>12</strong>-A<br />

Beginning Salary: $8.04 per hour<br />

Effective Date: November 20, 1985, thru December 30, 1985<br />

lkr<br />

,


DATE : December 4, 1985<br />

TO : Dr. Stout<br />

FROM : Dean <strong>of</strong> Instruction<br />

COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

MEMORANDUM<br />

SUBJECT : BOARD APPROVAL OF TEXTBOOKS<br />

The following textbooks are submitted for <strong>Board</strong> approval:<br />

DEPARTMENT TEXTBOOK<br />

Agriculture Turf Management for Golf Courses<br />

Developmental Education The <strong>College</strong> Student<br />

Social Sciences The Logic <strong>of</strong> International Relations<br />

5th Edition


COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

ACADEMIC CALENDAR HISTORICAL COMPARISON<br />

ACADEMIC YEAR SEMESTER STARTED SEMESTER ENDED *ENROLLMENT<br />

1. 1974-75<br />

Fall 1974 9-10-74 1-23-75 6,733<br />

Spring 1975 1-29-75 6-6-75 7,816<br />

2. 1975-76<br />

Fall 1975 9-<strong>12</strong>-75 1-30-76 7,354<br />

Spring 1976 2-9-76 6-18-76 8,<strong>11</strong>4<br />

3. 1976-77<br />

Fall 1976 9-7-76 1-26-77 7,466<br />

Spring 1977 1-31-77 6-10-77 9,096<br />

4. 1977-78<br />

Fall 1977 8-18-77 <strong>12</strong>-23-77 <strong>12</strong>,230<br />

Spring 1978 1-16-78 5-26-78 14,457<br />

5. 1978-79<br />

Fall 1978 8-17-78 <strong>12</strong>-22-78 9,300<br />

Spring 1979 1-1 5-79 5-25-79 <strong>11</strong>,297<br />

6. 1979-80<br />

Fall 1979 8-20-79 <strong>12</strong>-21-79 <strong>11</strong>,149<br />

. , Spring 1980 1-16-80 5-30-80 10,402<br />

><br />

7. 1980-81<br />

Fall 1980 8- 15-80 <strong>12</strong>-19-80 <strong>11</strong>,460<br />

Spring 1981 1-9-81 5-21-81 <strong>11</strong>,044<br />

8. 1981-82<br />

Fall 1981 8-17-81 <strong>12</strong>-18-81 <strong>11</strong>,722<br />

Spring 1982 1-8-82 5-21-82 <strong>11</strong>,543<br />

9. 1982-83<br />

Fall 1982 9-7-82 1-19-83 10,939<br />

Spring 1983 2-4-83 6-1 7-83 9,290<br />

10. 1983-84<br />

Fall 1983 9-6-83 1- 24-84 9,317<br />

Spring 1984 2-3-84 6-1 5-84 8,109<br />

<strong>11</strong> . 1984-85<br />

Fall 1984 8-20-84 <strong>12</strong>-21-84 9,687<br />

Spring 1985 1-17-85 5-31-85 9,529<br />

<strong>12</strong>. 1985-86<br />

Fall 1985 8-19-85 <strong>12</strong>-20-85 9,004<br />

Spring 1986 1-13-86 5-28-86<br />

*Second Census Total Enrollment<br />

<strong>12</strong>-4-85<br />

km<br />

Continued......,


8 MARIA RIIOTNSKV pr ten! 01 Ihr anlI8lulaonl in Mr <strong>11</strong> I~W studtnt, latq start an lhc<br />

I ht &%I lhtnj %urn< rladrnn Wat's ~uwey used il. whdr ihn tumn~rjobm.tk.l<br />

look al uhm <strong>the</strong> col.,e r~lllnaur yclc only 5 wr


FALL 1986<br />

COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

ACADEMIC CALENDAR 1986-87<br />

August 18 Monday, Classes Begin<br />

September 1 Monday, Labor Day-Hol iday<br />

November <strong>11</strong> Tuesday, Veterans Day-Hol iday<br />

November 27,28,29 Thursday to Saturday, Thanksgiving Day-Holiday<br />

December 13-1 9 Saturday to Friday, Final. Exams<br />

December 19 Friday, End Of Fall Semester<br />

Week Days Per Semester Working Days Per Month<br />

Monday 17 August 10<br />

Tuesday 17 September 21<br />

Wednesday 18 October 23<br />

Thursday 17 November 17<br />

Friday 17 December 15<br />

Saturday 16 (Not In Total)<br />

- -<br />

86 TOTAL 86 TOTAL<br />

SEMESTER BREAK: DECEMBER 20, 1986 TO JANUARY <strong>11</strong>, 1987<br />

************mfi*******************m***<br />

SPRING 1987<br />

January<br />

January<br />

February<br />

February<br />

March<br />

May<br />

May<br />

May<br />

May<br />

Week Days Per Semester<br />

Monday 16<br />

Tuesday 19<br />

Monday, Classes Begin<br />

Monday, Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r King, Jr. 's Birthday-Hol iday<br />

Friday, Lincoln's Birthday-Hol iday<br />

Monday, Washington's Birthday-Holiday<br />

Monday to Saturday, Spring Break<br />

Wednesday to Wednesday, Final Exams<br />

Monday, Memorial Day-Holiday<br />

Wednesday, End Of Spring Semester<br />

Friday, Spring Graduation<br />

Working Days Per Month<br />

January 14<br />

February 18<br />

March 17<br />

~hursday- 18 Apri 1 22<br />

Friday 17 May 18<br />

Saturday 18 (Not In Total)<br />

- -<br />

89 TOTAL 89 TOTAL<br />

Continued .......


FALL 1987<br />

August 17<br />

September 7<br />

November <strong>11</strong><br />

November 26,27,28<br />

December <strong>12</strong>- 18<br />

December 18<br />

COLLEGE OF THE DESER1<br />

ACADEMIC CALENDAR 1987-88<br />

Week Days Per Semester<br />

Working Days Per Month<br />

M0nda.v 17<br />

Auaust <strong>11</strong><br />

~uesday 18 ~eptember 21<br />

Wednesday 17 October 22<br />

Thursday 17 November 18<br />

Friday<br />

Saturday<br />

17<br />

16 (Not In Total )<br />

December 14<br />

-- -<br />

86 TOTAL 86 TOTAL<br />

Monday, Classes Begin<br />

Monday, Labor Day-Hol iday<br />

Wednesday, Veterans Day-Hol iday<br />

Thursday to Saturday, Thanksgiving Day-Hol iday<br />

Saturday to Friday, Final Exams<br />

Friday, End Of Fall Semester<br />

SEMESTER BREAK: DECEMBER 19, 1987 TO JANUARY 10, 1988<br />

* * * * H * * * * * m M * * H * * * * * * H * * * * n * * * * * M<br />

SPRING 1988<br />

January<br />

January<br />

February<br />

February<br />

March<br />

May<br />

May<br />

May<br />

May<br />

Week Days Per Semester Workinq Days Per Month<br />

Monday 17 January 14<br />

Tuesday 19 February 19<br />

Wednesday 18 March 18<br />

Thursday 18 April 21<br />

Friday 17 May 17<br />

Saturday 18 (Not In Total)<br />

-<br />

89 TOTAL 89 TOTAL<br />

Monday, Classes Begin<br />

Monday, Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r King, Jr. 's Birthday-Holiday<br />

Friday, Lincoln's Birthday-Holiday<br />

Monday, Washington's Birthday-Hol iday<br />

Monday to Saturday, Spring Break<br />

Wednesday to Tuesday, Final Exams<br />

Tuesday, End Of Spring Semester<br />

Tuesday, Spring Graduation<br />

Monday, Memorial Day-Hol iday<br />

I


FALL 1988<br />

August 15<br />

September 5<br />

November <strong>11</strong><br />

November 24,25,26<br />

December 10- 1 6<br />

December 16<br />

Week Days Per Semester<br />

Monday 17<br />

Tuesday 18<br />

COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

ACADEMIC CALENDAR 1988-89<br />

Monday, Classes Begin<br />

Monday, Labor Day-Hol iday<br />

Friday, Veterans Day-Hol iday<br />

Thursday to Saturday, Thanksgiving Day-Holiday<br />

Saturday to Friday, Final Exams<br />

Friday, End Of Fall Semester<br />

Working Days Per Month<br />

August 13<br />

~ednesday 18 ~ctober 21<br />

Thursday 17 November 19<br />

Friday 16 December <strong>12</strong><br />

Saturday 16 (Not In Total)<br />

--<br />

86 TOTAL<br />

-<br />

86 TOTAL<br />

SEMESTER BREAK: DECEMBER 17, 1988 TO JANUARY 8, 1989<br />

SPRING 1989<br />

January 9<br />

January 16<br />

February 17<br />

February 20<br />

March 20-25<br />

May 17-23<br />

May 23<br />

May 23<br />

May 29<br />

Week Days Per Semester<br />

Working Days Per Month<br />

Monday 17<br />

January 16<br />

~uesday 19 ~ebruar~ 18<br />

Wednesday 18 March 18<br />

Thursday 18 Apri 1 20<br />

Friday 17 May 17<br />

Saturday 18 (Not In Total)<br />

--<br />

89 TOTAL<br />

Monday, Classes Begin<br />

Monday, Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r King, Jr.'s Birthday-Holiday<br />

Friday, Lincoln's Birthday-Hol iday<br />

Monday, Washington's Birthday-Holiday<br />

Monday to Saturday, Spring Break<br />

Wednesday to Tuesday, Final Exams<br />

Tuesday, End Of Spring Semester<br />

Tuesday, Spring Graduation<br />

Monday, Memorial Day-Hol iday<br />

-<br />

89 TOTAL


DATE : December 4, 1985<br />

TO : Dr. Stout<br />

FROM : Dean <strong>of</strong> Instruction<br />

COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

MEMORANDUM<br />

SUBJECT : CONFERENCE PRESENTATION BY DR. HENRY BURNETT<br />

I am very pleased to inform you that Dr. Burnett has been requested<br />

to make a presentation at <strong>the</strong> national conference on Educational<br />

Communications and Technology.<br />

The conference will be held in Las Vegas, Nevada. Dr. Burnett is<br />

requesting that <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong> pay half <strong>of</strong> his expenses and<br />

he will pay <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expenses.<br />

Would you please consider requesting from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees at<br />

<strong>the</strong> December 1985 <strong>Board</strong> meeting <strong>the</strong> approval for this out-<strong>of</strong>-state<br />

travel and partial reimbursement?<br />

I am attaching materials from Dr. Burnett to support this request.<br />

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.<br />

k rfl


Date:<br />

To:<br />

From:<br />

Subject:<br />

November 19, 1985<br />

Dr. C.A. Patterson<br />

Dr. Henry J.<br />

COLLEGE OF THE DESERT<br />

Inter-Offlce Memorandum<br />

Conference Presentation<br />

I have been honored by an invitation from <strong>the</strong> President <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association<br />

for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) to give one <strong>of</strong> nine<br />

presidential sessions at <strong>the</strong> upcoming conference in January <strong>of</strong> 1986. AECT<br />

is <strong>the</strong> major national and international pr<strong>of</strong>essional organization for in-<br />

structional technologists. AECT anticipates having over 13,500 individuals<br />

attending <strong>the</strong>ir 1986 Annual Convention and COIiMTEX International Equipment<br />

Exposition.<br />

The selection process for <strong>the</strong> Presidential Session is highly competitive<br />

as <strong>the</strong>re are over three hundred sessions occurring during <strong>the</strong> conference -<br />

only nine are selected as featured Presidential Sessions. The Presidential<br />

Sessions have a prominent place on <strong>the</strong> conference schedule, have a time<br />

length <strong>of</strong> one hour and fifteen minutes, and receive special publicity during<br />

<strong>the</strong> conference.<br />

The topic for my session, Political Dynamics: Crucial Factors for Instructional<br />

Technology in Postsecondary Education is based on <strong>the</strong> research conducted for<br />

my dissertation. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AECT conference session, I have<br />

been asked to submit a manuscript for publication in <strong>the</strong> 1986 Educational<br />

Media and Technology Yearbook.<br />

The conference will be held January 16 through <strong>the</strong> 21st, 1986 in Las Vegas,<br />

Nevada, and I am asking for approval <strong>of</strong> out-<strong>of</strong>-state travel and reimburse-<br />

ment for one half <strong>the</strong> travel expenses ($297.00). Las Vegas is not my pre-<br />

ferred location to deliver an academic paper - I would ra<strong>the</strong>r be traveling<br />

to <strong>the</strong> campus <strong>of</strong> U.C.L.A., U.S.C., Stanford, or Indiana University to deliver<br />

<strong>the</strong> presentation. However, with <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> this particular conference, it<br />

can be held only at five locations nationally: Atlanta, New Orleans, Dallas,<br />

Anaheim, and Las Vegas. It happens to be in Las Vegas this time.<br />

I feel honored by this fantastic opportunity to share my research at AECT's<br />

national conference. The presentation will bring me considerable recognition<br />

within <strong>the</strong> academic community at <strong>the</strong> national level. <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong><br />

will also share in this national recognition.<br />

If I can provide additional information for your consideration, please contact<br />

me immediately.


*<br />

July 3, 1985<br />

aL 9 1985<br />

Association for Educational Communications & Technology<br />

1 <strong>12</strong>6 Sixteenth Street, N.W , Washington, D.C. 20036 a (202) 466-4780<br />

Dr. Henry J. Burnett<br />

Director <strong>of</strong> Learning Resources<br />

<strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> The <strong>Desert</strong><br />

43-500 Monterey Avenue<br />

Palm <strong>Desert</strong>, CA 92260<br />

Dear Dr. Burnett:<br />

I am pleased to inform you that your presentation proposal for<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1986 AECT Annual Conference entitled, "Political Dynamics:<br />

Crucial Factors for Instructional Technology in Postsecondary<br />

Education," has been selected as one <strong>of</strong> nine presidential<br />

sessions.<br />

You will be hearing in <strong>the</strong> near future from Ka<strong>the</strong>rine Wacker,<br />

President-Elect <strong>of</strong> CCAIT, with more detailed information and<br />

requests for your equipment needs. In addl tion, Ms. Wacker<br />

will be asking for a 5 x 7 black and white glossy photograph<br />

for inclusion in our convention program.<br />

I am looking forward to meeting you in Las Vegas in January,<br />

and on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Directors and<br />

myself, I want to thank you for contributing your time and<br />

effort to help make our convention a success.<br />

AECT President<br />

RGH : m<br />

cc: Ka<strong>the</strong>rine Wacker<br />

Lyn Gubser<br />

Frank Dwyer<br />

Elaine Didier


Community <strong>College</strong> Association for Instruction and Technology<br />

President: Joseph Borowskl Secretary: Dr. Robert Lucas<br />

Oakton Community <strong>College</strong> - Illinois Grand Valley State <strong>College</strong> - Michigan<br />

President Elect: Katie Wacker Treasurer: Dr. William Belmore<br />

Kirkwood Community <strong>College</strong> - lowa Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Communlty <strong>College</strong> - Virginia<br />

' July 18, 1985<br />

Dr. Henry J. Burnett<br />

Director <strong>of</strong> Learning Resources<br />

<strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Desert</strong><br />

43-500 Menterey Avenue<br />

Palm <strong>Desert</strong>, CA 92260<br />

Dear Dr. Burnett:<br />

I assume you have received Bob Hale's letter by now indicating that your<br />

proposal has been selected as a "Presidential Session" at A.E.C.T.'s<br />

January conference in Las Vegas. Congratulations1 Your session is<br />

scheduled for 9:OO-10:15 a.m. on Tuesday, January 21. I have asked Dr.<br />

Robert Lucas, CCAIT's Secretary from Grand Valley State <strong>College</strong> in<br />

Grand Rapids, Michigan, to serve as chair <strong>of</strong> your session. I need to<br />

have you send me several items, Henry:<br />

a. a brief biographical sketch which Bob Lucas may use to prepare his<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> you and your session topic.<br />

b. a 5 x 7 inch glossy black and white photo for use in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> conven-<br />

tion program to highlight your session.<br />

c. a completed "audiovisual request form" (attached) indicating <strong>the</strong><br />

free-loan equipment and room arrangement you desire for you; presenta-<br />

tion.<br />

Bob Hale asked me to communicate to you that he hopes you will be able<br />

to broaden <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> your presentation in order to assure that it is<br />

<strong>of</strong> interest to a variety <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> A.E.C.T. membership. I told him that I<br />

was confident you would be able to do so. Let me know if I may be <strong>of</strong><br />

any help or answer any questions for you.<br />

Please mail <strong>the</strong> picture and audio-visual form to me by September 1. The<br />

biographical sketch isn't as essential right away. Thanks.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Ka<strong>the</strong>rine A. lJacker<br />

Instructional Developer<br />

Kirkwood Co~nmunity <strong>College</strong><br />

P. 0. Box 2068<br />

Cedar Rapids, IA 52406


Association for Educational Communications & Technologjp<br />

1<strong>12</strong>6 SLrteetifh Sfreel, N. IV.. !Vashingron. D.C. 20036 * (202) 466-4780<br />

** FACT SHEET **<br />

1986 AECT Annual Conference 4<br />

Over 150 concurrent sessions are scheduled<br />

* Over 300 individual presentations will be given<br />

...<br />

< : .:<br />

.. ' , . :'. . , :<br />

CObbfl'EX international Exposition .,; , . . . ..' .<br />

, ' .' , . 1<br />

January 16 - 21, 1986 . .<br />

.......<br />

Las Vegas, Nevada , ,<br />

, > , 8 ,.. i . :: '; ..I<br />

. . . . . q,;.',<br />

, . . . . , . . . .<br />

25 workshops are scheduled . ?,:


: .~<br />

Friday, Jarluary 17<br />

1 :00 - 2:15 p.rn<br />

Tlie following are sesslons chosen by<br />

AECT Presldenl Bob Hale.<br />

Audlovlsual Educallon In Chlns (INTL)<br />

Chalr: Joanne Velati Dunn<br />

Presenter: LI Nal<br />

The Presldenllnl Sesslons begln wllli an overview <strong>of</strong> llie<br />

education syslern iri China and <strong>the</strong> lncreaslrig role <strong>of</strong> arrdlo-<br />

vlsual praclices. Tlie prese~ilnllon will be lllrrslraled by<br />

examples <strong>of</strong> audiovisual educallon In use In Chlna.<br />

Friday, Jatluary 17<br />

2:30 - 3:43 p.tn. .<br />

Mollday, January 20<br />

9:00 - 1 0: 15 a.m.<br />

Homework Asslslnnce Vla Televlslon (DSMS)<br />

Chalr: Diane Blesol<br />

Presenter: Jerry Nutt<br />

Beaverlon (Oregon) School Dlstrlct devlsed an lnnovallve<br />

melliod <strong>of</strong> liel~lna sludonls wllh homework. A coo~erallve<br />

<strong>of</strong>lorl l)rlbvcr~i llic scltool dfslrlcl and n lncnl cablrcorripafiy<br />

led lo a llvc, opcri telar)lio~in Ilne televislori scriesdeslancd lo<br />

provlde homework assistance to sludent viewers.<br />

Of Course. . . The Productlon Team Includes Evalualors<br />

(DOTI Tuesday, January 21<br />

'Chalr: Marlorle Cnriibre<br />

Presenlers: Koilh Mielke. Larry Walc<strong>of</strong>f<br />

, This presenlnllori llluslrales speclflc exalnples <strong>of</strong> productlon<br />

decisloris thal were changed as a rest<strong>11</strong>1 <strong>of</strong> for~nallve<br />

evalullon. "Ucfore" and "after" cllps from llic Agoricy for<br />

Pollllcal Dyna~iilcs: Cruclal Factors for lnslrucllonal Technology<br />

In Poslsecondary Educallon (CCAIT)<br />

lnslrucllorial Televlslon and llie Children's Telcvlslon Work- Chair: Kalherlne Wacker<br />

shop will be sliown. Presenter: Henry Btrrnell<br />

Saturclay, Jar~uary 18<br />

3:00 - 4:15 p.tri.<br />

Exemplary Media Centers, Exemplary Practices (DEMM)<br />

Chalr: Ttio~nns ntrssell<br />

Presenlers: Andy DiPaolo. William Schmldt<br />

Thls presentallon <strong>of</strong>lers a process for media friarlagers to<br />

evaluate <strong>the</strong> effecllveriess <strong>of</strong> lhelr e~nployees bnscd on a<br />

self-assessrnenl performance appraisal forrri arid a slruclured<br />

Interview leclinlq~te. Also, you wlll lake a look a1 26<br />

exemplary media cenlors lro~n colleges, public school dlstrlcts<br />

and regional media programs.<br />

Parllclpanls wlll leave this session wllh a delalled underslarldirllj<br />

<strong>of</strong> llic pullllcnl arid lrgal dyrtlnnlcs occ~~rrltig wlirri<br />

modllylrig ll~cInw~~ov~r~ilri(~ l~islr~~cllnnnl Tec<strong>11</strong><strong>11</strong>01ogy Tltc<br />

use <strong>of</strong> Iclccot~fscs, cortrprrler asslsled I~islruclol~i. n~lrl Iri<strong>11</strong>Ivldual<br />

lrislrucllo~i labs rvlll serve ns <strong>the</strong> basls for cllscusslori.<br />

Tuesday, Jatluary 21<br />

1030 - 1 1 :A5 a.m.<br />

Core Conipelencles for lnslrucllonal Developers: The Vlew<br />

from Flve Programs (DID)<br />

Chalr: Robin Lawrason<br />

Presenters: Jolin Berllng, Barry Bratton. Waller Dlck, Dennls<br />

Flelds, Alllson Rossetl. Don Srnellle. Robert Relser<br />

The presonlers discuss <strong>the</strong> essenllal cornpelencles In-<br />

structlorial dnveloparn mtlsl possess, ns ldenllflnd hy llvn<br />

grndunfe programs In lnstructlonnl devolopmoril. Tho corri-<br />

petenclcs are lrilended lo rellecl tho skllls 01 a prolosslortal<br />

developer regardless <strong>of</strong> hls or her current lob, academlc<br />

degree, or type <strong>of</strong> training.<br />

!


Williani Edwin Ted<br />

Ridlev Newman Turner<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

QUEST FOR QUALITY


BOARD OF TRllSTEES<br />

MS. DIANA N LOCKARD. PWIDENT<br />

OR W\RY L WOODS VCL PWlDLNT<br />

DR I. PAUL GELtRIS. CLLWSICRLTARY<br />

DR ROOLRT T. McLfAN, h!rh!8c~<br />

OR EDWARD C ORTLLL MCAqBLR<br />

November 15, 1985<br />

Dr. Ioshua L. Smith, Chancellor<br />

CALIEORNIA CtMOJITY 03LLB;F.S<br />

<strong>11</strong>07 Ninth Street<br />

Sacramento, 0\ 95814<br />

Dear Chancellor Smith: -<br />

DR LOUIS L ZELLERS<br />

PRL~IDENT/SUPENN~END~NT<br />

On behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Citrus <strong>College</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees, I am responding to <strong>the</strong><br />

Preliminary Draft <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors 1986 Basic <strong>Agenda</strong>, specifically to<br />

Section 4 which addresses <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> governance. After careful analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

Section 4, we have developed <strong>the</strong> following rationale for leaving governance <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> community colleges at <strong>the</strong> local level.<br />

The essence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> agenda, with respect to governance, is to be found on page 6,<br />

recommendation number 2, and portions <strong>of</strong> pages A-9 and A-10, which state that<br />

<strong>the</strong> community college governance structure should be "postsecondary in nature."<br />

Obviously, this is to recommend a "mini-UC" or "mini-state university" system<br />

with reference to structure. This amounts to not recognizing <strong>the</strong> great<br />

difference between <strong>the</strong> four year, strictly academically oriented college, and<br />

an institution like a community college with its diverse student population <strong>of</strong><br />

over a million students.<br />

The Citrus <strong>College</strong> Trustees believe that <strong>the</strong> Basic <strong>Agenda</strong> does not address <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that community colleges provide vocational education for <strong>the</strong>ir students,<br />

retrain re-entry students, give a second chance to high school dropouts, and<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer innumerable community oriented services.<br />

Local control <strong>of</strong> governments is a proud part <strong>of</strong> our American heritage. his is<br />

so for many reasons, not <strong>the</strong> least <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m being that centralization <strong>of</strong> power .<br />

makes it difficult for <strong>the</strong> citizenry to make its interests known to <strong>the</strong> power-<br />

holders because <strong>the</strong>y are geographically remote. This consideration applies to<br />

<strong>the</strong> abolition <strong>of</strong> local control as advocated in <strong>the</strong> report.


Chancellor Joshua L. Finith<br />

November 15, 1985<br />

page two<br />

With reference to governance, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> issues which arises is, what are <strong>the</strong><br />

prudent and proper divisions <strong>of</strong> labor and responsibility between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Governors and <strong>the</strong> local districts? The general answer to such a question giv,en<br />

by <strong>the</strong> dominant ideology <strong>of</strong> democracy would be, "<strong>the</strong> higher level <strong>of</strong> government<br />

should be given power where local authority is incompetent to act." If <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors thinks that local community college boards are incompetent<br />

with reference to governance, let <strong>the</strong>m make <strong>the</strong> case1 It is <strong>the</strong>y who bear <strong>the</strong><br />

burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>, yet one searches in vain for such arguments.<br />

Local boards, administrators and faculties know <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir communities<br />

better than do persons sitting on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors and, hence, are better<br />

able to deal with local issues than is <strong>the</strong> State <strong>Board</strong>. Understanding unique<br />

local problems is an inherent difficulty associated with centralized authority.<br />

An argument as old as Greek civilization bears on <strong>the</strong> present issue. It is that<br />

<strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> a constituency relates to <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> freedom, Smallness is<br />

indispensable to political liberty. This is so because large governmental<br />

bodies arc less responsive to indi"idua1 needs than are smaller governing<br />

agencies.<br />

When power is divided between governing agencies, as it is now between local<br />

districts and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors, local needs can be attended to while, at<br />

<strong>the</strong> same time, common interests can be advanced by <strong>the</strong> larger governing body.<br />

As a practical matter and under current law, California community colleges<br />

should remain under local control. This is so because <strong>the</strong> dominant<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> any institution will be determined where power is based. We<br />

want our community colleges to meet specific local needs. The present<br />

governance structure <strong>of</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s has created one- <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

finest models for comprehensive community college networks in <strong>the</strong> nation.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> local board has <strong>the</strong> power to hire administrators and faculty, <strong>the</strong>se<br />

persons will best reflect community needs. A "mini-UC" system applied to <strong>the</strong><br />

organization <strong>of</strong> community colleges will not provide for a faculty and<br />

administration that is oriented and accountable to <strong>the</strong>ir communities.<br />

A "mini-UC" system does hot confront <strong>the</strong> ~roblem<br />

that <strong>the</strong> report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong>,<br />

Governors attempts to answer. That issue is, "What is <strong>the</strong> fundamental goal <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s?" Our goal is to meet <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> our<br />

communities, it is not to meet <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> our communities as perceived by a<br />

geographically remote, large bureaucracy1


Chancellor Joshua L. Smith<br />

November 15, 1985<br />

page two<br />

We view <strong>the</strong>se concerns seriously and we encourage you to solicit active<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> all local community colleges in any modification <strong>of</strong> our present<br />

governance structure.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

LEZ: jm<br />

Attaclments (Page 6 and excerpts from pages A-9 and A-10 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Preliminary<br />

Draft <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors 1986 Basic <strong>Agenda</strong>)<br />

cc: All California Community <strong>College</strong> Trustees<br />

Governor George Deukmej ian<br />

All California Legislators<br />

All California Cmmunity <strong>College</strong> chief Executive Officers<br />

?he Ccmmission for <strong>the</strong> Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Master Plan for Higher Education


4. GOVERNANCE<br />

- Goal<br />

CZa14fy and improve tie governattoe structure for cornunit!! coZLegee.<br />

The governance structure for community colleges should provide <strong>the</strong><br />

powers, duties and decisionmaking structures necessary to deliver <strong>the</strong><br />

mission with excellence and accountability. Governance, <strong>the</strong>refore,<br />

should not be fully delineated until <strong>the</strong> mission is known. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

hand, attempting to conceive and implement major reforms for community<br />

colleges in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> a clear governance structure has complicated<br />

and will continue to complicate and under,itine <strong>the</strong> potential success <strong>of</strong><br />

reforms. For purposes <strong>of</strong> shaping an3 deciding reforms in mission, fi-<br />

nance, excellence and accountability, it is critical that at least some<br />

minim1 delineation <strong>of</strong> governance responsibilities be adhered to.<br />

Governance responsibilities can most simply and directly be delineated in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Stdte's role and tile system's role. The State, which essen-<br />

tially consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Legislature and Governor, retains plenary tontrol,<br />

but should focus. on <strong>the</strong> following: deciding <strong>the</strong> broad mission <strong>of</strong> corflmu-<br />

nity colleges; expressing broad expectations to <strong>the</strong> system; indicating<br />

generally how <strong>the</strong> system should interact with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r segments Of edu-<br />

cation; determtning <strong>the</strong> broad finance mechanism for <strong>the</strong> system; and<br />

appropriating revenues to <strong>the</strong> system. The system, which consists <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

local districts and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors, is one <strong>of</strong> shared governance.<br />

The <strong>Board</strong>'s primary roles are to provide leadership, direction, and over-<br />

sight for <strong>the</strong> system and to represent <strong>the</strong> system tn <strong>the</strong> State. The pri -<br />

mary role <strong>of</strong> districts is to operate <strong>the</strong> colleges -- to be primarily re-<br />

sponsible to <strong>the</strong>ir colnmunities dnd <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors for providing<br />

<strong>the</strong> mission, governance, excellence and accountability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

institutions.<br />

Recommends tions<br />

The <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors recommends <strong>the</strong> following initiatives to clarify<br />

and improve <strong>the</strong> governance structure <strong>of</strong> community colleges:<br />

1. The <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors will adopt processes for consultation and<br />

Comnunication with local districts in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> systemide<br />

polf cies adopted or administered by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong>, including consul ta-<br />

tive processes for board recorrmndations to <strong>the</strong> State regarding<br />

changes in State policy.<br />

2. The<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors, in consultation with both <strong>the</strong> community<br />

colleges and <strong>the</strong> State, will conduct a review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Education Code<br />

with <strong>the</strong> dim <strong>of</strong> identifying revisions to clarify governance and to<br />

provide a governance structure which is postsecondary in nature,<br />

The review w i l l be completed during 1986, with legislation being<br />

introduced in 1987.


EXCERPTS PRW<br />

PRELIMINARY DRAET OF THH BOARD OP OOVBR~ORS 1986 BASIC AGENDA<br />

Page A-9<br />

"In a postsecondary structure <strong>of</strong> governance, <strong>the</strong> Legislature<br />

speaks more exclusively to <strong>the</strong> state governing board. It<br />

delegates broad authority to <strong>the</strong> state governing board, and does<br />

much less to specify <strong>the</strong> powers and duties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local delivery<br />

entity (when <strong>the</strong> Legislature delegates major authority to a state<br />

governing board and is silent on <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local<br />

delivery entity, such structures are sometimes referred to as<br />

'state-controlled systenls') ."<br />

Page A-10<br />

"The position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors is that a postsecondary<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> governance should be applied to shaping and deciding<br />

responsibilities for community college reforms. This structure<br />

reflects a greater concentration <strong>of</strong> authority in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Governors, with <strong>the</strong> Legislature reserving less <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> specifics<br />

to itself, and with districts retaining essential control to<br />

operate <strong>the</strong> colleges."


0 T I ' COLLEGE<br />

C&+ltflISSION - HOLDS IMPORTAllT MEE.rIElG - IN NOVEMREll<br />

lie as a "Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> WholeN'ifor<br />

teeport and study received considerable<br />

The Commi ssion took action to eliminate,<br />

n adzlition, <strong>the</strong> Commission asked staff for<br />

sophical undergirding for Commission :<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> high school drop outs and<br />

s that require serious Commission<br />

December3-4: MeetingorlThirdDraftOutline<br />

January 7-0: Neetiny 0<strong>11</strong> "Draft Report"<br />

Pub1 i c He.lrin(~ - Sacramento<br />

Public tle?ring - San Diego<br />

Public He.jrin(l - San Francisco<br />

February 20: Submission <strong>of</strong> Report to Legislature<br />

-1;10re-


Master Plan Cotnmission<br />

2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2<br />

Some OF <strong>the</strong> more i~npoi'tant actions or discussion that took place were:<br />

1. Open Access and Student Succes~. There was hroad Commission support<br />

fiir;-cX%a%nTT€6 T i m o f not restrictina admission to tlie<br />

colleqes, hut instead limitinb access to proqram; arid classes. Various<br />

assessment activi ties were discussed along with <strong>the</strong> rmtriculation<br />

model. 5ome Commissioners stressed <strong>the</strong> need for accountability<br />

by students throuqll performance and <strong>the</strong> need for districts to he<br />

funded and held accountabl~~ for adequate assistance to students.<br />

-.-<br />

?. Tralisfer. The Commi ssion continues to support s trorig transfer programs<br />

in com~~~uriity colleges. Discussion centered on barriers to<br />

transfer (some OF ~.rliicli i~n,~act <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r segwnts) and possible<br />

solutions. Particular corisern was expressed on <strong>the</strong> special problems<br />

<strong>of</strong> ininori ty students.<br />

- -<br />

3. Vocational Education. The Comnli ssiori eliminated options that would<br />

give aTVocationa'l" education to ei<strong>the</strong>r community colleges or high<br />

schools and adult schools.<br />

1. Re~nedidl Education. Com~ni :;sion mwml)ers are divided on this issue.<br />

'%i?-Eoi?T%??ide~nic floor" ; o tliers would 1 i ke no floor, b<strong>11</strong> t<br />

\~oulcl place a1 1 work below a certain level into a separate insti tutional<br />

structure within tlie college. No wmbers favor elimination<br />

<strong>of</strong> remetli,ttion fran <strong>the</strong> colleges' function. lnterest was sliown in a<br />

new proposal that ~ould permit courses (programs) at any level with,<br />

a 1in1i t on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> ci~mula tive uni ts OF remedial courses.<br />

5. State Funded Adult Education. The Comtnission appears to favor con-<br />

mtTn-C? TEXTTTm)oth K-l? adul t schools and comeuni tv<br />

colleqes to <strong>of</strong>fer tile i,rograms with a strengtlieriing <strong>of</strong> delineation<br />

aqreements atid all enforcemt:nt nlechanisni to assure compliance.<br />

6. Faculty and Ad~tlitii stva tors. The Cornmi ssion extensively discussed<br />

issues o ' F - E e ~ instructor ~ i ~ limits, credentials and tlie<br />

50% Law. !to consetisus was rzi~ched, hut <strong>the</strong>re appears to be a strong<br />

iliteres t i <strong>11</strong> a longer probd tionary period and peer review for tenure.<br />

7. Comlnuni ty <strong>College</strong> Finance. The options represented were divided<br />

r e : (1) sources <strong>of</strong> support, (2) distri-<br />

bution <strong>of</strong> State slrpport, atid (3) allocdtinn neth hod <strong>of</strong> State support.<br />

While some options were eliminated, <strong>the</strong> Commission spent <strong>the</strong> no st<br />

time ill witle-ranging discussions on all possi!)ilities. This itein is<br />

likely to be one <strong>of</strong> tlie first tliscussed at tlie next meeting.<br />

Governance. Again, <strong>the</strong> discussion was wide ra~iging v ~ th i no clear<br />

consens6 except that <strong>the</strong>re should be less legislative direct con<br />

trol and <strong>the</strong> delineation between <strong>the</strong> lloard <strong>of</strong> Governors and local<br />

hoards sl~o~rld he clear. There nras little sentiment for tlie elimina<br />

tion <strong>of</strong> locally elected boards, hut regional planning activity was<br />

discussed.


BOARD OF TRUSTEE<br />

MS. DIANA N. LOCUARD. PRLSlDtNr<br />

OR GARY 1. WOODS. MCL PRLSIOINT<br />

OR I. PAUL GLLLRIS. CLIMSCCMTARY<br />

DR ROBERT T. McLEAN. Alu4OLR<br />

DR LOWARD C ORTELL h4UlOLR<br />

November 15, 1985<br />

Ms. Jackie Suitt<br />

1600 Beverly Drive<br />

Palm Springs. CA 92262<br />

Dear trustee Suitt:<br />

DR. LOUIS t ZELLERS<br />

PRLIIDtM/SUPtRINTLNOCNT<br />

On behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Citrus <strong>College</strong> trustees, we are writing to you today to urge<br />

you to place <strong>the</strong> enclosed analysis on your next board agenda.<br />

Have you read carefully <strong>the</strong> Preliminary Draft <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governorst 1986<br />

Basic <strong>Agenda</strong>, specifically page 6 which relates to -? Do you realize<br />

that <strong>the</strong> existing structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California community colleges is under fire?<br />

Statements on page 6, and on portions <strong>of</strong> pages A-9 and A-10, threaten to<br />

undermine your authority as a trustee by destroying local control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

community colleges through <strong>the</strong> imposition <strong>of</strong> a "mini-UC <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> ~egents"!<br />

Coachella Valley Community <strong>College</strong> District, which has been carefully nurtured<br />

by your local board, could become a cog in a statewide machine. If we do not<br />

act immediately, we predict we will see <strong>the</strong> day when our district will become<br />

s.<br />

State Community <strong>College</strong> District Number 641"<br />

Consider this letter to be a call to action for your college. We mYkt involve<br />

our campus communities, local community leaders, pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, local<br />

legislators and o<strong>the</strong>r elected <strong>of</strong>ficials who support community colleges, in<br />

voicing our concerns.<br />

Trustees are elected to a public trust to discharge <strong>the</strong>ir responsibilities and<br />

to see that <strong>the</strong>ir colleges function to meet community needs. If <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Governorst plan succeeds, state-appointed <strong>of</strong>ficials will determine local policy.<br />

There w i l l be little or no local accountability, and <strong>the</strong> citizens who elected<br />

you will have no recourse.<br />

We realize this is a time-consuming item for you to place on your agenda;<br />

however, all o<strong>the</strong>r items will be meaningless if we lose authority to govern our<br />

districts1


November 15, 1985<br />

page two<br />

The Citrus <strong>College</strong> trustees will be happy to assist you in any way and encourage<br />

you to voice your concerns about <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> governance to <strong>the</strong> Chancellor and<br />

your local legislators.<br />

We would be pleased to know <strong>of</strong> your response to this letter and whe<strong>the</strong>r you are<br />

considering placing this matter on your agenda.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

I. Paul Geleris. M.D.<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees<br />

g.Q d~-&'<br />

Edward C. Ortell. Ph.D.<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees<br />

Enclosure (Letter to Chancellor smith)


POLITICAL OYNAI~lICS: CRUCIAL FACTORS FOR<br />

IFJSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN POSTSECONOARY EOIJCATION<br />

Political Power Reelities<br />

The status <strong>of</strong> political relationehips in <strong>the</strong> governance <strong>of</strong><br />

Instructionel Technology in postsecondary education, partioularly in<br />

<strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s, ia marked by a dynemic tension.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> best tradition <strong>of</strong> a democratic ecciety, many<br />

forces--supportive, neutrel, and opposing--converge in <strong>the</strong> political<br />

arena. There are few certainties when reviewing <strong>the</strong> statue <strong>of</strong><br />

Educational Technology and Instructionel Technology [AECT, 1977,<br />

1979) in <strong>the</strong> Californie Community <strong>College</strong>s. The proponent8 <strong>of</strong><br />

Educational Technology and Instructional TeChnology have not gained<br />

a predominance <strong>of</strong> authority when putting <strong>the</strong>se educational<br />

strategies in place. Their efforte mre characterized by <strong>the</strong><br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> technologicsl develcpment, <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong><br />

technologicel applications, evelustion, fur<strong>the</strong>r develcpment, and<br />

permanent application. Opponents have not been successful in<br />

removing Educational Technology or Inetructional Technology from <strong>the</strong><br />

Community <strong>College</strong> oduoational scene. Their efforts usually rely<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> strategies <strong>of</strong> delay, extended essesement, and containment.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> pervasive power <strong>of</strong> newer communications technology is<br />

eo strong that sweeping changee are being mads and, in fact, <strong>the</strong><br />

changes are becoming integral componente <strong>of</strong> society.<br />

Interviews conducted for this research chronicle <strong>the</strong> depth and<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> politicel relationships in <strong>the</strong> governence <strong>of</strong>


Snstructional Technology. The excitement and confusion <strong>of</strong> being on<br />

<strong>the</strong> frontier is evident. Often individuals with similar positions<br />

and perceptions have diverse approaches to Instruotional Teohnology.<br />

Technology has <strong>of</strong>ten been viewed as <strong>the</strong> mechine since <strong>the</strong><br />

Induetriel Revolution. Charlie Chaplin's movie Modern Times gives a<br />

humorous, graphic juxtaposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> men/mschine<br />

conflict--perticularly in <strong>the</strong> scenes where Chaplin tries to keep<br />

paoe with <strong>the</strong> assembly line. The metaphor is so etrong that IDtI<br />

uees this <strong>the</strong>me in <strong>the</strong> advertising campaign for <strong>the</strong> IBM Personal<br />

Computer. The Chaplln figure has learned to love <strong>the</strong> machine and<br />

make <strong>the</strong> machine work for him. Eduoational Teohnology is reusonebly<br />

well accepted in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s. Inetruotional<br />

Technology is still perceived to be a threat by some.<br />

The perception that Instructional Technology will change<br />

education overnight is quite shortsighted. Change will not come in<br />

a clep <strong>of</strong> thunder and a blinding flash <strong>of</strong> light. The evolutionery<br />

trend similar to <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> printed textbooks is probably a<br />

more appropriate model for <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> Instructionel<br />

Technology in historicel perspective. The Communications Revolution<br />

is fully underway and <strong>the</strong> changee will accelerate. However, when<br />

Generel Motors introduced <strong>the</strong> dieael eleotric locomotive in <strong>the</strong><br />

1940'6, it took ten years to eliminate all steam powered treine in<br />

<strong>the</strong> United Staten. The steam locomotive had dominated rail travel<br />

for over one hundred yeare.<br />

The rapid growth and tremendous power <strong>of</strong> communication5<br />

technology emerged as <strong>the</strong> most pervesive factor in <strong>the</strong> discussion es<br />

revealed in <strong>the</strong> document research and interviews. No individual who


was interviewed sew this mejor societal trend dooreusing for <strong>the</strong><br />

short or long term. The Communications Revolution is in Full swing<br />

end shows few signs <strong>of</strong> stabilizing or slowing. Recent Federal end<br />

state legislation hae allowed corporstions to make tax reducing<br />

donations <strong>of</strong> equipment to schools. Recently, Apple Computer gave<br />

every K-<strong>12</strong> school in CaliFornia en Apple IIe computer. The<br />

donetion <strong>of</strong> more than twenty million dollers worth <strong>of</strong> computers<br />

stipuleted that <strong>the</strong> computers be used'in direct instruction with<br />

students. IDt.1, Digitel, and o<strong>the</strong>r menufaoturers heve speoiel grants<br />

and discounts for eduction. The growth potential for both<br />

Educational Technology end Instructions1 Technology is obvious.<br />

This broed societal trend will have many ramifioations for <strong>the</strong><br />

acceptance <strong>of</strong> Educetionel Technology and Instruotionel Teohnology.<br />

Societal Trends ere s mejor political edventage for <strong>the</strong> acceptance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Instructional Teohnology.<br />

All sectors <strong>of</strong> society will see tremendous pressure8 for<br />

increased productivity at equal or lees cost. Thle issue hss<br />

reshaped <strong>the</strong> auto manufacturing industry in Jspan in <strong>the</strong> mid 1970's<br />

and in <strong>the</strong> United States in <strong>the</strong> early 1980's. Robotics end computer<br />

controlled assembly are evident in msny industries. The Daumol<br />

Crunch as described by Heinich (1976) is continuing to shepe many<br />

fields. Tho private sector <strong>of</strong> tho economy may become increasingly<br />

intolerant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leck <strong>of</strong> significant increeses in productivitx in<br />

<strong>the</strong> public sector--and particularly in <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> eduoation.


Institutions, Organizations, and Actors<br />

California has a proliferation <strong>of</strong> Organizations operating in<br />

<strong>the</strong> political arena. The California Community <strong>College</strong>s, as a group,<br />

are <strong>the</strong> largest postsecondary educational system in <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> size and complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />

<strong>College</strong>s <strong>the</strong>re is a marked tendency in California to form various<br />

organizational structures. Thie organizational trend is emphseized<br />

by state agencies and <strong>the</strong> legislature who encourage oommunioation in<br />

lsrge repranantative struotures ra<strong>the</strong>r than by individual or<br />

splinter groups.<br />

Institutions and organizations represent <strong>the</strong> power bseo for<br />

most individual actors and are sxtramely influential when<br />

aetablishing operational parameters for an individual sctor. For<br />

this study, <strong>the</strong> term institutions means a grouping whioh is created<br />

by code law. The term organizations means groupings which have<br />

significant political motivation but are not created by code law.<br />

Examples <strong>of</strong> inetitutions are district governing boards, state<br />

governing boards, colleges, universities, and state commissions.<br />

Organizations include pr<strong>of</strong>esaionsl organizations, accreditation<br />

commission, task forces, consortia, and ad hoc groups.<br />

The study deecribed and enalyzed individual actors as <strong>the</strong>y<br />

executed a particular role on <strong>the</strong> political stage and did not<br />

attempt to pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>the</strong> personal traits and 0h~r~cteriStics <strong>of</strong> those<br />

individuals. Identification <strong>of</strong> individual actors should reveal most<br />

political interaotiona; however, conoentration wholly upon actors<br />

yields a single dimension without <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> organizations and<br />

inetitutions.


Pnedictably, <strong>the</strong> Institutions which were identified in this<br />

study were found to be most central to <strong>the</strong> politioel disouesion<br />

regarding Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />

<strong>College</strong>s. These Institutions tend to be very influential end very<br />

stable ,over a period <strong>of</strong> time. Organizations vary, to some degree,<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir goals and purpose over time. Coneequently, <strong>the</strong><br />

influence and importenoe <strong>of</strong> any Organization is subjeot to more<br />

relative change when compared with Institutions. Individual ectors<br />

are subject to more ohange ainoe rolea change within en Institution<br />

or Organization and incfividuels assume o<strong>the</strong>r roles. Overall,<br />

Institutions tend to be atable, Organizations less stable, and<br />

Actore are highly variabia.<br />

Overtly Stated and Underlying Self-Interests<br />

The Matrix Analysis <strong>of</strong> Overtly Stated Self-Intereets <strong>of</strong><br />

Institutions indicated support for Educetional Technology and<br />

Inetructional Technology. This perception was verified by <strong>the</strong><br />

interviews. Major reporte by <strong>the</strong> California Postsecondery Eduoation<br />

Commission (CPEC, 1979 end CPEC, 1981) ere supportive end<br />

promotional in tone. An eveluative report <strong>of</strong> Independent Study<br />

courses by <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong> Chancellors Office<br />

(CCCCO, 1981) ie equally supportive end makes reoomrnendatione for<br />

expending Instructional Technology within <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />

<strong>College</strong>s.<br />

Most Organizations ere overtly supportive <strong>of</strong> Educational<br />

Technology. The major disunity is found in <strong>the</strong> support or<br />

opposition regarding Inetructional Technology. Generally, <strong>the</strong>re is


support for Instructional Technology among Organizetions with tho<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> faculty groups. There is evidence that <strong>the</strong> Academic<br />

Senate and <strong>the</strong> Faculty Association may be moving toward a more<br />

neutral position.<br />

The perception <strong>of</strong> job security, certainly, is a powerful<br />

motivating force. Potential displacement in <strong>the</strong> work<br />

force is not mentioned in most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> documents addressing <strong>the</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology. However, this issue was<br />

frequently one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first items mentioned during <strong>the</strong> interviews.<br />

Faculty perceive <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology as a<br />

men/machine confronttation. Politically this is a most volatile<br />

issue for faculty to eddress directly in <strong>the</strong> political arena.<br />

Support for job security among faculty will be strong--giving <strong>the</strong><br />

faculty a positive political leverage. With <strong>the</strong> public at large,<br />

however, <strong>the</strong>re will be little sympathy for faculty job security. IF<br />

<strong>the</strong> issue is brought into <strong>the</strong> political arena, it will function at<br />

two levels. The first level will be supportive within <strong>the</strong> education<br />

comnunity, <strong>the</strong> second hostile with <strong>the</strong> public at largo.<br />

The underlying self-interests arc not always parellel with<br />

overtly expressed self-interests. Job security emerges as <strong>the</strong> major<br />

underlying self-interest. Almost as if a "gentlemanls agreement <strong>of</strong><br />

silence" had been struck, <strong>the</strong> iesua <strong>of</strong> job displacement rarely<br />

occurs in <strong>the</strong> formal discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> governance <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />

Technology. tiowever, during <strong>the</strong> face-to-face interviews, job<br />

displacement for faculty was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first and most frequent<br />

concerns raised. Public discussion does not eddress <strong>the</strong> job<br />

displacoment issue, but most assuredly, this issue woe on everyono's


mind in private. It is extremely important to note that public<br />

documents and statements do not always reveal <strong>the</strong> actual positions<br />

on a particular issue. Behevior <strong>of</strong> en Institution, Organization, or<br />

Actor can not he predicted exclusively from publicly stated<br />

positions. Issues that sre overt may mask more basic issues.<br />

Fac~rlty raise issues <strong>of</strong> "comparability" and "quslity" while ignoring<br />

issues <strong>of</strong> "cost" and iproductivity.''<br />

Fundin2<br />

Funding for Educational Technology and Instructional Teohnology<br />

is quite stable and well established in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />

<strong>College</strong>s. regulation^ which would govern and control Educational<br />

Technology are left exclusively to <strong>the</strong> discretion <strong>of</strong> looal<br />

districts. Budgets for Educational Teohnology are developed<br />

locolly, without a formula from <strong>the</strong> state, and reflect <strong>the</strong><br />

comnitment to this activity as determined by each oempus and<br />

district. However, <strong>the</strong> law and administrative regulations<br />

specifying <strong>the</strong> reimbursement <strong>of</strong> Average Daily Attendance (AOA) are<br />

quite specific and highly structured for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />

Technology. Chapter 1055, Section A4500 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California Education<br />

Coda and Chapter 4 in <strong>the</strong> California Administrative Code give <strong>the</strong><br />

complete regulations for Instructional Technology.<br />

The California Education Coda and <strong>the</strong> Administrative Code<br />

indicate that <strong>the</strong>re is a strong commitment to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

Instructional Technology, under certain conditions as <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

source for delivering educational presentations. In 1970, changes<br />

in <strong>the</strong> law included granting Average Daily Attendance (ADA]


eimbursement bnsed upon units <strong>of</strong> credit and not clock hours <strong>of</strong><br />

attendance. Previous provisions based a funding formula on<br />

reimhursing a district for less than one half <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

courses using Instructional Technology. These provisions were<br />

contained in Chepter 157fi Sootion 1<strong>12</strong>51 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Statutes <strong>of</strong> 1970<br />

regulating <strong>the</strong> prooursor <strong>of</strong> Independent Study, <strong>the</strong> Coordinated<br />

Instructional System format. Changing <strong>the</strong> funding formula to<br />

reflect apportionment based upon units ra<strong>the</strong>r than clock hours and<br />

funding <strong>the</strong> full amount, ra<strong>the</strong>r than less than one half, would<br />

demonstrate an increase in value placed on Instructional Technology<br />

in <strong>the</strong> California Community Collegos.<br />

Two major disadvantages remain in Chapter 1055, section 84500.<br />

One is <strong>the</strong> fact that only transfer courses may be <strong>of</strong>fered in<br />

Indepenrlent Study format. Tho eecond major disadvantage is that<br />

class sections are limited to <strong>12</strong>5 students unless a speoial waiver<br />

is granted by <strong>the</strong> Chancellor's Office. These restrictions indicate<br />

a reluctance to allovl expanded use <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology.<br />

This reluctance is manifest in <strong>the</strong> low and represents a compromise<br />

between supporters and opponents <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology. The<br />

concerns for cost and productivity in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />

<strong>College</strong>s may have an influence on funding formulas for Independent<br />

Study format classes.<br />

Political Dynamics<br />

As be expected in a democratic society, <strong>the</strong>re are few<br />

absolutes when reviewing <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> Educationel Technology and<br />

Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s. A


dynamic tension exists. The proponents <strong>of</strong> Educational Technology<br />

end Instructional Technology have not gained a predomin~nce <strong>of</strong><br />

authority when putting <strong>the</strong>se educational strategies in place.<br />

Opponents have not been successful in removing Educational<br />

Technology or Instructional Technclogy from <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />

<strong>College</strong> educational scene. However, <strong>the</strong> pervasive power <strong>of</strong> newer<br />

communications technology is so etrong that sweeping changes era<br />

being made end, in fact, <strong>the</strong> changes are becoming integral<br />

components <strong>of</strong> society.<br />

Eduoational Technclogy end Instructional Technology are firmly<br />

entrnnchnd in <strong>the</strong> Community <strong>College</strong> educational scene. fluring <strong>the</strong><br />

Fall Semester <strong>of</strong> 1079, students numbering <strong>11</strong>,339 enrolled in oourses<br />

using Instructional Technology and G,098 completed <strong>the</strong> courser:; in<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1900 Spring Semester, 15,452 enrolled and 9,033 completed<br />

distance learning throughout <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s<br />

(CCCCO, 1901, p. 16). Fur<strong>the</strong>r, elmost every student hee come into<br />

contact with Educational Technology while enrolled in <strong>the</strong> California<br />

Community <strong>College</strong>s. There is a stable, permanent law regulating <strong>the</strong><br />

use <strong>of</strong> Instruoticnal Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />

<strong>College</strong>s.<br />

The interactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institutions and Organizations w i l l<br />

tend to he aligned as chronicled in <strong>the</strong> findings. Faculty w i l l<br />

remain suspicious <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology until incentivee can<br />

be identified thmt would show Instructional Technology to be more to<br />

thoir pereonal advantage. This position w i l l be reflected in thsir<br />

organizations, particularly in <strong>the</strong> CTA end CFT. The Academic Senate<br />

has made attempts to become more supportive OF Instructional


Technology. The Faculty Association also shows signs <strong>of</strong> becoming<br />

more supportive as expressed by <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> "concerned" ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than "opposed ."<br />

support from Institutions continues end is stable for<br />

Instruotional Technology. The Association <strong>of</strong> California Community<br />

college Administrators, <strong>the</strong> Learninj Resources ~asociation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

California Community <strong>College</strong>s, and concerned district Chencellors<br />

and Presidente seem more determined than ever to streng<strong>the</strong>n<br />

Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s. The<br />

question is not will Educational Teohnology and Instructional<br />

Technology be utilized in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s; <strong>the</strong><br />

question is what will be <strong>the</strong> growth rate over <strong>the</strong> short and long<br />

term?<br />

Synchronization <strong>of</strong> Educational Technology/Instructional Tschnoloa<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Political Process<br />

There is widespread support for Educational Technology in <strong>the</strong><br />

California Community <strong>College</strong>s. The interviews veriFied <strong>the</strong> support<br />

<strong>of</strong> Educational Technology as presented in <strong>the</strong> Matrix Analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

Overtly Stated Self-Intereeb <strong>of</strong> Institutions and <strong>the</strong> Analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> Overtly Statad Self-Interests <strong>of</strong> Organizations. There were only<br />

a fevt exceptions: one respondent perceived <strong>the</strong> Student Government<br />

Association as being neutral to Educational Technology; one<br />

perceived <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governora as being neutral; a third<br />

perceived <strong>the</strong> Academic Senate, <strong>the</strong> California Federation <strong>of</strong><br />

Teachers, <strong>the</strong> California Teachers Association, end <strong>the</strong> Faculty<br />

Association as neutral when relating to Educational Technology.<br />

I


The assessment <strong>of</strong> tho Matrices in <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong><br />

Instructional Technology is, predictably, less conclusive.<br />

Gonerally, <strong>the</strong> perceptions from <strong>the</strong> interview tended to move some<br />

institutions toward a more neutral rating. A very significant<br />

movement, however, may be with regard to <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Academic Senate and <strong>the</strong> Faculty Assooiation [both <strong>of</strong> whom are<br />

presumed to oppose) Instructional Teohnology. Two individuals moved<br />

<strong>the</strong> Academic Senate to a neutral position. One individual moved<br />

both <strong>the</strong> Academic Senate and <strong>the</strong> Faculty Association to a neutral<br />

position. One individual felt <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Academic Senate<br />

and Fsculty Association was more appropriately described aa<br />

"concerned" ra<strong>the</strong>r than "opposed." Meet reepondente agreed with <strong>the</strong><br />

rankings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institutione and Organizatione over <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong><br />

Instructional Technology as presented in <strong>the</strong> matrices. Support from<br />

various institutions and organizations for Educational Technology<br />

form a political base for more support fdr Instructional Technology.<br />

Participation <strong>of</strong> Educational Technology/Instructional Technology in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Political Process<br />

The advantages for using Educational Technology and<br />

Instructional Tochnology in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s are<br />

overwhelming; however, <strong>the</strong> present incentives for faculty<br />

involvement remains minimal. The major political problem is that<br />

faculty in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s and in all <strong>of</strong><br />

postsecondary education do not percaive "that a deal has been cut"<br />

to make Instructional Teohnology a clear choice for existing<br />

faculty. Acceptance and resistance are two sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>


motivational coin. The resistance can he simply viewad as lack <strong>of</strong><br />

appropriate incentive. Instructional Technology when manifest in<br />

<strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> quality telecourses or quality computer assisted<br />

instruction does have all <strong>the</strong> faculty incentives in plaoe for<br />

those faculty who participate as content specialists and presenters.<br />

These faculty are in a small minority campared with all California<br />

Community <strong>College</strong> faculty. The forces which will broaden that<br />

participation aro many, but must be aligned by what John Gall (1977)<br />

describes as <strong>the</strong> Vector Theory <strong>of</strong> Systems!<br />

Systems run better when designed to run downhill.<br />

Corollary:<br />

Systems aligned with human motivstional vectors will<br />

sometimes work. Systema opposing such vectors work poorly<br />

or not at all. (p. 931<br />

The alignment <strong>of</strong>' human motivational vectors must be carefully<br />

considered in any system. Motivational veotors must be considered<br />

for all aspects <strong>of</strong> human interaction. Plotivational vectors are <strong>the</strong><br />

determining elements <strong>of</strong> politicel action. Political relationships<br />

will bs <strong>of</strong> vital importance in <strong>the</strong> governance <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />

Technology in postsecondsry education. In fact, <strong>the</strong> governance<br />

issue begins in <strong>the</strong> course approval process. Major decisions are<br />

predominantly made by an individual faculty member and at <strong>the</strong><br />

departmental level as to how instruction will be delivered to<br />

students. Typically, a faculty member formulates an idea for a<br />

course, presents <strong>the</strong> course to an appropriate department, <strong>the</strong><br />

department submits <strong>the</strong> course to <strong>the</strong> campus currioulum committee for<br />

review, <strong>the</strong> course <strong>the</strong>n goes to appropriate administrator, local<br />

board, and state <strong>of</strong>ficials for approval. In this configuration <strong>the</strong><br />

primary decision making power lies with <strong>the</strong> individual faculty


member who formulates an idea for a course. Since few incentives<br />

oxist for faculty to choose Instructionel Technology in <strong>the</strong> current<br />

governance configuration, minLmal expansion OF Instructional<br />

Technology w i l l occur unless this decision process is changed.<br />

Changes in faculty incentive ayotems for increased productivity and<br />

use <strong>of</strong> Instruction01 Technology are headed.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Orenge Coast District e separate college, Coastline<br />

Community college, was established to <strong>of</strong>fer a variety <strong>of</strong> alternative<br />

learning environments, including telecourses, <strong>of</strong>fered under <strong>the</strong><br />

Independent Study law. Faculty and staff were selected who<br />

supported <strong>the</strong> Instructional Technology configuration. Courses ere<br />

planned with a curriculum team ra<strong>the</strong>r than a single faoulty member<br />

and <strong>the</strong> tolecourse format is used frequently. The governance<br />

structure has more faculty incentives for Instructional Technology<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Coastline model.<br />

The major forces acting as political resouroes--Societal Trends<br />

and Ideas--are key elements <strong>of</strong> political control. Public Opinion i s<br />

an important factor because political figures must be responsive to<br />

<strong>the</strong> voting public. Access to <strong>the</strong> Legislative Process is vital and<br />

communications w i l l be channeled through <strong>the</strong> Chancellor's OfFice and<br />

Ooard <strong>of</strong> Governors. 'lass Communicetions bledia are important<br />

political rssources since Societal Trends and Ideas are conveyed<br />

through <strong>the</strong> mass media to shape Public Opinion. Money can be an<br />

important resource but for Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong><br />

California Community <strong>College</strong>s <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> cash contributions w i l l<br />

be minimal. The Electoral Process w i l l have little direct<br />

consequence on <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology in tho


California Community <strong>College</strong>s as <strong>the</strong> distinction drawn between<br />

Educational Technology and Instruotional Teohnology are ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

complex.<br />

The broad governance structure in <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />

<strong>College</strong>s supports Instructional Teohnology. The California<br />

Postsecondary Education Commission, <strong>the</strong> California Community<br />

<strong>College</strong>s Chancellors1 Offioe, along with many organizations support<br />

Instructional Technology. The Legielature has paseed a law<br />

authorizing Independent Study format courses. Alliances with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

organizations external to tho education world, such as <strong>the</strong><br />

Celifornia 14anufecturee Aescoiation, could prova to be supportive to<br />

Instruotionel Technology.<br />

Predictions About Future Actions<br />

The pressures <strong>of</strong> cost may prove to be <strong>of</strong> some political<br />

advantage for- Instructionel Technology. Although most educators<br />

state that cost should not be <strong>the</strong> deciding factor in <strong>the</strong> applicetion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology, <strong>the</strong> motivation is powerful. High<br />

initial costs, as identified .by CPEC (CPEC, 2982, pp. 70-741, are<br />

regained by mess distribution over a period <strong>of</strong> time. The high<br />

initial costs <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology are political liabilities;<br />

<strong>the</strong> low cost per student over a period <strong>of</strong> time is a persuasive<br />

political asset. The assessment <strong>of</strong> long term geina or short term<br />

gains will determine <strong>the</strong> political posture toward cost.<br />

Quality as a political issue will dissipate as evaluations<br />

focus upon student performance ra<strong>the</strong>r than upon instruotional<br />

methodology. The quality issue is really a transfer <strong>of</strong> "g~ilt by


association." Many people confuse <strong>the</strong> entertainment content <strong>of</strong><br />

commercial television with <strong>the</strong> technical medium <strong>of</strong> television. The<br />

assumption equates anything on telavision with something that has<br />

little intellectual value. This is a false assumption. The quality<br />

intellectual <strong>of</strong>Porings from Public Brosdcasting System (PUS) are<br />

rapidly ohanging that notion for a widening mass audience. An<br />

interesting comparison is <strong>the</strong> attitude toward TV and computers.<br />

Television started an a mass medium on <strong>the</strong> heels <strong>of</strong> radio. Computer<br />

applicetions were started in highly specialized, limited Fiolds.<br />

Computers are rapidly becoming a mass technology, while tslevision,<br />

particularly cahls television, is sweking incraasingly specielizsd<br />

markets. Uecsuse computers started with tfserious" applications in<br />

<strong>the</strong> military, science, and business, <strong>the</strong>re is a more intellectual<br />

oonnotation to computers. These are subtle but important<br />

observations as feculty ere enthusiaetically applying computers in<br />

<strong>the</strong> instructional proceae. There is less reeietance to <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

computaro in instruction end leso <strong>of</strong>' a perception that quality will<br />

be hampered with <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong>' this technology. These<br />

attitudes have significant political implications For <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

Inetructional Technology.<br />

Contract education, although neutral on tho ourfaoe, may have<br />

some important leverages For Inetructionel Teohnology. Corporations<br />

are finding <strong>the</strong> training and retreining mission very important as<br />

industrial operations rapidly change and require new, more complex<br />

skills. Joint efforts by industry and <strong>the</strong> community colleges bring<br />

relevant training to <strong>the</strong> corporate site. Muoh <strong>of</strong> thin training is<br />

delivered by Instructional Taohnology. Positive experiences for


corporatione and community colleges may be converted to political<br />

support for Instructional Technology from groups such as tho<br />

California I.lanufacturers Association.<br />

The opportunities for pr<strong>of</strong>essional development for faculty<br />

through Educational Technology and ~netructional Technology are<br />

related to issues <strong>of</strong> quality and can he used to augment political<br />

support. The content reseerch and presentation rigor <strong>the</strong>t must be<br />

an integral part <strong>of</strong> good inntructional materials or telecourses are<br />

powerful motivational forces. The racognition for media development<br />

is a creative challenge most faculty find rewarding. Appropriate<br />

Financial incentive in royalty agreements for faoulty can compensate<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir extra effort for creating alternative learning syeterns.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, opportunities for increased student and faculty interaction<br />

is a distinct part <strong>of</strong> Instructional Technology. The human,<br />

integrated with s<strong>of</strong>tware and hardware systems, is vital for<br />

effective Instructional Technology. Instructional Technology can<br />

divert faoulty efforts from repetitious delivery <strong>of</strong> information to<br />

stimulating discussion with students at levels <strong>of</strong> higher cognitive<br />

activities. These advances can be political assets for students and<br />

faculty.<br />

The issue <strong>of</strong> job security may hold some points <strong>of</strong> compromine<br />

with regard to <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> full-time instructors to part-time<br />

instructors. Currently, in <strong>the</strong> Celifornie Community <strong>College</strong>s<br />

nun-tenured, part-time faculty outnumber full-time faoulty. As<br />

financial pressures mount, more and mora classes are being taught by<br />

<strong>the</strong> part-tine instructore. If produotivity can be increased through<br />

<strong>the</strong> use OF Instructional Tachnology by <strong>the</strong> full-time Faculty, <strong>the</strong>n


<strong>the</strong> need for pert-time faculty would he reduced. This would<br />

stabilize <strong>the</strong> employment <strong>of</strong> full-time faculty and give some needed<br />

incentives for using full-time faculty ra<strong>the</strong>r than part-time<br />

faculty. This is a strong political argument for <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

Instructional Technology in <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s.<br />

One important area for examination is <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> technology<br />

and differentiated etaffing in o<strong>the</strong>r pr<strong>of</strong>essions. The use <strong>of</strong><br />

technology is rapidly expanding in <strong>the</strong> medical and legal<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essions, Both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se fields also make extonaive use <strong>of</strong><br />

differentiated staffing. However, upon close obeervation no job<br />

displacement or reduction in salary has occurred while productivity<br />

and quality <strong>of</strong> services <strong>of</strong>fered has increased. Parallels might he<br />

drawn from <strong>the</strong> medical end legel pr<strong>of</strong>essions and be applied to<br />

education.<br />

Alliances with supportive organizations and incentives for<br />

faculty hold <strong>the</strong> key for future axpansion <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />

Technology. The organizational alliences w i l l be Found with<br />

organizations external to <strong>the</strong> current education scene or with<br />

emerging educetional orgenizationa. Currently alliances are stable<br />

with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> some poeitive movement by <strong>the</strong> Academic Senate<br />

and Faculty Association toward more support nF Instructional<br />

Technology.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> debate regarding Eduoational Technology and<br />

Instructional Technology ever ends, it w i l l be <strong>the</strong> values and <strong>the</strong><br />

-<br />

idaels <strong>the</strong>t <strong>the</strong> society deems importent which w i l l datermine tho<br />

outcomen--not <strong>the</strong> technologioel means used to shape <strong>the</strong> outcomes.<br />

Technology in merely a tool to be used or not used, st <strong>the</strong>


discretion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> society. Values and idsala drive <strong>the</strong> system.<br />

These values and ideals combined v~ith technological advances arc<br />

pert <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> continuing evolutionary change, <strong>of</strong> education. O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

innovation, such as <strong>the</strong> universal adoption <strong>of</strong> textbooks, did not<br />

occur in one day. Placing <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> Instructional<br />

Technology in perspective Dr. Bernie Luskln has said, '~Uoll, changa<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory says it takes a generation to live--and a generation to die."


BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

ACCT Tesk Force on Definition and Terminology. Educational<br />

Technology: A Glossary <strong>of</strong> Terms. Washington, 0. C.: AECT,<br />

1977, 1979.<br />

nailey, S. K. Education Interest Groups in <strong>the</strong> Nation's Capital.<br />

Washington, 0. C.f American Council on Education, 1975.<br />

Berg, E. <strong>11</strong>. Report to <strong>the</strong> Legislature on <strong>the</strong> tducationel and<br />

Fiscal EfFects <strong>of</strong> Inclepend~nt Studx. IJnpublished report to<br />

<strong>the</strong> bard <strong>of</strong> Governors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> California Community <strong>College</strong>s.<br />

Sacramento, June 1901.<br />

CaliPornia Community Collage Chancellor's Office. The Educational<br />

and Fincal Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Legislation Authorizing Independent<br />

Study, 1970-00. Sacramento: California Community <strong>College</strong><br />

Chancellor's Office, 1901.<br />

California Postsecondary Education Commission.<br />

Instructional tledia Osycnd Campus. Sacramento: California<br />

Postsecondary Education Commieeion, 1979.<br />

California Postsecondary Education Commission. Linking<br />

Californians for Learning. Sacramento: California<br />

Postsecondary Education Commission, 1901.<br />

Coder, A. Why Do Community <strong>College</strong> Faculty Resint Media as an<br />

Instructional Delivery System? Educetionel Technology, May<br />

1903, pp. 7-<strong>11</strong>.<br />

flalil, R. Mcdorn Political Analysis. Englevrood Cliffs, Nevi<br />

Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963.<br />

Gall, J. Systemetics. New York: The New York Times nook Co.,<br />

1577.<br />

Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y. S. Effective Evaluation. Sen<br />

Francisco: Jossey-Bass P~lblishers, 1901.<br />

Heinich, R. Instructional Technology and Decision<br />

Educational Considerations, Spring 1903, z(2), 25-25.<br />

Ileinich, R. and Ebert, K. Legal Barriers to Educational<br />

Technology and Instructional Productivity. Rloomington,<br />

Indiana: National Institute for Education, 1976.<br />

Japan Computer llsage Development Institute. The Plan for an<br />

Information Society: A Notional Goal Toward <strong>the</strong> Year 2000.<br />

Ekistics 226, September 1974.


I


To: Trustees<br />

From : Jackie Suitt<br />

Subject: The Great Policy Debate<br />

A CCGT Regional Workshop<br />

held in San Diego on<br />

December 4, 1905<br />

Workshop presentor: Dan Weiler who reviewed<br />

key findings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community college study sponsored<br />

by <strong>the</strong> California Business l{oundtable,(86 largest<br />

corporations in California which adopt positions on<br />

public policy issues).<br />

Bernian-iiileiler is a private policy research corporation<br />

which did <strong>the</strong> 1980 study on educational policy for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Roundtable on I{-<strong>12</strong>'s. Their recommendations resulted<br />

in SB813; major reform legislation for public schools<br />

in California. I<br />

Their study on col~~n~unity colleges included<br />

cost effectiveness, This study is a major source<br />

<strong>of</strong> information for <strong>the</strong> Masterrplan Commission and<br />

included research on Governance; Finance; Faculty;<br />

Hemediation and Students.<br />

CONGLUBIONB: Community colleges have too many1:missions.<br />

Public relations efforts need great improvement. There<br />

is much mis-information,<br />

A. Governqnce : .<br />

Governance is shargd today with overlapping<br />

authority. A t least 1600 code changes since 197%-<br />

more authority given to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Legislature. Money authority shifted to <strong>the</strong><br />

Legislature. l%esponsibilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors<br />

and local boards almost identical. No detailed oversite:<br />

authority. <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors may be forced by <strong>the</strong><br />

Legislature to make inroads into local authority. !<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> uncertain governance authority,<br />

key decisions are made in <strong>the</strong> Legislature--decisions<br />

whose outcome may or may not benefit colleges. The<br />

Legislature is not <strong>the</strong> arena where key decisions<br />

should be made. But <strong>the</strong>re is no CLEAR power to<br />

enforce by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors.


Page 2<br />

B. Finance<br />

lievenues are down 10% per ADA since 1978.<br />

Attendance-based funding has lowered <strong>the</strong> quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> educational program; with a tendency to bring<br />

in as many students as possible with lower academic<br />

quality to encourage students to stay in class.<br />

C. Students<br />

Increased part-time. Pull-time declined in 10<br />

years with enough part-time gains to make up for<br />

full-time losses. Over 76% work: more than half are<br />

over 30 years old. vocational students increased from<br />

39$ in 1970 to 50% in 1984.<br />

There is a decline in students who tramsfer; most<br />

who transfer are full-time community college students.<br />

Typical students at four-year institytions do not<br />

work.<br />

STUDY FOINTED OUT INADEQUATE COUNSLXING AND<br />

SCREENING. STUDENT-COUNSL%OI? RAT I0 AVERAGE 1-900<br />

MINIMUQI. AHTICULATION IINKVLN WITH FOUR-YEAH SCIIOOLS.<br />

STUDY IiECOIU'IMlCNDEU I\lORI< bVOI


Community <strong>College</strong>s continue to be flexible and<br />

diverse--but <strong>the</strong>re are problem areas:<br />

1. Transfer programs--articulation<br />

2. Counseling--too many students per counselor<br />

3. Outdated vocational programs and equipment<br />

4. Growing rate <strong>of</strong> minority students<br />

Obstacles include uncertain priorities; uncertain<br />

financing; inadequate academic programs; weak articulation<br />

between feeder high schools and four-year institutions.<br />

liecon~mendations <strong>the</strong> ?,laster Plan Commission<br />

is examining:<br />

1. Access<br />

2. Matriculation<br />

3. Core curriculum<br />

4. Transfer centers<br />

5. Technical institutes<br />

6. Remedial; including separate centers on or <strong>of</strong>f campus<br />

. Mandatory testing ; assessment<br />

8. Maximum number <strong>of</strong> units for remedial (24-36 units) :<br />

9. Academic floor<br />

10. Fur<strong>the</strong>r restricting or increasing part-time teachers<br />

<strong>11</strong>. Increase tenure from 2 to 4-6 years before granting :<br />

<strong>12</strong>. Peer review before granting tenure<br />

13. Abolish tenure--use contract system<br />

14. State Salary schedule<br />

15. , Collective bargaining<br />

16. Faculty development including money for this area<br />

1. Student fees<br />

1.8. Funding<br />

19. MORE POWER TO BOARD OP GOVERNORS<br />

20. Add people to B <strong>of</strong> G. Regional <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Trustees<br />

with regional chancellors appointed by Chancellor's<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice,<br />

Comrnents: Effects <strong>of</strong> Prop. 13 only NOW affecting community<br />

colleges as far a public is concerned.<br />

Legislature BEE going around local boards in making<br />

decisions affecting local colleges.<br />

Absence <strong>of</strong> yardsticks to measure accountability. No<br />

standards to which changes can be measured.<br />

Reacting instead <strong>of</strong> moving forward<br />

Bad press.


Fage It<br />

Cotnrnunity colleges are NOT a system. They ARE a<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> individual colleges--must have local<br />

decision-making; but also must be held acoountable.<br />

No agreement. Lots <strong>of</strong> diversity--we must build a<br />

cotnnlon vision. What should mission be? In <strong>the</strong><br />

attempt to meet ALL missions, a failure to have<br />

a sense <strong>of</strong> priority. Too much for too many.<br />

We must stop defining mission in terms <strong>of</strong> client<br />

group--missions Beep shifting as clients shift. No<br />

clear definition, Clients have changed in last<br />

20 years.<br />

We must become inner directed. Have an academic<br />

mission and a vocational mission, Teach from<br />

basics to advanced courses. We educate people<br />

from different levels <strong>of</strong> academic background.<br />

State should set standards and allovi local boards<br />

to make decisions how to carry out. We need to<br />

work more closely with k-<strong>12</strong>'s to develop academic<br />

standards. Have ei<strong>the</strong>r high school exit or<br />

community college entrance testing. Defining<br />

academic standards is elusive. What do students<br />

knovi and at what educational level should <strong>the</strong>y<br />

be placed?<br />

COMMUNITY COLLEGES IXJ~SPONSIBLE FOR TAKING STUDENTS<br />

AT THEIR OdN PACE AND MAKING THl91 SUCCESSFUL.<br />

Teach students how to adapt to new information.<br />

Tremendous infighting for funds between academic and<br />

vocational on campus--hurting students. May need<br />

separate administration for vocational.


, .:<br />

.. . , ~ . .<br />

, ,<br />

, .<br />

I I<br />

, . ,<br />

, , , ': . ,<br />

. , 1<br />

, ,<br />

THE GREAT POLICY DEBAT<br />

A CCCT REGIONAL WORKSHOP<br />

WORI


POLICY QUESTIONS FOR CALIFORNIA'S COMMUNITY COLLEGES<br />

The California Roundtable<br />

May 1985


POLICY QUESTIONS<br />

FOR<br />

CALIFORNIA'S cwnwxTY COLLEGES<br />

The California Roundtable, an organization <strong>of</strong> senior exacutives <strong>of</strong> major<br />

California corporations, recently sponsored an independent six-month study <strong>of</strong><br />

California's cmmunity colleges. The swdy was conducted by Bennan, Weiler<br />

Associates, Berkeley, California. This paper sets forth <strong>the</strong>-key policy<br />

questions that have emerged from that study, for <strong>the</strong> cone ideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Commission for <strong>the</strong> Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hater Plan for Higher Education -- and for<br />

<strong>the</strong> caamuni ty colleges, <strong>the</strong> legisla are, and o<strong>the</strong>r interes ted parties. The<br />

Roundtable believes tha t <strong>the</strong>se questions must be addressed if significant<br />

improvements are to be realized in <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> cammunity college<br />

education. Before turning to <strong>the</strong>se questions, a brief review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study<br />

conclusions is in order.<br />

Overview <strong>of</strong> S tudp Conclusions /<br />

The Berman, Wailer Associates study showed that cmmunity colleges have<br />

mny strengths, including institutional adaptability, a number <strong>of</strong> high quality<br />

programs, many competent and dedicated instructors, and a tradition <strong>of</strong><br />

commitment to educational opportuoi ty for all students.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> serious problems were also discussed: Weaknesses in transfer<br />

education, counseling and assessment, and special programs for underprepared<br />

minorltles; vocational programs that emphasize specific skill training at <strong>the</strong><br />

expense <strong>of</strong> broader competencies; widely varying standards for remedial<br />

education; and a need for greater faculty effectiveness.<br />

The study concluded that, while individual colleges could take many steps<br />

to improve <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir programs, subs tantial sys tern-wide improvement


was baing impeded by a number <strong>of</strong> obstacles whose resolution vould require<br />

state level policies and leadership. These obstacles include inefficiencies<br />

in governance, finance, snd personnel rules; a decline in financial eupport,<br />

varying academic standards, weak intersegmental coordination, and a need to<br />

agree on major priorities.<br />

issues.<br />

The policy questions set forth below address <strong>the</strong>se topics and related


MISSIONS AND PRIORITIES<br />

WHAT HISSIONS AND PRIORITIES SHOULD THE Q)HllUNITX<br />

COLLEGES HAVE THROUGH THE END OF THIS CENTURY?<br />

What overall vision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community colleges should guide state<br />

and local policymakers?<br />

Discussions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community colleges are <strong>of</strong>ten marked by uncertainty about<br />

<strong>the</strong> colleges' identity. Should <strong>the</strong> colleges be primsrily higher education<br />

institutions; community-oriented institutions; "bridges" be ween secondary and<br />

postsecondary education; centers <strong>of</strong> employment training; genuinely multi-<br />

faceted fns titu tions that attempt to embrace all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se roles; or<br />

institutions defined by an entirely different vision?<br />

Should all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' present missions -- transfer, vocational,<br />

remedial, adult and communLCy education -- be retained?<br />

These major missions have been endorsed by four different legislative reviews<br />

over <strong>the</strong> past sixty-five years. But times have changed, and some observers<br />

fear that <strong>the</strong> colleges are trying to do too much, vi th a consequent erosion <strong>of</strong><br />

educational program quality.<br />

Should one or more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' missions be emphasized more than o<strong>the</strong>rs?<br />

Some observers believe that <strong>the</strong> colleges' identity and roles could be<br />

clarified, and <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> trying to do too much reduced, if one or two<br />

missions were selected as <strong>the</strong> colleges' main tasks, with o<strong>the</strong>rs clearly<br />

treated as ancillary or supportive. O<strong>the</strong>r analysts worry that a system-wide<br />

decision Eo emphasize one or two missions would not be wise because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

varying needs <strong>of</strong> diverse local communities.<br />

Should <strong>the</strong> purposes and objectives <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' missions be re-<br />

evaluated?<br />

The evidence shows that <strong>the</strong>re have been a number <strong>of</strong> important changes in <strong>the</strong><br />

interests and characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' clients. More students are<br />

currently interested in "quick turuaround" vocational training; more students<br />

are underprepared for college-level work; minority student populations are<br />

growing. Much enrollment growth in <strong>the</strong> future may be among minority and<br />

immigrant populations, who have historically been among <strong>the</strong> least well<br />

prepared for postsecondary work. These changes suggest <strong>the</strong> possibility that<br />

at least some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' missions -- particularly vocational and<br />

remadial. education -- might need to be re-examined.


GOVERNANCE, ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION<br />

HOW CAN THE GOVERNANCE, ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION<br />

OF THE conmxm (X~LLEGES BE MADE MORE EFFICIENT?<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> right balance between state and local control?<br />

I<br />

Since 1978, much control over cmmunity college policies has shifted from <strong>the</strong><br />

local to <strong>the</strong> state level, where it is shared by <strong>the</strong> legislabire and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Governors. The study findings suggest that some decisions can only be made<br />

efficiently at <strong>the</strong> state level. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> great ccmplexitg and<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges argue in favor '<strong>of</strong> highly decentralized governance<br />

and administretion. Most study respondents felt that <strong>the</strong> right balance<br />

bebeen state and local control had not yet been achieved.<br />

What changes, if any, are desirable in <strong>the</strong> roles and authoritp <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Governors re s ature<br />

SNdy findings show that both local trustees and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors lack<br />

key elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> capacity to govern, and that key decisions affecting <strong>the</strong><br />

colleges are consequently <strong>of</strong>ten made in <strong>the</strong> political arena. California '<br />

appears to be <strong>the</strong> only state with both complete state financing and locally<br />

elected trustees. The findings also showed a number <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> overlapping<br />

authority between <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors and local trustees. There was broad<br />

agreement among sb~dy respondents that this system <strong>of</strong> governance does not work<br />

efficiently.<br />

What changes, if any, are desirable in <strong>the</strong> organiza tion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Off ice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Chancallor?<br />

Unlike <strong>the</strong> systemuide administrative <strong>of</strong> fices for UC and CSU, <strong>the</strong> community<br />

colleges' Chancellor's Office is located in Sacramento and utilizes civil<br />

service ra <strong>the</strong>r than cmmunity college system employees. Some analysts have<br />

expressed concern that <strong>the</strong>se arrangeman ts reduce administrative efficiency and<br />

blur <strong>the</strong> distinction be ween cmmuni ty college and state poll tical authority.<br />

What efficiencies, if any, could be realized through <strong>the</strong> reorganization <strong>of</strong><br />

districts or services?<br />

While many key educational policy decisions continue to be made by locally<br />

elected trus teas, <strong>the</strong> administrative functions <strong>of</strong> single-college districts 'are<br />

virtually identical to those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir colleges. This has pranpted some<br />

analysts to call for an examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential efficiencies <strong>of</strong> regional<br />

governance structures andlor <strong>the</strong> consolidation <strong>of</strong> some single-college I<br />

districts. In larger districts, attempts have been made to avoid costly<br />

duplication <strong>of</strong> services by restricting some programs to one or two campuses<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>the</strong>m at all colleges in <strong>the</strong> district.


llov can more complete data be developed to support <strong>the</strong> evaluation and<br />

adminis tm tion <strong>of</strong> cmmunf ty college programs?<br />

The study found that data collection and raporting was not uniform, and much<br />

data was not comparable, across <strong>the</strong> three segments <strong>of</strong> public higher<br />

education. Coramunity college data collection and analysis is also not closely<br />

coordinated with similar activities performed by <strong>the</strong> State Dapartment <strong>of</strong><br />

Education and o<strong>the</strong>r agencies for <strong>the</strong> K-<strong>12</strong> system. Within <strong>the</strong> cmmuni ty ,<br />

college system, much data was missing or incomplete.


(5<br />

FINANCE AND FUNDIN<br />

HOW SHOULD COMMINIlY mLLEGE FINANCIS BE QiANGED SO AS<br />

TO PROVIDE A HORE EFFICIENT, FAIR, STABLE, AND ADEQUATE .<br />

SYSTM OF FUNDIN?<br />

Can <strong>the</strong> ADA-based funding formula be altered so as to make it laore neutral in<br />

its impact on college course and program planning7 "-,<br />

So+..c Lcue sc .,rci \.<br />

0 ~he-eWd&ed that <strong>the</strong> ADA-based funding formula, which ties college income<br />

to student classroom a ttendanca, has created strong incentives for <strong>the</strong><br />

colleges to emphasize popular, inexpensiie courses, and to refrain from<br />

-<br />

/<br />

<strong>of</strong>fering advanced, high-quality courses that do not attract lnrge numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

students. 13 t.:, sn rccr.-a& rcL1-choir *nd 8 ZSu cad . . 1'<br />

If <strong>the</strong> ADA-based funding formula is discarded, what should replace it as <strong>the</strong><br />

basis for funding college programs and services? r<br />

?<br />

3L" L", r%,grrk, +


materials) have ken suspended. Some analysts believe that districts should<br />

be allowed to reinstate soma uaer fees, or have <strong>the</strong> option <strong>of</strong> charging limited<br />

additional general fees, with any new feas retained locally. Pees have also<br />

been widely discussed as a mechanism for discriminating between caausl and<br />

serious students, and between smdents who already have college degrees a-frrl<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs who are in college for <strong>the</strong> first time. Many 7<br />

that<br />

<strong>the</strong> mandatory sh~dent fee imposed for <strong>the</strong> first time in 1984-85 has<br />

contributed to enrollment declines this year, particularly among minority<br />

smdents. O<strong>the</strong>rs felt that this impact will decline as more students learn 1<br />

about available financial aid. .Ch-14 ,kd4,.t cis . . . ,<br />

How can interdistrict funding disparities be reduced or eliminated? I<br />

The shldy found substantial variation among districts in expenditures per ADA,<br />

as <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> state funding formulas put in place in <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong><br />

Proposition 13. These formulas have left some districts particularly<br />

underfunded relative to <strong>the</strong>ir needs. The leglslsture has periodically tried<br />

to equalize funding rates by varying <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> inflation allowance provided<br />

to districts, with low expenditure districts given a higher allowance than '<br />

high expenditure districts.<br />

How can reasonable stability and predictability <strong>of</strong> funding be assured?<br />

Since 1973, <strong>the</strong> legislature has passed ten major bills affecting ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

allocation provisions or level <strong>of</strong> funding for canmunity colleges, Final and<br />

supplemental appropriations decisions are <strong>of</strong> ten not made until well into <strong>the</strong><br />

school year. Tha study found <strong>the</strong>t <strong>the</strong>se uncertainties have made program<br />

planning difficult, have discouraged <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> neu or innovative<br />

programs, and have created incentives to rely heavily on part-time staff, who<br />

can be hired or laid <strong>of</strong>f quickly.


ACADEMIC STANDARDS AND SNDENT ACCESS<br />

HOW CAN ACADMIC STANDARDS BE IMPROVED WITHOUT RRIUCINC<br />

ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION FOR SOME STUDENTS?<br />

Is some reduction in access to community colleges acceptable in order to<br />

achieve higher standards?<br />

There was strong bslief among s tudy respondante that some higher standards --<br />

notably tougher grading, probation and dismissal policies -- have contributed<br />

to recant declines in student enrollment. If this is true, some students who<br />

have traditionally had access to canmuniCy colleges have Left, whereas <strong>the</strong><br />

quality <strong>of</strong> education for those who remain may have improved (though <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> higher standards has not been studied), Higher academic standards have<br />

typically been thought <strong>of</strong> as associated with transfereligible courses, but<br />

many observers have also raised <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> stendards in connection with '<br />

voca tional and o<strong>the</strong>r programs. -<br />

What form should higher standards take?<br />

Higher academic standards adopted by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>of</strong> Governors in 1981 and 1983<br />

concentrated on insuring that failing grades would be issued for<br />

unsatisfactory perfomnce, that students would uaintain a minimum grade point<br />

average or be subject to protetion or dismissal, and that students enroll in a<br />

minimum number <strong>of</strong> graded credit courses each semester. There has been no<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r tightening <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se standards (though districts or colleges can impose<br />

higher standards on <strong>the</strong>ir own), and <strong>the</strong> Boacd has not addressed <strong>the</strong> standards<br />

currently applied to course prerequisites, course sequance requirements, or<br />

curricula.<br />

What roles should counseling and assessment, remedial education, and special<br />

programs play in helping to maintain access for undetprepared students despite<br />

<strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> higher standards?<br />

The study found that assessment <strong>of</strong> student skills was rarely used to determine<br />

what courses a student would be allowed to enroll in, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong><br />

some mathmatics and English placement. Students <strong>of</strong>ten enroll in remedial<br />

level courses at <strong>the</strong> same time that <strong>the</strong>y enroll in courses requiring <strong>the</strong> same<br />

academic skills in which <strong>the</strong>y are deficient, and for which <strong>the</strong>y require<br />

remedial assistance. The findings also showed that special programs for<br />

underprepared minority students had not, on <strong>the</strong> whole, been sufficiently<br />

thorough or concentrated to bring Black and Hispanic transfer races up to <strong>the</strong><br />

whitelAsian average.


materials) have been suspended. Some analysts believe that districts should<br />

be elloved to reinstate some user fees, or have tha option <strong>of</strong> charging limited<br />

additional general fees, with any new fees retained locally. Pees have also<br />

been widely discussed as a mechanism for discriminating betueen casual and<br />

serious students, and between students who already have college degrees a-&el<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs who are in college for <strong>the</strong> first time. Many 7<br />

that<br />

<strong>the</strong> man& tory sb~dent fae imposed for <strong>the</strong> first time in 1984-85 has<br />

contributed to enrollment declines this year, particularly among minority<br />

shldents. O<strong>the</strong>rs felt that this impact will decline as more students learn<br />

about available financial aid. rhoid ce~<br />

. . .<br />

How can interdistrict funding disparities be reduced or eliminated?<br />

,<br />

The study found substantial variation among districts in expenditures per ADA,<br />

as <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> state funding formulas put in place in <strong>the</strong> wake <strong>of</strong><br />

Proposition 13. These formulas have left some districts particularly<br />

underfunded relative to <strong>the</strong>ir needs. The legislature has periodically tried<br />

to equalize funding rates by varying <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> inflation allowance provided<br />

to districts, with lw expenditure districts given a higher allowance than<br />

high expenditure districts.<br />

Iiow can reasonable stability and predictability <strong>of</strong> funding be assured?<br />

Since 1973, <strong>the</strong> legislature has passed ten major bills affecting ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

allocation provisions or level <strong>of</strong> funding for cmmunity colleges. Final and<br />

supplemental appropriations decisions are <strong>of</strong>ten not made until well into <strong>the</strong><br />

school year. Tha study found that <strong>the</strong>se uncertainties have made program<br />

planning difficult, have discouraged <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> new or innovative<br />

programs, and have created incentives to rely heavily on part-time staff, who<br />

can be hired or laid <strong>of</strong>f quickly.


VOCATIONAL EDUCATION<br />

TO %IAT EXTENT SHOULD VOCATIONAL EDUCATION PROGRAHS<br />

CONCENTRATE ON GENERAL COHPEI'ENCIES AS WELL AS SPECIFIC<br />

VOCATIONAL SKILLS?<br />

What role should <strong>the</strong> community colleges play in overall state employment<br />

training efforts?<br />

Recent studies have identified seventeen different employment training<br />

programs for adults authorized, operated, funded, or administered by <strong>the</strong><br />

state. The cmmunity colleges are by far <strong>the</strong> largest provider <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

services; about half <strong>of</strong> all community college students are enrolled in<br />

vocational or job training programs. Statewide, this employment training ,<br />

effort involves a complex netuork <strong>of</strong> agencies and organizations, with<br />

different and sometimes conflicting missions, clients, financing, and<br />

reporting structures. Coordination is loose and sporadic.<br />

How much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> colleges' vocational education resources should be devoted to<br />

specific job training?<br />

The cmmunity colleges provide specific job trainirq through programs<br />

supported by <strong>the</strong> state Employmen t Training Panel (ETP) , through <strong>the</strong> federally<br />

funded Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), and through performance-based<br />

contracts with industry. The study found that <strong>the</strong>se job training programs ,<br />

compe te w i th regular voca tional programs for campus resources, and are<br />

controversial at may colleges.<br />

Should vocational programs -- course sequences, curricula, prerequisites -- be<br />

reorganized to insure <strong>the</strong> teaching <strong>of</strong> general cmpetencies?<br />

The study found that workers in <strong>the</strong> future will need to have a high level <strong>of</strong><br />

general competence, including <strong>the</strong> ability to learn, to solve problems, and tb<br />

adapt to changing working conditions. Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current effort in<br />

vocational programs focuses on specific vocational skills, or training<br />

tailored to particular jobs, and does no't address <strong>the</strong> competencies that ace<br />

likely to be required in tho future for job securicj and advancement, and for<br />

<strong>the</strong> maintenance <strong>of</strong> a competitive economy.<br />

What role should business and industry play in <strong>the</strong> shaplng <strong>of</strong> vocational<br />

programs and <strong>the</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> vocational curricula?<br />

Business and industry representatives serve on advisory committees that <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

work with <strong>the</strong> colleges on vocational program planning and curriculum<br />

decisions. The study found that some colleges had established close workin<br />

rela tionshtps ui th local business and industry, with results that pleased bo<br />

parties, whereas many o<strong>the</strong>r colleges did not have many active programs <strong>of</strong> th<br />

kind, or were not making full use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir vocational advisory eanmiteees.


FACULTY I<br />

HOW SHOULD PERSONNEL RULES AND PRACTICES BE CHANGED SO AS<br />

TO HELP INCREASE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITX<br />

COLLEGE FACULTY?<br />

Should changes be made in <strong>the</strong> rules affectiw tenure, credentialing, and ,<br />

salarp formulas?<br />

The study found that rules and practices in <strong>the</strong>se areas resemble those found<br />

in <strong>the</strong> K-<strong>12</strong> system ra<strong>the</strong>r than in o<strong>the</strong>r segments <strong>of</strong> higher education.<br />

Community college faculty becane fully tenured in two years without peer<br />

review, They must obtain one <strong>of</strong> 76 subject area credentials in order to teach<br />

a credit class; California appears to be <strong>the</strong> only state that requires a state<br />

credential for community college instructors. Faculty are paid on <strong>the</strong> basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> salary schedules that vary widely from district to distt%ct, with salary<br />

levels tied to <strong>the</strong> instructor's level <strong>of</strong> education and number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong><br />

academic service. In 1983-84, <strong>the</strong> difference in average salary betwee6 <strong>the</strong><br />

highest and lowest paying districts was more than 37 percan:.<br />

Should <strong>the</strong> rules affecting <strong>the</strong> roles, responsibilities and compensation <strong>of</strong>,<br />

part-time faculty be changed?<br />

Part-time faculty may not teach more than 60 percent <strong>of</strong> a full-time work load;<br />

this typically translates to a mximum <strong>of</strong> nine classroom hours per week.<br />

Study findings indicate that part-time faculty generally do not hold <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

hours for students or participate in campus academic planning activities.<br />

They typically receive less supervision and support, and <strong>the</strong>ir compensation is<br />

estimted to average 38 percent <strong>of</strong> that paid to full-time instructors. With<br />

<strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> some categorical programs, <strong>the</strong>re are no provisions for <strong>the</strong><br />

employment <strong>of</strong> full-time non-tenured faculty on l i m i tad contracts.<br />

Should faculties play a larger role in academic program decisions?<br />

Study f indings show that though <strong>the</strong>re are s tate-au thorized faculty senates' and<br />

faculty associations, <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir active participation in campus<br />

academic planning and program decisions varies widely £run college to college,<br />

and is highly dependent on <strong>the</strong> administrative style <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> college<br />

president. In general, ccmmuni ty college faculty senates do not play <strong>the</strong> same<br />

role as faculty senates at UC or CSU.<br />

Should changes be considered in <strong>the</strong> rules affecting faculty lay<strong>of</strong>f and<br />

senior1 ty?<br />

Current law provides that a faculty member may not be laid <strong>of</strong>f if a less<br />

senior faculty member is teaching a course that <strong>the</strong> more senior inst~ctor is<br />

credentialed to teach. The shldy found that faculty canmonly hold multiple<br />

credentials, and that when lay<strong>of</strong>fs are necessary, faculty with little or no<br />

'/!!,'<br />

'9 ',


teaching experfence in a subject area <strong>of</strong>ten "bump" less senior staff who may '<br />

have been teaching competently in that area for some time.<br />

What steps should bo taken to improve <strong>the</strong> likelihood that faculty will stay up<br />

to date in <strong>the</strong>ir fields?<br />

Faculty pr<strong>of</strong>essional development is supported out <strong>of</strong> each college's general<br />

apportionment; <strong>the</strong>re are (uith one recent exception) no state funds earmarked<br />

for this purpose. The study found that college support for <strong>the</strong>se activities<br />

has declined over <strong>the</strong> last several years, and that <strong>the</strong>y are rarely coordinated<br />

uith csmpus long range planning or linked to staff evalua tioas.<br />

Administrators do not have <strong>the</strong> authority to require faculty to improve <strong>the</strong>ir !,<br />

skills or update <strong>the</strong>ir knowledge; all such activities are voluntary.<br />

What staff evaluation procedures should be encouraged and supported?<br />

The Education Code requires tenured faculty to be evaluated at least once<br />

every No years, The study found that <strong>the</strong>se evaluations usually coinbined<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r a team (administrator and peer) or administrative assessment with<br />

student andlor self evaluations, with wide variation in sequence and<br />

frequency. Part-time faculty were evaluated less frequently and<br />

systematically, and <strong>the</strong>ir evaluation processes varied widely. Systematic data<br />

on staff quality were not available in most districts, and data were not<br />

canparable between districts.<br />

What steps should be taken to insure an adequate supply <strong>of</strong> competent full-time<br />

staff in <strong>the</strong> future?<br />

Data cited by <strong>the</strong> sbdy suggest that <strong>the</strong> full-time faculty are "greying" --<br />

with a decline both in relatively junior and very senior staff, and an<br />

increase in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> faculty between <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> 35 and 54. Study<br />

panelists pointed out that while some older full-time faculty will soon be<br />

retiring, little is currently being done to induct new qualified instructors.


HOW CAN COMMINITY DOLLEGE ARTI~ILATION WITH FOUR-YEAR<br />

INSTI'NTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION AND HIGH SGIOOLS<br />

BE IMPROVED?<br />

Should new articulation procedures be arranged between <strong>the</strong> community colleges<br />

and <strong>the</strong> publlc four-year ins titu tions <strong>of</strong> higher education7<br />

There are currently no statewide agreements on articulation procedures betueen<br />

UCICSU and <strong>the</strong> community colleges, and <strong>the</strong> study found that <strong>the</strong>se procedures<br />

varied widely, Community college respondents expressed concern that changes<br />

in UC or CSU transfer requirements were <strong>of</strong>ten not coordinated wf th <strong>the</strong><br />

community colleges, and that information on <strong>the</strong> progress <strong>of</strong> transfer students<br />

at <strong>the</strong> four-year institutions was <strong>of</strong> ten difficult to obtain and reported in<br />

non-canparable ways by different four-year campuses.<br />

What steps could <strong>the</strong> community colleges take to improve articulation with <strong>the</strong><br />

four-year ins ti tutions?<br />

Some colleges in <strong>the</strong> smdy sample coordinated <strong>the</strong>ir counseling efforts with<br />

staff from four-year institutions, provided individualized assistance to<br />

smdents wishing to transfer, or tried to insure that <strong>the</strong> curriculum in<br />

transfereligible courses paralleled <strong>the</strong> material covered in similar courses<br />

at UC or CSU. Most colleges in <strong>the</strong> sample, however, largely res tticted <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

articulation activities to <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> courses that would qualify<br />

for transfer credit £ran <strong>the</strong> fouryear instim tions.<br />

Should system-wide policies be implemented for community college articulation<br />

with high schools?<br />

Community college work wi th local high schools was cited by many smdy<br />

respondents as a way <strong>of</strong> helping high school students understand important<br />

options for pas tsecondary education, as well as <strong>the</strong> colleges' academic<br />

expectations. Most colleges in <strong>the</strong> study sample provided written information<br />

to local high school students and occasionally made some form <strong>of</strong> personal<br />

presentation. A feu also administered placement tests, worked with high<br />

school counselors, or took o<strong>the</strong>r steps to coordinate information and<br />

activities.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!