06.05.2013 Views

LG204 background.pdf

LG204 background.pdf

LG204 background.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>LG204</strong>-5-FY ENGLISH PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY Background<br />

labial part is a rounding of the lips whilst the velar part is where the frication occurs.<br />

The sound is, of course, voiceless.<br />

Another fricative, with restricted use, is the voiceless velar fricative [x]. For many<br />

speakers this sound, occurring in a few words of non-English origin like Scots loch or<br />

German Bach, is, in any case, replaced by the equivalent stop [k].<br />

Finally, for many speakers, a word like huge is pronounced, not with [h] followed by<br />

the glide [j], but with a voiceless palatal fricative [].<br />

None of the sounds featured in this section is generally considered to be phonemic in<br />

English.<br />

English sonorant consonants<br />

As we saw, obstruents are defined as sounds where the air pressure behind an<br />

obstruction if greater than that outside. This build up of air is achieved by ensuring<br />

that the only point at which air can escape is that of what we call the ‘primary<br />

constriction’. This entails ensuring that the velum is raised to that air cannot escape<br />

through the nasal cavity. In order to articulate a sonorant consonant, a primary<br />

constriction will still be formed at some point in the oral tract (since that’s the<br />

definition of a consonant) but air is allowed to escape elsewhere. This escape of air<br />

ensures that the air pressure behind and beyond the constriction is roughly equal.<br />

Nasals<br />

All the nasal consonants of English involve a primary stop constriction (indeed it is<br />

hard to imagine how a nasal fricative could possibly exist). Vowels may be<br />

inherently nasal (although not in English) or contextually nasalized – we shall discuss<br />

this in a week or so’s time. The basic articulatory difference between oral stops and<br />

nasal stops is the position of the velum. For oral stops there is a velic closure, as<br />

mentioned above, and for nasal stops the velum is lowered so that air can escape into<br />

the nasal cavity. Thus the difference between [b] and [m] is fundamentally the<br />

difference in the position of the velum, whilst the difference between [m] and [n]<br />

comes from the relative places where the primary constriction occurs.<br />

English has three phonemically relevant nasal stops:<br />

Bilabial: [m] as in ram [rm]<br />

Alveolar: [n] as in ran [rn]<br />

Velar: [] as in rang [r] (this does not have the same distribution as the<br />

other two, as we shall see in the second term)<br />

In addition, there is also a phonetic symbol [] which denotes a labio-dental nasal.<br />

This sound does, indeed, occur in English but, as we shall see in a week or so, this can<br />

be viewed as an allophone either of [m] or [n], occurring only before [f] or [v] (e.g.<br />

triumph [taf].<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!