06.05.2013 Views

LG204 background.pdf

LG204 background.pdf

LG204 background.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>LG204</strong>-5-FY ENGLISH PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY Background<br />

out that all the other obstruents of English may occur in most positions of the word<br />

(initial, medial and final), although, again, there may be gaps in certain contexts – a<br />

matter I shall also take up in the second term.<br />

Missing ‘obstruents’ and states of the glottis<br />

I remarked at the beginning that the basic definition of ‘consonant’ would seem to<br />

preclude the inclusion of the sounds [h] and [] (glottal stop) from the category. As<br />

we know, the type of sound made with no oral obstruction is known as a vowel. We<br />

shall be looking at these in a few weeks.<br />

The two sounds in question, then, leave us with a characterisation problem. It’s clear<br />

that [h] must be included in the inventory of English consonants, since it occurs in<br />

minimal contrast with other true obstruents (for example hot vs. cot and got). One<br />

wouldn’t normally want to include [] in this inventory, although it is a very common<br />

sound in the language. This is because it never contrasts with any other consonant,<br />

but is generally recognised as a contextual variant of a voiceless stop phoneme, in<br />

particular [t]. The reason for its inclusion in this list is that it helps to exemplify a<br />

certain state of the glottis.<br />

The phoneme [h] is described in much of the literature, including CP and the IPA<br />

chart, as a voiceless glottal fricative. It is possible that some frication does occur at<br />

the glottis, since there appears to be more sound emitting than would occur if this<br />

were merely produced by opening the glottis and letting air pass through. However,<br />

another way of describing this sound is to characterise it as a burst of aspiration<br />

similar to that we shall be discussing with regard to voiceless stops. This involves<br />

what is known as a ‘spread glottis’. It has also been described in the literature as a<br />

‘voiceless vowel’. This is because, [h] is always followed by a vowel and the mouth<br />

will be formed into the shape of the vowel which is to follow it, but a puff of air will<br />

be released, to introduce the vowel. Clearly, [h] is voiceless, since the vocal folds<br />

remain open. It does, however, have a voiced counterpart, which isn’t phonemic,<br />

merely contextual. When /h/ occurs between two vowels, as in behind or ahead, then<br />

vocal fold vibration does take place. This feat is accomplished by allowing vibration<br />

to take place in one part of the glottis whilst the other part remains open (see fig. 1.14<br />

in CP). The phonetic symbol is [].<br />

The glottal stop involves a momentary total closure of the glottis, with the vocal folds<br />

tight rather than slack as for voicing. A term used for this state of affairs is<br />

‘constricted glottis’. This can also refer to the situation where we get creaky voice,<br />

where the total closure would occur at one end and a slacker closure at the other.<br />

Creaky voice isn’t a distinctive feature of English, although it occurs in some<br />

circumstances for certain types of effect. We won’t be discussing this in this course.<br />

Fricatives that don’t usually appear in the basic inventory<br />

In some dialects of English (in particular Scottish and perhaps American), there is a<br />

contrast between the words which and witch. In other dialects, these words are<br />

homophones. The second of these starts with [w], which will be discussed in due<br />

course, but the first has a fricative initially. This sound is a labio-velar fricative. The<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!