06.05.2013 Views

LG204 background.pdf

LG204 background.pdf

LG204 background.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>LG204</strong>-5-FY ENGLISH PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY Background<br />

We can now start to plot in the English set against these cardinal vowels. I shall start<br />

with the four corners of the chart and then go on to fill in the sides. Finally, we can<br />

go into uncharted territory and consider the vowels that are more centralised than<br />

those in the cardinal sets. The vowel we represent by the symbol [i] in English is<br />

somewhat lower than the cardinal, say [i]. Compare the sound in sea with the French<br />

si (or indeed the Scottish vowel, which is close to the French one). In most dialects of<br />

Southern British English (SBE), the equivalent to cardinal 4, is almost exactly that.<br />

Traditionally, the ash symbol [] was used for the vowel in hat and, if you examine<br />

the IPA chart, you’ll find that it’s a somewhat raised vowel relative to cardinal 4 (for<br />

which they use [a]). True cardinal 4 was found in Northern accents. However, the<br />

raised pronunciation of [] sounds very old-fashioned these days and most speakers<br />

use 4.<br />

The SBE equivalent of cardinal 5 – [] as in heart isn’t quite so far back as 5, it’s a<br />

little more centralised []. The truly back vowel is, however, found in South African<br />

English.<br />

Cardinal 8 [u] is slightly lowered in SBE and other similar dialects, including GA, and<br />

is centralised somewhat to [] in Scotland and Northern Ireland.<br />

Cardinal 2 [e] exists in its pure form in Scottish and close to this, although slightly<br />

lower, in Yorkshire. It’s diphthongised in SBE, as we shall see in due course.<br />

Cardinal 3 [] occurs in words like let in Yorkshire and Scotland but is raised slightly<br />

in SBE, keeping a distance from [] and [e].<br />

Cardinal 7 [o] is roughly this in Scotland and a bit lower (almost a raised []) but still<br />

a monophthong in Yorkshire. Again in SBE it is diphthongised (see later).<br />

Cardinal 6 [] is raised both in both SBE and Scots. It’s more rounded and higher in<br />

SBE – similar to the Spanish vowel in loco but with more rounding and tenser.<br />

The nearest English equivalent to cardinal 13 [] is slightly raised.<br />

The vowel in hit [] doesn’t have an equivalent in the cardinal set. This vowel is<br />

shorter and laxer than [i]. The tenseness of [i] tends to increase the tongue height and<br />

push the vowel further to the front. Thus, [] is lower and more retracted than its<br />

counterpart. In Scots it’s centralised to [], as indeed it is in NZ English.<br />

At the back the vowel [u] has a partner [] which shares the same relationship with it<br />

as [] to [i]. That is to say that it’s more centralised and a bit lower, as well as being<br />

lax. It’s even more centralised in Scotland and Northern Ireland (barred [] – I don’t<br />

have the symbol for this).<br />

The English equivalent to cardinal 14 [] is more central in GA, Irish and Scots [].<br />

In SBE the vowel in hut is considerably further forward []. This vowel doesn’t occur<br />

at all in northern dialects of English where there is no contrast between could and cud<br />

both being pronounced with [].<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!