06.05.2013 Views

LG204 background.pdf

LG204 background.pdf

LG204 background.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>LG204</strong>-5-FY ENGLISH PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY Background<br />

Approximants<br />

There are four phonemic approximants in English. Three [ w j] are classified as<br />

‘central’ and the fourth [l] as lateral. If we divide them in a different way, we can say<br />

that [ l] are ‘liquids and [w j] are glides (see above). These approximants share a<br />

number of attributes. They may occur as the second element of word initial<br />

consonant clusters, although, as we shall see, there is some doubt about the status of<br />

[j] in this context. We’ll discuss this next term.<br />

When preceded by voiceless obstruents, approximants will be voiceless (e.g. play,<br />

pry, fry, fly, three, sleep, try, shriek, climb, cry, swim, twin, queen, cute, few, pure).<br />

/l/ has two positional allophones i.e. [l] (clear l) in syllable onsets and [] (dark l) in<br />

syllable rhymes. In many dialects dark l is vocalised (full [fuw]). The extent to which<br />

such vocalisation occurs and the contexts in which it is more likely to appear is a<br />

matter for research.<br />

In non-rhotic dialects, // occurs only in syllable onsets having been replaced by []<br />

particularly following non-low vowels, although in recent years the schwa has also<br />

tended to disappear except where the preceding vowel is high. (fear [f], hour [a]<br />

higher [ha] but dare [d:] door [d:] etc.).<br />

As I mentioned in class, // also has two allophones (although the dark variant lacks a<br />

symbol as far as I can ascertain – this may be because it’s usually attached to a vowel<br />

– Ladefoged discusses rhoticised vowels in AmEng. For example [] for the vowel<br />

in dare in contrast to [] in a non-rhotic dialect.<br />

References<br />

Ladefoged P. (2001) A Course in Phonetics Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers<br />

THE VOWELS OF ENGLISH<br />

Over the past two weeks, we have discussed the articulation of English consonants<br />

and have been able to give a pretty accurate description of how and where they are<br />

articulated. This is because there is an interruption to the airstream that it’s possible<br />

to pinpoint. We found out, of course, that the consonants can be influenced by<br />

position in the word or by neighbouring sounds, which will cause them to vary in a<br />

number of ways. However, it’s still possible to describe the variation in terms of<br />

place, manner and voicing etc. When we come to the description of vowels, however,<br />

we have no points like this to guide us. There is no interruption to the airflow.<br />

Vowels involve the vibration of the vocal folds and a free passage of air. If we<br />

practise this we get something like []. So how do we vary vowel quality in order to<br />

give us a greater range than just one vowel? This can be achieved by changing the<br />

shape and size of the resonating chamber – the mouth. When the vibrating air<br />

particles enter this chamber, they will produce different notes according to this shape<br />

and size. This can be compared with the trick some people perform with glasses of<br />

water. They put different amounts of water into glasses and then play a tune by<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!