LG204 background.pdf
LG204 background.pdf
LG204 background.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>LG204</strong>-5-FY ENGLISH PHONETICS AND PHONOLOGY Background<br />
Approximants<br />
There are four phonemic approximants in English. Three [ w j] are classified as<br />
‘central’ and the fourth [l] as lateral. If we divide them in a different way, we can say<br />
that [ l] are ‘liquids and [w j] are glides (see above). These approximants share a<br />
number of attributes. They may occur as the second element of word initial<br />
consonant clusters, although, as we shall see, there is some doubt about the status of<br />
[j] in this context. We’ll discuss this next term.<br />
When preceded by voiceless obstruents, approximants will be voiceless (e.g. play,<br />
pry, fry, fly, three, sleep, try, shriek, climb, cry, swim, twin, queen, cute, few, pure).<br />
/l/ has two positional allophones i.e. [l] (clear l) in syllable onsets and [] (dark l) in<br />
syllable rhymes. In many dialects dark l is vocalised (full [fuw]). The extent to which<br />
such vocalisation occurs and the contexts in which it is more likely to appear is a<br />
matter for research.<br />
In non-rhotic dialects, // occurs only in syllable onsets having been replaced by []<br />
particularly following non-low vowels, although in recent years the schwa has also<br />
tended to disappear except where the preceding vowel is high. (fear [f], hour [a]<br />
higher [ha] but dare [d:] door [d:] etc.).<br />
As I mentioned in class, // also has two allophones (although the dark variant lacks a<br />
symbol as far as I can ascertain – this may be because it’s usually attached to a vowel<br />
– Ladefoged discusses rhoticised vowels in AmEng. For example [] for the vowel<br />
in dare in contrast to [] in a non-rhotic dialect.<br />
References<br />
Ladefoged P. (2001) A Course in Phonetics Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers<br />
THE VOWELS OF ENGLISH<br />
Over the past two weeks, we have discussed the articulation of English consonants<br />
and have been able to give a pretty accurate description of how and where they are<br />
articulated. This is because there is an interruption to the airstream that it’s possible<br />
to pinpoint. We found out, of course, that the consonants can be influenced by<br />
position in the word or by neighbouring sounds, which will cause them to vary in a<br />
number of ways. However, it’s still possible to describe the variation in terms of<br />
place, manner and voicing etc. When we come to the description of vowels, however,<br />
we have no points like this to guide us. There is no interruption to the airflow.<br />
Vowels involve the vibration of the vocal folds and a free passage of air. If we<br />
practise this we get something like []. So how do we vary vowel quality in order to<br />
give us a greater range than just one vowel? This can be achieved by changing the<br />
shape and size of the resonating chamber – the mouth. When the vibrating air<br />
particles enter this chamber, they will produce different notes according to this shape<br />
and size. This can be compared with the trick some people perform with glasses of<br />
water. They put different amounts of water into glasses and then play a tune by<br />
12