06.05.2013 Views

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Comparative and Interdisciplinary Study of East Georgian Polyph<strong>on</strong>ic S<strong>on</strong>g<br />

Styles in the C<strong>on</strong>text of Middle Eastern and Central Asian M<strong>on</strong>oph<strong>on</strong>ic Music<br />

55<br />

range in south-east Georgia) culture (2500-1000 BC), which succeeded the Mtkvari-Araxes culture in eastern<br />

Transcaucasia (East Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan). Trialeti culture featured new significant ethnic and<br />

cultural elements such as, for example, the burial rites of individual tumulus. Archaeologists have interpreted<br />

this novelty in culture as a result of foreign influences rather than as a result of internal changes (Japaridze,<br />

1988: 26; Lortkipanidze, 1989: 37-38).<br />

A similar “migrati<strong>on</strong>” theory was proposed by Charles Burney who described the Trialeti barrow culture<br />

of the early Samtavro (1800-1750 BC) in East Georgia as having developed out of the fusi<strong>on</strong> of two completely<br />

different elements, <strong>on</strong>e related to the steppes north of the Caucasus and the other related to the Araxes valley of<br />

eastern Transcaucasia (Burney, 1958: 175). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> former is assumed to be of the Indo-European origin (Burney,<br />

206-207).<br />

I do not discuss the data of physical anthropology yet. However, I must note that data of physical<br />

anthropology from the Samtavro graveyard of the plain East Georgia corresp<strong>on</strong>ds with the discussed<br />

archaeological and linguistic theories about the infusi<strong>on</strong> of the newcomers of a supposedly Indo-European<br />

origin in the territory of the present Kartli-Kakheti and the neighbouring regi<strong>on</strong>s of Armenia and Azerbaijan.<br />

For example, the Samtavro cranial group in the Trialeti culture is related to the ancient West Asian Caspian<br />

anthropological type of populati<strong>on</strong> also represented in a synchr<strong>on</strong>ic series from Afghanistan, North India,<br />

Armenia and Azerbaijan (Alexeev, 1974: 137).<br />

In c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>, the methods of interdisciplinary study using data of physical anthropology, archaeology,<br />

linguistics and musicology might help in interpreting the musical-comparative analysis in relati<strong>on</strong> to early<br />

historical or even pre-historical processes. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> hypothesis of music-cultural links between East Georgia<br />

(Kartli-Kakheti), south Transcaucasia and Central Asia proposed in the first part of this paper, is thus supported<br />

by the archaeological, linguistic and anthropological data. According to my hypothesis, the elements of<br />

m<strong>on</strong>odic music-culture in the Kartli-Kakhetian polyph<strong>on</strong>ic music (and the solo singing style) are the result of<br />

the ancient arrival from Central Asia of the Indo-Europeans who had music-culture similar to that employed<br />

by the c<strong>on</strong>temporary Armenians, Azerbaijanians, and the peoples of Central Asia, and the mixture between<br />

these different cultures.<br />

According to the musical analysis undertaken by the seven selected style factors, Kartli-Kakhetian “l<strong>on</strong>g”<br />

s<strong>on</strong>gs seem to be a stylistic combinati<strong>on</strong> of the indigenous polyph<strong>on</strong>ic music which was prior to the Indo-<br />

European migrati<strong>on</strong> and the m<strong>on</strong>odic music-making which came here with the Indo-Europeans (Tsitsishvili,<br />

1997, 2000).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> introducti<strong>on</strong> of the new elements of m<strong>on</strong>ody such as vocal style with melisma, tetrachordal scales,<br />

freely improvised rhythm and free metre must have caused substantial transformati<strong>on</strong> of the indigenous<br />

polyph<strong>on</strong>ic style. One of the most substantial changes of style seems to be the emergence of pedal dr<strong>on</strong>e in<br />

“l<strong>on</strong>g” s<strong>on</strong>gs. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> ornamentati<strong>on</strong>, rhythmic and metric freedom could be easily accommodated within a pedal<br />

dr<strong>on</strong>e-based polyph<strong>on</strong>y. That the pedal dr<strong>on</strong>e in combinati<strong>on</strong> with the melismatic melody and free metric and<br />

rhythmic development must have developed after and as a result of the introducti<strong>on</strong> of ornamentati<strong>on</strong> and free<br />

rhythm can also be supported by the intriguing fact of the absence of this style in West Georgian polyph<strong>on</strong>ic<br />

singing styles. At the same time it must be noted, that despite all the above-discussed important stylistic<br />

changes in the “l<strong>on</strong>g” s<strong>on</strong>gs, the most important element of the indigenous singing style – vocal polyph<strong>on</strong>y<br />

survived, creating a completely new vocal polyph<strong>on</strong>ic style and aesthetics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!