06.05.2013 Views

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

508<br />

Franz Föedermayr<br />

Ph<strong>on</strong>ogram 2767 (fig. 4)<br />

According to Lach (1931), the ph<strong>on</strong>ogram c<strong>on</strong>tains a two-part Megrelian dance s<strong>on</strong>g c<strong>on</strong>sisting of<br />

meaningless syllables. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> most striking elements are four refrain-like phrases prominently emerging by<br />

their str<strong>on</strong>g performance (fig. 5). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>y have a double-fourth structure Eflat 3 — Aflat 3 — Dflat 4 , in the shape<br />

of a mirror image of two bow-shaped melodies first running off stepwise and then, again stepwise, running<br />

together. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> lower voice draws its bow from Aflat 3 step by step downwards to Eflat 3 and again step by step<br />

back to Aflat 3. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> upper voice draws its bow, again stepwise, from Aflat 3 upward to Dflat 4 and returns, again<br />

step by step, back to Aflat 3 . This structure is comm<strong>on</strong> to all four phrases, their performance, however, is d<strong>on</strong>e<br />

with much variati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

(1) <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>vergence of the two melodic bows at Aflat 3 in phrases R 2 , R 3 and R 4 is delegated, as it were, by<br />

the lower voice to the upper voice, because instead of going from Gflat 3 to Aflat 3 , the lower voice makes a jump<br />

downwards to Dflat 3, thus introducing the transiti<strong>on</strong> figure Dflat 3 —Eflat 3 —F 3 to the next subsecti<strong>on</strong>; In R 1 the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>vergence is delayed by the upper voice. (2) It is <strong>on</strong>ly in the lower voice that the upbeat to the double bow<br />

is d<strong>on</strong>e in the same manner in all four cases, namely from Eflat 3 via F 3 to Aflat 3 . <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> upper voice varies more.<br />

In R 1 and R 4 it forms parallel thirds with the lower voice, reaching in this way the starting t<strong>on</strong>e of the double<br />

bow by anticipati<strong>on</strong>, but with quarter notes instead of eight notes. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> upbeat figure in R 2 is built by two fifths<br />

so that – because of the anticipati<strong>on</strong> in the upper voice – the main part begins with a third chord, and Dflat 4 is<br />

reached via a changing note. In R 3 the upbeat is formed by a changing note-figure in such a manner that the<br />

parallel thirds are shifted in time by a eight-note and reaching Aflat 3 by anticipati<strong>on</strong>. In a similar manner also<br />

the upper melodic bow in the core of the double bow is performed with more variati<strong>on</strong> than the <strong>on</strong>e in the lower<br />

voice, namely by passing t<strong>on</strong>es, changing and passing note-figures (especially in R 1 , R 3 and R 4 ), whereas the<br />

structure is more clearer expressed in R 2 .<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> results of the analysis can be summed up as follows: all three s<strong>on</strong>gs are well structured and compact<br />

entities, each with an individuality of its own. Trying to find something that they have in comm<strong>on</strong>, we would<br />

surely detect <strong>on</strong>e or the other musical element characteristic of a Megrelian multi-part style, but apart from<br />

that, the most important comm<strong>on</strong> feature is an aesthetic principle which I would like to name “variety in<br />

compactness”. Whether the different designs of a melodic third (as in ph<strong>on</strong>ogram 2762/2), the refinement of<br />

shifting the metrical beat in two widely identical melodies in ph<strong>on</strong>ogram 2762/1, or the subtleties of varying<br />

the four refrain-like phrases in ph<strong>on</strong>ogram 2767 – in all cases the tendency is clearly recognizable: each s<strong>on</strong>g<br />

has <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e or two structural elements or patterns, but they are varied in a masterly way within the limits<br />

of a style (possibly by improvisati<strong>on</strong>). But despite the scarceness of the elements no stereography arises.<br />

Instinctively recognizing the structure of the s<strong>on</strong>gs, the listener is captivated and charmed by the subtleties<br />

of the performance.<br />

References<br />

Födermayr, Franz, Deutsch, Werner A. (2010). “Transcribing historical sound recordings: Multipart s<strong>on</strong>gs from Guria recorded<br />

by Robert Lach in 1916”. In: Proceedings of the IV <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Symposium</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Traditi<strong>on</strong>al Polyph<strong>on</strong>y. P. 376-394. Editors:<br />

Tsurtsumia, Rusudan and Jordania, Joseph. Tbilisi: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> Research Center for Traditi<strong>on</strong>al Polyph<strong>on</strong>y of Tbilisi State<br />

C<strong>on</strong>servatoire<br />

Lach, Robert. (1931). Gesänge russischer Kriegsgefangener. Bd. 3, Abt. 2. Mingrelische, abchasische, svanische und ossetische<br />

Gesänge (S<strong>on</strong>gs of Pris<strong>on</strong>ers of War: Megrelian, Abkhasian, Svanetian and Ossetian S<strong>on</strong>gs). Wien, Leipzig: Hölder-Pichler-<br />

Tempsky

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!