The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ... The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

06.05.2013 Views

476 Nino Naneishvili In the first heirmos – the interval octave in the plain mode, in the ornamented – fourteenth. In the third heirmos – in the plain mode the seventh interval, in the ornamented – thirteenth. In the fourth heirmos – in the plain mode the seventh interval, in the ornamented – fourteenth. In the fifth heirmos – in the plain mode the seventh interval, in the ornamented – thirteenth. In the sixth heirmos – in the plain mode the interval – an octave, in the ornamented – thirteenth. In the seventh heirmos – in the plain mode the interval – an octave, in the ornamented – thirteenth. In the eighth heirmos – in the plain mode – the sixth, in the ornamented – fourteenth. In the ninth heirmos – in the plain mode – the sixth interval, in the ornamented – thirteenth. For the present I shall dwell on the analysis of the formulas of the heirmos melody. ong>Theong> ornamented tune moves quite freely. ong>Theong> method of ornamentation reveals a stereotypical formulaic character. ong>Theong>se formulas occur in different hymns of the matin canon. For instance, the conditionally first stereotype formula is present in several variants: 1. In the first and fifth stanzas, on the words: […]det ats erno and kveqanit tsad [not sure of meaning] are similar to the last movement of the sixth stanza of the fourth heirmos […]sa rametu (ex. 1). ong>Theong> second stereotype formula of the ornamentation (with its variants) was attested in the following sections of the heirmoses: 1. ong>Theong> first movement of the sixth stanza of the first heirmos […]aghmi[…], 2. the last movement of the third stanza of the third heirmos: […]bias dsqaro, 3. the third stanza of the fourth heirmos […]zi natlisa, 4. the fifth stanza of the fourth heirmos – […]tskovre[…]. the third stanza of the fifth heirmos – simartlisa, 6. the seventh stanza of the sixth heirmos – veshpit. 7. the second stanza of the seventh heirmos gankatsna ivno. 8. the fourth stanza of the seventh heirmos mkholoman kurtkheulman. 9. the seventh stanza of the seventh heirmos […]man da. 10. the second stanza of the ninth heirmos – […]ba uplisa (the second, third, fifth, seventh and tenth specimens are variants of one another, which occur in one and the same ending tone, but the first and fourth specimens resemble each other only in their initial figure. ong>Theong> eighth example may be considered a variant of the first one (ex. 2). ong>Theong> third stereotypical formula of ornamentation occur in the terminating stanzas of the hymns: the seventh stanza of the first heirmos – […]sa mgalobel[…], the fifth stanza of the fifth hermos: […]ghmo brdsqinvebuli, the seventh stanza of the eighth heirmos: […]sa saukunod (ex. 3). ong>Theong> fourth stereotypical formula of ornamentation is attested in the following sections of the heirmoses: the fourth stanza of the third heirmos: kmnili kristes saplavit…, the seventh stanza of the fourth heirmos. Aghsdga kriste vitar…, the seventh stanza of the sixth heirmos (ending): Aghsdgeg saplavit (ex. 4). ong>Theong> fifth stereotype formula occurs in the fourth stanza of the eighth heirmos: dghesasdsaulta and on the words […]tkhevt kriste in the sixth stanza of the same heirmos (ex. 5). ong>Theong> sixth stereotype formula can be observed in the sixth stanza of the seventh heirmos: […] maghlebulman and in the seventh stanza (ending) of the ninth heirmos: shenisasa (ex. 6). I have also singled out the so-called “minor ornamentations” occurring in every movement and twist of every chant (ex. 7). In the stanza-models and movement formulas that M. Sukhiashvili has discussed in her work, like the heirmoses I have presented, certain “structural stereotypes” are distinguished (Sukhiashvili, 2006: 83). It is noteworthy that a scholar singles out three kinds of ornamentation: 1. Minor ornamentation; 2. Ornamentation with a broad melodic pattern, which creates extended structural inserts among the so–unds of the basic melody; 3. Ornamentation characterized by only casual deviations from the mode.

Ornamented Structural Formulas in the Easter Heirmoses 477 It is these three types of ornamentation that occur in the samples of the ornamented mode of Gelati School which I have touched upon. A number of stereotypical structural units (with deviations from the chant mode) stand out sharply in the Easter heirmoses, which prove that the ornamentations of this type are characteristic not only of troparia but of the heirmos genre as well. ong>Theong>refore in spite of the changeable nature and improvisation of the ornamentation, the emergence of their stereotypical formulas seems to have been a characteristic feature of Georgian ecclesiastic hymns of various genres. Notes 1 (from the editors) An alternative view on this subject see in Shugliashvili paper in 2004 symposium materials “Some Peculiarities of Chanting Traditions from Eastern Georgia” 2 As it is usually known, in the twelfth-thirteenth centuries there was the so-called Kondakion chanting of the melismatic-virtuoso style, which was written down in Kondakions by means of special two-line Kodrakion notation. ong>Theong> primary source of Russian Kondakions is the Byzantine Psalticon – a collection of melismatic-virtuoso hymns, i.e. in Byzantium the virtuoso-melismatic style of chanting was in popular use beginning from earlier centuries, it was so widespread that at this period special collections of the hymns were even created about the. tenth-eleventh centuries (Oniani, 2009:3) 3 As D. Shughliashvili notes, the diversity of Georgian chanting schools is based on the individual character of ornamentation. It is clear that it concerns both the top, canonic voice and the types of voice harmonizing (Shughliashvili, 2006: 11) 4 ong>Theong> stereotype character of the improvised variants of the troparia of the ornamented mode and of movement formulas are dealt with in M. Sukhiashvili’s dissertation (Sukhiashvili, 2006: 83) References Koridze, Pilimon. (1904). Aghdgomis sagalobelni. Partitura No.4 (Easter Chants. Scores No.4). Tfilisi: Mstsrafl-mbechdavi, ar. kutateladze (in Georgian) Oniani, Ekaterine. (2009). Kartuli galobis mravalkhmianobis sakitkhisatvis (On the Problem of Polyphony of Georgian Chant). Handwriten. Private archive Shughliashvili, Davit. (2006). Kartuli saeklesio galoba. Shermokmedis skola. Artem erkomaishvilis chanatserebis mikhedvit (Georgian Sacred Chant. Shemokmedi School. According to Artem Erkomaishvili’s records). Tbilisi (in Georgian) Sukhiashvili, Magda. (2006). Galobis kanonikis dziritadi aspektebi dzvel kartul sasuliero musikashi (Basic aspects of the Canonics of Chant in Old Georgian Sacred Music). Dissertation presented for the academic degree of PhD in Musicology. Tbilisi State Conservatoire (in Georgian) Manuscripts Sources Kereselidze, Ekvtime. Manuscript of handwritten scores. National Centre of Manuscripts. Fund Q692; book No.25:62-132 Translated by Liana Gabechava

Ornamented Structural Formulas in the Easter Heirmoses<br />

477<br />

It is these three types of ornamentati<strong>on</strong> that occur in the samples of the ornamented mode of Gelati School<br />

which I have touched up<strong>on</strong>.<br />

A number of stereotypical structural units (with deviati<strong>on</strong>s from the chant mode) stand out sharply in the<br />

Easter heirmoses, which prove that the ornamentati<strong>on</strong>s of this type are characteristic not <strong>on</strong>ly of troparia but of<br />

the heirmos genre as well. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore in spite of the changeable nature and improvisati<strong>on</strong> of the ornamentati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

the emergence of their stereotypical formulas seems to have been a characteristic feature of Georgian<br />

ecclesiastic hymns of various genres.<br />

Notes<br />

1 (from the editors) An alternative view <strong>on</strong> this subject see in Shugliashvili paper in 2004 symposium materials “Some Peculiarities<br />

of Chanting Traditi<strong>on</strong>s from Eastern Georgia”<br />

2 As it is usually known, in the twelfth-thirteenth centuries there was the so-called K<strong>on</strong>daki<strong>on</strong> chanting of the melismatic-virtuoso<br />

style, which was written down in K<strong>on</strong>daki<strong>on</strong>s by means of special two-line Kodraki<strong>on</strong> notati<strong>on</strong>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> primary source of Russian<br />

K<strong>on</strong>daki<strong>on</strong>s is the Byzantine Psaltic<strong>on</strong> – a collecti<strong>on</strong> of melismatic-virtuoso hymns, i.e. in Byzantium the virtuoso-melismatic style<br />

of chanting was in popular use beginning from earlier centuries, it was so widespread that at this period special collecti<strong>on</strong>s of the<br />

hymns were even created about the. tenth-eleventh centuries (Oniani, 2009:3)<br />

3 As D. Shughliashvili notes, the diversity of Georgian chanting schools is based <strong>on</strong> the individual character of ornamentati<strong>on</strong>. It is<br />

clear that it c<strong>on</strong>cerns both the top, can<strong>on</strong>ic voice and the types of voice harm<strong>on</strong>izing (Shughliashvili, 2006: 11)<br />

4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> stereotype character of the improvised variants of the troparia of the ornamented mode and of movement formulas are dealt<br />

with in M. Sukhiashvili’s dissertati<strong>on</strong> (Sukhiashvili, 2006: 83)<br />

References<br />

Koridze, Pilim<strong>on</strong>. (1904). Aghdgomis sagalobelni. Partitura No.4 (Easter Chants. Scores No.4). Tfilisi: Mstsrafl-mbechdavi, ar.<br />

kutateladze (in Georgian)<br />

Oniani, Ekaterine. (2009). Kartuli galobis mravalkhmianobis sakitkhisatvis (On the Problem of Polyph<strong>on</strong>y of Georgian Chant).<br />

Handwriten. Private archive<br />

Shughliashvili, Davit. (2006). Kartuli saeklesio galoba. Shermokmedis skola. Artem erkomaishvilis chanatserebis mikhedvit<br />

(Georgian Sacred Chant. Shemokmedi School. According to Artem Erkomaishvili’s records). Tbilisi (in Georgian)<br />

Sukhiashvili, Magda. (2006). Galobis kan<strong>on</strong>ikis dziritadi aspektebi dzvel kartul sasuliero musikashi (Basic aspects of the Can<strong>on</strong>ics<br />

of Chant in Old Georgian Sacred Music). Dissertati<strong>on</strong> presented for the academic degree of PhD in Musicology. Tbilisi State<br />

C<strong>on</strong>servatoire (in Georgian)<br />

Manuscripts Sources<br />

Kereselidze, Ekvtime. Manuscript of handwritten scores. Nati<strong>on</strong>al Centre of Manuscripts. Fund Q692; book No.25:62-132<br />

Translated by Liana Gabechava

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!