The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ... The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

06.05.2013 Views

394 JEREMY FOUTZ (USA) ANCIENTNESS AND TRADITIONALITY IN GEORGIAN TRADITIONAL VOCAL MUSIC “If it is not old, then Georgians aren’t interested”, quipped Luca, a Georgian sociologist and jazz aficionado. “Look at out buildings, our churches, our music”. We were discussing the cultural importance of Georgian traditional vocal music, talking loudly over the Russian music videos that were blaring overhead in a fashionable bar on Rustaveli Avenue in Tbilisi. Of course, “old” is a somewhat nebulous term, but coming from a Georgian, the word has a different connotation than from most people in Western Europe or North America. In the Georgian context, “old” seems to be nearly synonymous with ancient. Through interviews with Georgians in the summer of 2009 and through reading English translations of works by Georgian ethnomusicologists, it is abundantly clear that Georgians have emphasized what I call the “ancientness” of their traditional vocal music. Within Georgian ethnomusicology and within the larger Georgian culture itself, the concept of ancientness has a prominent role in musical discourse and, I assert, in the perception and practice of “traditionality” of Georgian traditional vocal music. Data sources for this project include selections from Georgian ethnomusicological literature and analysis of detailed interviews conducted in the summer of 2009 with Georgians from all walks of life including musicians, non-musicians, and scholars. While I believe these interviews can illuminate aspects of Georgian culture, they do not define Georgian culture alone. Together with literature selections from Georgian ethnomusicologists, we can begin to recognize the emergence of ancientness and traditionality as important contributors to Georgian culture. Analyzing possible cultural interactions is daunting business, even if one “belongs” to the cultural group in question. In discussing ethnomusicological insiders and outsiders, Nazir Jairazbhoy makes several points which partially ease my mind in presenting my analysis. He states that no ethnomusicologist would claim to possess “the deeper intuitive grasp” of their subject matter than the people themselves (Jairazbhoy, 1984: 37). Let me be clear – I will forever lack the understanding of Georgian music, history, and culture that comes only with life experience as a Georgian. Jairazbhoy suggests, however, that the outsider can “bring to bear a different perspective and approach which might help to illumine certain musical phenomena”, offering potentially “ingenious ideas and approaches” (Jairazbhoy, 1984). Quite honestly, “ingenious” is beyond my grasp, so in this paper I will aim for thought-provoking. In this manner, I mean merely to offer suggestions and outline a web of interactions and likely possibilities as we walk through a portion of my research project. Another potential stumbling block that must be addressed involves the almost pathological need in cultural studies to exhaustively define concepts. In this project, I suggest that ancientness and traditionally should be conceived not as rigid definitions but as a field of probabilities. In this approach, I draw upon the work of Brian Massumi. In his book, Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation, Massumi uses an approach to description and “definition” based on the idea that a concept can be “abstract-but-real” (Masumi, 2002: 5-16). He uses the example of Zeno’s arrow to show that the flight of the arrow can only be perceived at its conclusion and endpoint. By defining things in concrete terms, their endpoint is reached, freezing the concept and, in many cases, ignoring its path or journey to that end point. This does not imply that the concepts discussed here are completely subjective, but that the flight path is perhaps more important than the terminus.

Ancientness and Traditionality in Georgian Traditional Vocal Music 395 To freely paraphrase Massumi, a definition is the place where nothing ever happens (Masumi, 2002: 27). As such, my goal is to share information directly from the interviews and ethnomusicological works by Georgian scholars and avoid (as much as is possible) defining these terms in the traditional academic sense. Description of ancientness and examples in the data In my reading and experience so far, when Georgians speak of something as “old”, the meaning with regards to time is usually closer to what is considered “ancient” in the western world. Like Georgia, many areas of Western Europe and the Americas have been settled for thousands of years. ong>Theong> cultural groups that are currently dominant in most of these areas, however, have not been established for nearly as long, contributing to a difference in understanding and perception of old and ancient. In describing ancientness, the focus is not simply on the perception of time. By my interpretation of the data, in the Georgian sense ancientness is a flexible idea – as distant as the pre-Christian age and as close as the pre-Soviet days. More than simply implying extreme age, the data of this project describes ancientness as a perception of considerable distance or space in terms of time and in terms of life experience. In reading Georgian ethnomusicological works, it would seem that Georgian scholars are heavily invested in making a logical and empirical claim to the ancientness of Georgian traditional vocal music. As part of a welcoming speech to the United States Vice President Joe Biden on July 23, 2009, the Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili, stressed the resilience of Georgia as a nation that is three thousand years old (Saakashvili, 2009). Ancientness in the temporal sense is also stressed in Georgian literature through the examination of the origins and evolution of vocal polyphony. Throughout the vast majority of articles, lectures, and sound recording liner notes on Georgian music, vocal polyphony is described as the most ancient of all Georgian music. Much of its cache in this regard derives from the frequently cited ancient character of Georgian vocal music linked to the observations of the Greek historian Xenophon in 401 B.C. ong>Theong> short account briefly describes the marching songs of Mossiniks, an early tribe living in what is now Georgia, in that the tribe sang in a “distinctive manner” (Jordania, 2000: 842-843). Other prominent Georgian scholars, such as Rusudan Tsurtsumia, lay claim to this ancient nature as well. After relating the same account, she continues: “And really, it is impossible to assert that by this “specific way” the Greek historian meant polyphony, but it can be presumed that already, by that time, the Georgian song was polyphonic because a few centuries later, this “specific” singing culture conditioned the originally polyphonic character of the Georgian polyphonic chanting within the initially monodic Christian world” (Tsurtsumia, 2002: 97). Further evidence for these claims of antiquity comes from ongoing manuscript studies that suggest welldeveloped notational and oral systems for transmission of vocal music prior to the thirteenth century. Building upon the work of other Georgian scholars, Manana Andriadze and Tamar Chkdeidze discuss this in their presentation on historical evidence of chreli systems of musical notation in Georgian sacred music. ong>Theong>y acknowledge the possibility that cherli was created in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as a replacement for forgotten Georgian neumes, but conclude through comparisons between manuscripts that cherli existed as a parallel system to the neumes at least as far back as the thirteenth century (Andriadze, Chkheidze 2002: 452- 454). In their book on the first recorded music of Georgia, Anzor Erkomaishvili and Vakhtang Rodonaia note the different analyses that situate the origin of Georgian folk song polyphony between the third and second millennia, B.C. and the beginning of polyphonic chant around 6 A.D. (Erkomaishvili, Rodonaia, 2006: 24). Nearly all of the Georgian scholars discussing the origins of vocal polyphony point to significant ancient elements present on recordings, manuscripts, and in current performance practice which suggests a Georgian

Ancientness and Traditi<strong>on</strong>ality in Georgian Traditi<strong>on</strong>al Vocal Music<br />

395<br />

To freely paraphrase Massumi, a definiti<strong>on</strong> is the place where nothing ever happens (Masumi, 2002: 27). As<br />

such, my goal is to share informati<strong>on</strong> directly from the interviews and ethnomusicological works by Georgian<br />

scholars and avoid (as much as is possible) defining these terms in the traditi<strong>on</strong>al academic sense.<br />

Descripti<strong>on</strong> of ancientness and examples in the data<br />

In my reading and experience so far, when Georgians speak of something as “old”, the meaning with<br />

regards to time is usually closer to what is c<strong>on</strong>sidered “ancient” in the western world. Like Georgia, many areas<br />

of Western Europe and the Americas have been settled for thousands of years. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> cultural groups that are<br />

currently dominant in most of these areas, however, have not been established for nearly as l<strong>on</strong>g, c<strong>on</strong>tributing<br />

to a difference in understanding and percepti<strong>on</strong> of old and ancient.<br />

In describing ancientness, the focus is not simply <strong>on</strong> the percepti<strong>on</strong> of time. By my interpretati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

data, in the Georgian sense ancientness is a flexible idea – as distant as the pre-Christian age and as close as<br />

the pre-Soviet days. More than simply implying extreme age, the data of this project describes ancientness<br />

as a percepti<strong>on</strong> of c<strong>on</strong>siderable distance or space in terms of time and in terms of life experience. In reading<br />

Georgian ethnomusicological works, it would seem that Georgian scholars are heavily invested in making a<br />

logical and empirical claim to the ancientness of Georgian traditi<strong>on</strong>al vocal music.<br />

As part of a welcoming speech to the United States Vice President Joe Biden <strong>on</strong> July 23, 2009, the<br />

Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili, stressed the resilience of Georgia as a nati<strong>on</strong> that is three thousand<br />

years old (Saakashvili, 2009). Ancientness in the temporal sense is also stressed in Georgian literature through<br />

the examinati<strong>on</strong> of the origins and evoluti<strong>on</strong> of vocal polyph<strong>on</strong>y. Throughout the vast majority of articles,<br />

lectures, and sound recording liner notes <strong>on</strong> Georgian music, vocal polyph<strong>on</strong>y is described as the most ancient<br />

of all Georgian music. Much of its cache in this regard derives from the frequently cited ancient character<br />

of Georgian vocal music linked to the observati<strong>on</strong>s of the Greek historian Xenoph<strong>on</strong> in 401 B.C. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> short<br />

account briefly describes the marching s<strong>on</strong>gs of Mossiniks, an early tribe living in what is now Georgia, in that<br />

the tribe sang in a “distinctive manner” (Jordania, 2000: 842-843). Other prominent Georgian scholars, such as<br />

Rusudan Tsurtsumia, lay claim to this ancient nature as well. After relating the same account, she c<strong>on</strong>tinues:<br />

“And really, it is impossible to assert that by this “specific way” the Greek historian meant polyph<strong>on</strong>y, but it<br />

can be presumed that already, by that time, the Georgian s<strong>on</strong>g was polyph<strong>on</strong>ic because a few centuries later,<br />

this “specific” singing culture c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ed the originally polyph<strong>on</strong>ic character of the Georgian polyph<strong>on</strong>ic<br />

chanting within the initially m<strong>on</strong>odic Christian world” (Tsurtsumia, 2002: 97).<br />

Further evidence for these claims of antiquity comes from <strong>on</strong>going manuscript studies that suggest welldeveloped<br />

notati<strong>on</strong>al and oral systems for transmissi<strong>on</strong> of vocal music prior to the thirteenth century. Building<br />

up<strong>on</strong> the work of other Georgian scholars, Manana Andriadze and Tamar Chkdeidze discuss this in their<br />

presentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> historical evidence of chreli systems of musical notati<strong>on</strong> in Georgian sacred music. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>y<br />

acknowledge the possibility that cherli was created in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as a replacement<br />

for forgotten Georgian neumes, but c<strong>on</strong>clude through comparis<strong>on</strong>s between manuscripts that cherli existed as<br />

a parallel system to the neumes at least as far back as the thirteenth century (Andriadze, Chkheidze 2002: 452-<br />

454). In their book <strong>on</strong> the first recorded music of Georgia, Anzor Erkomaishvili and Vakhtang Rod<strong>on</strong>aia note<br />

the different analyses that situate the origin of Georgian folk s<strong>on</strong>g polyph<strong>on</strong>y between the third and sec<strong>on</strong>d<br />

millennia, B.C. and the beginning of polyph<strong>on</strong>ic chant around 6 A.D. (Erkomaishvili, Rod<strong>on</strong>aia, 2006: 24).<br />

Nearly all of the Georgian scholars discussing the origins of vocal polyph<strong>on</strong>y point to significant ancient<br />

elements present <strong>on</strong> recordings, manuscripts, and in current performance practice which suggests a Georgian

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!