The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...
The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ... The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...
394 JEREMY FOUTZ (USA) ANCIENTNESS AND TRADITIONALITY IN GEORGIAN TRADITIONAL VOCAL MUSIC “If it is not old, then Georgians aren’t interested”, quipped Luca, a Georgian sociologist and jazz aficionado. “Look at out buildings, our churches, our music”. We were discussing the cultural importance of Georgian traditional vocal music, talking loudly over the Russian music videos that were blaring overhead in a fashionable bar on Rustaveli Avenue in Tbilisi. Of course, “old” is a somewhat nebulous term, but coming from a Georgian, the word has a different connotation than from most people in Western Europe or North America. In the Georgian context, “old” seems to be nearly synonymous with ancient. Through interviews with Georgians in the summer of 2009 and through reading English translations of works by Georgian ethnomusicologists, it is abundantly clear that Georgians have emphasized what I call the “ancientness” of their traditional vocal music. Within Georgian ethnomusicology and within the larger Georgian culture itself, the concept of ancientness has a prominent role in musical discourse and, I assert, in the perception and practice of “traditionality” of Georgian traditional vocal music. Data sources for this project include selections from Georgian ethnomusicological literature and analysis of detailed interviews conducted in the summer of 2009 with Georgians from all walks of life including musicians, non-musicians, and scholars. While I believe these interviews can illuminate aspects of Georgian culture, they do not define Georgian culture alone. Together with literature selections from Georgian ethnomusicologists, we can begin to recognize the emergence of ancientness and traditionality as important contributors to Georgian culture. Analyzing possible cultural interactions is daunting business, even if one “belongs” to the cultural group in question. In discussing ethnomusicological insiders and outsiders, Nazir Jairazbhoy makes several points which partially ease my mind in presenting my analysis. He states that no ethnomusicologist would claim to possess “the deeper intuitive grasp” of their subject matter than the people themselves (Jairazbhoy, 1984: 37). Let me be clear – I will forever lack the understanding of Georgian music, history, and culture that comes only with life experience as a Georgian. Jairazbhoy suggests, however, that the outsider can “bring to bear a different perspective and approach which might help to illumine certain musical phenomena”, offering potentially “ingenious ideas and approaches” (Jairazbhoy, 1984). Quite honestly, “ingenious” is beyond my grasp, so in this paper I will aim for thought-provoking. In this manner, I mean merely to offer suggestions and outline a web of interactions and likely possibilities as we walk through a portion of my research project. Another potential stumbling block that must be addressed involves the almost pathological need in cultural studies to exhaustively define concepts. In this project, I suggest that ancientness and traditionally should be conceived not as rigid definitions but as a field of probabilities. In this approach, I draw upon the work of Brian Massumi. In his book, Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation, Massumi uses an approach to description and “definition” based on the idea that a concept can be “abstract-but-real” (Masumi, 2002: 5-16). He uses the example of Zeno’s arrow to show that the flight of the arrow can only be perceived at its conclusion and endpoint. By defining things in concrete terms, their endpoint is reached, freezing the concept and, in many cases, ignoring its path or journey to that end point. This does not imply that the concepts discussed here are completely subjective, but that the flight path is perhaps more important than the terminus.
Ancientness and Traditionality in Georgian Traditional Vocal Music 395 To freely paraphrase Massumi, a definition is the place where nothing ever happens (Masumi, 2002: 27). As such, my goal is to share information directly from the interviews and ethnomusicological works by Georgian scholars and avoid (as much as is possible) defining these terms in the traditional academic sense. Description of ancientness and examples in the data In my reading and experience so far, when Georgians speak of something as “old”, the meaning with regards to time is usually closer to what is considered “ancient” in the western world. Like Georgia, many areas of Western Europe and the Americas have been settled for thousands of years.
- Page 344 and 345: 344 Mikhail Lobanov Kravchinskaia,
- Page 346 and 347: 346 mixail lobanovi. danrTi Mikhail
- Page 348 and 349: 348 mixail lobanovi. danrTi Mikhail
- Page 350 and 351: 350 ana piotrovska ungreTSi boSa mu
- Page 352 and 353: 352 ana piotrovska tradicia grZelde
- Page 354 and 355: 354 ana piotrovska iseT istoriul mi
- Page 356 and 357: 356 THE NOTION OF SO CALLED GYPSY M
- Page 358 and 359: 358 Anna Piotrowska be claimed that
- Page 360 and 361: 360 Anna Piotrowska Consequently im
- Page 362 and 363: 362 Anna Piotrowska Nettl, Bruno. (
- Page 364 and 365: 364 nino razmaZe indi mindi da sxv.
- Page 366 and 367: 366 nino razmaZe qme. (2) Sesrulebi
- Page 368 and 369: 368 THE DYNAMICS OF THE EVOLUTION O
- Page 370 and 371: 370 Nino Razmadze was always perfor
- Page 372 and 373: 372 nino razmaZe. danarTi Nino Razm
- Page 374 and 375: 374 magaliTi 4. oTxxmianoba patara
- Page 377 and 378: 377 ekaterine oniani (saqarTvelo) q
- Page 379 and 380: qarTuli galobis mravalxmianobis sak
- Page 381 and 382: ON THE POLYPHONY OF GEORGIAN CHANT
- Page 383 and 384: On the Polyphony of Georgian Chant
- Page 385 and 386: ekaterine oniani. danarTi Ekaterine
- Page 387 and 388: 387 jeremi fauci (aSS) siZvele da t
- Page 389 and 390: siZvele da tradiciuloba qarTul trad
- Page 391 and 392: siZvele da tradiciuloba qarTul trad
- Page 393: siZvele da tradiciuloba qarTul trad
- Page 397 and 398: Ancientness and Traditionality in G
- Page 399 and 400: Ancientness and Traditionality in G
- Page 401 and 402: 401 svimon (jiqi) jangulaSvili (saq
- Page 403 and 404: mravalxmiani musikaluri qsovilis tr
- Page 405 and 406: mravalxmiani musikaluri qsovilis tr
- Page 407 and 408: mravalxmiani musikaluri qsovilis tr
- Page 409 and 410: SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE POLYPHONIC
- Page 411 and 412: Specific Features of the Polyphonic
- Page 413 and 414: Specific Features of the Polyphonic
- Page 415 and 416: Specific Features of the Polyphonic
- Page 417 and 418: svimon (jiqi) jangulaSvili. danarTi
- Page 419 and 420: svimon (jiqi) jangulaSvili. danarTi
- Page 421 and 422: svimon (jiqi) jangulaSvili. danarTi
- Page 423 and 424: svimon (jiqi) jangulaSvili. danarTi
- Page 425 and 426: ivliane nikolaZe: qarTul ZlispirTa
- Page 427 and 428: ivliane nikolaZe: qarTul ZlispirTa
- Page 429 and 430: ivliane nikolaZe: qarTul ZlispirTa
- Page 431 and 432: ivliane nikolaZe: qarTul ZlispirTa
- Page 433 and 434: Ivliane Nikoladze: The</str
- Page 435 and 436: Ivliane Nikoladze: The</str
- Page 437 and 438: Ivliane Nikoladze: The</str
- Page 439 and 440: jon a. gremi. danarTi John A. Graha
- Page 441 and 442: jon a. gremi. danarTi John A. Graha
- Page 443 and 444: jon a. gremi. danarTi John A. Graha
Ancientness and Traditi<strong>on</strong>ality in Georgian Traditi<strong>on</strong>al Vocal Music<br />
395<br />
To freely paraphrase Massumi, a definiti<strong>on</strong> is the place where nothing ever happens (Masumi, 2002: 27). As<br />
such, my goal is to share informati<strong>on</strong> directly from the interviews and ethnomusicological works by Georgian<br />
scholars and avoid (as much as is possible) defining these terms in the traditi<strong>on</strong>al academic sense.<br />
Descripti<strong>on</strong> of ancientness and examples in the data<br />
In my reading and experience so far, when Georgians speak of something as “old”, the meaning with<br />
regards to time is usually closer to what is c<strong>on</strong>sidered “ancient” in the western world. Like Georgia, many areas<br />
of Western Europe and the Americas have been settled for thousands of years. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> cultural groups that are<br />
currently dominant in most of these areas, however, have not been established for nearly as l<strong>on</strong>g, c<strong>on</strong>tributing<br />
to a difference in understanding and percepti<strong>on</strong> of old and ancient.<br />
In describing ancientness, the focus is not simply <strong>on</strong> the percepti<strong>on</strong> of time. By my interpretati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />
data, in the Georgian sense ancientness is a flexible idea – as distant as the pre-Christian age and as close as<br />
the pre-Soviet days. More than simply implying extreme age, the data of this project describes ancientness<br />
as a percepti<strong>on</strong> of c<strong>on</strong>siderable distance or space in terms of time and in terms of life experience. In reading<br />
Georgian ethnomusicological works, it would seem that Georgian scholars are heavily invested in making a<br />
logical and empirical claim to the ancientness of Georgian traditi<strong>on</strong>al vocal music.<br />
As part of a welcoming speech to the United States Vice President Joe Biden <strong>on</strong> July 23, 2009, the<br />
Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili, stressed the resilience of Georgia as a nati<strong>on</strong> that is three thousand<br />
years old (Saakashvili, 2009). Ancientness in the temporal sense is also stressed in Georgian literature through<br />
the examinati<strong>on</strong> of the origins and evoluti<strong>on</strong> of vocal polyph<strong>on</strong>y. Throughout the vast majority of articles,<br />
lectures, and sound recording liner notes <strong>on</strong> Georgian music, vocal polyph<strong>on</strong>y is described as the most ancient<br />
of all Georgian music. Much of its cache in this regard derives from the frequently cited ancient character<br />
of Georgian vocal music linked to the observati<strong>on</strong>s of the Greek historian Xenoph<strong>on</strong> in 401 B.C. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> short<br />
account briefly describes the marching s<strong>on</strong>gs of Mossiniks, an early tribe living in what is now Georgia, in that<br />
the tribe sang in a “distinctive manner” (Jordania, 2000: 842-843). Other prominent Georgian scholars, such as<br />
Rusudan Tsurtsumia, lay claim to this ancient nature as well. After relating the same account, she c<strong>on</strong>tinues:<br />
“And really, it is impossible to assert that by this “specific way” the Greek historian meant polyph<strong>on</strong>y, but it<br />
can be presumed that already, by that time, the Georgian s<strong>on</strong>g was polyph<strong>on</strong>ic because a few centuries later,<br />
this “specific” singing culture c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ed the originally polyph<strong>on</strong>ic character of the Georgian polyph<strong>on</strong>ic<br />
chanting within the initially m<strong>on</strong>odic Christian world” (Tsurtsumia, 2002: 97).<br />
Further evidence for these claims of antiquity comes from <strong>on</strong>going manuscript studies that suggest welldeveloped<br />
notati<strong>on</strong>al and oral systems for transmissi<strong>on</strong> of vocal music prior to the thirteenth century. Building<br />
up<strong>on</strong> the work of other Georgian scholars, Manana Andriadze and Tamar Chkdeidze discuss this in their<br />
presentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> historical evidence of chreli systems of musical notati<strong>on</strong> in Georgian sacred music. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>y<br />
acknowledge the possibility that cherli was created in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries as a replacement<br />
for forgotten Georgian neumes, but c<strong>on</strong>clude through comparis<strong>on</strong>s between manuscripts that cherli existed as<br />
a parallel system to the neumes at least as far back as the thirteenth century (Andriadze, Chkheidze 2002: 452-<br />
454). In their book <strong>on</strong> the first recorded music of Georgia, Anzor Erkomaishvili and Vakhtang Rod<strong>on</strong>aia note<br />
the different analyses that situate the origin of Georgian folk s<strong>on</strong>g polyph<strong>on</strong>y between the third and sec<strong>on</strong>d<br />
millennia, B.C. and the beginning of polyph<strong>on</strong>ic chant around 6 A.D. (Erkomaishvili, Rod<strong>on</strong>aia, 2006: 24).<br />
Nearly all of the Georgian scholars discussing the origins of vocal polyph<strong>on</strong>y point to significant ancient<br />
elements present <strong>on</strong> recordings, manuscripts, and in current performance practice which suggests a Georgian