06.05.2013 Views

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ON THE POLYPHONY OF GEORGIAN CHANT<br />

381<br />

EKATERINE ONIANI (GEORGIA)<br />

Opini<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>cerning the emergence of Georgian ecclesiastical chanting are focused <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>jecture,<br />

namely: “In the past Georgians chanted according to Greek tunes” (Prince Ioane, 1991: 524), i.e. the rules of the<br />

Christian divine service and the chanting practice associated with the former were introduced into Georgia from<br />

Byzantium: “and King Mirian dispatched his envoys to Greece, to C<strong>on</strong>stantine, King of Greeks… and asked him<br />

to send priests to baptize Georgians… and the whole nati<strong>on</strong> received baptism all over Georgia”, writes Le<strong>on</strong>ti<br />

Mroveli in his Mepeta Tskhovreba (Mroveli, 1987: 93-98). Since then Christianity became the religi<strong>on</strong> determining<br />

the identity of Georgians and the Georgian nati<strong>on</strong> never ceased singing hymns to the Creator. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> hymns sung by<br />

the worthy ancestors, imbued with the grace of the Holy Spirit, with the help and mercy of God became popular<br />

throughout the churches of Christ and were passed down from generati<strong>on</strong> to generati<strong>on</strong>. Nobody was allowed to<br />

deliberately change the hymns approved by the ecclesiastic can<strong>on</strong>s. Chanters were well aware of the significance<br />

of the can<strong>on</strong>ical melody, and they believed that the violati<strong>on</strong> of the true mode (as the can<strong>on</strong>ical tune was called)<br />

was equal to losing the chant.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> chanting traditi<strong>on</strong>, introduced from Byzantium into Georgia together with the divine service practice,<br />

found a highly developed musical culture in Georgia, so during the next stage of development of Georgian chanting<br />

the traditi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinued toward the fusing of Byzantine melody with the nati<strong>on</strong>al musical mentality. It was <strong>on</strong> the<br />

basis of the nati<strong>on</strong>al musical mentality that Georgian chanting acquired polyph<strong>on</strong>y in such a way that the can<strong>on</strong>ical<br />

roots of chanting were not lost.<br />

At first glance the polyph<strong>on</strong>ic nature of Georgian chanting is a versi<strong>on</strong> of the Byzantine source. As we know<br />

early Byzantine chanting was m<strong>on</strong>oph<strong>on</strong>ic, as chanting in unis<strong>on</strong> was c<strong>on</strong>sidered by the holy fathers to express<br />

the unity of the faith of participants and was raised to the rank of a symbol of exulting God “with <strong>on</strong>e mouth<br />

and <strong>on</strong>e heart”. How can this basic essence of the Christian faith can be realized in multipart chanting? First of<br />

all by the polyph<strong>on</strong>ic form chosen for chanting. Georgian folk s<strong>on</strong>gs are distinguished for a great diversity of<br />

polyph<strong>on</strong>ic forms and in fact, there was a vast choice of them for turning Byzantine m<strong>on</strong>ody into polyph<strong>on</strong>y. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

first step of teaching “the voices to be learned”, where the most ancient layer of Georgian chanting is represented<br />

(Shugliashvili, 2001: 104), indicates the Georgian people’s preference for re-arranging the chants according to<br />

the nati<strong>on</strong>al pattern at its earlier stage. It is no mere chance that this stage chanting traditi<strong>on</strong> is characterized by<br />

parallelism. Parallel voice-leading, <strong>on</strong>e of the manifestati<strong>on</strong>s of the heteroph<strong>on</strong>ic texture, is an intermediate aspect<br />

of the m<strong>on</strong>odic and different melodic texture (Arutunov-Jincharadze, 2010: 15), and as scholars suggest, of all the<br />

compositi<strong>on</strong>al principles of polyph<strong>on</strong>y it is closest to homoph<strong>on</strong>y (Gabis<strong>on</strong>ia, 2009: 82) 1 . <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> interval ratio of the<br />

voices is as follows: mtkmeli (top voice), who is the keeper, performer of the can<strong>on</strong>ical tune which the chanters take<br />

the greatest care of, “modzakhili” (middle, sec<strong>on</strong>d voice), follows it a fifth lower, the bass part – an octave lower<br />

from the can<strong>on</strong>ical melody 2 . Even in the plain mode or “in the can<strong>on</strong>ically acknowledged, accepted and approved”<br />

chanting chordal-unit polyph<strong>on</strong>y with frequent parallelisms of fifths and octaves prevails 3. We think that the nati<strong>on</strong><br />

of polyph<strong>on</strong>ic mentality found the following way out – being aware that homoph<strong>on</strong>y is a symbol of the unity of<br />

faith and an accepted form of expressing this unity, of all the forms of polyph<strong>on</strong>y they chose the parallel voice<br />

leading, which, in principle, does not change the essence of m<strong>on</strong>ody. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> basic can<strong>on</strong>ical tune was not lost: just the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!