The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ... The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

06.05.2013 Views

340 Mikhail Lobanov Konz mäthil Gruzijan ö pimed katab man, ong>Theong> blackness of night lies on the Mountains of Georgia, Aragvan joksend rindal kulub… ong>Theong> Aragvi rushes forth with great Noise before me… In 1927 the Sheltozero National District was created in the Karelian ASSR, in 1931 the Vinnitsa National District was established in the Leningrad Region. In 1937 all these national – administrative activities were reduced abrupt. Vinnitsa was deprived of its rights as a national-territorial unit. In 1956 the Sheltozero National District was abolished in Karelia. Attempts to introduce education in the Vepses’ national language, whose alphabet was created in 1931, was made in the 1930s but in 1937 the process was put an end too. Though without uniting the Veps villages, scattered in different administrative regions into some kind of a single territorial unit with a special status, these attempts were doomed to failure. In the 1990s, during the “Perestroyka” (Reconstruction), the Veps National District was founded again in the Karelian Republic (the Vepses amounting to less than 40 per cent of its population). Some functions of the administrative unit are performed by Vepskskii les (Veps Forest), a nature protection organization of the Leningrad Region, but understandably, it is not sufficient. In 1991 Petrozavodsk Pedagogical University opened a department for preparing teachers of the Veps language. At about the same time the newspaper Kodima (Motherland) came out in Petrozavodsk, it is circulated in the Leningrad Region as well. Of course, something must be done to preserve this distinctive nation, but the most difficult problem is not the fact that the Vepses do not have a common territorial-administrative unit, but the absence of economic perspectives for the population of those areas where they live. It is remote villages, whose agriculture is not so important now, and such towns where the Veps language was spoken at industrial enterprises or offices have never existed. In the countryside Vepses live in the houses similar to those of their Russian neighbours, use the same agricultural methods and do not differ from Russians and Karelians by their appearance. ong>Theong>refore the ethnographic study of the Vepses apart from the rest of the population of the same area cannot yield any significant results which may reveal their original cultural traditions. Finding out anything about the ethnocultural heritage of the Vepses may be achieved only by: a) a thorough survey of the entire area, b) discovering some specific facts within this vast context and after that c) to review as to how often these specific features occur among the Vepses, Russians or Karelians. For instance, the funeral traditions connected with music. It is called “cheering up the deceased”. At the time when the deceased is still at home, the accordion-player performs cheerful tunes and young people dance. This tradition was attested at the Ladoga-Onega isthmus, but in the Karelian and Russian villages it can be observed in rare instances only, though in Veps villages it occurs quite frequently. It allow to consider such a custom as Vepses peculiarity? (Pimenov, 1960) In general, musical archaisms, in their complete forms1 that have survived in a live tradition, can be observed very rarely. In this respect surprising finds can be attested in the folklore of Vepses. In this way it has been determined that the tune of Veps dirges, recorded from the middle and northern Vepses is none other than the famous epic melody of the Onega narrators of Bylina (Russian epic), of the Ryabinins in particular (Vasilieva, 1981, 1990). Besides, in those passages, where the lamentations sound, the Bylina does not occur and vice versa. ong>Theong> signaling melody of the forest call and response also proved to be such a live archaism,

Joint Singing of the Vepses and Archaic Phenomena in the Peasants’ Multipart Singing in the Baltic Countries 341 namely in the regions of the middle and southern Vepses, in the centre of its area (Lobanov, 1997). In both cases, by the archaic time we mean not the Stone Age but the historically observable period, reflected in the old Russian written monuments. Musical folklore of the Vepses started to be recorded beginning from the year 1937, its genre content being rather poor. In their native language middle and southern Vepses perform only laments, lullabies, chastooshkas (two-line or four-line folk verse, usually humorous and topical, sung in a lively manner), songs for the swings, among them, performed to a specific tune, tunes without texts – melodies of call and response. ong>Theong> repertoire of the Veps multipart singing mainly consists of Russian songs, which were performed by the Vepses in the 1960s distorting the language terribly, perceiving the text rather as a phonetic than a semantic basis of the song. In 1990s from the southern Vepses I recorded polyphonic songs of a later stratum and there the Russian language was correct. Songs sung by Vepses (northern), both in the Veps and Russian languages were published in the form of a small collection of songs of the peoples of the Karelian-Finnish ASSR in 1941 (Gudkov, Levi, 1941) (ex. 1). Russian songs, recorded in the villages of middle Vepses, appeared later in the materials of the Leningrad Conservatoire folklore expedition of 1963 to the Lodeinopolsky Region (Lapin, Lobanov, 1970). I, a first-year student at that time also participated in the expedition (ex. 2). Having adopted Orthodox Christianity, now Vepses have Russian names and family names and in order to find out whether this or that of Russian songs is included in the repertoire or musical tradition of only Vepses and not of their Russian neighbours, all the corresponding data must be obtained. So, in the collection of songs of the Leningrad Region, which came out in 1950, there are two songs with the characteristic features of polyphony, which I consider to belong to Vepses (Kravchinskaia, Shiraeva, 1950: No. 155, 156), but it is not clear whether the choir they were performed by, had any links with the Veps nation (ex. 3). In a small collection Songs of the Veps Forest (Mekhnetsov, 1994) it is only “the forest” that belongs to Vepses. ong>Theong> basis of the joint singing of Vepses is the unison heterophony which is widespread all over the northwestern part of Russia and possesses some stable traits: breaking up of the voices into intervals – mostly in the thirds, occurs before the cadential unison, which seems to allow the accumulation of discordance, or before any other movement toward the tonic of the mode. Such a type of heterophony may be called regulated. I would like to quote the description of my first impression produced by the singing of Vepses: “Songs of Vepses astounded us by their distinction and musical specificity. Almost all of them are placed within their narrow range, most often in the fourth, with a long-drawn basic tone at the end of each stanza, and with archaic sounding threechords, which form the basis of the tune. ong>Theong> original, specific manner of performing renders the Veps songs an unusual freshness. […] ong>Theong> fourth or the fifth intonation at the beginning of each following stanza falls on the sustained ending tone of the preceding one and the whole song is performed continuously up to the very end, in chain breathing” (Lapin, Lobanov, 1970: 7-8). F.A. Rubtsov’s note about the specific features of multipart singing of a similar style, lost somewhere among the commentaries on the collection of songs of the Leningrad region (compiled by Rubtsov himself), is also very significant: “In the cases of multipart singing the supporting voice emphasizes the tonic of the mode, by means of its movements, its sounding making an impression of almost like a drone together with the top voice” 2 (Rubtsov, 1958: 202) (ex. 3). However Rubtsov hadn’t put a problem to the Vepses manner of singing of Russian songs. This is how Vepses sing elegiac lyrics – beginning from long-drawn songs to romances, and it is the longdrawn songs that sound the most stylish. Combined with another specific feature – flattening the intonation

Joint Singing of the Vepses and Archaic Phenomena in the<br />

Peasants’ Multipart Singing in the Baltic Countries<br />

341<br />

namely in the regi<strong>on</strong>s of the middle and southern Vepses, in the centre of its area (Lobanov, 1997). In both<br />

cases, by the archaic time we mean not the St<strong>on</strong>e Age but the historically observable period, reflected in the<br />

old Russian written m<strong>on</strong>uments.<br />

Musical folklore of the Vepses started to be recorded beginning from the year 1937, its genre c<strong>on</strong>tent<br />

being rather poor. In their native language middle and southern Vepses perform <strong>on</strong>ly laments, lullabies,<br />

chastooshkas (two-line or four-line folk verse, usually humorous and topical, sung in a lively manner), s<strong>on</strong>gs<br />

for the swings, am<strong>on</strong>g them, performed to a specific tune, tunes without texts – melodies of call and resp<strong>on</strong>se.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> repertoire of the Veps multipart singing mainly c<strong>on</strong>sists of Russian s<strong>on</strong>gs, which were performed by the<br />

Vepses in the 1960s distorting the language terribly, perceiving the text rather as a ph<strong>on</strong>etic than a semantic<br />

basis of the s<strong>on</strong>g. In 1990s from the southern Vepses I recorded polyph<strong>on</strong>ic s<strong>on</strong>gs of a later stratum and there<br />

the Russian language was correct.<br />

S<strong>on</strong>gs sung by Vepses (northern), both in the Veps and Russian languages were published in the form of<br />

a small collecti<strong>on</strong> of s<strong>on</strong>gs of the peoples of the Karelian-Finnish ASSR in 1941 (Gudkov, Levi, 1941) (ex.<br />

1). Russian s<strong>on</strong>gs, recorded in the villages of middle Vepses, appeared later in the materials of the Leningrad<br />

C<strong>on</strong>servatoire folklore expediti<strong>on</strong> of 1963 to the Lodeinopolsky Regi<strong>on</strong> (Lapin, Lobanov, 1970). I, a first-year<br />

student at that time also participated in the expediti<strong>on</strong> (ex. 2).<br />

Having adopted Orthodox Christianity, now Vepses have Russian names and family names and in order<br />

to find out whether this or that of Russian s<strong>on</strong>gs is included in the repertoire or musical traditi<strong>on</strong> of <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

Vepses and not of their Russian neighbours, all the corresp<strong>on</strong>ding data must be obtained. So, in the collecti<strong>on</strong><br />

of s<strong>on</strong>gs of the Leningrad Regi<strong>on</strong>, which came out in 1950, there are two s<strong>on</strong>gs with the characteristic features<br />

of polyph<strong>on</strong>y, which I c<strong>on</strong>sider to bel<strong>on</strong>g to Vepses (Kravchinskaia, Shiraeva, 1950: No. 155, 156), but it is<br />

not clear whether the choir they were performed by, had any links with the Veps nati<strong>on</strong> (ex. 3). In a small<br />

collecti<strong>on</strong> S<strong>on</strong>gs of the Veps Forest (Mekhnetsov, 1994) it is <strong>on</strong>ly “the forest” that bel<strong>on</strong>gs to Vepses.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis of the joint singing of Vepses is the unis<strong>on</strong> heteroph<strong>on</strong>y which is widespread all over the<br />

northwestern part of Russia and possesses some stable traits: breaking up of the voices into intervals – mostly<br />

in the thirds, occurs before the cadential unis<strong>on</strong>, which seems to allow the accumulati<strong>on</strong> of discordance, or<br />

before any other movement toward the t<strong>on</strong>ic of the mode. Such a type of heteroph<strong>on</strong>y may be called regulated.<br />

I would like to quote the descripti<strong>on</strong> of my first impressi<strong>on</strong> produced by the singing of Vepses: “S<strong>on</strong>gs of<br />

Vepses astounded us by their distincti<strong>on</strong> and musical specificity. Almost all of them are placed within their<br />

narrow range, most often in the fourth, with a l<strong>on</strong>g-drawn basic t<strong>on</strong>e at the end of each stanza, and with archaic<br />

sounding threechords, which form the basis of the tune. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> original, specific manner of performing renders<br />

the Veps s<strong>on</strong>gs an unusual freshness. […] <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> fourth or the fifth int<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> at the beginning of each following<br />

stanza falls <strong>on</strong> the sustained ending t<strong>on</strong>e of the preceding <strong>on</strong>e and the whole s<strong>on</strong>g is performed c<strong>on</strong>tinuously<br />

up to the very end, in chain breathing” (Lapin, Lobanov, 1970: 7-8).<br />

F.A. Rubtsov’s note about the specific features of multipart singing of a similar style, lost somewhere<br />

am<strong>on</strong>g the commentaries <strong>on</strong> the collecti<strong>on</strong> of s<strong>on</strong>gs of the Leningrad regi<strong>on</strong> (compiled by Rubtsov himself),<br />

is also very significant: “In the cases of multipart singing the supporting voice emphasizes the t<strong>on</strong>ic of the<br />

mode, by means of its movements, its sounding making an impressi<strong>on</strong> of almost like a dr<strong>on</strong>e together with<br />

the top voice” 2 (Rubtsov, 1958: 202) (ex. 3). However Rubtsov hadn’t put a problem to the Vepses manner<br />

of singing of Russian s<strong>on</strong>gs.<br />

This is how Vepses sing elegiac lyrics – beginning from l<strong>on</strong>g-drawn s<strong>on</strong>gs to romances, and it is the l<strong>on</strong>gdrawn<br />

s<strong>on</strong>gs that sound the most stylish. Combined with another specific feature – flattening the int<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!