The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ... The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

06.05.2013 Views

308 Daiva Račiūnaitė -Vyčinienė singing styles in canon, as well as by the number of performers involved. Lithuanian sutartinės tradition Sutartinės is a conditional name which cannot be applied in all cases of polyphonic singing. ong>Theong>refore a more descriptive term of ancient polyphonic sin– ging would be linear polyphony. This term would encompass all the varieties of polyphonic music inc– luding antiphony 3 . Various forms of linear polypho– ny in eastern Lithuania are the primitive pakaitinės ‘alternations’ hymns, symmetrical pakaitinės, as– ymmetrical pakaitinės, continual hymns, antipho– nal singing by two groups and antiphonal singing by three groups 4 . ong>Theong> primary principle involved in chanting all the alternation (amoebaean) hymns is that one group chants the main text and the other group – the short refrain with the performance continuing without in– terruption as the groups take turns in their chants. ong>Theong> structure of these alternation hymns can be quite varied. ong>Theong> structure of a primitive alternation hymn is such: Text 5(4) + Refrain 3(2), for example: 1st pair (Text 5) 2nd pair (Refrain 2) 1. Kėkštas kėkštelis .......... .......................... Tuj tuj 2. Až kų tu kūdas? .......... ........................ Tuj tuj 1st pair (Text 5) 2nd pair (Refrain 3) 1. Nepernešioja ……… …………… Dobile! 2. Mana kojalas ……… …………… Dobile! 3. Kamašelių ……… …………... Dobile! In symmetrical pakaitinės, the segments of both me– part chorus” 2 . b) antiphonal singing Ainu tradition “Iekaye indicates an antiphonal or call-and-response format. For example, in rimse-upopo, a soloist and chorus sing a short melody. ong>Theong> soloist sometimes also leads the group in changes of song to create a medley performance. ong>Theong> soloist and chorus can sha– re the singing either by alternately singing the whole melody or by each taking a part of the melody” (Chiba, 2008: 333) (ex. 6, 7).

Lithuanian and Ainu Vocal Polyphony: Certain Parallels lodies are equal in length, for example, structured as Text 6 + Refrain 6: 1st pair (Text) 2nd pair (Refrain) 1. Aš ėjau, keliavau ...................... ........................... Ai ciuta, da ciuta 2. Viešuoju keleliu ........................... .......................... Ai ciuta, da ciuta 3. Su didžiu vargeliu ........................... .......................... Ai ciuta, da ciuta ong>Theong>re are an especially large number of symmetrical pakaitinės songs, and their manners of performance are quite varied (ex. 5). ong>Theong>se are closely related to the sutartinės. In the opi– nion of Jadvyga Čiurlionytė, the oldest type of amo– ebaean (antiphonal) singing “could be held to be a prototype of the sutartinės” (Čiurlionytė, 1969: 257). According to her, various types of amoebaean sin– ging “had tremendous importance in consolidating the strophe of songs” (Čiurlionytė, 1969: 260). Lithuanian sutartinės tradition c) counterpoint ong>Theong>re are various counterpoint manifestations in the sutartinės tradition. I am inclined to think some of them could be typologically related to cases of Ainu polyphony. One example is the dvejinės ‘twosomes’ by three (counterpoint by three). ong>Theong> name here is not entirely accurate for this type, however, it does reflect a concord that only characterises the dvejinės – a free-form counterpoint polyphony amongst the voices as well as the repetition of the same text in different parts. For this type, three, not two, voices are different (ex. 8). Another group of vocal sutartinės include collective sutartinės. Differently from the traditional or group sutartinės, 4 to 20 performers sing these collectively. Each has her own part – a certain formula of words and music which is repeated frequently without stop– ping. In traditional sutartinės, the second interval Ainu tradition 309 Some Ainu group vocal formats include dance songs in which two or three melodies are sung simul– taneously and, in the Sakhalin tradition, a type of dance song in which two melodies are treated in the manner as an ukouk (Chiba, 2008: 333). It is predicated that “the upopos (seated songs) are a vocalized form of contrapuntal or polyphonic music based on chanting” 6 . However, Carlo Forlivesi thinks otherwise. According to him, at the beginning of the 20th century, the concept of polyphony was defined only via western music, and the term was often used interchangeably with counterpoint. This is not properly correct, since polyphony generally refers to music that consists of two or more distinct lines, whereas counterpoint refers to the compositional technique involved in the handling of these lines (Forlivesi, 2004: 80). Forlivesi coins a special term

Lithuanian and Ainu Vocal Polyph<strong>on</strong>y: Certain Parallels<br />

lodies are equal in length, for example, structured as<br />

Text 6 + Refrain 6:<br />

1st pair (Text) 2nd pair (Refrain)<br />

1. Aš ėjau, keliavau ......................<br />

........................... Ai ciuta, da ciuta<br />

2. Viešuoju keleliu ...........................<br />

.......................... Ai ciuta, da ciuta<br />

3. Su didžiu vargeliu ...........................<br />

.......................... Ai ciuta, da ciuta<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are an especially large number of symmetrical<br />

pakaitinės s<strong>on</strong>gs, and their manners of performance<br />

are quite varied (ex. 5).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se are closely related to the sutartinės. In the opi–<br />

ni<strong>on</strong> of Jadvyga Čiurli<strong>on</strong>ytė, the oldest type of amo–<br />

ebaean (antiph<strong>on</strong>al) singing “could be held to be a<br />

prototype of the sutartinės” (Čiurli<strong>on</strong>ytė, 1969: 257).<br />

According to her, various types of amoebaean sin–<br />

ging “had tremendous importance in c<strong>on</strong>solidating<br />

the strophe of s<strong>on</strong>gs” (Čiurli<strong>on</strong>ytė, 1969: 260).<br />

Lithuanian sutartinės traditi<strong>on</strong><br />

c) counterpoint<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are various counterpoint manifestati<strong>on</strong>s in the<br />

sutartinės traditi<strong>on</strong>. I am inclined to think some of<br />

them could be typologically related to cases of Ainu<br />

polyph<strong>on</strong>y. One example is the dvejinės ‘twosomes’<br />

by three (counterpoint by three). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> name here is<br />

not entirely accurate for this type, however, it does<br />

reflect a c<strong>on</strong>cord that <strong>on</strong>ly characterises the dvejinės<br />

– a free-form counterpoint polyph<strong>on</strong>y am<strong>on</strong>gst the<br />

voices as well as the repetiti<strong>on</strong> of the same text in<br />

different parts. For this type, three, not two, voices<br />

are different (ex. 8).<br />

Another group of vocal sutartinės include collective<br />

sutartinės. Differently from the traditi<strong>on</strong>al or group<br />

sutartinės, 4 to 20 performers sing these collectively.<br />

Each has her own part – a certain formula of words<br />

and music which is repeated frequently without stop–<br />

ping. In traditi<strong>on</strong>al sutartinės, the sec<strong>on</strong>d interval<br />

Ainu traditi<strong>on</strong><br />

309<br />

Some Ainu group vocal formats include dance s<strong>on</strong>gs<br />

in which two or three melodies are sung simul–<br />

taneously and, in the Sakhalin traditi<strong>on</strong>, a type of<br />

dance s<strong>on</strong>g in which two melodies are treated in the<br />

manner as an ukouk (Chiba, 2008: 333).<br />

It is predicated that “the upopos (seated s<strong>on</strong>gs) are a<br />

vocalized form of c<strong>on</strong>trapuntal or polyph<strong>on</strong>ic music<br />

based <strong>on</strong> chanting” 6 . However, Carlo Forlivesi thinks<br />

otherwise. According to him, at the beginning of the<br />

20th century, the c<strong>on</strong>cept of polyph<strong>on</strong>y was defined<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly via western music, and the term was often<br />

used interchangeably with counterpoint. This is not<br />

properly correct, since polyph<strong>on</strong>y generally refers<br />

to music that c<strong>on</strong>sists of two or more distinct lines,<br />

whereas counterpoint refers to the compositi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

technique involved in the handling of these lines<br />

(Forlivesi, 2004: 80). Forlivesi coins a special term

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!