The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ... The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

06.05.2013 Views

276 Simha Arom, Polo Vallejo Let us now look at the relationship that is established between the various degrees: *ong>Theong> II degree does not appear This diagram shows that the degrees that have the greatest potential for connections are VI and VII (which are linked with the same degrees), and then I and IV; these are followed by V and lastly III. In the mode of A there are a limited number of songs with the III degree which is only related with the IV degree. ong>Theong> following degrees are reciprocal. I VI I VII III IV IV V IV VI V VI V VII VI VII We do not find reciprocal relationships of the types: I - IV - I / I - V - I / I - VI - I / IV – VII – IV / VI - III - VI / Between the degrees I - III, I - V and III - V, there is no type of relationship. Between the degrees I – IV, VI – III and VII – III, there is only a unidirectional relationship. Conclusion ong>Theong> title of this work – “Outline of a Syntax of Chords in some songs from Samegrelo” – represents another step in the continuity that our investigation is pursuing: the study of the Georgian polyphonic language and the principles that underlie its harmonic system. As for the previous phase, this presentation must be seen as a provisional step in a long-term project and from the perspective of a complement to the investigations carried out by our Georgian colleagues. In this case, the need to delimit the field of investigation led us to get to know the music of the region of Samegrelo to try to find in it specific elements that distinguish it from the forms found in other regions of Georgia. Immediately after concluding the 5th ong>Symposiumong> at which we gave this presentation, and for the purpose of acquiring new material of our own, we travelled to the region of Samegrelo accompanied by two outstanding members of the Ensemble Basiani, Giorgi Donadze and Zurab Tskrialashvili, who took charge of making the relevant contacts and handled the translation work. Over the course of a week, we visited, and intensively listened to and recorded the music of various ensembles, groups of adult men and women, young people and children, in the cities of Tsalenjikha, Chkhorotsku and Zugdidi, and were able to work directly with personalities of Georgian folk culture such as Policarpe Khubulava. Afterwards, and once we had transcribed and analyzed the music of Samegrelo, we were able to confirm most of the data and hypotheses that appear in this document. In this investigation we again used the earlier analytical tools: notation of degrees and chords, separation of parameters (modes and intervals) and processes (cadences and harmonic syntax). From the reduction of a given piece to the essential harmonies, and in order to validate our method, we created 4 versions (in the modes

Outline of a Syntax of Chords in Some Songs from Samegrelo 277 of E, G and A) of a harmonic sequence of chords among which only one was supposed to fit the model of the songs of Samegrelo, while the other three had foreign elements. With the participation of the members of the ensemble Basiani, we presented these examples to the audience and, in accordance with our expectations, two of them were immediately rejected by the listeners while one of them was accepted as “genuine”; this fact partly corroborated our theory. We say “partly” because one of the examples provoked a heated debate among the audience members because it contained both elements specific to the style of Samegrelo and others foreign to it. ong>Theong> discussion took on such proportions that we had to organize an extraordinary meeting at the end of the ong>Symposiumong> for the purpose of continuing the debate. This brought us a double satisfaction: firstly because it stimulated the interest and the participation of our Georgian colleagues, an aspect that we consider capital for the evolution of the investigation, and also because we observed that only the experimental method and the act of “forcing” the system, will help us and lead progressively towards the decoding and understanding of a harmonic language as singular as that of Georgia. References Arom, Simha, Vallejo, Polo. (2008). “Towards a ong>Theong>ory of the Chord Syntax of Georgian Polyphony”. In: Proceedings of the IV ong>Internationalong> ong>Symposiumong> on Traditional Polyphony. P. 309-335. Editors: Tsurtsumia, Rusudan and Jordania, Joseph. Tbilisi: ong>Internationalong> Research Center for Traditional Polyphony of Tbilisi State Conservatoire

Outline of a Syntax of Chords in Some S<strong>on</strong>gs from Samegrelo<br />

277<br />

of E, G and A) of a harm<strong>on</strong>ic sequence of chords am<strong>on</strong>g which <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e was supposed to fit the model of the<br />

s<strong>on</strong>gs of Samegrelo, while the other three had foreign elements.<br />

With the participati<strong>on</strong> of the members of the ensemble Basiani, we presented these examples to the<br />

audience and, in accordance with our expectati<strong>on</strong>s, two of them were immediately rejected by the listeners<br />

while <strong>on</strong>e of them was accepted as “genuine”; this fact partly corroborated our theory. We say “partly”<br />

because <strong>on</strong>e of the examples provoked a heated debate am<strong>on</strong>g the audience members because it c<strong>on</strong>tained both<br />

elements specific to the style of Samegrelo and others foreign to it. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> discussi<strong>on</strong> took <strong>on</strong> such proporti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

that we had to organize an extraordinary meeting at the end of the <str<strong>on</strong>g>Symposium</str<strong>on</strong>g> for the purpose of c<strong>on</strong>tinuing<br />

the debate.<br />

This brought us a double satisfacti<strong>on</strong>: firstly because it stimulated the interest and the participati<strong>on</strong> of our<br />

Georgian colleagues, an aspect that we c<strong>on</strong>sider capital for the evoluti<strong>on</strong> of the investigati<strong>on</strong>, and also because<br />

we observed that <strong>on</strong>ly the experimental method and the act of “forcing” the system, will help us and lead<br />

progressively towards the decoding and understanding of a harm<strong>on</strong>ic language as singular as that of Georgia.<br />

References<br />

Arom, Simha, Vallejo, Polo. (2008). “Towards a <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>ory of the Chord Syntax of Georgian Polyph<strong>on</strong>y”. In: Proceedings of the<br />

IV <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Symposium</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Traditi<strong>on</strong>al Polyph<strong>on</strong>y. P. 309-335. Editors: Tsurtsumia, Rusudan and Jordania, Joseph. Tbilisi:<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> Research Center for Traditi<strong>on</strong>al Polyph<strong>on</strong>y of Tbilisi State C<strong>on</strong>servatoire

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!