The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...
The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ... The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...
192 Žanna Pärtlas melodic lines cannot be separated. Anne Vabarna’s performance was compared with three more recent multi-channel recordings. One of these is the narrative song sung by the singers from Mikitamäe and Värska villages and recorded in a studio in 1996 using a multi-channel tape-recorder (6-channel recording).
Retracing Processes of Change: the Case of the Scales of the Setu Songs (Southeast Estonia) 193
- Page 141 and 142: kavkasiel xalxTa mravalxmianoba da
- Page 143 and 144: 143 NATALIA ZUMBADZE, KETEVAN MATIA
- Page 145 and 146: Caucasian Peoples’ Polyphony and
- Page 147 and 148: Caucasian Peoples’ Polyphony and
- Page 149 and 150: Caucasian Peoples’ Polyphony and
- Page 151 and 152: Caucasian Peoples’ Polyphony and
- Page 153 and 154: natalia zumbaZe, qeTevan maTiaSvili
- Page 155 and 156: 155 maia gelaSvili (saqarTvelo) pan
- Page 157 and 158: pankisis xeobis qistebis tradiciuli
- Page 159 and 160: ON THE STUDY OF THE TRADITIONAL MUS
- Page 161 and 162: On the Study of the Traditional Mus
- Page 163 and 164: 163 maka xarZiani (saqarTvelo) samx
- Page 165 and 166: samxmiani simRerebis gaerTxmianebis
- Page 167 and 168: samxmiani simRerebis gaerTxmianebis
- Page 169 and 170: On the Change of Three-Part Songs i
- Page 171 and 172: On the Change of Three-Part Songs i
- Page 173 and 174: 173 manana SilakaZe (saqarTvelo) qa
- Page 175 and 176: qarTuli da adiReuri instrumentuli m
- Page 177 and 178: 177 MANANA SHILAKADZE (GEORGIA) GEO
- Page 179 and 180: Georgian and Adyghe Music in the Co
- Page 181 and 182: manana SilakaZe. danarTi Manana Shi
- Page 183: Ktradiciuli polifoniis regionuli st
- Page 186 and 187: 186 Jana partlasi mizezis gamo. upi
- Page 188 and 189: 188 Jana partlasi naxevartoniani ki
- Page 190 and 191: 190 ŽANNA PÄRTLAS (ESTONIA) RETRA
- Page 194 and 195: 194 Jana partlasi. danarTi Žanna P
- Page 196 and 197: 196 damwyebi xma qarTul mravalxmian
- Page 198 and 199: 198 Tamaz gabisonia g) mxolod simRe
- Page 200 and 201: 200 Tamaz gabisonia sovs, damwyebis
- Page 202 and 203: 202 Tamaz Gabisonia of these songs
- Page 204 and 205: 204 Tamaz Gabisonia mazhogh). So do
- Page 206 and 207: 206 Tamaz gabisonia. danarTi Tamaz
- Page 208 and 209: 208 Tamaz gabisonia. danarTi Tamaz
- Page 210 and 211: 210 Tamaz gabisonia. danarTi Tamaz
- Page 212 and 213: 212 gerald florian mesneri mosaxldn
- Page 214 and 215: 214 gerald florian mesneri lebi da
- Page 216 and 217: 216 GERALD FLORIAN MESSNER (AUSTRAL
- Page 218 and 219: 218 Gerald Florian Messner gives us
- Page 220 and 221: 220 Gerald Florian Messner Audio Ex
- Page 222 and 223: 222 daviT SuRliaSvili rac Seexeba a
- Page 224 and 225: 224 daviT SuRliaSvili tradicia, rom
- Page 226 and 227: 226 daviT SuRliaSvili damowmebuli l
- Page 228 and 229: 228 Davit Shughliashvili characteri
- Page 230 and 231: 230 Davit Shughliashvili the bell),
- Page 232 and 233: 232 daviT SuRliaSvili. danarTi Davi
- Page 234 and 235: 234 daviT SuRliaSvili. danarTi Davi
- Page 236 and 237: 236 elena iovanoviCi (serbeTi) hibr
- Page 238 and 239: 238 elena iovanoviCi rebiT, sakvlev
- Page 240 and 241: 240 elena iovanoviCi lis `damuqeba~
192<br />
Žanna Pärtlas<br />
melodic lines cannot be separated.<br />
Anne Vabarna’s performance was compared with three more recent multi-channel recordings. One of<br />
these is the narrative s<strong>on</strong>g sung by the singers from Mikitamäe and Värska villages and recorded in a studio in<br />
1996 using a multi-channel tape-recorder (6-channel recording). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> two other s<strong>on</strong>gs (both are <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Grinding<br />
St<strong>on</strong>e s<strong>on</strong>g) were performed by the Leiko and Kuldatsäuk choirs from Värska village in 2006 and recorded<br />
digitally (9-channel recordings). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> data c<strong>on</strong>cerning the three multi-channel recordings are taken from the<br />
student work by Aare Tool, made under my supervisi<strong>on</strong> in 2009 (Tool, 2009). He analysed three melostrophes<br />
from each s<strong>on</strong>g, which makes 72 tune variants in all. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> tune versi<strong>on</strong> recorded in 1996 and 2006 differs<br />
to some extent from that by Anne Vabarna, but they are similar enough to be compared. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> generalized<br />
transcripti<strong>on</strong> of the first melostrophe of <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Grinding St<strong>on</strong>e s<strong>on</strong>g performed by the Leiko choir is provided<br />
in ex. 4 (audio ex. 2).<br />
For acoustic analysis the speech analysis program PRAAT was used. In the multi-channel recordings the<br />
pitch of the t<strong>on</strong>es was measured using the possibility, provided by the Praat software, to see an average pitch<br />
for the selected area. For the purposes of measurement the most stable fragments of the t<strong>on</strong>es were chosen.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> program can show the results in semit<strong>on</strong>es in relati<strong>on</strong> to the A note above middle C (i.e. 440 Hz). In the<br />
case of n<strong>on</strong>-multi-channel recording (it is “<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Grinding St<strong>on</strong>e” s<strong>on</strong>g performed by Anne Vabarna’s duo),<br />
the procedure of measurement was more complex. In this s<strong>on</strong>g the fundamental frequencies of the t<strong>on</strong>es were<br />
measured from the spectra, and the pitches in semit<strong>on</strong>es were calculated using the program Microsoft Excel.<br />
To find the average pitch of the t<strong>on</strong>es each c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>al eighth note was measured in two places; quarter notes<br />
were measured in four places. In Anne Vabarna’s s<strong>on</strong>g 6 melostrophes were analysed.<br />
As <strong>on</strong>e can hear from audio examples 1 and 2, the tuning of Anne Vabarna’s duo and that of the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>temporary Setu choirs is significantly different. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> s<strong>on</strong>g by the choir Leiko (audio ex. 2) sounds almost<br />
diat<strong>on</strong>ic. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> tuning of Anne Vabarna’s duo (audio ex. 1) sounds very unusual because they use the <strong>on</strong>e-threesemit<strong>on</strong>e<br />
mode. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> results of the acoustical measurements c<strong>on</strong>firm this impressi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> average intervals between adjacent scale notes in the four performances under c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> are<br />
provided in the table (tab. 2). In the top row of the table, the “ideal” intervals of the <strong>on</strong>e-three-semit<strong>on</strong>e scale<br />
and the usual names of the scale notes (in two alternative variants) are written. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>d row comprises the<br />
same informati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerning the anhemit<strong>on</strong>ic-diat<strong>on</strong>ic scale. In the next rows, the corresp<strong>on</strong>ding average<br />
intervals in the four s<strong>on</strong>gs analysed are shown.<br />
It can be seen that the intervals between the adjacent scale notes are not exactly <strong>on</strong>e and three semit<strong>on</strong>es,<br />
even in Anne Vabarna’s s<strong>on</strong>g. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> lower interval, which should be theoretically a three-semit<strong>on</strong>e interval, is<br />
actually closer to the major third (3.7 semit<strong>on</strong>es) and the upper “semit<strong>on</strong>e” is 30 cents narrower than an equaltempered<br />
semit<strong>on</strong>e (0.7). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> central trichord , which is the main object of analysis in this paper, c<strong>on</strong>sists of<br />
the narrowed semit<strong>on</strong>e (0.7) and enlarged three-semit<strong>on</strong>e interval (3.2).<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> average intervals in the other performances analysed differ far more from the “ideal” <strong>on</strong>e-threesemit<strong>on</strong>e<br />
structure, and the scale of the s<strong>on</strong>g performed by the Kuldatsäuk choir (see the bottom row of the<br />
table) is quite close to the diat<strong>on</strong>ic scale G-A-B-C, especially if we speak about the central trichord (1.8 and<br />
2.2). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> performance by the choir Leiko c<strong>on</strong>firms the earlier observati<strong>on</strong> that the lower interval of the scale<br />
tends to be wider than three semit<strong>on</strong>es (3.6), although, in the recording from 1996 it is almost exactly three<br />
semit<strong>on</strong>es (2.9). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> upper interval becomes very narrow in all recent recordings – about a quarter t<strong>on</strong>e (0.5,<br />
0.4, and 0.4). This can be partly explained by the mistakes of the killõ – the singer who performs the upper solo<br />
part in the Setu s<strong>on</strong>gs. Nowadays it is quite difficult to find a really good killõ-singer.