The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ... The Fifth International Symposium on Traditional Polyphony ...

06.05.2013 Views

192 Žanna Pärtlas melodic lines cannot be separated. Anne Vabarna’s performance was compared with three more recent multi-channel recordings. One of these is the narrative song sung by the singers from Mikitamäe and Värska villages and recorded in a studio in 1996 using a multi-channel tape-recorder (6-channel recording). ong>Theong> two other songs (both are ong>Theong> Grinding Stone song) were performed by the Leiko and Kuldatsäuk choirs from Värska village in 2006 and recorded digitally (9-channel recordings). ong>Theong> data concerning the three multi-channel recordings are taken from the student work by Aare Tool, made under my supervision in 2009 (Tool, 2009). He analysed three melostrophes from each song, which makes 72 tune variants in all. ong>Theong> tune version recorded in 1996 and 2006 differs to some extent from that by Anne Vabarna, but they are similar enough to be compared. ong>Theong> generalized transcription of the first melostrophe of ong>Theong> Grinding Stone song performed by the Leiko choir is provided in ex. 4 (audio ex. 2). For acoustic analysis the speech analysis program PRAAT was used. In the multi-channel recordings the pitch of the tones was measured using the possibility, provided by the Praat software, to see an average pitch for the selected area. For the purposes of measurement the most stable fragments of the tones were chosen. ong>Theong> program can show the results in semitones in relation to the A note above middle C (i.e. 440 Hz). In the case of non-multi-channel recording (it is “ong>Theong> Grinding Stone” song performed by Anne Vabarna’s duo), the procedure of measurement was more complex. In this song the fundamental frequencies of the tones were measured from the spectra, and the pitches in semitones were calculated using the program Microsoft Excel. To find the average pitch of the tones each conditional eighth note was measured in two places; quarter notes were measured in four places. In Anne Vabarna’s song 6 melostrophes were analysed. As one can hear from audio examples 1 and 2, the tuning of Anne Vabarna’s duo and that of the contemporary Setu choirs is significantly different. ong>Theong> song by the choir Leiko (audio ex. 2) sounds almost diatonic. ong>Theong> tuning of Anne Vabarna’s duo (audio ex. 1) sounds very unusual because they use the one-threesemitone mode. ong>Theong> results of the acoustical measurements confirm this impression. ong>Theong> average intervals between adjacent scale notes in the four performances under consideration are provided in the table (tab. 2). In the top row of the table, the “ideal” intervals of the one-three-semitone scale and the usual names of the scale notes (in two alternative variants) are written. ong>Theong> second row comprises the same information concerning the anhemitonic-diatonic scale. In the next rows, the corresponding average intervals in the four songs analysed are shown. It can be seen that the intervals between the adjacent scale notes are not exactly one and three semitones, even in Anne Vabarna’s song. ong>Theong> lower interval, which should be theoretically a three-semitone interval, is actually closer to the major third (3.7 semitones) and the upper “semitone” is 30 cents narrower than an equaltempered semitone (0.7). ong>Theong> central trichord , which is the main object of analysis in this paper, consists of the narrowed semitone (0.7) and enlarged three-semitone interval (3.2). ong>Theong> average intervals in the other performances analysed differ far more from the “ideal” one-threesemitone structure, and the scale of the song performed by the Kuldatsäuk choir (see the bottom row of the table) is quite close to the diatonic scale G-A-B-C, especially if we speak about the central trichord (1.8 and 2.2). ong>Theong> performance by the choir Leiko confirms the earlier observation that the lower interval of the scale tends to be wider than three semitones (3.6), although, in the recording from 1996 it is almost exactly three semitones (2.9). ong>Theong> upper interval becomes very narrow in all recent recordings – about a quarter tone (0.5, 0.4, and 0.4). This can be partly explained by the mistakes of the killõ – the singer who performs the upper solo part in the Setu songs. Nowadays it is quite difficult to find a really good killõ-singer.

Retracing Processes of Change: the Case of the Scales of the Setu Songs (Southeast Estonia) 193 ong>Theong> results for the central trichord (in tab. 2 these are shown in bold font) are the most interesting. As one can see, the proportion between the two intervals changes significantly. In the song performed in 1996 the lower interval of the trichord becomes much wider (it is exactly between the semitone and whole tone – 1.5); the upper interval, on the contrary, becomes narrower than the equal-tempered three-semitone interval – 2.8 semitones. Ten years later (i.e. in 2006) this tendency has increased: 1.6 and 2.4 semitones in Leiko’s performance and 1.8 and 2.2 semitones in the song by Kuldatsäuk. ong>Theong> difference between the tuning of the Leiko and Kuldatsäuk choirs, which were recorded in the same year, can be explained by the fact that the latter choir consists of younger singers. ong>Theong> process of change in the central trichord of the scale is shown graphically in the diagram (diag. 1). Under the diagram one can also see the average year of birth of the singers in each choir (see the numbers in brackets). It can be seen that the lower interval of the trichord rises from 0.7 to 1.8 semitones; the upper interval, on the contrary, narrows from 3.2 to 2.2 semitones. As a result, the difference between two intervals diminishes significantly. In the performance of the youngest choir (Kuldatsäuk) both intervals of the trichord are close to the whole tone, but between them there is still difference of 40 cents, which provides evidence that the old musical thinking has not completely disappeared even nowadays. Some of the contemporary Setu singers are aware of the fact that their singing sounds different from that of the older choirs, but unfortunately there is nothing to be done about it. ong>Theong> diatonization of the ancient tunes and loss of the originality of the local musical styles is part of the general process of cultural globalisation. We can take comfort, however, in the fact that traces of the ancient musical culture still exist in contemporary musical practice. Notes 1 I described this interesting phenomenon in great detail in my paper at the previous ong>Symposiumong> on Traditional Polyphony in Tbilisi (Pärtlas, 2010) References Pärtlas, Žanna. (2004). «O ladovom “dvuiazichii” Setuskikh mnogogolocnikh pesen» (“On the Modal Bilingualism of Setu Multi-Part Songs”). In: Mekhanizm peredachi folklornoj traditsii (ong>Theong> Transmission Mechanism of Folk Tradition). P. 78-90. Editor and compiler: Абубакирова-Глазунова, Н. Н. Saint-Petersburg: РИИИ Pärtlas, Žanna. (2010). “A “Hen-and-Egg” Problem: Interrelation Between Scale Structure and Vertical Structure in Setu Multipart Songs”. In: Proceedings of the IV ong>Internationalong> ong>Symposiumong> on Traditional Polyphony. P. 336-354. Editors: Tsurtsumia, Rusudan and Jordania, Joseph. Tbilisi: ong>Internationalong> Research Center for Traditional Polyphony of Tbilisi State Conservatoire Sarv, Vaike. (1980). «O zakonomernoctiakh stroenia zvukoriadov i ritmiki v Setuskom muzikalnom foklore (na materiale pesen odnoi zapevali)» [“On the Regularities of Scale Structure and Rhythm System of Setu Musical Folklore (On the Material of Songs of One First Singer)”]. In: Finno-ugorskij muzikalnij folklor i vzaimocviazi s sosednimi kulturami (Finno-Ugor Folk Music and Interconnection with Neighboring Cultures). P. 129-145. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat Tool, Aare. (2009). Varieeruvatest helilaadidest Setu rahvalaulus akustilise analüüsi põhjal (About the Variable Modes in the Setu Traditional Songs on the Basis of the Acoustical Analysis). Proseminaritöö. Tallinn: Eesti Muusika- ja Teatriakadeemia

192<br />

Žanna Pärtlas<br />

melodic lines cannot be separated.<br />

Anne Vabarna’s performance was compared with three more recent multi-channel recordings. One of<br />

these is the narrative s<strong>on</strong>g sung by the singers from Mikitamäe and Värska villages and recorded in a studio in<br />

1996 using a multi-channel tape-recorder (6-channel recording). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> two other s<strong>on</strong>gs (both are <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Grinding<br />

St<strong>on</strong>e s<strong>on</strong>g) were performed by the Leiko and Kuldatsäuk choirs from Värska village in 2006 and recorded<br />

digitally (9-channel recordings). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> data c<strong>on</strong>cerning the three multi-channel recordings are taken from the<br />

student work by Aare Tool, made under my supervisi<strong>on</strong> in 2009 (Tool, 2009). He analysed three melostrophes<br />

from each s<strong>on</strong>g, which makes 72 tune variants in all. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> tune versi<strong>on</strong> recorded in 1996 and 2006 differs<br />

to some extent from that by Anne Vabarna, but they are similar enough to be compared. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> generalized<br />

transcripti<strong>on</strong> of the first melostrophe of <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Grinding St<strong>on</strong>e s<strong>on</strong>g performed by the Leiko choir is provided<br />

in ex. 4 (audio ex. 2).<br />

For acoustic analysis the speech analysis program PRAAT was used. In the multi-channel recordings the<br />

pitch of the t<strong>on</strong>es was measured using the possibility, provided by the Praat software, to see an average pitch<br />

for the selected area. For the purposes of measurement the most stable fragments of the t<strong>on</strong>es were chosen.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> program can show the results in semit<strong>on</strong>es in relati<strong>on</strong> to the A note above middle C (i.e. 440 Hz). In the<br />

case of n<strong>on</strong>-multi-channel recording (it is “<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Grinding St<strong>on</strong>e” s<strong>on</strong>g performed by Anne Vabarna’s duo),<br />

the procedure of measurement was more complex. In this s<strong>on</strong>g the fundamental frequencies of the t<strong>on</strong>es were<br />

measured from the spectra, and the pitches in semit<strong>on</strong>es were calculated using the program Microsoft Excel.<br />

To find the average pitch of the t<strong>on</strong>es each c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>al eighth note was measured in two places; quarter notes<br />

were measured in four places. In Anne Vabarna’s s<strong>on</strong>g 6 melostrophes were analysed.<br />

As <strong>on</strong>e can hear from audio examples 1 and 2, the tuning of Anne Vabarna’s duo and that of the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>temporary Setu choirs is significantly different. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> s<strong>on</strong>g by the choir Leiko (audio ex. 2) sounds almost<br />

diat<strong>on</strong>ic. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> tuning of Anne Vabarna’s duo (audio ex. 1) sounds very unusual because they use the <strong>on</strong>e-threesemit<strong>on</strong>e<br />

mode. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> results of the acoustical measurements c<strong>on</strong>firm this impressi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> average intervals between adjacent scale notes in the four performances under c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> are<br />

provided in the table (tab. 2). In the top row of the table, the “ideal” intervals of the <strong>on</strong>e-three-semit<strong>on</strong>e scale<br />

and the usual names of the scale notes (in two alternative variants) are written. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>d row comprises the<br />

same informati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerning the anhemit<strong>on</strong>ic-diat<strong>on</strong>ic scale. In the next rows, the corresp<strong>on</strong>ding average<br />

intervals in the four s<strong>on</strong>gs analysed are shown.<br />

It can be seen that the intervals between the adjacent scale notes are not exactly <strong>on</strong>e and three semit<strong>on</strong>es,<br />

even in Anne Vabarna’s s<strong>on</strong>g. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> lower interval, which should be theoretically a three-semit<strong>on</strong>e interval, is<br />

actually closer to the major third (3.7 semit<strong>on</strong>es) and the upper “semit<strong>on</strong>e” is 30 cents narrower than an equaltempered<br />

semit<strong>on</strong>e (0.7). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> central trichord , which is the main object of analysis in this paper, c<strong>on</strong>sists of<br />

the narrowed semit<strong>on</strong>e (0.7) and enlarged three-semit<strong>on</strong>e interval (3.2).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> average intervals in the other performances analysed differ far more from the “ideal” <strong>on</strong>e-threesemit<strong>on</strong>e<br />

structure, and the scale of the s<strong>on</strong>g performed by the Kuldatsäuk choir (see the bottom row of the<br />

table) is quite close to the diat<strong>on</strong>ic scale G-A-B-C, especially if we speak about the central trichord (1.8 and<br />

2.2). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> performance by the choir Leiko c<strong>on</strong>firms the earlier observati<strong>on</strong> that the lower interval of the scale<br />

tends to be wider than three semit<strong>on</strong>es (3.6), although, in the recording from 1996 it is almost exactly three<br />

semit<strong>on</strong>es (2.9). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> upper interval becomes very narrow in all recent recordings – about a quarter t<strong>on</strong>e (0.5,<br />

0.4, and 0.4). This can be partly explained by the mistakes of the killõ – the singer who performs the upper solo<br />

part in the Setu s<strong>on</strong>gs. Nowadays it is quite difficult to find a really good killõ-singer.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!