September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

gnosticliberationfront.com
from gnosticliberationfront.com More from this publisher
06.05.2013 Views

located the nerve centers of Chechen terrorism along with the bank accounts of the terrorists.” [Who's Noticing the NATO danger? General Leonid Ivashov , Sovetskaya Rossiya , April 8, 2004 ] Even after the World Trade Center attack of September 11, Britain was ‘protecting’ known Al Qaeda officials. “Investigators from Spain, Germany and Italy are desperate to question Abu Qatada, who they claim is a pivotal figure in cells they have under arrest in their own countries. Their requests to question him and some of the other suspects directly have been rejected by the Government. Investigators in Spain who named Abu Qatada as 'the spiritual leader of al-Qaeda in Europe', say their own terror trials are hindered by Britain's refusal to let them interrogate the cleric. The Jordanian Government has sentenced him to life imprisonment for his role in planning a bombing campaign to coincide with the millenium celebrations and cannot understand why Abu Qatada is not extradited. In spite of holding most of the terror suspects for many months, the men are providing the security services and police with little intelligence on terrorist activity in the United Kingdom."[ London Times 19 December 2003] "Described by some justice officials as the spiritual leader and possible puppet master of al-Qaeda's European networks, Abu Qatada has been missing since mid-December after British authorities confiscated his passport, froze his assets and ordered him confined to his London home. With Jordan seeking his return to serve a life sentence for terror-related crimes, some observers figured Abu Qatada went underground—and perhaps left Britain—to avoid extradition. But senior European intelligence officials tell TIME that Abu Qatada is tucked away in a safe house in the north of England, where he and his family are being lodged, fed and clothed by British intelligence services".['Sheltering A Puppet Master?' Time Magazine 7 July 2002] The Mujahedin mercenaries hired by Richard Secord to fight in Azerbaijan fought for multiple causes in multiple countries. Their use as instruments of US policy in Afghansistan, Kosovo, Chechnya, Georgia, Azerbaijan has been documented in hundreds of reports. Their protection by US and British policy makers long after the fatwa proclamation is equally well documented. The reader needs to suspend judgment when it comes to accepting at face value the claim that the hijackers and fatwa bombers were in the service of Osama Bin Ladin. The timing of the fatwa and the embassy bombings is consistent with the timing of a decision to destroy the World Trade Center, in such a way that it is possible that the fatwa and bombings were part of a larger plan to blame the WTC attack on ‘terrorists’. Evidence has been presented that the individuals responsible for these bombings were US trained, and belonged to a resource pool available to Secord, Armitage and Kimche. This is another in a list of hundreds of coincidences that support the conclusion that the Al Qaeda explanation offered by the US investigation is a falsehood. U.S. Control of Afghanistan In December 1998, following the US bombardment of Afghanistan and the anti-Taliban campaign of the Feminist Majority that was directed against Unocal, that company withdrew from the pipeline consortium. Unocal, in a related news release, also announced a 40 percent drop in capital spending for 1999 because of low oil prices, which it suggested, would prevent moving ahead on the pipeline in a timeframe required by the Taliban. The Taliban wanted the financial rewards associated with a pipeline, and THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 86

Unocal was not in a position to provide it in the desired timeframe for political and financial reasons. Hence, the Taliban opened the door once again to Bridas. The Unocal move, however was purely a political response to US public opinion, and the true intentions never were to give up on the contract. When the Taliban indicated a renewed willingness to work with Bridas, the US negotiators responded with threats of invasion. The timing of these threats is a critical clue. The July, 2001 threats could only be made with a pre-knowledge of a “Pearl Harbor” event by at least one of the three negotiators: Tom Simons, Karl Inderfurth or Lee Coldren. “Three former American officials, Tom Simons (former US Ambassador to Pakistan), Karl Inderfurth (former Deputy Secretary of State for South Asian Affairs), and Lee Coldren (former State Department expert on South Asia) meet with Pakistani and Russian intelligence officers in a Berlin hotel. [Salon, 8/16/02] This is the third of a series of back-channel conferences called “brainstorming on Afghanistan.” Taliban representatives sat in on previous meetings, but boycotted this one due to worsening tensions. However, the Pakistani ISI relays information from the meeting to the Taliban. [Guardian, 9/22/01] At the meeting, Coldren passes on a message from Bush officials. He later says, “I think there was some discussion of the fact that the United States was so disgusted with the Taliban that they might be considering some military action.” [Guardian, 9/26/01] Accounts vary, but former Pakistani Foreign Secretary Niaz Naik later says he is told by senior American officials at the meeting that military action to overthrow the Taliban in Afghanistan is planned to “take place before the snows started falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at the latest.” The goal is to kill or capture both bin Laden and Taliban leader Mullah Omar, topple the Taliban regime, and install a transitional government of moderate Afghans in its place. Uzbekistan and Russia would also participate. Naik also says, “It was doubtful that Washington would drop its plan even if bin Laden were to be surrendered immediately by the Taliban.” [BBC, 9/18/01] One specific threat made at this meeting is that the Taliban can choose between “carpets of bombs” —an invasion—or “carpets of gold” — the pipeline. [Brisard, Dasquie and Madsen, 2002, pp 43] Naik contends that Tom Simons made the “carpets” statement. Simons claims, “It's possible that a mischievous American participant, after several drinks, may have thought it smart to evoke gold carpets and carpet bombs. Even Americans can't resist the temptation to be mischievous.” Naik and the other American participants deny that the pipeline was an issue at the meeting. [Salon, 8/16/02] Creative Commons Just prior to the time these statements were being made to the Taliban, Richard Armitage was in Islamabad, and it is speculated by this report that the above three agents were working under his direction. Armitage’s expertise in the Afghan region was substantial in that he holds the ‘highest Pakistani civil decoration that could be awarded to a foreigner’ for his role during the Afghan war in the 1980s. While Unocal publicly appeared to back away from any association with the Taliban, it maintained a presence in Afghanistan, and the US intelligence agencies worked on behalf of Unocal (and Enron) to promote an environment that would support a re-instatement of the pipeline. At that time, there were twenty CIA agents working for Enron using a leave-of-absence from the agency. They all managed to return to their positions within the agency when Enron went under. A key player in facilitating that covert operation was Dick Cheney. “A chief benefactor in the CentGas (Central Asian Pipeline) deal would have been Halliburton, the huge oil pipeline construction firm that also had its eye on the Central Asian oil reserves. At the time, Halliburton was headed by Dick Cheney.” [Provisional leader Karzai links to US Oil, Indymedia Somewhere, Wayne Madsen, 2002-01-21] THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 87

located the nerve centers of Chechen terrorism along with the bank accounts of the terrorists.” [Who's<br />

Noticing the NATO danger? General Leonid Ivashov , Sovetskaya Rossiya , April 8, 2004 ]<br />

Even after the World Trade Center attack of <strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong>, Britain was ‘protecting’<br />

known Al Qaeda officials.<br />

“Investigators from Spain, Germany and Italy are desperate to question Abu Qatada, who they claim is<br />

a pivotal figure in cells they have under arrest in their own countries. Their requests to question him<br />

and some of the other suspects directly have been rejected by the Government. Investigators in Spain<br />

who named Abu Qatada as 'the spiritual leader of al-Qaeda in Europe', say their own terror trials are<br />

hindered by Britain's refusal to let them interrogate the cleric. The Jordanian Government has<br />

sentenced him to life imprisonment for his role in planning a bombing campaign to coincide with the<br />

millenium celebrations and cannot understand why Abu Qatada is not extradited. In spite of holding<br />

most of the terror suspects for many months, the men are providing the security services and police<br />

with little intelligence on terrorist activity in the United Kingdom."[ London Times 19 December<br />

2003]<br />

"Described by some justice officials as the spiritual leader and possible puppet master of al-Qaeda's<br />

European networks, Abu Qatada has been missing since mid-December after British authorities<br />

confiscated his passport, froze his assets and ordered him confined to his London home. With Jordan<br />

seeking his return to serve a life sentence for terror-related crimes, some observers figured Abu Qatada<br />

went underground—and perhaps left Britain—to avoid extradition. But senior European intelligence<br />

officials tell TIME that Abu Qatada is tucked away in a safe house in the north of England, where he<br />

and his family are being lodged, fed and clothed by British intelligence services".['Sheltering A Puppet<br />

Master?' Time Magazine 7 July 2002]<br />

The Mujahedin mercenaries hired by Richard Secord to fight in Azerbaijan fought for<br />

multiple causes in multiple countries. Their use as instruments of US policy in<br />

Afghansistan, Kosovo, Chechnya, Georgia, Azerbaijan has been documented in hundreds<br />

of reports. Their protection by US and British policy makers long after the fatwa<br />

proclamation is equally well documented. The reader needs to suspend judgment when it<br />

comes to accepting at face value the claim that the hijackers and fatwa bombers were in<br />

the service of Osama Bin Ladin. The timing of the fatwa and the embassy bombings is<br />

consistent with the timing of a decision to destroy the World Trade Center, in such a way<br />

that it is possible that the fatwa and bombings were part of a larger plan to blame the<br />

WTC attack on ‘terrorists’. Evidence has been presented that the individuals responsible<br />

for these bombings were US trained, and belonged to a resource pool available to Secord,<br />

Armitage and Kimche. This is another in a list of hundreds of coincidences that support<br />

the conclusion that the Al Qaeda explanation offered by the US investigation is a<br />

falsehood.<br />

U.S. Control of Afghanistan<br />

In December 1998, following the US bombardment of Afghanistan and the anti-Taliban<br />

campaign of the Feminist Majority that was directed against Unocal, that company<br />

withdrew from the pipeline consortium. Unocal, in a related news release, also<br />

announced a 40 percent drop in capital spending for 1999 because of low oil prices,<br />

which it suggested, would prevent moving ahead on the pipeline in a timeframe required<br />

by the Taliban. The Taliban wanted the financial rewards associated with a pipeline, and<br />

THE SEPTEMBER <strong>11</strong> COMMISSION REPORT Page 86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!