06.05.2013 Views

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

emergency, suspending key provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and driving the<br />

‘ten-year special rate’ to almost zero.<br />

• Certain key unknown figures in the Federal Reserve may have ‘conspired’ with<br />

key unknown figures at the Bank of New York to create a situation where $240<br />

billion in illegal securities created in 1991 as part of an official covert operation to<br />

overthrow the Soviet Union, could be cleared without publicly acknowledging<br />

their existence.<br />

• These securities, originally managed by Cantor Fitzgerald, were cleared and<br />

settled in the aftermath of <strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong> th through the BoNY. The $100 billion<br />

account balance bubble reported by the Wall Street Journal as being experienced<br />

in the BoNY was tip of a three day operation, when these securities were moved<br />

from off-balance-sheet to the balance sheet. (The off-balance-sheet process is<br />

described by banking advisor to the US Presidents Earl Cocke, who admitted<br />

under sworn testimony to managing Project Hammer funds – the suspected source<br />

of these illegal securities.)<br />

• By reducing the ‘ten-year special rate’ to almost zero, the Fed structurally<br />

increased the number of refinancing (Repo) settlement fails. Under the umbrella<br />

of this artificially created statistical bump of fails, the high level of fails due to the<br />

laundering of the $240 billion was able to be processed unnoticed.<br />

• The cover for this bubble is found in the footnotes to the BoNY annual and<br />

quarterly reports, which report that the BoNY took over $330 billion of<br />

commercial securities business from U.S. Trust between June and October of<br />

2001, although the assets under control of U.S. Trust in 2000 were reported by<br />

two sources as $80 or $86 billion. [Charles Schwab Shells Out for U.S. Trust,<br />

Nick Paumgarten, The New York Observer, January 23, 2000; Schwab to Pay<br />

$2.73 Billion For U.S. Trust, New York Times, Patrick McGeehan, January 14,<br />

2000]<br />

Federal Reserve Management of the Aftermath of <strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong><br />

There were two key disruptions reported in the financial markets:<br />

1) Excessive account balances in a few banks reportedly contributing to an increase in<br />

the account balance in a wide array of banks which required a massive infusion of<br />

credit to stabilize the Federal Reserve system. These accumulations started appearing<br />

on <strong>September</strong> 12 th and ran through the 18 th, . They resulted in the addition of $300<br />

billion to the US monetary supply, which initiated the on-set of the sub-prime market.<br />

2) A reported excessive number of fails in securities settling requiring the lifting of<br />

controls on settlements. There were two reasons reported for these fails:<br />

• Missing trade data due to loss of communications and data;<br />

• Refinancing (Repo) settlements had lost any financial incentive to avoid fails<br />

because the special rate for 10 year notes was dropped to almost zero.<br />

The first wave of fails is attributed to the BoNY situation.<br />

“In the absence of complete information on deliveries into and out of its account at BoNY on<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong>, and as a result of its assumption of settlement fails on the starting legs of blind-<br />

THE SEPTEMBER <strong>11</strong> COMMISSION REPORT Page 373

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!