September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

• How is it that Russian, German and Israeli intelligence organizations knew in advance
of the attack on the WTC?
• How is it that Russian and German financial advisors could forecast such a pinpointed
time for a collapse of the dollar, which coincided with an attack on the WTC?
• Why would the Israeli secret service – purportedly an ally of the United States – go to
such extensive lengths to execute this attack on the WTC and US intelligence agents
in Iraq?
• How can so much evidence point to Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda without them
being the responsible parties?
• Why were large investment banks targets of the WTC conspiracy?
• How is it that Nazi sympathizers and Israeli patriots could find themselves on the
same side of a fight?
• Why would the Bush Whitehouse cover-up the warnings it had received?
• Why would the Bush Whitehouse attack Iraq, when Saddam had nothing to do with
the international terrorists?
This hypothetical explanation seems to fit together previously contradictory and
inconsistent pieces of information known about the attack. This explanation however, is
only the tip of the iceberg. The attack was meant to cover-up far more than moneylaundering
and illegal gold trades. It was meant to accomplish far more than cripple
American banking competition. It was meant to preserve for its owners the greatest
treasure on earth – the stolen national treasuries of the world, and prevent investigators
from auditing the bank records leading to that treasure.
5.5 Unplanned Consequences: The Invasion of Iraq
Here is the ironic twist in the story. The invasion of Iraq was not part of the original
plan of the banking executives that required this attack. This same group that planned
and financed the WTC attack had a vested interest in Saddam Hussein staying in power,
and keeping the US and Israel out of Iraq. As this report later unveils Adnan
Khoshoggi’s involvement in the attack on the WTC, it should be noted that in a meeting
arranged by him with Richard Perle (the Whitehouse ‘neocon’ advisor), Khashoggi tried
to broker a deal that would prevent the attack on Iraq. The American government ‘nixed’
the deal.
“According to both Khashoggi and Zuhair, there were two items on the agenda. The first was to give
Zuhair a chance to propose a peaceful alternative to war with Iraq; Khashoggi said that he and Perle
knew that such an alternative was far-fetched, but Zuhair had recently returned from a visit to
Baghdad, and was eager to talk about it….
Perle, in a series of telephone interviews, acknowledged that he had met with two Saudis at the lunch
in Marseilles, but he did not divulge their identities. (At that time, I still didn't know who they were.)
"There were two Saudis there," he said. "But there was no discussion of Trireme. It was never
mentioned and never discussed." He firmly stated, "The lunch was not about money. It just would
never have occurred to me to discuss investments, given the circumstances." Perle added that one of
the Saudis had information that Saddam was ready to surrender. "His message was a plea to negotiate
THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 125