September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

gnosticliberationfront.com
from gnosticliberationfront.com More from this publisher
06.05.2013 Views

assets. (Dresdner is part of the German Bank cartel.) These are clear indicators that the financial impact of the attack was a consideration by those with pre-knowledge. (There is another conclusion to be drawn from the Russian and German financial forecasts, which stood alone in the midst of other financial forecasts at that time– that a financial collapse was actually possible. This forecasted collapse actually was a very real possibility, and the prevention of this collapse was one of the specific reasons for the attack on the World Trade Center. This possibility is analyzed in depth in Section 8 of the report, where it is hypothesized that $240 Billion in fraudulent 10 year bonds under the control of Cantor Fitzgerald needed to be re-issued to prevent the financial collapse of the US securities market.) The first and cardinal rule of any criminal investigation has been totally ignored in an attack on the headquarters of three of the world’s largest investment banks. That rule is “Follow the money.” The 9/11 Commission Report does not even acknowledge the occurrence of any of this crime. The terrorist gambit has convinced most of the world this atrocity was the responsibility of fanatics with little concern for wealth. As a result, what little thought was given to the “apparent” money trail – the put options – was dropped as incidental to a bigger evil –global terrorism. What if, however, the attack was about “the money?” The original hypothesis of this investigation was that the financial beneficiaries of these crimes were part of a German and Swiss banking cartel. Subsequent investigation of that cartel and the cover-up it required, resulted in findings that suggested that an American financial cartel of commercial banks may have participated in the planning and execution of the attack (the Federal reserve Banks). These two cartels were interlocked by a common customer base of money launderers, heroin dealers and corrupt politicians. 5.3 The Threat to German Banking For the moment, please assume the actual targets were the three largest equity banking firms of Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co (MSDW), and Goldman Sachs – filling 22, 22, and 15 floors of the WTC respectively. (Goldman Sachs had a significant presence in the WTC, but the instigators did not take “put options” on Goldman Sachs.) In the course of a normal investigation, one might ask – who stood to gain from the direct disruption of these financial giants. These giants, along with Citibank and JP Morgan Chase represented the five major threats to the German banking market, and as a result the Dresdner Bank (a subsidiary of Allianz) and Deutsche Bank stood to gain from a temporary disruption of the capabilities of Merrill Lynch, MSDW, Goldman Sachs, Citibank and JP Morgan Chase. A brief bit of background on these two German banks, and the German banking industry in general, is relevant. Banks have created a bank-center culture, with banking centers created in New York, London, Paris, Tokyo and Frankfurt. These centers have become fairly ‘incestuous,’ swapping employees and favors. These centers represent common interests and policies generally based on their country’s primary currency values. Today, Paris and Frankfurt are creating a unity around the Euro, and incorporating Basel into the Frankfurt center, while London and New York operate around the dollar. THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 116

During World War II, the two German banks represented the primary banking powers in Nazi Germany. There are three events that occurred during the last 50 years which have provided a basis for resentment on their part with the American banking community. When the Allies took over Germany, the British generally left the banking structure in their zone as they found it. The Americans, however, broke up these banks into 30 autonomous regional banks and put in place a number of regulations to prevent these banks from ever re-establishing themselves as major global powers. Those rules, however, were ultimately circumvented, and the banks manage to re-establish themselves in the 1960’s. Just as these banks were re-emerging as global players, the Richard Nixon administration unilaterally took the dollar off the Bretton Woods System of Fixed Exchange Rates, which then created an advantage for the American banks and economy that has taken the rest of the world several decades to recover from. It seriously undermined the German competitiveness in the export market, which took the Germans years to recover from. The advantages that came with the move off the Bretton Woods agreement – in terms of enhanced perceived value of the dollar– has given a global advantage to the New York bank center for almost two decades. Over the next three decades, Europe was able to muscle its way back to a position where the banks were almost on par with New York. Together, the two banks represented a coordinated and balanced global strategy: Deutsche Bank had 21 of its 28 foreign affiliates in Africa and Asia, Dresdner had 16 of its 21 affiliates in Latin America. Not all of this “comeback” can be attributed to the inherent attractiveness of the Euro or European currencies. At one point, Tokyo banks, representing the growth of the orient, stood to overwhelm European banks in the 80’s. In response to this threat, the International Bank of Settlements (heavily weighted by participants from Paris, Frankfurt and Basel, and taking advantage of the unfortunate absence of the American delegate) voted to establish new bank capitalization requirements which targeted the Tokyo banking practices of defining property value as equity with which to create loans. This redefinition of the asset base with the stroke of a pen essentially drove the collapse of the Tokyo banking system, and subsequently, the rest of the Pacific Rim. (Currently, this same group is driving another round of re-defining capitalization requirements which are designed to cripple the US banking industry by regulating the use of government debt as a capital base. Given that a devaluation of the dollar is globally perceived as inevitable, requiring the US banking system to hold large amounts of US government debt will automatically devalue the reserves of the American banks. American bankers watching this regulation emerge over the years have converted their primary strategies from traditional banking to equity banks, hence the battle with the German equity banks.) A third American attack on the German banking industry took place in 1993, led by George Soros and George Bush Sr. “His US contacts put Soros very close to the financial and secret service circles around George Bush. His most important deposit bank and main lender during his attack on the European monetary system in Sept. 1993 was CITICORP, America's largest bank. Soros called upon the international investors to unhinge the Deutsche Mark. When in late 1989 a reunification became probable, a high ranking Citicorp manager who before had been advisor in the Dukakis campaign said: "German unity will be catastrophic for our interests. We have to take action to insure a decline of the Deutsche Mark by about 30% so that Germany will not be able to built up Eastern Germany to become the economic factor THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 117

During World War II, the two German banks represented the primary banking powers in<br />

Nazi Germany. There are three events that occurred during the last 50 years which have<br />

provided a basis for resentment on their part with the American banking community.<br />

When the Allies took over Germany, the British generally left the banking structure in<br />

their zone as they found it. The Americans, however, broke up these banks into 30<br />

autonomous regional banks and put in place a number of regulations to prevent these<br />

banks from ever re-establishing themselves as major global powers. Those rules,<br />

however, were ultimately circumvented, and the banks manage to re-establish themselves<br />

in the 1960’s.<br />

Just as these banks were re-emerging as global players, the Richard Nixon administration<br />

unilaterally took the dollar off the Bretton Woods System of Fixed Exchange Rates,<br />

which then created an advantage for the American banks and economy that has taken the<br />

rest of the world several decades to recover from. It seriously undermined the German<br />

competitiveness in the export market, which took the Germans years to recover from. The<br />

advantages that came with the move off the Bretton Woods agreement – in terms of<br />

enhanced perceived value of the dollar– has given a global advantage to the New York<br />

bank center for almost two decades.<br />

Over the next three decades, Europe was able to muscle its way back to a position where<br />

the banks were almost on par with New York. Together, the two banks represented a<br />

coordinated and balanced global strategy: Deutsche Bank had 21 of its 28 foreign<br />

affiliates in Africa and Asia, Dresdner had 16 of its 21 affiliates in Latin America. Not<br />

all of this “comeback” can be attributed to the inherent attractiveness of the Euro or<br />

European currencies. At one point, Tokyo banks, representing the growth of the orient,<br />

stood to overwhelm European banks in the 80’s. In response to this threat, the<br />

International Bank of Settlements (heavily weighted by participants from Paris, Frankfurt<br />

and Basel, and taking advantage of the unfortunate absence of the American delegate)<br />

voted to establish new bank capitalization requirements which targeted the Tokyo<br />

banking practices of defining property value as equity with which to create loans. This<br />

redefinition of the asset base with the stroke of a pen essentially drove the collapse of the<br />

Tokyo banking system, and subsequently, the rest of the Pacific Rim. (Currently, this<br />

same group is driving another round of re-defining capitalization requirements which are<br />

designed to cripple the US banking industry by regulating the use of government debt as<br />

a capital base. Given that a devaluation of the dollar is globally perceived as inevitable,<br />

requiring the US banking system to hold large amounts of US government debt will<br />

automatically devalue the reserves of the American banks. American bankers watching<br />

this regulation emerge over the years have converted their primary strategies from<br />

traditional banking to equity banks, hence the battle with the German equity banks.)<br />

A third American attack on the German banking industry took place in 1993, led by<br />

George Soros and George Bush Sr.<br />

“His US contacts put Soros very close to the financial and secret service circles around George Bush.<br />

His most important deposit bank and main lender during his attack on the European monetary system<br />

in Sept. 1993 was CITICORP, America's largest bank. Soros called upon the international investors to<br />

unhinge the Deutsche Mark. When in late 1989 a reunification became probable, a high ranking<br />

Citicorp manager who before had been advisor in the Dukakis campaign said: "German unity will be<br />

catastrophic for our interests. We have to take action to insure a decline of the Deutsche Mark by about<br />

30% so that Germany will not be able to built up Eastern Germany to become the economic factor<br />

THE SEPTEMBER <strong>11</strong> COMMISSION REPORT Page <strong>11</strong>7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!