September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front
September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front
assets. (Dresdner is part of the German Bank cartel.) These are clear indicators that the financial impact of the attack was a consideration by those with pre-knowledge. (There is another conclusion to be drawn from the Russian and German financial forecasts, which stood alone in the midst of other financial forecasts at that time– that a financial collapse was actually possible. This forecasted collapse actually was a very real possibility, and the prevention of this collapse was one of the specific reasons for the attack on the World Trade Center. This possibility is analyzed in depth in Section 8 of the report, where it is hypothesized that $240 Billion in fraudulent 10 year bonds under the control of Cantor Fitzgerald needed to be re-issued to prevent the financial collapse of the US securities market.) The first and cardinal rule of any criminal investigation has been totally ignored in an attack on the headquarters of three of the world’s largest investment banks. That rule is “Follow the money.” The 9/11 Commission Report does not even acknowledge the occurrence of any of this crime. The terrorist gambit has convinced most of the world this atrocity was the responsibility of fanatics with little concern for wealth. As a result, what little thought was given to the “apparent” money trail – the put options – was dropped as incidental to a bigger evil –global terrorism. What if, however, the attack was about “the money?” The original hypothesis of this investigation was that the financial beneficiaries of these crimes were part of a German and Swiss banking cartel. Subsequent investigation of that cartel and the cover-up it required, resulted in findings that suggested that an American financial cartel of commercial banks may have participated in the planning and execution of the attack (the Federal reserve Banks). These two cartels were interlocked by a common customer base of money launderers, heroin dealers and corrupt politicians. 5.3 The Threat to German Banking For the moment, please assume the actual targets were the three largest equity banking firms of Merrill Lynch & Co., Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co (MSDW), and Goldman Sachs – filling 22, 22, and 15 floors of the WTC respectively. (Goldman Sachs had a significant presence in the WTC, but the instigators did not take “put options” on Goldman Sachs.) In the course of a normal investigation, one might ask – who stood to gain from the direct disruption of these financial giants. These giants, along with Citibank and JP Morgan Chase represented the five major threats to the German banking market, and as a result the Dresdner Bank (a subsidiary of Allianz) and Deutsche Bank stood to gain from a temporary disruption of the capabilities of Merrill Lynch, MSDW, Goldman Sachs, Citibank and JP Morgan Chase. A brief bit of background on these two German banks, and the German banking industry in general, is relevant. Banks have created a bank-center culture, with banking centers created in New York, London, Paris, Tokyo and Frankfurt. These centers have become fairly ‘incestuous,’ swapping employees and favors. These centers represent common interests and policies generally based on their country’s primary currency values. Today, Paris and Frankfurt are creating a unity around the Euro, and incorporating Basel into the Frankfurt center, while London and New York operate around the dollar. THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 116
During World War II, the two German banks represented the primary banking powers in Nazi Germany. There are three events that occurred during the last 50 years which have provided a basis for resentment on their part with the American banking community. When the Allies took over Germany, the British generally left the banking structure in their zone as they found it. The Americans, however, broke up these banks into 30 autonomous regional banks and put in place a number of regulations to prevent these banks from ever re-establishing themselves as major global powers. Those rules, however, were ultimately circumvented, and the banks manage to re-establish themselves in the 1960’s. Just as these banks were re-emerging as global players, the Richard Nixon administration unilaterally took the dollar off the Bretton Woods System of Fixed Exchange Rates, which then created an advantage for the American banks and economy that has taken the rest of the world several decades to recover from. It seriously undermined the German competitiveness in the export market, which took the Germans years to recover from. The advantages that came with the move off the Bretton Woods agreement – in terms of enhanced perceived value of the dollar– has given a global advantage to the New York bank center for almost two decades. Over the next three decades, Europe was able to muscle its way back to a position where the banks were almost on par with New York. Together, the two banks represented a coordinated and balanced global strategy: Deutsche Bank had 21 of its 28 foreign affiliates in Africa and Asia, Dresdner had 16 of its 21 affiliates in Latin America. Not all of this “comeback” can be attributed to the inherent attractiveness of the Euro or European currencies. At one point, Tokyo banks, representing the growth of the orient, stood to overwhelm European banks in the 80’s. In response to this threat, the International Bank of Settlements (heavily weighted by participants from Paris, Frankfurt and Basel, and taking advantage of the unfortunate absence of the American delegate) voted to establish new bank capitalization requirements which targeted the Tokyo banking practices of defining property value as equity with which to create loans. This redefinition of the asset base with the stroke of a pen essentially drove the collapse of the Tokyo banking system, and subsequently, the rest of the Pacific Rim. (Currently, this same group is driving another round of re-defining capitalization requirements which are designed to cripple the US banking industry by regulating the use of government debt as a capital base. Given that a devaluation of the dollar is globally perceived as inevitable, requiring the US banking system to hold large amounts of US government debt will automatically devalue the reserves of the American banks. American bankers watching this regulation emerge over the years have converted their primary strategies from traditional banking to equity banks, hence the battle with the German equity banks.) A third American attack on the German banking industry took place in 1993, led by George Soros and George Bush Sr. “His US contacts put Soros very close to the financial and secret service circles around George Bush. His most important deposit bank and main lender during his attack on the European monetary system in Sept. 1993 was CITICORP, America's largest bank. Soros called upon the international investors to unhinge the Deutsche Mark. When in late 1989 a reunification became probable, a high ranking Citicorp manager who before had been advisor in the Dukakis campaign said: "German unity will be catastrophic for our interests. We have to take action to insure a decline of the Deutsche Mark by about 30% so that Germany will not be able to built up Eastern Germany to become the economic factor THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 117
- Page 65 and 66: of operations was Azerbaijan. (For
- Page 67 and 68: Dick Cheney’s “intelligence blo
- Page 69 and 70: to this region. Kazakhstan is repor
- Page 71 and 72: 4.2 Azerbaijan Because of the restr
- Page 73 and 74: “The elections confirmed Ilham Al
- Page 75 and 76: “In 1987, Stephen’s deal [Jacks
- Page 77 and 78: Japanese for a pipeline which would
- Page 79 and 80: "With regard to Chechnya, the main
- Page 81 and 82: Two years later, another historic m
- Page 83 and 84: “In 1996, Abu Hafs relocated to G
- Page 85 and 86: “Three of the alleged hijackers l
- Page 87 and 88: Unocal was not in a position to pro
- Page 89 and 90: switching traffic from the Russian
- Page 91 and 92: “An article in The Nation magazin
- Page 93 and 94: [Profits of Death (A Special FTW Se
- Page 95 and 96: “The Tengiz oil field on Kazakhst
- Page 97 and 98: Giffen and Williams were found guil
- Page 99 and 100: investigations had access to the vi
- Page 101 and 102: • US oil companies in Kazakhstan
- Page 103 and 104: Angola. Unfortunately, while the sw
- Page 105 and 106: anks were part of the same money-la
- Page 107 and 108: 5 Russian and Israeli Mafiya Before
- Page 109 and 110: source of the fabricated evidence,
- Page 111 and 112: Target Put Options Table 1 Unclaime
- Page 113 and 114: "Richard Wagner, a data retrieval e
- Page 115: On the other hand, almost always, i
- Page 119 and 120: 2. seething resentment due to U.S.
- Page 121 and 122: • Board representatives from Thys
- Page 123 and 124: have purchased major ownership posi
- Page 125 and 126: • How is it that Russian, German
- Page 127 and 128: “I got the document here, on the
- Page 129 and 130: 6 Destruction of the World Trade Ce
- Page 131 and 132: was to testify in court about her r
- Page 133 and 134: 6 Analysis of videotape of the coll
- Page 135 and 136: THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT
- Page 137 and 138: Tower Two: Deaths By Company/Floor
- Page 139 and 140: 6.1 The Link between the WTC, Illeg
- Page 141 and 142: http://sync.democraticunderground.c
- Page 143 and 144: was used for storing files and evid
- Page 145 and 146: The key matter for consideration an
- Page 147 and 148: frame with concrete floors, the fir
- Page 149 and 150: dollars worth of precious metals we
- Page 151 and 152: 7 GOLD TRADING AND MONEY LAUNDERING
- Page 153 and 154: Chairman of the Deutsche Bank Board
- Page 155 and 156: considerable portions of Santa Roma
- Page 157 and 158: protected from Congressional oversi
- Page 159 and 160: The amounts of illegal gold from al
- Page 161 and 162: About the same time Khashoggi and A
- Page 163 and 164: Gold Weight/Value Conversion Chart
- Page 165 and 166: 3. Create credibility for the compa
During World War II, the two German banks represented the primary banking powers in<br />
Nazi Germany. There are three events that occurred during the last 50 years which have<br />
provided a basis for resentment on their part with the American banking community.<br />
When the Allies took over Germany, the British generally left the banking structure in<br />
their zone as they found it. The Americans, however, broke up these banks into 30<br />
autonomous regional banks and put in place a number of regulations to prevent these<br />
banks from ever re-establishing themselves as major global powers. Those rules,<br />
however, were ultimately circumvented, and the banks manage to re-establish themselves<br />
in the 1960’s.<br />
Just as these banks were re-emerging as global players, the Richard Nixon administration<br />
unilaterally took the dollar off the Bretton Woods System of Fixed Exchange Rates,<br />
which then created an advantage for the American banks and economy that has taken the<br />
rest of the world several decades to recover from. It seriously undermined the German<br />
competitiveness in the export market, which took the Germans years to recover from. The<br />
advantages that came with the move off the Bretton Woods agreement – in terms of<br />
enhanced perceived value of the dollar– has given a global advantage to the New York<br />
bank center for almost two decades.<br />
Over the next three decades, Europe was able to muscle its way back to a position where<br />
the banks were almost on par with New York. Together, the two banks represented a<br />
coordinated and balanced global strategy: Deutsche Bank had 21 of its 28 foreign<br />
affiliates in Africa and Asia, Dresdner had 16 of its 21 affiliates in Latin America. Not<br />
all of this “comeback” can be attributed to the inherent attractiveness of the Euro or<br />
European currencies. At one point, Tokyo banks, representing the growth of the orient,<br />
stood to overwhelm European banks in the 80’s. In response to this threat, the<br />
International Bank of Settlements (heavily weighted by participants from Paris, Frankfurt<br />
and Basel, and taking advantage of the unfortunate absence of the American delegate)<br />
voted to establish new bank capitalization requirements which targeted the Tokyo<br />
banking practices of defining property value as equity with which to create loans. This<br />
redefinition of the asset base with the stroke of a pen essentially drove the collapse of the<br />
Tokyo banking system, and subsequently, the rest of the Pacific Rim. (Currently, this<br />
same group is driving another round of re-defining capitalization requirements which are<br />
designed to cripple the US banking industry by regulating the use of government debt as<br />
a capital base. Given that a devaluation of the dollar is globally perceived as inevitable,<br />
requiring the US banking system to hold large amounts of US government debt will<br />
automatically devalue the reserves of the American banks. American bankers watching<br />
this regulation emerge over the years have converted their primary strategies from<br />
traditional banking to equity banks, hence the battle with the German equity banks.)<br />
A third American attack on the German banking industry took place in 1993, led by<br />
George Soros and George Bush Sr.<br />
“His US contacts put Soros very close to the financial and secret service circles around George Bush.<br />
His most important deposit bank and main lender during his attack on the European monetary system<br />
in Sept. 1993 was CITICORP, America's largest bank. Soros called upon the international investors to<br />
unhinge the Deutsche Mark. When in late 1989 a reunification became probable, a high ranking<br />
Citicorp manager who before had been advisor in the Dukakis campaign said: "German unity will be<br />
catastrophic for our interests. We have to take action to insure a decline of the Deutsche Mark by about<br />
30% so that Germany will not be able to built up Eastern Germany to become the economic factor<br />
THE SEPTEMBER <strong>11</strong> COMMISSION REPORT Page <strong>11</strong>7