September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front

gnosticliberationfront.com
from gnosticliberationfront.com More from this publisher
06.05.2013 Views

"Bill Kristol, (is) one of the most sought-after political commentators in the US, editor of The Weekly Standard, and President of The Project for a New American Century. In his talk, entitled “US Foreign Policy after 9-11: The Bush Doctrine,” Kristol declared that “for the US, the world really changed on September 11. We are no longer prepared to rely mainly on negotiations, trade pressures, arms control regimes and international institutions in order to solve critical world problems. The Israeli operation against the Iraqi nuclear reactor in Osirak is our new paradigm. Time is not on our side. We need to act soon, act preemptively, and act alone if necessary. Osirak is now the model of how foreign policy has to be conducted,” said Kristol. “Indeed, today the US is committed to forcing regime change in Iran, Iraq, and North Korea,” continued Kristol “We will be much more aggressive in pursuing this goal; no longer are we content to wait for history to work things through. Unfortunately, Europe does not yet seem to understand our new world. They wish to return to pre-September 2001 rules.” [Begin –Sadat Center For Strategic Studies, May 2002 No. 14 ] "Later in the year, Bush's influential advisor Richard Perle states, “No stages. This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq … this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war … our children will sing great songs about us years from now.” [New Statesman, December 16, 2002] While the praises for the victory of democracy in these conquered countries of Afghanistan and Iraq are sung by the Bush administration, those who visit these countries are aware of the realities of this new policy, which do little to change the ways these countries operate: "Apart from notional freedoms, little has changed. The warlords installed to power by America are as bad as the Taliban, terrorising whole communities, and ensuring that 90 per cent of Afghan women remained oppressed and that pledges of Western reconstruction aid remain empty promises."[The Betrayal Of Afghanistan, John Pilger, The Guardian, November 22,2003] The background of many of these key policy players however, suggests they are far more interested in the security of Israel than that of the US. Two of the key architects of this group – Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz- have a well documented (both Congressional and FBI investigations) past of being alleged agents for the Israeli government, and have been directly responsible for the employment by US Policy making groups (Office of Special Plans- OSP) of at least four other similarly documented and alleged agents of Israel: Douglas J. Feith (Undersecretary of Defense for Policy), Lawrence Franklin (currently under investigation by the FBI as being a potential Israeli spy), Michael Ledeen and Dr. Stephen Bryen. Lawrence Franklin works in an office overseen by Douglas J. Feith, the Defense Undersecretary for Policy. Feith is an influential aide to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Also included in this list is Dr. Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who at the time was acting as chief-financial officer for the Department of Defense. A signer of the “Pearl Harbor” statement and an original member of the PNAC, Dr. Dov Zakheim’s personal and family’s significant involvement in Yeshivat Sha’alvim is a clear demonstration of his loyalties. "Sha'alvim is a dynamic and comprehensive educational community where … students are imbued with …an abiding commitment to the People and the State of Israel.”[www.shaalvim.org] From all available evidence it was these “unofficial” political advisers organized by Wolfowitz, Feith and Rumsfeld in the US Office of Special Planning (OSP) who were the THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 108

source of the fabricated evidence, which was used to “justify” the invasion and occupation of Iraq. "Precisely because of the qualms the administration encountered, it created a rogue intelligence operation, the Office of Special Plans (OSP), located within the Pentagon and under the control of neoconservatives. The OSP roamed outside the ordinary inter-agency process, stamping its approval on stories from Iraqi exiles that the other agencies dismissed as lacking credibility, and feeding them to the president. At the same time, constant pressure was applied to the intelligence agencies to force their compliance. In one case, a senior intelligence officer who refused to buckle under was removed." [NEWS BRIEF: "There was no failure of intelligence: US spies were ignored, or worse, if they failed to make the case for war", The Guardian (London), February 5, 2004, carried in Daily News Updates 2/8/2004.,http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1141116,00.html ] These fabrications which took America to war with Iraq were based on a long standing Likud policy paper authored by Perle and Feith in 1996. "The OSP and the other members of the networks that operated throughout key US agencies shared a right-wing, pro-militarist ideology and are fanatically pro-Israel. Feith and Perle authored an infamous policy paper in 1996 for the Likud Party extremist, Benjamin Netanyahu, entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” This strategy called for the destruction of Saddam Hussein and his replacement by a Hashemite monarch. Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Iran would then have to be overthrown or destabilized for Israel to be secure in a kind of ‘Greater US-Israel Co-Prosperity Sphere.’ The OSP was an arm of the Wolfowitz-Feith policy of furthering the policies of the most extremist groups of the Sharon regime, forging close ties with a parallel ad hoc intelligence operation in the Israeli regime according to a report from the British newspaper, The Guardian" [“Who fabricated the Iraq War Threat: An Inside View” James Petras, Centre for Research on Globalisation, August 22, 2003] To that end, the invasion of Iraq was as much a foregone conclusion as was the invasion of Afghanistan. It was a decision made by this group years before ‘weapons of mass destruction’ were presented to the public as the excuse for invasion, and years before the attack on the World Trade Center. Nothing would have prevented the invasion, because it could easily have been prevented – and spared thousands of lives and injured. According to the Chicago Tribune, Saddam Hussein was more than ready to leave Iraq, just like the Taliban was ready to surrender Bin Laden, but the US Government chose to start a war instead. "As Trireme (Richard Perle’s and Henry Kissinger’s venture capital firm)solicited investors at the end of 2002, Harb al-Zuhair (a wealthy and politically connected Saudi businessman) made a trip to his native Iraq, and met with government officials including Saddam's intelligence chief -- Tahir Abd' Jalil Habbush al-Tiktriti, head of Iraq's Mukhabarat, or General Intelligence Service. He returned with an important message for the U.S. government: On the eve of war, Saddam wanted to throw in the towel, Zuhair reported to Khashoggi. The Iraqi dictator sought back channel negotiations with America that might offer him a safe exit. Harriman and Khashoggi decided to arrange for Zuhair to tell his story to Perle…."[Hersh uncovered Pentagon adviser Richard Perle’s role in securing homeland security contracts, David Jackson, Chicago Tribune, June 25, 2004] Both so called “conspiracy” interpretations (one in which oil interests are responsible, another in which pro-Israeli Neocons are responsible) provide compelling insights, and may explain the Bush administration’s behavior after the WTC tragedy, but do little to explain events leading up to the attack. The hard truth is, this tragedy was beginning to unfold long before Bush won the election, and before he won the Republican National THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 109

"Bill Kristol, (is) one of the most sought-after political commentators in the US, editor of The Weekly<br />

Standard, and President of The Project for a New American Century. In his talk, entitled “US Foreign<br />

Policy after 9-<strong>11</strong>: The Bush Doctrine,” Kristol declared that “for the US, the world really changed on<br />

<strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong>. We are no longer prepared to rely mainly on negotiations, trade pressures, arms control<br />

regimes and international institutions in order to solve critical world problems. The Israeli operation<br />

against the Iraqi nuclear reactor in Osirak is our new paradigm. Time is not on our side. We need to act<br />

soon, act preemptively, and act alone if necessary. Osirak is now the model of how foreign policy has<br />

to be conducted,” said Kristol. “Indeed, today the US is committed to forcing regime change in Iran,<br />

Iraq, and North Korea,” continued Kristol “We will be much more aggressive in pursuing this goal; no<br />

longer are we content to wait for history to work things through. Unfortunately, Europe does not yet<br />

seem to understand our new world. They wish to return to pre-<strong>September</strong> 2001 rules.” [Begin –Sadat<br />

Center For Strategic Studies, May 2002 No. 14 ]<br />

"Later in the year, Bush's influential advisor Richard Perle states, “No stages. This is total war. We are<br />

fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to<br />

do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq … this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our<br />

vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever<br />

diplomacy, but just wage a total war … our children will sing great songs about us years from now.”<br />

[New Statesman, December 16, 2002]<br />

While the praises for the victory of democracy in these conquered countries of<br />

Afghanistan and Iraq are sung by the Bush administration, those who visit these countries<br />

are aware of the realities of this new policy, which do little to change the ways these<br />

countries operate:<br />

"Apart from notional freedoms, little has changed. The warlords installed to power by America are as<br />

bad as the Taliban, terrorising whole communities, and ensuring that 90 per cent of Afghan women<br />

remained oppressed and that pledges of Western reconstruction aid remain empty promises."[The<br />

Betrayal Of Afghanistan, John Pilger, The Guardian, November 22,2003]<br />

The background of many of these key policy players however, suggests they are far more<br />

interested in the security of Israel than that of the US. Two of the key architects of this<br />

group – Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz- have a well documented (both Congressional<br />

and FBI investigations) past of being alleged agents for the Israeli government, and have<br />

been directly responsible for the employment by US Policy making groups (Office of<br />

Special Plans- OSP) of at least four other similarly documented and alleged agents of<br />

Israel: Douglas J. Feith (Undersecretary of Defense for Policy), Lawrence Franklin<br />

(currently under investigation by the FBI as being a potential Israeli spy), Michael<br />

Ledeen and Dr. Stephen Bryen. Lawrence Franklin works in an office overseen by<br />

Douglas J. Feith, the Defense Undersecretary for Policy. Feith is an influential aide to<br />

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Also included in this list is Dr. Rabbi Dov<br />

Zakheim, who at the time was acting as chief-financial officer for the Department of<br />

Defense. A signer of the “Pearl Harbor” statement and an original member of the<br />

PNAC, Dr. Dov Zakheim’s personal and family’s significant involvement in Yeshivat<br />

Sha’alvim is a clear demonstration of his loyalties. "Sha'alvim is a dynamic and<br />

comprehensive educational community where … students are imbued with …an abiding<br />

commitment to the People and the State of Israel.”[www.shaalvim.org]<br />

From all available evidence it was these “unofficial” political advisers organized by<br />

Wolfowitz, Feith and Rumsfeld in the US Office of Special Planning (OSP) who were the<br />

THE SEPTEMBER <strong>11</strong> COMMISSION REPORT Page 108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!