September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front
September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front September 11 Commission Report - Gnostic Liberation Front
"Bill Kristol, (is) one of the most sought-after political commentators in the US, editor of The Weekly Standard, and President of The Project for a New American Century. In his talk, entitled “US Foreign Policy after 9-11: The Bush Doctrine,” Kristol declared that “for the US, the world really changed on September 11. We are no longer prepared to rely mainly on negotiations, trade pressures, arms control regimes and international institutions in order to solve critical world problems. The Israeli operation against the Iraqi nuclear reactor in Osirak is our new paradigm. Time is not on our side. We need to act soon, act preemptively, and act alone if necessary. Osirak is now the model of how foreign policy has to be conducted,” said Kristol. “Indeed, today the US is committed to forcing regime change in Iran, Iraq, and North Korea,” continued Kristol “We will be much more aggressive in pursuing this goal; no longer are we content to wait for history to work things through. Unfortunately, Europe does not yet seem to understand our new world. They wish to return to pre-September 2001 rules.” [Begin –Sadat Center For Strategic Studies, May 2002 No. 14 ] "Later in the year, Bush's influential advisor Richard Perle states, “No stages. This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq … this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war … our children will sing great songs about us years from now.” [New Statesman, December 16, 2002] While the praises for the victory of democracy in these conquered countries of Afghanistan and Iraq are sung by the Bush administration, those who visit these countries are aware of the realities of this new policy, which do little to change the ways these countries operate: "Apart from notional freedoms, little has changed. The warlords installed to power by America are as bad as the Taliban, terrorising whole communities, and ensuring that 90 per cent of Afghan women remained oppressed and that pledges of Western reconstruction aid remain empty promises."[The Betrayal Of Afghanistan, John Pilger, The Guardian, November 22,2003] The background of many of these key policy players however, suggests they are far more interested in the security of Israel than that of the US. Two of the key architects of this group – Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz- have a well documented (both Congressional and FBI investigations) past of being alleged agents for the Israeli government, and have been directly responsible for the employment by US Policy making groups (Office of Special Plans- OSP) of at least four other similarly documented and alleged agents of Israel: Douglas J. Feith (Undersecretary of Defense for Policy), Lawrence Franklin (currently under investigation by the FBI as being a potential Israeli spy), Michael Ledeen and Dr. Stephen Bryen. Lawrence Franklin works in an office overseen by Douglas J. Feith, the Defense Undersecretary for Policy. Feith is an influential aide to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Also included in this list is Dr. Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who at the time was acting as chief-financial officer for the Department of Defense. A signer of the “Pearl Harbor” statement and an original member of the PNAC, Dr. Dov Zakheim’s personal and family’s significant involvement in Yeshivat Sha’alvim is a clear demonstration of his loyalties. "Sha'alvim is a dynamic and comprehensive educational community where … students are imbued with …an abiding commitment to the People and the State of Israel.”[www.shaalvim.org] From all available evidence it was these “unofficial” political advisers organized by Wolfowitz, Feith and Rumsfeld in the US Office of Special Planning (OSP) who were the THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 108
source of the fabricated evidence, which was used to “justify” the invasion and occupation of Iraq. "Precisely because of the qualms the administration encountered, it created a rogue intelligence operation, the Office of Special Plans (OSP), located within the Pentagon and under the control of neoconservatives. The OSP roamed outside the ordinary inter-agency process, stamping its approval on stories from Iraqi exiles that the other agencies dismissed as lacking credibility, and feeding them to the president. At the same time, constant pressure was applied to the intelligence agencies to force their compliance. In one case, a senior intelligence officer who refused to buckle under was removed." [NEWS BRIEF: "There was no failure of intelligence: US spies were ignored, or worse, if they failed to make the case for war", The Guardian (London), February 5, 2004, carried in Daily News Updates 2/8/2004.,http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1141116,00.html ] These fabrications which took America to war with Iraq were based on a long standing Likud policy paper authored by Perle and Feith in 1996. "The OSP and the other members of the networks that operated throughout key US agencies shared a right-wing, pro-militarist ideology and are fanatically pro-Israel. Feith and Perle authored an infamous policy paper in 1996 for the Likud Party extremist, Benjamin Netanyahu, entitled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” This strategy called for the destruction of Saddam Hussein and his replacement by a Hashemite monarch. Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Iran would then have to be overthrown or destabilized for Israel to be secure in a kind of ‘Greater US-Israel Co-Prosperity Sphere.’ The OSP was an arm of the Wolfowitz-Feith policy of furthering the policies of the most extremist groups of the Sharon regime, forging close ties with a parallel ad hoc intelligence operation in the Israeli regime according to a report from the British newspaper, The Guardian" [“Who fabricated the Iraq War Threat: An Inside View” James Petras, Centre for Research on Globalisation, August 22, 2003] To that end, the invasion of Iraq was as much a foregone conclusion as was the invasion of Afghanistan. It was a decision made by this group years before ‘weapons of mass destruction’ were presented to the public as the excuse for invasion, and years before the attack on the World Trade Center. Nothing would have prevented the invasion, because it could easily have been prevented – and spared thousands of lives and injured. According to the Chicago Tribune, Saddam Hussein was more than ready to leave Iraq, just like the Taliban was ready to surrender Bin Laden, but the US Government chose to start a war instead. "As Trireme (Richard Perle’s and Henry Kissinger’s venture capital firm)solicited investors at the end of 2002, Harb al-Zuhair (a wealthy and politically connected Saudi businessman) made a trip to his native Iraq, and met with government officials including Saddam's intelligence chief -- Tahir Abd' Jalil Habbush al-Tiktriti, head of Iraq's Mukhabarat, or General Intelligence Service. He returned with an important message for the U.S. government: On the eve of war, Saddam wanted to throw in the towel, Zuhair reported to Khashoggi. The Iraqi dictator sought back channel negotiations with America that might offer him a safe exit. Harriman and Khashoggi decided to arrange for Zuhair to tell his story to Perle…."[Hersh uncovered Pentagon adviser Richard Perle’s role in securing homeland security contracts, David Jackson, Chicago Tribune, June 25, 2004] Both so called “conspiracy” interpretations (one in which oil interests are responsible, another in which pro-Israeli Neocons are responsible) provide compelling insights, and may explain the Bush administration’s behavior after the WTC tragedy, but do little to explain events leading up to the attack. The hard truth is, this tragedy was beginning to unfold long before Bush won the election, and before he won the Republican National THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT Page 109
- Page 57 and 58: with Afghanistan, and secure access
- Page 59 and 60: September the 11th?” Bush replied
- Page 61 and 62: “There were a lot of BCCI documen
- Page 63 and 64: that 2.2 trillion dollars was missi
- Page 65 and 66: of operations was Azerbaijan. (For
- Page 67 and 68: Dick Cheney’s “intelligence blo
- Page 69 and 70: to this region. Kazakhstan is repor
- Page 71 and 72: 4.2 Azerbaijan Because of the restr
- Page 73 and 74: “The elections confirmed Ilham Al
- Page 75 and 76: “In 1987, Stephen’s deal [Jacks
- Page 77 and 78: Japanese for a pipeline which would
- Page 79 and 80: "With regard to Chechnya, the main
- Page 81 and 82: Two years later, another historic m
- Page 83 and 84: “In 1996, Abu Hafs relocated to G
- Page 85 and 86: “Three of the alleged hijackers l
- Page 87 and 88: Unocal was not in a position to pro
- Page 89 and 90: switching traffic from the Russian
- Page 91 and 92: “An article in The Nation magazin
- Page 93 and 94: [Profits of Death (A Special FTW Se
- Page 95 and 96: “The Tengiz oil field on Kazakhst
- Page 97 and 98: Giffen and Williams were found guil
- Page 99 and 100: investigations had access to the vi
- Page 101 and 102: • US oil companies in Kazakhstan
- Page 103 and 104: Angola. Unfortunately, while the sw
- Page 105 and 106: anks were part of the same money-la
- Page 107: 5 Russian and Israeli Mafiya Before
- Page 111 and 112: Target Put Options Table 1 Unclaime
- Page 113 and 114: "Richard Wagner, a data retrieval e
- Page 115 and 116: On the other hand, almost always, i
- Page 117 and 118: During World War II, the two German
- Page 119 and 120: 2. seething resentment due to U.S.
- Page 121 and 122: • Board representatives from Thys
- Page 123 and 124: have purchased major ownership posi
- Page 125 and 126: • How is it that Russian, German
- Page 127 and 128: “I got the document here, on the
- Page 129 and 130: 6 Destruction of the World Trade Ce
- Page 131 and 132: was to testify in court about her r
- Page 133 and 134: 6 Analysis of videotape of the coll
- Page 135 and 136: THE SEPTEMBER 11 COMMISSION REPORT
- Page 137 and 138: Tower Two: Deaths By Company/Floor
- Page 139 and 140: 6.1 The Link between the WTC, Illeg
- Page 141 and 142: http://sync.democraticunderground.c
- Page 143 and 144: was used for storing files and evid
- Page 145 and 146: The key matter for consideration an
- Page 147 and 148: frame with concrete floors, the fir
- Page 149 and 150: dollars worth of precious metals we
- Page 151 and 152: 7 GOLD TRADING AND MONEY LAUNDERING
- Page 153 and 154: Chairman of the Deutsche Bank Board
- Page 155 and 156: considerable portions of Santa Roma
- Page 157 and 158: protected from Congressional oversi
"Bill Kristol, (is) one of the most sought-after political commentators in the US, editor of The Weekly<br />
Standard, and President of The Project for a New American Century. In his talk, entitled “US Foreign<br />
Policy after 9-<strong>11</strong>: The Bush Doctrine,” Kristol declared that “for the US, the world really changed on<br />
<strong>September</strong> <strong>11</strong>. We are no longer prepared to rely mainly on negotiations, trade pressures, arms control<br />
regimes and international institutions in order to solve critical world problems. The Israeli operation<br />
against the Iraqi nuclear reactor in Osirak is our new paradigm. Time is not on our side. We need to act<br />
soon, act preemptively, and act alone if necessary. Osirak is now the model of how foreign policy has<br />
to be conducted,” said Kristol. “Indeed, today the US is committed to forcing regime change in Iran,<br />
Iraq, and North Korea,” continued Kristol “We will be much more aggressive in pursuing this goal; no<br />
longer are we content to wait for history to work things through. Unfortunately, Europe does not yet<br />
seem to understand our new world. They wish to return to pre-<strong>September</strong> 2001 rules.” [Begin –Sadat<br />
Center For Strategic Studies, May 2002 No. 14 ]<br />
"Later in the year, Bush's influential advisor Richard Perle states, “No stages. This is total war. We are<br />
fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to<br />
do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq … this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our<br />
vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever<br />
diplomacy, but just wage a total war … our children will sing great songs about us years from now.”<br />
[New Statesman, December 16, 2002]<br />
While the praises for the victory of democracy in these conquered countries of<br />
Afghanistan and Iraq are sung by the Bush administration, those who visit these countries<br />
are aware of the realities of this new policy, which do little to change the ways these<br />
countries operate:<br />
"Apart from notional freedoms, little has changed. The warlords installed to power by America are as<br />
bad as the Taliban, terrorising whole communities, and ensuring that 90 per cent of Afghan women<br />
remained oppressed and that pledges of Western reconstruction aid remain empty promises."[The<br />
Betrayal Of Afghanistan, John Pilger, The Guardian, November 22,2003]<br />
The background of many of these key policy players however, suggests they are far more<br />
interested in the security of Israel than that of the US. Two of the key architects of this<br />
group – Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz- have a well documented (both Congressional<br />
and FBI investigations) past of being alleged agents for the Israeli government, and have<br />
been directly responsible for the employment by US Policy making groups (Office of<br />
Special Plans- OSP) of at least four other similarly documented and alleged agents of<br />
Israel: Douglas J. Feith (Undersecretary of Defense for Policy), Lawrence Franklin<br />
(currently under investigation by the FBI as being a potential Israeli spy), Michael<br />
Ledeen and Dr. Stephen Bryen. Lawrence Franklin works in an office overseen by<br />
Douglas J. Feith, the Defense Undersecretary for Policy. Feith is an influential aide to<br />
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. Also included in this list is Dr. Rabbi Dov<br />
Zakheim, who at the time was acting as chief-financial officer for the Department of<br />
Defense. A signer of the “Pearl Harbor” statement and an original member of the<br />
PNAC, Dr. Dov Zakheim’s personal and family’s significant involvement in Yeshivat<br />
Sha’alvim is a clear demonstration of his loyalties. "Sha'alvim is a dynamic and<br />
comprehensive educational community where … students are imbued with …an abiding<br />
commitment to the People and the State of Israel.”[www.shaalvim.org]<br />
From all available evidence it was these “unofficial” political advisers organized by<br />
Wolfowitz, Feith and Rumsfeld in the US Office of Special Planning (OSP) who were the<br />
THE SEPTEMBER <strong>11</strong> COMMISSION REPORT Page 108