Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

Word Pictures in the NT [Acts: Chapter 10]
Pentecost (2:32). Here Peter affirms full knowledge of the work
of Jesus in Judea (for whole country including Galilee and Perea)
and Jerusalem (given mainly in John's Gospel). In the Greek \h•n\
(which) is attracted into the genitive case to agree with the
antecedent \pant•n\ (all), a common enough idiom. {Whom also they
slew} (\hon kai aneilan\). Second aorist active indicative of
\anaire•\ with \a\ as often in Acts (2:23; 5:30). But note
\kai\ (also) in the old MSS., not in the Textus Receptus. They
"also" slew him, went that far, "this crowning atrocity"
(Vincent), \kai\ could here be "even." {Hanging him on a tree}
(\kremasantes epi xulou\). This same expression used by Peter in
5:30 which see for discussion.
10:40 {Gave him to be made manifest} (\ed•ken auton emphan•
genesthai\). Peculiar phrase, here only in the N.T. and in Ro
10:20 (quoted from Isa 65:1). \Emphan•\, predicate accusative
after infinitive \genesthai\ agreeing with \auton\ object of
\ed•ken\.
10:41 {Chosen before} (\prokecheiroton•menois\). Perfect passive
participle dative plural from \procheirotone•\, to choose or
designate by hand (\cheirotone•, cheir\, hand, and \tein•\, to
stretch, as in Ac 14:23; 2Co 8:19), beforehand (\pro\), a
double compound as old as Plato, but here alone in the N.T. Peter
is evidently stating the thing as it happened and not trying to
make a convincing story by saying that both friends and foes saw
him after his resurrection. It is the "historian's candour"
(Paley) in Luke here that adds to the credibility of the
narrative. The sceptical Jews would not have believed and Jesus
was kept from open contact with the world of sin after his
Passion. {To us who did eat and drink with him} (\h•min hoitines
sunephagomen kai sunepiomen aut•i\). The "who" (\hoitines\) is
first person agreeing with "us" (\h•min\). Second aorist active
indicative of the common verbs \sunesthi•\ and \sumpin•\. \Aut•i\
is associative instrumental case. There are difficulties to us in
understanding how Jesus could eat and drink after the
resurrection as told here and in Lu 24:41-3, but at any rate
Peter makes it clear that it was no hallucination or ghost, but
Jesus himself whom they saw after he rose from the dead, "after
the rising as to him" (\meta to anast•nai auton\, \meta\ with the
accusative articular infinitive second aorist active and the
accusative \auton\ of general reference). Furneaux dares to think
that the disciples misunderstood Jesus about eating after the
http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/AC10.RWP.html (12 of 15) [28/08/2004 09:06:41 a.m.]