Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

Word Pictures in the NT [Acts: Chapter 9]
proverb (Pindar) that Jesus quotes to Saul about kicking against
the goad is genuine in 26:14, but not here.
9:5 {Lord} (\kurie\). It is open to question if \kurie\ should
not here be translated "Sir" as in 16:30 and in Mt 21:29,30;
Joh 5:7; 12:21; 20:15; and should be so in Joh 9:36. It is
hardly likely that at this stage Saul recognized Jesus as Lord,
though he does so greet him in 22:10 "What shall I do, Lord?"
Saul may have recognized the vision as from God as Cornelius says
"Lord" in 10:4. Saul surrendered instantly as Thomas did (Joh
20:28) and as little Samuel (1Sa 3:9). This surrender of the
will to Christ was the conversion of Saul. He saw a real Person,
the Risen Christ, to whom he surrendered his life. On this point
he never wavered for a moment to the end.
9:6 The best MSS. do not have "trembling and astonished," and
"What wilt thou have me to do, Lord?" The Textus Receptus put
these words in here without the authority of a Greek codex. See
22:10 above for the genuine text. {It shall be told thee}
(\lal•th•setai\). Future passive indicative of \lale•\. It is
hardly likely that Luke records all that Jesus said to Saul, but
more was to come on his arrival in Damascus. Saul had received
all that he could bear just now (Joh 16:12). {What} (\hoti\).
Rare in _Koin•_ use of this indefinite neuter relative in an
indirect question, the only example in the N.T. (Robertson,
_Grammar_, p. 731). Human agents like Ananias can finish what
Jesus by supernatural manifestation has here begun in Saul.
9:7 {That journeyed with him} (\hoi sunodeuontes aut•i\). Not in
the older Greek, but in the _Koin•_, with the associative
instrumental. {Speechless} (\eneoi\). Mute. Only here in N.T.,
though old word. {Hearing the voice, but beholding no man}
(\akouontes men t•s ph•n•s, m•dena de the•rountes\). Two present
active participles in contrast (\men, de\). In 22:9 Paul says
that the men "beheld the light" (\to men ph•s etheasanto\), but
evidently did not discern the person. Paul also says there, "but
they heard not the voice of him that spake to me" (\t•n de ph•n•n
ouk •kousan tou lalountos moi\). Instead of this being a flat
contradiction of what Luke says in 9:7 it is natural to take it
as being likewise (as with the "light" and "no one") a
distinction between the "sound" (original sense of \ph•n•\ as in
Joh 3:8) and the separate words spoken. It so happens that
\akou•\ is used either with the accusative (the extent of the
hearing) or the genitive (the specifying). It is possible that
http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/AC9.RWP.html (4 of 17) [28/08/2004 09:06:38 a.m.]