Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

davidcox.com.mx
from davidcox.com.mx More from this publisher
06.05.2013 Views

Word Pictures in the NT [Matthew: Chapter 2] contradictory. 2:23 {Should be called a Nazarene} (\Naz•raios kl•th•setai\). Matthew says "that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets" (\dia t•n proph•t•n\). It is the plural and no single prophecy exists which says that the Messiah was to be called a Nazarene. It may be that this term of contempt (Joh 1:46; 7:52) is what is meant, and that several prophecies are to be combined like Ps. 22:6,8; 69:11,19; Isa 53:2,3,4. The name Nazareth means a shoot or branch, but it is by no means certain that Matthew has this in mind. It is best to confess that we do not know. See Broadus on Matthew for the various theories. But, despised as Nazareth was at that time, Jesus has exalted its fame. The lowly Nazarene he was at first, but it is our glory to be the followers of the Nazarene. Bruce says that "in this case, therefore, we certainly know that the historic fact suggested the prophetic reference, instead of the prophecy creating the history." The parallels drawn by Matthew between the history of Israel and the birth and infancy of Jesus are not mere fancy. History repeats itself and writers of history find frequent parallels. Surely Matthew is not beyond the bounds of reason or of fact in illustrating in his own way the birth and infancy of Jesus by the Providence of God in the history of Israel. [Table of Contents] [Previous] [Next] http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/MT2.RWP.html (7 of 7) [28/08/2004 09:02:54 a.m.] Word Pictures in the New Testament (Matthew: Chapter 2)

Word Pictures in the NT [Matthew: Chapter 3]. [Table of Contents] [Previous] [Next] 3:1 {And in those days cometh John the Baptist} (\en de tais h•merais paraginetai I•an•s ho Baptist•s\). Here the synoptic narrative begins with the baptism of John (Mt. 3:1; Mr 1:2; Lu 3:1) as given by Peter in Ac 1:22, "from the baptism of John, unto the day that he was received up from us" (cf. also Ac 10:37-43, Peter's summary to Cornelius very much like the outline of Mark's Gospel). Matthew does not indicate the date when John appeared as Luke does in ch. 3 (the fifteenth year of Tiberius's reign). It was some thirty years after the birth of John, precisely how long after the return of Joseph and Mary to Nazareth we do not know. Moffatt translates the verb (\paraginetai\) "came on the scene," but it is the historical present and calls for a vivid imagination on the part of the reader. There he is as he comes forward, makes his appearance. His name John means "Gift of Jehovah" (cf. German _Gotthold_) and is a shortened form of Johanan. He is described as "the Baptist," "the Baptizer" for that is the rite that distinguishes him. The Jews probably had proselyte baptism as I. Abrahams shows (_Studies in Pharisaism and the Gospels_, p. 37). But this rite was meant for the Gentiles who accepted Judaism. John is treating the Jews as Gentiles in demanding baptism at their hands on the basis of repentance. {Preaching in the wilderness of Judea} (\K•russ•n en t•i er•m•i t•s Ioudaias\). It was the rough region in the hills toward the Jordan and the Dead Sea. There were some people scattered over the barren cliffs. Here John came in close touch with the rocks, the trees, the goats, the sheep, and the shepherds, the snakes that slipped before the burning grass over the rocks. He was the Baptizer, but he was also the Preacher, heralding his message out in the barren hills at first where few people were, but soon his startling message drew crowds from far and near. Some preachers start with crowds and drive them away. 3:2 {Repent} (\metanoeite\). Broadus used to say that this is the worst translation in the New Testament. The trouble is that the English word "repent" means "to be sorry again" from the Latin _repoenitet_ (impersonal). John did not call on the people to be http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/MT3.RWP.html (1 of 6) [28/08/2004 09:02:55 a.m.] Word Pictures in the New Testament (Matthew: Chapter 3)

<strong>Word</strong> <strong>Pictures</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NT [Mat<strong>the</strong>w: Chapter 2]<br />

contradictory.<br />

2:23 {Should be called a Nazarene} (\Naz•raios kl•th•setai\).<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w says "that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by <strong>the</strong><br />

prophets" (\dia t•n proph•t•n\). It is <strong>the</strong> plural and no s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

prophecy exists which says that <strong>the</strong> Messiah was to be called a<br />

Nazarene. It may be that this term of contempt (Joh 1:46; 7:52)<br />

is what is meant, and that several prophecies are to be comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

like Ps. 22:6,8; 69:11,19; Isa 53:2,3,4. The name Nazareth<br />

means a shoot or branch, but it is by no means certa<strong>in</strong> that<br />

Mat<strong>the</strong>w has this <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. It is best to confess that we do not<br />

know. See Broadus on Mat<strong>the</strong>w for <strong>the</strong> various <strong>the</strong>ories. But,<br />

despised as Nazareth was at that time, Jesus has exalted its<br />

fame. The lowly Nazarene he was at first, but it is our glory to<br />

be <strong>the</strong> followers of <strong>the</strong> Nazarene. Bruce says that "<strong>in</strong> this case,<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, we certa<strong>in</strong>ly know that <strong>the</strong> historic fact suggested <strong>the</strong><br />

prophetic reference, <strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>the</strong> prophecy creat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

history." The parallels drawn by Mat<strong>the</strong>w between <strong>the</strong> history of<br />

Israel and <strong>the</strong> birth and <strong>in</strong>fancy of Jesus are not mere fancy.<br />

History repeats itself and writers of history f<strong>in</strong>d frequent<br />

parallels. Surely Mat<strong>the</strong>w is not beyond <strong>the</strong> bounds of reason or<br />

of fact <strong>in</strong> illustrat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> his own way <strong>the</strong> birth and <strong>in</strong>fancy of<br />

Jesus by <strong>the</strong> Providence of God <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> history of Israel.<br />

[Table of Contents]<br />

[Previous] [Next]<br />

http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/MT2.RWP.html (7 of 7) [28/08/2004 09:02:54 a.m.]<br />

<strong>Word</strong> <strong>Pictures</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Testament</strong><br />

(Mat<strong>the</strong>w: Chapter 2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!