06.05.2013 Views

Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Word</strong> <strong>Pictures</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NT [Mat<strong>the</strong>w: Chapter 16].<br />

<strong>in</strong> verse 18. In Re 1:18; 3:7 Christ <strong>the</strong> Risen Lord has "<strong>the</strong><br />

keys of death and of Hades." He has also "<strong>the</strong> keys of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom<br />

of heaven" which he here hands over to Peter as "gatekeeper" or<br />

"steward" (\oikonomos\) provided we do not understand it as a<br />

special and peculiar prerogative belong<strong>in</strong>g to Peter. The same<br />

power here given to Peter belongs to every disciple of Jesus <strong>in</strong><br />

all <strong>the</strong> ages. Advocates of papal supremacy <strong>in</strong>sist on <strong>the</strong> primacy<br />

of Peter here and <strong>the</strong> power of Peter to pass on this supposed<br />

sovereignty to o<strong>the</strong>rs. But this is all quite beside <strong>the</strong> mark. We<br />

shall soon see <strong>the</strong> disciples actually disput<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong> (Mt 18:1)<br />

as to which of <strong>the</strong>m is <strong>the</strong> greatest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom of heaven as<br />

<strong>the</strong>y will aga<strong>in</strong> (20:21) and even on <strong>the</strong> night before Christ's<br />

death. Clearly nei<strong>the</strong>r Peter nor <strong>the</strong> rest understood Jesus to say<br />

here that Peter was to have supreme authority. What is added<br />

shows that Peter held <strong>the</strong> keys precisely as every preacher and<br />

teacher does. To "b<strong>in</strong>d" (\d•s•is\) <strong>in</strong> rabb<strong>in</strong>ical language is to<br />

forbid, to "loose" (\lus•is\) is to permit. Peter would be like a<br />

rabbi who passes on many po<strong>in</strong>ts. Rabbis of <strong>the</strong> school of Hillel<br />

"loosed" many th<strong>in</strong>gs that <strong>the</strong> school of Schammai "bound." The<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g of Jesus is <strong>the</strong> standard for Peter and for all preachers<br />

of Christ. Note <strong>the</strong> future perfect <strong>in</strong>dicative (\estai dedemenon,<br />

estai lelumenon\), a state of completion. All this assumes, of<br />

course, that Peter's use of <strong>the</strong> keys will be <strong>in</strong> accord with <strong>the</strong><br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g and m<strong>in</strong>d of Christ. The b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and loos<strong>in</strong>g is repeated<br />

by Jesus to all <strong>the</strong> disciples (18:18). Later after <strong>the</strong><br />

Resurrection Christ will use this same language to all <strong>the</strong><br />

disciples (Joh 20:23), show<strong>in</strong>g that it was not a special<br />

prerogative of Peter. He is simply first among equals, _primus<br />

<strong>in</strong>ter pares_, because on this occasion he was spokesman for <strong>the</strong><br />

faith of all. It is a violent leap <strong>in</strong> logic to claim power to<br />

forgive s<strong>in</strong>s, to pronounce absolution, by reason of <strong>the</strong> technical<br />

rabb<strong>in</strong>ical language that Jesus employed about b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

loos<strong>in</strong>g. Every preacher uses <strong>the</strong> keys of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom when he<br />

proclaims <strong>the</strong> terms of salvation <strong>in</strong> Christ. The proclamation of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se terms when accepted by faith <strong>in</strong> Christ has <strong>the</strong> sanction and<br />

approval of God <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. The more personal we make <strong>the</strong>se great<br />

words <strong>the</strong> nearer we come to <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d of Christ. The more<br />

ecclesiastical we make <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r we drift away from him.<br />

16:20 {That <strong>the</strong>y should tell no man} (\h<strong>in</strong>a m•deni eip•s<strong>in</strong>\).<br />

Why? For <strong>the</strong> very reason that he had himself avoided this claim<br />

<strong>in</strong> public. He was <strong>the</strong> Messiah (\ho Christos\), but <strong>the</strong> people<br />

would <strong>in</strong>evitably take it <strong>in</strong> a political sense. Jesus was pla<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/MT16.RWP.html (6 of 9) [28/08/2004 09:03:14 a.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!