Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox Word Pictures in the New Testament - David Cox

davidcox.com.mx
from davidcox.com.mx More from this publisher
06.05.2013 Views

Word Pictures in the NT [1 Corinthians: Chapter 3]. punishment is certain and equally effective. The church-wrecker God will wreck. What does Paul mean by "will destroy"? Does he mean punishment here or hereafter? May it not be both? Certainly he does not mean annihilation of the man's soul, though it may well include eternal punishment. There is warning enough here to make every pastor pause before he tears a church to pieces in order to vindicate himself. {Holy} (\hagios\). Hence deserves reverential treatment. It is not the building or house of which Paul speaks as "the sanctuary of God" (\ton naon tou theou\), but the spiritual organization or organism of God's people in whom God dwells, "which temple ye are" (\hoitines este humeis\). The qualitative relative pronoun \hoitines\ is plural to agree with \humeis\ (ye) and refers to the holy temple just mentioned. The Corinthians themselves in their angry disputes had forgotten their holy heritage and calling, though this failing was no excuse for the ringleaders who had led them on. In 6:19 Paul reminds the Corinthians again that the body is the temple (\naos\, sanctuary) of the Holy Spirit, which fact they had forgotten in their immoralities. 3:18 {Let no man deceive himself} (\M•deis heauton exapat•\). A warning that implied that some of them were guilty of doing it (\m•\ and the present imperative). Excited partisans can easily excite themselves to a pious phrenzy, hypnotize themselves with their own supposed devotion to truth. {Thinketh that he is wise} (\dokei sophos einai\). Condition of first class and assumed to be true. Predicate nominative \sophos\ with the infinitive to agree with subject of \dokei\ (Robertson, _Grammar_, p. 1038). Paul claimed to be "wise" himself in verse 10 and he desires that the claimant to wisdom may become wise (\hina gen•tai sophos\, purpose clause with \hina\ and subjunctive) by becoming a fool (\m•ros genesth•\, second aorist middle imperative of \ginomai\) as this age looks at him. This false wisdom of the world (1:18-20,23; 2:14), this self-conceit, has led to strife and wrangling. Cut it out. 3:19 {Foolishness with God} (\m•ria para t•i the•i\). Whose standard does a church (temple) of God wish, that of this world or of God? The two standards are not the same. It is a pertinent inquiry with us all whose idea rules in our church. Paul quotes Job 5:13. {That taketh} (\ho drassomenos\). Old verb \drassomai\, to grasp with the hand, is used here for the less vivid word in the LXX \katalamban•n\. It occurs nowhere else in http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/1CO3.RWP.html (8 of 10) [28/08/2004 09:11:04 a.m.]

Word Pictures in the NT [1 Corinthians: Chapter 3]. the N.T., but appears in the papyri to lay hands on. Job is quoted in the N.T. only here and in Ro 11:35 and both times with variations from the LXX. This word occurs in Ecclesiasticus 26:7; 34:2. In Ps 2:12 the LXX has \draxasthe paideias\, lay hold on instruction. {Craftiness} (\panourgi•i\). The \panourgos\ man is ready for any or all work (if bad enough). So it means versatile cleverness (Robertson and Plummer), _astutia_ (Vulgate). 3:20 {And again} (\kai palin\). Another confirmatory passage from Ps 94:11. {Reasonings} (\dialogismous\). More than _cogitationes_ (Vulgate), sometimes disputations (Php 2:14). Paul changes "men" of LXX to wise (\soph•n\) in harmony with the Hebrew context. {Vain} (\mataioi\). Useless, foolish, from \mat•\, a futile attempt. 3:21 {Wherefore let no one glory in men} (\h•ste m•deis kauchasth• en anthr•pois\). The conclusion (\h•ste\) from the self-conceit condemned. This particle here is merely inferential with no effect on the construction (\h•s+te\ = and so) any more than \oun\ would have, a paratactic conjunction. There are thirty such examples of \h•ste\ in the N.T., eleven with the imperative as here (Robertson, _Grammar_, p. 999). The spirit of glorying in party is a species of self-conceit and inconsistent with glorying in the Lord (1:31). 3:22 {Yours} (\hum•n\). Predicate genitive, belong to you. All the words in this verse and 23 are anarthrous, though not indefinite, but definite. The English reproduces them all properly without the definite article except \kosmos\ (the world), and even here just world will answer. Proper names do not need the article to be definite nor do words for single objects like world, life, death. Things present (\enest•ta\, second perfect participle of \enist•mi\) and things to come divide two classes. Few of the finer points of Greek syntax need more attention than the absence of the article. We must not think of the article as "omitted" (Robertson, _Grammar_, p. 790). The wealth of the Christian includes all things, all leaders, past, present, future, Christ, and God. There is no room for partisan wrangling here. http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/1CO3.RWP.html (9 of 10) [28/08/2004 09:11:04 a.m.]

<strong>Word</strong> <strong>Pictures</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NT [1 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians: Chapter 3].<br />

<strong>the</strong> N.T., but appears <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> papyri to lay hands on. Job is<br />

quoted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> N.T. only here and <strong>in</strong> Ro 11:35 and both times<br />

with variations from <strong>the</strong> LXX. This word occurs <strong>in</strong> Ecclesiasticus<br />

26:7; 34:2. In Ps 2:12 <strong>the</strong> LXX has \draxas<strong>the</strong> paideias\, lay<br />

hold on <strong>in</strong>struction. {Craft<strong>in</strong>ess} (\panourgi•i\). The \panourgos\<br />

man is ready for any or all work (if bad enough). So it means<br />

versatile cleverness (Robertson and Plummer), _astutia_<br />

(Vulgate).<br />

3:20 {And aga<strong>in</strong>} (\kai pal<strong>in</strong>\). Ano<strong>the</strong>r confirmatory passage from<br />

Ps 94:11. {Reason<strong>in</strong>gs} (\dialogismous\). More than<br />

_cogitationes_ (Vulgate), sometimes disputations (Php 2:14).<br />

Paul changes "men" of LXX to wise (\soph•n\) <strong>in</strong> harmony with <strong>the</strong><br />

Hebrew context. {Va<strong>in</strong>} (\mataioi\). Useless, foolish, from<br />

\mat•\, a futile attempt.<br />

3:21 {Wherefore let no one glory <strong>in</strong> men} (\h•ste m•deis<br />

kauchasth• en anthr•pois\). The conclusion (\h•ste\) from <strong>the</strong><br />

self-conceit condemned. This particle here is merely <strong>in</strong>ferential<br />

with no effect on <strong>the</strong> construction (\h•s+te\ = and so) any more<br />

than \oun\ would have, a paratactic conjunction. There are thirty<br />

such examples of \h•ste\ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> N.T., eleven with <strong>the</strong> imperative<br />

as here (Robertson, _Grammar_, p. 999). The spirit of glory<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

party is a species of self-conceit and <strong>in</strong>consistent with glory<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord (1:31).<br />

3:22 {Yours} (\hum•n\). Predicate genitive, belong to you. All<br />

<strong>the</strong> words <strong>in</strong> this verse and 23 are anarthrous, though not<br />

<strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>ite, but def<strong>in</strong>ite. The English reproduces <strong>the</strong>m all<br />

properly without <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ite article except \kosmos\ (<strong>the</strong><br />

world), and even here just world will answer. Proper names do not<br />

need <strong>the</strong> article to be def<strong>in</strong>ite nor do words for s<strong>in</strong>gle objects<br />

like world, life, death. Th<strong>in</strong>gs present (\enest•ta\, second<br />

perfect participle of \enist•mi\) and th<strong>in</strong>gs to come divide two<br />

classes. Few of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>er po<strong>in</strong>ts of Greek syntax need more<br />

attention than <strong>the</strong> absence of <strong>the</strong> article. We must not th<strong>in</strong>k of<br />

<strong>the</strong> article as "omitted" (Robertson, _Grammar_, p. 790). The<br />

wealth of <strong>the</strong> Christian <strong>in</strong>cludes all th<strong>in</strong>gs, all leaders, past,<br />

present, future, Christ, and God. There is no room for partisan<br />

wrangl<strong>in</strong>g here.<br />

http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/1CO3.RWP.html (9 of 10) [28/08/2004 09:11:04 a.m.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!