Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
68<br />
1998: 249-254). The decorated ark is in the centre<br />
of the square panel forming the focal point of the<br />
scene. It is a three-dimensional chest standing<br />
on four legs; it is open and the lid is folded back.<br />
A dove can be seen inside the ark and the tail<br />
end of another dove (?) protrudes from the side<br />
opening (Budde 1969: figs. 26, 30). The Greek<br />
inscription KIBWTOC NWEP on the inner<br />
open lid of the ark means ‘The ark of Noah the<br />
r[edeemer]’ or ‘The r[edeemed] ark of Noah’<br />
(Budde 1969: 41-42; Avi-Yonah 1981b: 186; but<br />
see Buschhausen [1972: 67-68] who asserts that<br />
the Greek Ρ means 100, that is, 100 years between<br />
the building of the ark and the flood). The word<br />
KIBWTOC means box or chest and is the word<br />
used in the Septuagint for Noah’s Ark as well as<br />
for the Ark of the Covenant. In Hebrew the word<br />
for the ark of Noah is הבית.<br />
The ark is decorated with three coloured<br />
rectangles similar to standard decorations of<br />
Torah arks appearing on the mosaic pavements<br />
of Hammath-Tiberias, Susiya, Beth "Alpha and<br />
others (figs. II-9-12) (Hachlili 1976: 40-50; 1988:<br />
272-278, figs. IX 21; 22, pls. 102-105; 2000:<br />
154-5, figs. 11: 4,5, 12: 1-4; but see Buschhausen’s<br />
suggestion [1972: 65] that the ark is a type<br />
of columbarium).<br />
The animals are arrayed in two wide rows<br />
around them so they can be viewed from all<br />
sides. Two rows of animals surround the ark, an<br />
inner row consisting of birds and an outer row<br />
of mammals. The birds are identified as crane,<br />
cock, hen, peacock, dove, nightingale, and stork;<br />
some are depicted in flight, and some stand on<br />
a simple base line (Budde 1969: figs. 27, 28, 34,<br />
36, 38, 39, 42). The mammals stand on a thicker<br />
line, which may indicate landscape. The animals<br />
also have an added line in darker colours between<br />
or under their feet. The mammals appear to be<br />
arranged, for example, the savage beasts such as<br />
the bear, lion, and panther or leopard are placed<br />
at the corners, one of which is damaged (Budde<br />
1969: figs. 26, 27, 29, 32); the domesticated<br />
animals such as ox, deer, donkey, gazelle, and<br />
camel are placed in between the corners (Budde<br />
1969: figs. 30, 35, 40-42; Avi-Yonah 1981: 186).<br />
In this row one bird, a crane, is also depicted<br />
among the mammals. Surprisingly, the animals<br />
are not depicted in pairs: only a single example of<br />
each animal species appears. Furthermore, Noah<br />
and his family are also missing from the scene,<br />
although they do appear in the later mosaic.<br />
The animals’ movement is stereotypically awkward<br />
and stiff, body bulk is excessive and their<br />
chapter four<br />
eyes are large and emphasized; they are portrayed<br />
isolated on a white background. Differences in<br />
bird size attest to the probability that the depictions<br />
were from observations in nature, as well<br />
as copied from some model books. The scene is<br />
comparable to the Antioch tradition of the Martyrion<br />
of Seleucia (Kitzinger 1965: 345, 348-9;<br />
Buschhausen 1972: 61). Dunbabin (1978: 230-<br />
31) suggests that the rows of animals at the Misis<br />
mosaic accord with a favourite theme in Christian<br />
churches, namely bands of animals moving peacefully.<br />
This is interpreted as the Animal Paradise, a<br />
peaceful assembly of animals prophesied by Isaiah<br />
(see below).<br />
The style of the pavement emphasizes the ark,<br />
which is three-dimensional but lacks perspective<br />
or shadow, though there is some influence of<br />
a Hellenistic illusionary description. Kitzinger<br />
(1976a: 65) claims that the pavement with Noah’s<br />
Ark surrounded by animals is a figure carpet,<br />
although it ‘retains a certain vestige emblema’.<br />
Noah’s Ark on the Later Mosaic Pavement at Misis<br />
The other Noah’s Ark scene on the repaired later<br />
part of the mosaic is viewed from the opposite<br />
direction to the older mosaic (Budde 1969: 54-55,<br />
Fig. 50, 55, 113-114).<br />
This mosaic has two parts (fig. IV-9): one shows<br />
a large figure holding a vessel in the left hand. An<br />
animal (panther?), a bird, and an upside-down<br />
bird cage are between this figure and a much<br />
smaller figure on the left. A red box-like object<br />
appears under the first figure. The other part<br />
of the mosaic shows three animals, one openmouthed<br />
without ears. Budde (1969: 54) contends<br />
that they are a lion and a panther, and<br />
that the third animal looking back on the right<br />
has an elephant’s trunk. A bird is placed above<br />
this animal, and remains of a building are beside<br />
it. Budde suggests that this scene shows Noah and<br />
his two sons Shem and Japhet offering thanks<br />
after their salvation. He compares the primitive,<br />
rustic style of the Misis mosaic to the Beth<br />
"Alpha mosaic style. Neither is of high artistic<br />
standard and both were executed by local artists.<br />
The later pavement at Misis is especially crude<br />
compared with the high quality of the earlier<br />
mosaics.<br />
The date of the early mosaic pavement is disputed.<br />
Budde (1960: 116, 123) first suggested the<br />
end of the 4th or early 5th century, the period<br />
of Theodore, Mopsuhestia’s famous bishop (392-<br />
428), but in his later book (Budde 1969: 34) he