06.05.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

68<br />

1998: 249-254). The decorated ark is in the centre<br />

of the square panel forming the focal point of the<br />

scene. It is a three-dimensional chest standing<br />

on four legs; it is open and the lid is folded back.<br />

A dove can be seen inside the ark and the tail<br />

end of another dove (?) protrudes from the side<br />

opening (Budde 1969: figs. 26, 30). The Greek<br />

inscription KIBWTOC NWEP on the inner<br />

open lid of the ark means ‘The ark of Noah the<br />

r[edeemer]’ or ‘The r[edeemed] ark of Noah’<br />

(Budde 1969: 41-42; Avi-Yonah 1981b: 186; but<br />

see Buschhausen [1972: 67-68] who asserts that<br />

the Greek Ρ means 100, that is, 100 years between<br />

the building of the ark and the flood). The word<br />

KIBWTOC means box or chest and is the word<br />

used in the Septuagint for Noah’s Ark as well as<br />

for the Ark of the Covenant. In Hebrew the word<br />

for the ark of Noah is הבית.<br />

The ark is decorated with three coloured<br />

rectangles similar to standard decorations of<br />

Torah arks appearing on the mosaic pavements<br />

of Hammath-Tiberias, Susiya, Beth "Alpha and<br />

others (figs. II-9-12) (Hachlili 1976: 40-50; 1988:<br />

272-278, figs. IX 21; 22, pls. 102-105; 2000:<br />

154-5, figs. 11: 4,5, 12: 1-4; but see Buschhausen’s<br />

suggestion [1972: 65] that the ark is a type<br />

of columbarium).<br />

The animals are arrayed in two wide rows<br />

around them so they can be viewed from all<br />

sides. Two rows of animals surround the ark, an<br />

inner row consisting of birds and an outer row<br />

of mammals. The birds are identified as crane,<br />

cock, hen, peacock, dove, nightingale, and stork;<br />

some are depicted in flight, and some stand on<br />

a simple base line (Budde 1969: figs. 27, 28, 34,<br />

36, 38, 39, 42). The mammals stand on a thicker<br />

line, which may indicate landscape. The animals<br />

also have an added line in darker colours between<br />

or under their feet. The mammals appear to be<br />

arranged, for example, the savage beasts such as<br />

the bear, lion, and panther or leopard are placed<br />

at the corners, one of which is damaged (Budde<br />

1969: figs. 26, 27, 29, 32); the domesticated<br />

animals such as ox, deer, donkey, gazelle, and<br />

camel are placed in between the corners (Budde<br />

1969: figs. 30, 35, 40-42; Avi-Yonah 1981: 186).<br />

In this row one bird, a crane, is also depicted<br />

among the mammals. Surprisingly, the animals<br />

are not depicted in pairs: only a single example of<br />

each animal species appears. Furthermore, Noah<br />

and his family are also missing from the scene,<br />

although they do appear in the later mosaic.<br />

The animals’ movement is stereotypically awkward<br />

and stiff, body bulk is excessive and their<br />

chapter four<br />

eyes are large and emphasized; they are portrayed<br />

isolated on a white background. Differences in<br />

bird size attest to the probability that the depictions<br />

were from observations in nature, as well<br />

as copied from some model books. The scene is<br />

comparable to the Antioch tradition of the Martyrion<br />

of Seleucia (Kitzinger 1965: 345, 348-9;<br />

Buschhausen 1972: 61). Dunbabin (1978: 230-<br />

31) suggests that the rows of animals at the Misis<br />

mosaic accord with a favourite theme in Christian<br />

churches, namely bands of animals moving peacefully.<br />

This is interpreted as the Animal Paradise, a<br />

peaceful assembly of animals prophesied by Isaiah<br />

(see below).<br />

The style of the pavement emphasizes the ark,<br />

which is three-dimensional but lacks perspective<br />

or shadow, though there is some influence of<br />

a Hellenistic illusionary description. Kitzinger<br />

(1976a: 65) claims that the pavement with Noah’s<br />

Ark surrounded by animals is a figure carpet,<br />

although it ‘retains a certain vestige emblema’.<br />

Noah’s Ark on the Later Mosaic Pavement at Misis<br />

The other Noah’s Ark scene on the repaired later<br />

part of the mosaic is viewed from the opposite<br />

direction to the older mosaic (Budde 1969: 54-55,<br />

Fig. 50, 55, 113-114).<br />

This mosaic has two parts (fig. IV-9): one shows<br />

a large figure holding a vessel in the left hand. An<br />

animal (panther?), a bird, and an upside-down<br />

bird cage are between this figure and a much<br />

smaller figure on the left. A red box-like object<br />

appears under the first figure. The other part<br />

of the mosaic shows three animals, one openmouthed<br />

without ears. Budde (1969: 54) contends<br />

that they are a lion and a panther, and<br />

that the third animal looking back on the right<br />

has an elephant’s trunk. A bird is placed above<br />

this animal, and remains of a building are beside<br />

it. Budde suggests that this scene shows Noah and<br />

his two sons Shem and Japhet offering thanks<br />

after their salvation. He compares the primitive,<br />

rustic style of the Misis mosaic to the Beth<br />

"Alpha mosaic style. Neither is of high artistic<br />

standard and both were executed by local artists.<br />

The later pavement at Misis is especially crude<br />

compared with the high quality of the earlier<br />

mosaics.<br />

The date of the early mosaic pavement is disputed.<br />

Budde (1960: 116, 123) first suggested the<br />

end of the 4th or early 5th century, the period<br />

of Theodore, Mopsuhestia’s famous bishop (392-<br />

428), but in his later book (Budde 1969: 34) he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!