You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
concluding remarks, comments, and observations 287<br />
represent combat in the arena). From the way in<br />
which these categories are related it is possible<br />
to deduce the meaning of the mosaic as a whole.<br />
The artist has created an analogue of human society<br />
and its relation to the natural world…fights<br />
between men and beasts …embody and symbolize<br />
the triumph of civilization over nature… The<br />
three divisions of the mosaic subject matter correspond<br />
quite literally to divisions the personality…<br />
As an allegory of human nature’.<br />
The pavements of the churches of the Priest<br />
John and of St. George at Khirbat al-Mukhayyat<br />
on Mt. Nebo are interpreted by Maguire (1987:<br />
67-72) as representing the association between<br />
heaven and earth; the images appear to show<br />
the animal kingdom dominated by men as signs<br />
for the created world. Maguire maintains that<br />
‘it is possible for the motifs in any given mosaic<br />
to differ among themselves with respect to the<br />
density of their meanings. Some motifs could be<br />
intended only in their literal sense, others could<br />
carry several levels of symbolism... However it<br />
is an open question how many, if any, of these<br />
meaning were in the designer’s mind when he set<br />
the eagle and the caged bird on the central axis of<br />
the floor’. He further contends that some mosaics<br />
‘bring together into one composition portrayals<br />
of Earth, of the food she provides, of man’s mastery<br />
over domestic animals, and of his defenses<br />
against wild beasts, and that these images have<br />
a close parallel in the ninth sermon of St. John<br />
Chrysostom’. Thus, ‘like the Christian commentators,<br />
the makers of the mosaics were defining<br />
humanity’s place in the natural world created by<br />
God’ (Maguire 1987: 72).<br />
Piccirillo (1989: 337-340) claims that many of<br />
the designs on Jordan church mosaic floors, such<br />
as the scenes of shepherds, farming, hunting, and<br />
animal combat, are meant to praise God’s creation<br />
of the world and commend his grandeur<br />
and the superiority of man; the significance of this<br />
concept is intensified by such inscriptions as those<br />
at the Theotokos Chapel in the Basilica of Moses<br />
on Mt. Nebo: ‘O Creator and Maker of all things,<br />
Christ our God…’. A similar inscription appears<br />
around the medallion with a personification of the<br />
Sea in the nave of the Church of the Apostles:<br />
‘Lord who has made the heavens and the earth…’<br />
(Piccirillo 1993: 91, 200). Many of the images and<br />
other iconographic elements such as the rivers of<br />
Paradise, the eagle, the peacocks, and in particular<br />
the Madaba map received a new significance<br />
of the Christian faith. Waliszewski (2001: 264-5)<br />
contends that the Petra church mosaics may be<br />
read at three general levels. On the highest level<br />
the mosaics symbolize God’s domain, rendering<br />
the world’s flora and fauna and man’s work. The<br />
seasons could be interpreted as symbols of the<br />
world and God’s rule over time.<br />
For some scholars, the design intended to be<br />
decorative could at times also have a symbolic<br />
purpose. Dauphin (1978b: 31-34) is correct in<br />
claiming that the ‘readings’, namely interpretations,<br />
of the inhabited scroll pavements can be<br />
discerned on three different levels. The first is<br />
the rural community’s identification with the pictures<br />
of everyday life that they see. The second<br />
is identification by the more cultured citizens,<br />
who recognize the birds, animals, and humans<br />
as a representation of God’s creation, and the<br />
pavements as a gift of thanks. On the third level<br />
the clergy show an affinity: they might recognize<br />
and interpret details in the vine composition as<br />
symbols of Christ and the church. She concludes,<br />
‘Neither symbolism nor decoration are inherent in<br />
the inhabited scrolls. It is simply a neutral theme,<br />
read, understood and interpreted according to<br />
the mentality of the onlooker, for the life of artistic<br />
motifs is far longer than that of their original<br />
significance…the inhabited scroll…taking on different<br />
meanings according to the period, the religion,<br />
the building and the onlooker’.<br />
Antique imagery encompassed many levels<br />
of significance, in which differences in culture,<br />
experience, and spirit played a part (Jesnick 1997:<br />
117). Some of the designs convey ideas and relate<br />
essential conception. Merrony (1998: 443) focuses<br />
on the significance of religious and secular iconography<br />
in the early Byzantine period: ‘An<br />
iconographic dichotomy between ecclesiastical<br />
buildings, churches and synagogues, on the one<br />
hand, and villae on the other’. He maintains that<br />
different iconographic traits exist: mythological<br />
scenes are typical of the villa but do not occur in<br />
a Christian or Jewish religious context; whereas<br />
vintage rural and genre scenes appear in churches<br />
and are absent from the villa context and synagogue<br />
pavements.<br />
Dunbabin (1978: 230-233) holds that some<br />
motifs are purely decorative, while several secular<br />
episodes might have had Christian significance.<br />
She further maintains (1999: 198) that the genre<br />
scenes inserted in the inhabited medallions might<br />
sometimes appear anecdotal, ‘but often it is clear<br />
that there is a unifying underlying significance…<br />
The church floor becomes an image of the earth,