Untitled
Untitled Untitled
206 In Caesarea the scene is on a mosaic pavement almost completely preserved in the hall of the courtyard building (stratum IVb, Area NN; Patrich et al. 1999: 97-98, fig. 33). The main field consists of a square composition of four long vinetree trunks inserted in each of the four corners of the square, set diagonally, meeting in the centre to form four triangles; within them, two horned animals face each other: pairs of ibexes, deer, goats, and stags (fig. IX-6). The rest of the carpet is completely filled with vine trellises, leaves, and a few small birds. Comparable designs in Jordan are the following. The western panel of the nave of Sts. Lot and Procopius church at Khirbat al-Mukhayyat (Saller and Bagatti 1949: 61-63, 105; fig. 7; pls. 20,1,2; chapter nine Figure IX-6. Caesarea mosaic pavement. 34,3; Piccirillo 1993: 164-5, fig. 213; 1998: 346) has a comparable diagonal composition (pl. IX.3). The western field of the nave (oriented in the opposite direction from the eastern field) consists of four diagonal stylized fruit trees that meet in the centre to form four triangles, in each of which a pair of animals face each other. The most important is pair of bulls, each the distinctively different, flanking a small octagonal altar with flames of fire; below the scene is an accompanying biblical verse in Greek: ‘Then they shall lay calves upon thine altar’ (Psalms 51: 21). The bulls perhaps represent animals for sacrifice on the altar (Saller and Bagatti 1949: 105). The other animals are a pair of hares flanking a rock, one crouching, a pair of wild goats (destroyed), and a pair of
long-horned deer drinking from a spring, which Saller and Bagatti (1949: 103, pl. 20,1) argue is ‘the baptismal water’. The mosaic in the second chapel of the Apostles church portrays two pairs of horned animals and a pair of hares flanking plants. They are between four fruit trees, each rising in one of the corners. One side has a dedicatory inscription (Piccirillo 1993: 106, figs. 89, 95). The Mosaic of Paradise at Madaba is a square with fruit trees placed diagonally and meeting in the centre with a medallion with a face. Down the sides between the trees, pairs of non-symmetrical rendered animals face each other: two hares, two rams, and two ducks or geese. On the north side a lion and a zebu flank a plant (Piccirillo 1993: 128, figs. 137, 139). This is interpreted as a scene of filia (friendship) among animals, perhaps ‘a symbolic representation of the biblical Eden or Paradise’. A variation of this composition appears on the presbytery mosaic panel at the Deacon Thomas church (Piccirillo 1993: 187, figs. 266, 269). Here the four fruit trees are vertical. A lion faces a bull/ zebu in the lower part, each animal in front of a tree, and a ram is in the upper part. Another variation occurs on the platform mosaic at the west end of the Martyr Theodore chapel in the cathedral at Madaba (Piccirillo 1993: 117, figs. 110, 111). A square panel contains four fruit trees dividing the space, and only two pairs of animals are between the two pairs of trees. Two lions (only the rear part of one is preserved) flank a tree in the eastern space and a pair of deer flank a tree in the western space. The pairs of beasts are interpreted by Dunbabin (1999: 198) as ‘allusions to Paradise and to sacrifice’. Interestingly, on all these pavements the same animals face each other, except for the lion and the bull on the Mosaic of Paradise and in Deacon Thomas church. D. Unidentical Symmetrical Composition Symmetry is a distinctive feature of the art of the ancient world. Antithetic or heraldic symmetrical composition—a central object flanked by a pair of animals or various items, which occurs in many figurative and decorative subjects, is one of the basic elements of Oriental art (Avi-Yonah 1948: 144; Hachlili 1989: 65, figs. 1-3). As a rule the symmetry is intensified by the flanking animals designs of symmetrical antithetic animals 207 or objects being identical. But sometimes this composition is unconventional: (1) motifs have unidentical symmetry; or (2) the design is nonsymmetrical in the depiction of different flanking motifs (Hachlili 1988: 376-79; 1989: 65-67). A non-symmetrical design feature is found in the entrance panel of the mosaic pavement of the Beth "Alpha synagogue, where the inscription is flanked by a lion on one side and by a bull on the other (pl. IX.1, fig. IX-1). The animals were apparently selected for their symbolic value (Avi- Yonah 1981a: 51). Most frequently antithetic designs are composed symmetrically, but in some cases aesthetic symmetry is realized even though some objects or animals, are clearly not identical, and are intentionally represented dissimilarly. Impressive examples of this tendency are found on mosaic pavements of synagogues, as detailed next. Several panels depict a Torah shrine flanked by menoroth and ritual objects in a symmetrical composition which contains dissimilar flanking objects. For example, almost all the heraldic elements in the Beth "Alpha Torah shrine panel are not identical (pl. II.2a): the menoroth flanking the Ark differ, especially in their bases and in the lamps on the bar; each of the four ritual objects is portrayed differently; the two lions appear similar but have different tails; and the birds are unalike. In Hammath Tiberias synagogue the upper panel has a symmetrical design (pl. II.1a), but even here the two shofaroth and incense shovels are dissimilar in their details. At Sepphoris, the Torah shrine panel details are almost identical but the bases of the menoroth differ in scale and size; the ethrogim are positioned dissimilarly (pl. II.1b). The menoroth in the Susiya pavement (pl. II.2b) are entirely unalike, particularly in their branches and bases. In the centre of the zodiac panel at Beth "Alpha (pl. III.3) the horses, two on each side of the sun god, are rendered symmetrically but are portrayed differently, particularly in their head decoration. The entrance panel at Huseifa (pl. IX.4a; fig. IX-4) shows two wholly different menoroth: one has pottery lamps whereas glass lamps are seen on the other; the branches too are unalike. Animals flank inscriptions, menoroth, and the Ark on several synagogue mosaic pavements. These animals are usually similar, although differences in details can be distinguished. The Hammath Tiberias pavement shows lions facing each other across the inscription (pl. IX.1a; fig. IX-1a).
- Page 217 and 218: The forerunners for these vintage s
- Page 219 and 220: Snake and Mongoose Confrontation Th
- Page 221 and 222: Table VII.2. Animal chase and comba
- Page 223 and 224: iconographic aspects of rural life
- Page 225 and 226: scenes are found in the mid-5th- to
- Page 227 and 228: Table VII.3. Big Game Hunting scene
- Page 229 and 230: iconographic aspects of rural life
- Page 231 and 232: likewise surround the basin of the
- Page 233 and 234: iconographic aspects of rural life
- Page 235 and 236: iconographic aspects of rural life
- Page 237 and 238: the cathedral at Madaba (Piccirillo
- Page 239 and 240: 443, 455-6, 466) holds that this ty
- Page 241 and 242: Personification is a common theme o
- Page 243 and 244: Rivers of Paradise, but only two of
- Page 245 and 246: irds, apparently created by the Fou
- Page 247 and 248: in an intercolumnar space (Church o
- Page 249 and 250: the seasons with deliberate differe
- Page 251 and 252: personification of natural forces 1
- Page 253 and 254: crook Spring’s attribute at the B
- Page 255 and 256: personification of natural forces 1
- Page 257 and 258: while in mosaics of the Greek East
- Page 259 and 260: Moon, as the partner of Sun, is a b
- Page 261 and 262: Animals in a repeated antithetic sy
- Page 263 and 264: designs of symmetrical antithetic a
- Page 265 and 266: (Ovadiah 1987: 105) and at the Naha
- Page 267: a bear, a lion and a destroyed anim
- Page 271 and 272: iconoclasm on mosaic pavements of s
- Page 273 and 274: iconoclasm on mosaic pavements of s
- Page 275 and 276: iconoclasm on mosaic pavements of s
- Page 277 and 278: iconoclasm on mosaic pavements of s
- Page 279 and 280: iconoclasm on mosaic pavements of s
- Page 281 and 282: A significant subject in ancient ar
- Page 283 and 284: These compositions with division in
- Page 285 and 286: frequent ornamentation of the synag
- Page 287 and 288: (Ovadiah 1987: 68): A cross within
- Page 289 and 290: Some scholars propose that depictio
- Page 291 and 292: V.5 City representations: a. Beth L
- Page 293 and 294: V.7 The sail boat: a. Beth Leontis,
- Page 295 and 296: VI.1 Gaza synagogue pavement.
- Page 297 and 298: VI.3 Jerusalem ‘Armenian’ churc
- Page 299 and 300: VI.6-8 Petra Church: North Aisle mo
- Page 301 and 302: VI.8
- Page 303 and 304: VI.10 The church of the Deacon Thom
- Page 305 and 306: VI.12 Amphorae depicted on inhabite
- Page 307 and 308: VI.14 Bird of prey on inhabited vin
- Page 309 and 310: VI.16 Baskets on inhabited vine scr
- Page 311 and 312: VI.18 Vine leaves and bunches of gr
- Page 313 and 314: VI.20 Subdued animals: a. Be’er S
- Page 315 and 316: VII.2 Transporting grapes: a. El Ha
- Page 317 and 318: VII.4 Flute player: a. Beth She’a
206<br />
In Caesarea the scene is on a mosaic pavement<br />
almost completely preserved in the hall of the<br />
courtyard building (stratum IVb, Area NN;<br />
Patrich et al. 1999: 97-98, fig. 33). The main field<br />
consists of a square composition of four long vinetree<br />
trunks inserted in each of the four corners of<br />
the square, set diagonally, meeting in the centre<br />
to form four triangles; within them, two horned<br />
animals face each other: pairs of ibexes, deer,<br />
goats, and stags (fig. IX-6). The rest of the carpet<br />
is completely filled with vine trellises, leaves, and<br />
a few small birds.<br />
Comparable designs in Jordan are the following.<br />
The western panel of the nave of Sts. Lot and<br />
Procopius church at Khirbat al-Mukhayyat (Saller<br />
and Bagatti 1949: 61-63, 105; fig. 7; pls. 20,1,2;<br />
chapter nine<br />
Figure IX-6. Caesarea mosaic pavement.<br />
34,3; Piccirillo 1993: 164-5, fig. 213; 1998: 346)<br />
has a comparable diagonal composition (pl. IX.3).<br />
The western field of the nave (oriented in the<br />
opposite direction from the eastern field) consists<br />
of four diagonal stylized fruit trees that meet in the<br />
centre to form four triangles, in each of which a<br />
pair of animals face each other. The most important<br />
is pair of bulls, each the distinctively different,<br />
flanking a small octagonal altar with flames of<br />
fire; below the scene is an accompanying biblical<br />
verse in Greek: ‘Then they shall lay calves upon<br />
thine altar’ (Psalms 51: 21). The bulls perhaps<br />
represent animals for sacrifice on the altar (Saller<br />
and Bagatti 1949: 105). The other animals are<br />
a pair of hares flanking a rock, one crouching,<br />
a pair of wild goats (destroyed), and a pair of